Vascular morphometric changes after radioactivestent implantation: a dose-response analysis

AbstractObjectivesThe goal of this study was to evaluate the dose-dependency of morphometric changes in the coronary arterial wall after radioactive stenting.BackgroundRadioactive stents have been found to reduce intrastent intimal hyperplasia (IIH) but lead to a characteristic type of restenosis occurring predominantly at the stent edges.MethodsFifteen patients underwent intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) examination after implantation of a P-32 radioactive stent and at the six-month follow-up. The post-stent IVUS measurements on seven predefined locations of each lesion were subjected to a computer algorithm for the development of dose-volume histograms (DVH). Thus, we derived the radiation doses delivered to at least 10% and 90% of the adventitia (DV10, DV90). The IIH and vascular remodeling at follow-up were correlated with the doses in each segment.ResultsThe IIH was most pronounced at the stent edges and lowest in the stent-body, whereas we detected a significant expansive remodeling within the stent body. The delivered doses correlated with a decreased IIH (r = 0.52, p < 0.001 for DV10 and r = 0.62, p < 0.001 for DV90) and with expansive remodeling (r = 0.48, p = 0.009 for DV10 and r = 0.50, p = 0.006 for DV90). A DV10 >90 Gy or a DV90 >15 Gy reduced IIH and induced expansive remodeling. Plaque growth was not reduced by radioactive stents.ConclusionsThe DVH analysis reveals a dose-dependent increase of external elastic lamina area behind radioactive stents, whereas plaque growth is not reduced but inverted into an outward direction from the stent. A DV10 >90 Gy or a DV90 >15 Gy results in a beneficial long-term outcome after radioactive stenting

EviGUIDE - a tool for evidence-based decision making in image-guided adaptive brachytherapy for cervical cancer

PURPOSE: To develop a novel decision-support system for radiation oncology that incorporates clinical, treatment and outcome data, as well as outcome models from a large clinical trial on magnetic resonance image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (MR-IGABT) for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). METHODS: A system, called EviGUIDE, was developed that combines dosimetric information from the treatment planning system, patient and treatment characteristics, and established tumor control probability (TCP), and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models, to predict clinical outcome of radiotherapy treatment of LACC. Six Cox Proportional Hazards models based on data from 1341 patients of the EMBRACE-I study have been integrated. One TCP model for local tumor control, and five NTCP models for OAR morbidities. RESULTS: EviGUIDE incorporates TCP-NTCP graphs to help users visualize the clinical impact of different treatment plans and provides feedback on achievable doses based on a large reference population. It enables holistic assessment of the interplay between multiple clinical endpoints and tumour and treatment variables. Retrospective analysis of 45 patients treated with MR-IGABT showed that there exists a sub-cohort of patients (20%) with increased risk factors, that could greatly benefit from the quantitative and visual feedback. CONCLUSION: A novel digital concept was developed that can enhance clinical decision- making and facilitate personalized treatment. It serves as a proof of concept for a new generation of decision support systems in radiation oncology, which incorporate outcome models and high-quality reference data, and aids the dissemination of evidence-based knowledge about optimal treatment and serve as a blueprint for other sites in radiation oncology

Phase I/II trial evaluating carbon ion radiotherapy for the treatment of recurrent rectal cancer: the PANDORA-01 trial

