20 research outputs found

    Incidence and outcomes of delayed presentation and surgery in peritoneal surface malignancies

    Get PDF
    BackgroundPeritoneal surface malignancies (PSM) present insidiously and often pose diagnostic challenges. There is a paucity of literature quantifying the frequency and extent of therapeutic delays in PSM and its impact on oncological outcomes.MethodsA review of a prospectively maintained registry of PSM patients undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intra-peritoneal Chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) was conducted. Causes for treatment delays were identified. We evaluate the impact of delayed presentation and treatment delays on oncological outcomes using Cox proportional hazards models.Results319 patients underwent CRS-HIPEC over a 6-years duration. 58 patients were eventually included in this study. Mean duration between symptom onset and CRS-HIPEC was 186.0 ± 37.1 days (range 18-1494 days) and mean duration of between patient-reported symptom onset and initial presentation was 56.7 ± 16.8 days. Delayed presentation (> 60 days between symptom onset and presentation) was seen in 20.7% (n=12) of patients and 50.0% (n=29) experienced a significant treatment delay of > 90 days between 1st presentation and CRS-HIPEC. Common causes for treatment delays were healthcare provider-related i.e. delayed or inappropriate referrals (43.1%) and delayed presentation to care (31.0%). Delayed presentation was a significantly associated with poorer disease free survival (DFS) (HR 4.67, 95% CI 1.11-19.69, p=0.036).ConclusionDelayed presentation and treatment delays are common and may have an impact on oncological outcomes. There is an urgent need to improve patient education and streamline healthcare delivery processes in the management of PSM

    The Role of Total Parenteral Nutrition in Patients with Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    No full text
    Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is often associated with malnutrition and an inability to tolerate enteral feeding. Although total parenteral nutrition (TPN) can be lifesaving for patients with no other means of nutritional support, its use in the management of PC patients remains controversial. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the benefit of TPN on the overall survival of PC patients, in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. A total of 187 articles were screened; 10 were included in this review and eight were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled median overall survival of patients who received TPN was significantly higher than patients who did not receive TPN (p = 0.040). When only high-quality studies were included, a significant survival advantage was observed in PC patients receiving TPN (p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis of patients receiving chemotherapy demonstrated a significant survival benefit (p = 0.008) associated with the use of TPN. In conclusion, TPN may improve survival outcomes in PC patients. However, further studies are needed to conclude more definitively on the effect of TPN

    A systematic review of margin status in retroperitoneal liposarcomas: does the R0 margin matter?

    No full text
    Retroperitoneal liposarcomas (RPLPSs) are a rare tumor group for which current guidelines recommend aggressive en bloc resection to attain microscopically negative (R0) margins. To ensure R0 margins, resection of adherent or adjacent organs is often required. However, it is still unclear if R0 margins confer any additional benefit to patients over a grossly negative but microscopically positive (R1) margin. We performed a systematic search of PubMed and Embase databases for studies including patients receiving R0 or R1 resection for RPLPS. Nine retrospective cohort studies, one prospective cohort study, and 49 case reports/case series were included. A total of 552 patients with RPLPS were evaluated: 346 underwent R0 resection and 206 underwent R1 resection. In the R0 group, 5-year overall survival (OS) ranged from 58.3% to 85.7%; local recurrence (LR) ranged from 45.5% to 52.3%. In the R1 group, 5-year OS ranged from 35% to 55.3%; LR ranged from 66.7% to 91.7%. Among cohort studies, OS, disease-free survival (DFS), LR rate, and LR-free survival (LRFS) were significantly associated with R0 resections. Assessment of case series and reports suggested that the R0 margin led to a slightly higher morbidity than that of R1. In conclusion, this review found the R0 margin to be associated with reductions in LR rates and improved OS when compared with the R1 margins, though accompanied by slight increases in morbidity. The roles of tumor histotype and perioperative chemotherapy or radiotherapy were not well-elucidated in this review.Published versionThis study is supported by the NCCS Cancer Fund (Research) and SingHealth Duke-NUS Academic Medicine Centre, facilitated by Joint Office of Academic Medicine (JOAM). C-AJO is supported by the National Research Council Clinician Scientist-Individual Research Grant (CIRG21jun-0038). All the funding sources had no role in the study design, data interpretation or writing of the manuscript

    Novel use of natural language processing for registry development in peritoneal surface malignancies

    No full text
    Background: Traditional methods of research registry development for rare conditions such as peritoneal surface malignancies (PSM) are often hindered by poor patient accrual and need for significant manpower resources. We develop a novel pipeline using natural language processing (NLP) to accelerate this process and demonstrate its real-world application in the identification of PSM patients, as well as characterisation of referral patterns in this cohort. Materials and methods: A training set comprising 100 radiological reports of abdomen and pelvis computed tomography scans was used to develop a rule-based NLP system able to classify reports based on the presence or absence of PSM. The algorithm was applied to a test set of 10,261 reports to identify all patients with PSM for registry creation. The registry was subsequently linked to electronic medical records, and the referral patterns of patients evaluated. Results: The algorithm identified 251 reports as positive for PSM from a total of 10,261 reports, of which 239 were concordant with manual review. Performance was excellent with a specificity of 90%, positive predictive value of 95%, and accuracy of 96%. From these, 228 unique patients were identified for registry inclusion after corroboration with pathological findings. Only 27.6% of patients were found to have been referred to and reviewed by PSM specialist surgeons. For those without a PSM specialist consult, 39.4% were managed by medical oncology, 11.5% by colorectal surgery, 7.3% by gastroenterology, 5.4% by internal medicine, and 29.1% by various other miscellaneous medical and surgical subspecialties. Conclusion: NLP is a useful tool in automated pipelines that can greatly contribute to registry creation, as well as research and quality improvement efforts
    corecore