Chronic Pain Practices: An Evaluation of Positive and Negative Online Patient Reviews

BACKGROUND: The role of patient satisfaction continues to play an important role in health care quality measures. The use of online review platforms has been adopted by patients to share their perceptions about the quality of care provided by physicians. Chronic pain practice has unique challenges regarding patient satisfaction. OBJECTIVES: The main goal of this study is to identify the themes associated with positive and negative reviews of chronic pain physicians at publicly available online review platforms. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study design. SETTING: We evaluated publicly available online patient-generated reviews of chronic pain physicians from Yelp and Healthgrades. METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated patient-generated reviews of chronic pain physicians from 2 online platforms-Yelp and Healthgrades-between the September 1, 2018 through November 1, 2018. Ninety chronic pain physicians were randomly selected from 4 diverse geographic cities in the United States: New York (NY), Houston (TX), Chicago (IL), and Seattle (WA). Primary outcome was defined as high and low rating scores. Secondary outcome was the proportion of positive and negative attributes (patient, physician, procedure, and administrative attributes) that was associated with high and low rating scores. RESULTS: A total of 1,627 reviews were extracted from 90 physicians evaluated at Yelp and Healthgrades. Of this total review, 1,296 (79.7%) were high scoring and (331) 20.3% were low scoring. Chronic pain providers who were high scoring had positive reviews that consisted of physician attributes (63.5%), administrative attributes (23.4%), and patient attributes (12.2%). The highest proportion of the first 3 physician attributes associated with high ratings were knowledgeable, helpful, and caring. Chronic pain providers who were low scoring had negative reviews that consisted of physician attributes (41.4%), administrative attributes (52.1%), and procedure attributes (5.2%). The highest proportion of the first 3 physician attributes associated with low ratings were disrespectful, unhelpful, and uncaring. LIMITATIONS: First, this study looks at reviews of 4 large cities, thus we may have excluded patient populations with substantially different preferences as health care consumers. Second, it is impossible to confirm the validity of individual reviewers\u27 interactions with the pain management specialist who provided care or validate the identity of the reviewers. Third, it is very difficult, or even impossible, to tell if the rater is a patient or someone posing as a patient, such as an unhappy employee or a business competitor. CONCLUSIONS: Online platforms provide a medium that facilitates immediate communication among patients. These platforms may provide timely data for chronic pain physicians to gain more insight into the quality of care perceived by patients, thereby aiding providers to improve on ways to optimize patient-care experiences and encounters. KEY WORDS: Chronic pain practice, online review, patient review, patient satisfaction

Recent Advances in the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Opioid use disorder (OUD) remains a national epidemic with an immense consequence to the United States\u27 healthcare system. Current therapeutic options are limited by adverse effects and limited efficacy. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent advances in therapeutic options for OUD have shown promise in the fight against this ongoing health crisis. Modifications to approved medication-assisted treatment (MAT) include office-based methadone maintenance, implantable and monthly injectable buprenorphine, and an extended-release injectable naltrexone. Therapies under investigation include various strategies such as heroin vaccines, gene-targeted therapy, and biased agonism at the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), but several pharmacologic, clinical, and practical barriers limit these treatments\u27 market viability. This manuscript provides a comprehensive review of the current literature regarding recent innovations in OUD treatment

Combination Intrathecal Drug Therapy Strategies for Pain Management

Background: Numerous combination intrathecal drug therapy (CIDT) strategies exist and are utilized for varying pain syndromes, typically when monotherapy dose escalation or medication alternation is deemed untenable or unfeasible. Unfortunately, the supportive evidence basis for the use of these strategies and specific drug combinations is generally lacking and unclear, with many medications being used for off-label indications. Objective: In this manuscript, we provide a robust exploration and analysis of the literature to provide an evidence-based narrative for the use of CIDT strategies in regard to clinical indications, pharmacologic parameters, specific drug combinations, safety profiles, and future directions. Study design: Narrative review. Methods: This was an evidence based narrative performed after extensive review of the literature. Results: Variances in intrathecal pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics are utilized advantageously with CIDT strategies to achieve improved analgesic benefit; however, appropriate use may be limited by increased or compounded risk of adverse effects. The supportive evidence for CIDT use for chronic pain conditions is largely lacking and limited to small, uncontrolled, observational studies, with many having various confounding factors, including a lack of standardized dosing. The most evidenced CIDT strategies include polyanalgesia with morphine-ziconotide, opioid-clonidine, and morphine-bupivacaine. Notably, in addition to pain relief, morphine-bupivacaine has been shown to decrease early opioid escalation requirements. Limitations: The supportive evidence for CIDT use for chronic pain conditions is largely lacking and limited to small, uncontrolled, observational studies, with many having various confounding factors including a lack of standardized dosing. Conclusions: CIDT strategies and polyanalgesia combinations can be effective for treating various patient populations with chronic pain. The appropriate use of these strategies may be limited by increased or compounded risk of adverse effects, both of which are highly patient and scenario dependent. Therefore, practitioners should maintain a particularly low threshold of suspicion for adverse effects in patients with CIDT such that safety profiles associated with this therapy can be favorably maintained