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Treatment standard for patients with rectal cancer depends on the initial staging and includes surgical resection, radiotherapy as well as chemotherapy. For stage II and III tumors, radiochemotherapy should be performed in addition to surgery, preferentially as preoperative radiochemotherapy or as short-course hypofractionated radiation. Advances in surgical approaches, especially the establishment of the total mesorectal excision (TME) in combination with sophisticated radiation and chemotherapy have reduced local recurrence rates to only few percent. However, due to the high incidence of rectal cancer, still a high absolute number of patients present with recurrent rectal carcinomas, and effective treatment is therefore needed.</p> <p>Carbon ions offer physical and biological advantages. Due to their inverted dose profile and the high local dose deposition within the Bragg peak precise dose application and sparing of normal tissue is possible. Moreover, in comparison to photons, carbon ions offer an increase relative biological effectiveness (RBE), which can be calculated between 2 and 5 depending on the cell line as well as the endpoint analyzed.</p> <p>Japanese data on the treatment of patients with recurrent rectal cancer previously not treated with radiation therapy have shown local control rates of carbon ion treatment superior to those of surgery. Therefore, this treatment concept should also be evaluated for recurrences after radiotherapy, when dose application using conventional photons is limited. Moreover, these patients are likely to benefit from the enhanced biological efficacy of carbon ions.</p> <p>Methods and design</p> <p>In the current Phase I/II-PANDORA-01-Study the recommended dose of carbon ion radiotherapy for recurrent rectal cancer will be determined in the Phase I part, and feasibilty and progression-free survival will be assessed in the Phase II part of the study.</p> <p>Within the Phase I part, increasing doses from 12 × 3 Gy E to 18 × 3 Gy E will be applied.</p> <p>The primary endpoint in the Phase I part is toxicity, the primary endpoint in the Phase II part is progression-free survival.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>With conventional photon irradiation treatment of recurrent rectal cancer is limited, and the clinical effect is only moderate. With carbon ions, an improved outcome can be expected due to the physical and biological characteristics of the carbon ion beam. However, the optimal dose applicable in this clincial situation as re-irradiation still has to be determined. This, as well as efficacy, is to be evaluated in the present Phase I/II trial.</p> <p>Trial registration</p> <p><a href="http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01528683">NCT01528683</a></p

Tools for large-scale data analytics of an international multi-center study in radiation oncology for cervical cancer

PURPOSE: To develop and implement a software that enables centers, treating patients with state-of-the-art radiation oncology, to compare their patient, treatment, and outcome data to a reference cohort, and to assess the quality of their treatment approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive data dashboard was designed, which al- lowed holistic assessment of institutional treatment approaches. The software was tested in the ongoing EMBRACE-II study for locally advanced cervical cancer. The tool created individualized dashboards and automatic analysis scripts, verified pro- tocol compliance and checked data for inconsistencies. Identified quality assurance (QA) events were analysed. A survey among users was conducted to assess usability. RESULTS: The survey indicated favourable feedback to the prototype and highlighted its value for internal monitoring. Overall, 2302 QA events were identified (0.4% of all collected data). 54% were due to missing or incomplete data, and 46% originated from other causes. At least one QA event was found in 519/1001 (52%) of patients. QA events related to primary study endpoints were found in 16% of patients. Sta- tistical methods demonstrated good performance in detecting anomalies, with precisions ranging from 71% to 100%. Most frequent QA event categories were Treatment Technique (27%), Patient Characteristics (22%), Dose Reporting (17%), Outcome 156 (15%), Outliers (12%), and RT Structures (8%). CONCLUSION: A software tool was developed and tested within a clinical trial in radia- tion oncology. It enabled the quantitative and qualitative comparison of institutional patient and treatment parameters with a large multi-center reference cohort. We demonstrated the value of using statistical methods to automatically detect implau- sible data points and highlighted common pitfalls and uncertainties in radiotherapy for cervical cancer

General principles for prescribing, recording and reporting a therapeutic irradiation.

Exchange of clinical information is essential for the development and progress in radiation oncology. This goal can be achieved only through a general harmonization on methods of reporting. The ICRU has been involved for several decades in a continuous effort to harmonize reporting of dose and to standardize methods used to determine the doses and points or volumes where these doses are delivered. Requirements for reporting proton and ion beam therapy should, in principle, be as similar as possible to reporting the current radiation therapy modalities. However, proton and ion therapy have their own clinical and technical uniqueness: in particular, they require definition of new clinical, radiobiological and technical concepts, and strict quality assurance programmes for efficient and safe clinical application. The current ICRU definitions of volumes are reviewed: Gross Tumour Volume (GTV), Clinical Target Volume (CTV), Planning Target Volume (PTV), Organs At Risk (OAR), Planning organ at Risk Volume (PRV), treated volume and reference volume. The irradiation conditions and the absorbed dose should always be reported together with the point(s) and/or volume(s) where the dose is delivered. In addition, the weighting factor W(RBE) introduced to take into account the RBE, and the related weighted dose D(RBE) have to be reported