Prevalence of smoking in adults with chronic pain

Background Cigarette smoking is common among adults with chronic pain. The primary objective of this study was to determine the period prevalence of smoking in patients with chronic pain. A secondary objective was to determine the prevalence of smoking among patients with commonly occurring pain diagnoses including fibromyalgia, low back pain, and headache. Methods This population study included 5350 patients (1256 smokers, 4094 nonsmokers) admitted to the Mayo Comprehensive Pain Rehabilitation Center from January 1998 through December 2012. Smoking status was determined using a self-report questionnaire. Results During the 15 year study period, the overall prevalence of smoking was 23.5 % (95 % CI 22.4 – 24.6). The prevalence of smoking in 2000, 2005, and 2010 was 24.2, 25.7, and 28.3 % respectively. The overall prevalence of smoking in patients with fibromyalgia, low back pain, and headache was 25.2 % (95 % CI 22.8 – 28.3), 22.8 % (95 % CI 21.3 – 25.9), and 21.2 % (95 % CI 17.9 – 24.7), respectively. In a multiple variable logistic model adjusted for age and sex, opioid use was significantly associated with status as a current smoker. Conclusions The prevalence of smoking in patients with chronic pain has not declined when compared to the general population. The higher prevalence of smoking was consistently observed in commonly occurring pain diagnoses including fibromyalgia, back pain, and headache. Further research is needed to identify the potential factors that contribute to the high prevalence of smoking in this patient population

A Case Study of Combined Perception-Based and Perception-Free Spinal Cord Stimulator Therapy for the Management of Persistent Pain after a Total Knee Arthroplasty

IntroductionTotal knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective treatment modality for severe osteoarthritis of the knee. Causes of pain following TKA are poorly understood; however, patient-specific biology and various neuropathic underlying mechanisms such as neuroma formation and complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) have been suggested. Our case demonstrated the successful treatment of CRPS in the knee with the use of combination therapy in spinal cord stimulator.CaseWe present a 71-year-old Caucasian non-Hispanic male who presented with chronic left knee pain after undergoing a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) 18 months prior. Following his TKA, he reported doing well in the acute post-operative period but began to develop progressively worsening left knee pain at approximately the third post-operative week. He underwent a successful spinal cord stimulator (SCS) trial and subsequent implantation of two 16-contact Boston Scientific leads with a Boston Scientific Spectra WaveWriterTM SCS system. Upon first post-procedural follow-up, and moreover at his 6-month follow-up, the patient reported complete resolution of his symptoms.DiscussionThe development of persistent pain following TKA is a significant complication that is often challenging to treat. Our case demonstrated the successful treatment of CRPS in the knee with the use of combination therapy in spinal cord stimulator therapy. We anticipate that more data will continue to emerge to assess for the safety and efficacy of combination therapy.Open access journalThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at [email protected]

Images in Practice: Successful Recapture of Spinal Cord Stimulator Paresthesia Coverage via Generator Reprogramming in a Patient with a Severely Displaced Percutaneous Trial Lead

Open access journalThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at [email protected]

Neuromodulation for Management of Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Comprehensive Review

Abstract Introduction Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is a symptom that derives from a complex group of heterogeneous pathologies of the pelvic organs. The aim of this study was to review the available evidence on efficacy of neuromodulatory modalities including sacral neuromodulation, dorsal root ganglion stimulation, dorsal column neuromodulation, and pudendal nerve stimulation. Methods This narrative review focuses on updated information on neuromodulation for management of chronic pelvic pain. In 2022, we searched English-language studies on neuromodulation, pelvic pain, and chronic pain in a comprehensive search. We searched the following databases: PubMed, Medline, SciHub, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Google Scholar. We used the following combinations of keywords: neuromodulation, pelvic pain, chronic pain, chronic pelvic pain, pelvic pain treatment. We tried to include as many recent manuscripts as possible (within the last 3 years) but also included papers older than 3 years if they were particularly relevant to our topic. We also attempted to search for, use, and cite primary manuscripts whenever possible. Results CPP is a challenging entity to treat because of diagnostic inconsistencies and limited evidence for therapeutic modalities. Our review found evidence suggestive of benefit for all modalities reviewed but the data was of overall low quality with numerous limitations. The literature highlights a lack of randomized controlled trials for neuromodulatory therapies but suggests a growing role for such techniques in treating refractory chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS). Conclusions This review explores the available evidence on efficacy of neuromodulatory modalities for CPPS and contextualizes the results with information about the type of neuromodulation, lead location and waveform, pain outcomes and assessment timepoints, and reported adverse effects