An empirical study on the operative treatment of symptomatic urolithiasis in Germany

$\bf Purpose:$ The guidelines of the German, European, and American Urological Associations on urolithiasis advise against general ureteral stenting before and after an uncomplicated ureterorenoscopy (URS). However, German and European guidelines state that stenting prior to URS facilitates stone extraction and reduces intraoperative complications. According to the published literature, German practice seems to deviate from recommendations. This nationwide survey aimed to evaluate the treatment modalities of urolithiasis. $\bf Methods:$ In November 2018 and March 2019, a total of 199 urological hospital departments in Germany were anonymously surveyed about operative care of symptomatic urolithiasis. The response rate was 72.9%. The survey consisted of 25 questions about diagnostics, surgical technique, and aftercare of the URS. This questionnaire is available in the appendix. $\bf Results:$ A primary URS is performed in ≤10% in 49.6% of the hospitals. In every second urological department (49.7%), the German Diagnosis Related Group (G-DRG) system influences the period of pre-stenting before a secondary URS. After a secondary URS, which is performed in 53.8% of the departments in over 80% of the patients, 14% of the departments omit stenting. The standard for stenting seems to be a 28-cm-long 7 Charrière double-J stent in Germany. $\bf Conclusion:$ In Germany, the percentage of primary URS is low, and a ureter stenting is performed in most of the urological departments after URS. Delaying therapy due to economic aspects is the standard in almost half of all urological departments

Prophylaxis of recurrent stone disease in outpatient clinics in Germany

$\bf Introduction:$ The aim of the study was to survey current practices for preventing recurrent stone disease in an outpatient clinic setting in Germany. $\bf Methods:$ Two invitations to complete an anonymous REDCap® survey were emailed to members of the occupational union of German urologists who work as outpatient urologists (“Berufsverband Deutscher Urologen e.V.”). The survey included questions on diagnostic modalities and counselling to prevent stone disease. $\bf Results:$ A total of 130 outpatient urologists completed the survey. 84.6% of urologists give general advice to first-time stone formers. Recommendations comprise increased fluid uptake in 100%, two-thirds advice on calcium and oxalate intake, and one-third on salt and protein intake. 64.6% perform a metabolic evaluation for high-risk stone formers. However, patients with risk factors other than repeat stone disease are often overlooked. Urologists agreed that a lack of time (73.1%) and reimbursement (64.6%), as well as insufficient patient compliance (60.8%), pose significant challenges. The majority of urologists agreed that training is required. $\bf Conclusion:$ General recommendations for stone formers are usually provided, but nutritional advice tends to be incomplete. Our results raise quality-of-care concerns: Metabolic evaluation of stone formers at high risk of recurrence is uncommon. Structural changes are required due to time constraints, and poor remuneration must be addressed to improve patient care

An empirical study on hospital-based prevention of recurrent urinary stone disease in Germany

$\bf Purpose$ Urinary stone disease is a common disease with a prevalence of 4.7% in Germany. The incidence increased over the last decades, and recurrence rates are up to 50% in the first 5 years after diagnosis. Adequate preventive measures can avoid up to 46% of stone recurrences. These numbers outline the importance of prevention. Especially among high-risk stone formers, specific diagnostics and measures are required. Published data indicate the divergence between the importance of prevention and its implementation in everyday clinical practice. This is the first survey among German urological departments highlighting medical care concerning the prevention of recurrent urinary stone disease, identifying challenges and providing recommendations for improvements. $\bf Methods$ Two hundred and seventy urological hospital departments in Germany were anonymously surveyed about measurements to prevent recurrent stone disease. The questionnaire comprised 23 items dealing with diagnostics, counselling, knowledge among doctors concerning preventive measures and difficulties in preventing recurrent urinary stone disease. $\bf Results$ Sixty-three urological departments (23.8%) answered the survey. The majority perform stone analysis at first and repeat events. Most patients with urinary stone disease receive general advice on preventive measures during their hospitalization. General recommendations focus on fluid intake and lifestyle changes. However, specific diets are infrequently recommended by inpatient urologists. Diagnostics to identify high-risk stone formers are mostly insufficient, and guideline-compliant urine tests are uncommon. $\bf Conclusion$ The quality of secondary prevention needs to improve considerably. The focus should be put on identifying high-risk stone formers and offering those patients specific counselling. Furthermore, general advice on dietary recommendations should be extended

Institutional adoption and apprenticeship of fusion targeted prostate biopsy

$\textit {Introduction:}$ There are limited data on the learning curve of magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound (MRI/TRUS)-fusion targeted prostate biopsies (tBx). $\textit {Objective:}$ The aim of this study was to investigate the difference in prostate cancer (PCa) detection rate between an experienced urologist and novice resident performing tBx. $\textit {Methods:}$ A total of 183 patients underwent tBx from 2012 to 2016 for a total of 518 tBx cores. Biopsies in this study were performed by an experienced urologist (investigator A) or a novice resident (investigator B). The outcome was the detection of PCa on tBx. Using a multivariable logistic regression model, we estimated odds ratios for the detection of PCa. Inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance patients' baseline characteristics and compare detection rates of PCa. Before performance of tBx, all patients underwent MRI. $\textit {Results:}$ On multivariable logistic regression analysis, investigator experience was associated with a higher odds of detection of PCa (OR = 1.003; 95% confidence interval 1.002–1.006, $\it p$ = 0.037). After IPTW adjustment, there was no significant difference between the detection rate of investigator A (23%) and investigator B (32%; $\it p$ = 0.457). $\textit {Conclusions:}$ Data revealed a positive association between investigator experience and the odds of PCa detection, although there was no difference in the detection rates of the investigators

Hypoxemia of the lower limbs during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in Trendelenburg position

$\bf Objectives$ The objective of this study is to assess frequency and risk factors for intraoperative hypoxemia of the lower limbs during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Trendelenburg position during RARP may contribute to hypoxemia and compartment syndrome (CS) of the lower limbs as a major but rare complication. $\textbf {Patients and methods}$ This prospective study included patients undergoing RARP for prostate cancer. Preoperative calculation of the ankle-brachial-index (ABI) was performed. Peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) at the toes was routinely measured. Occurrence of SpO2 levels of <90% was defined as hypoxemic events and treated immediately. Blood pressure, intraabdominal pressure, SpO2 of the upper limb and surgery time were monitored in case of hypoxemia. A multivariable logistic regression model was performed with age, BMI, nicotine abuse, MAP, comorbidities as covariates and hypoxemia of the lower limbs as the outcome. $\bf Results$ A total of 207 patients were included. Among these, 126 patients had ABI measurements with 10.6% having an abnormal ABI value. One, two or at least three events of lower limb hypoxemia occurred intraoperatively in 19.7%, 14.8% and 16.9%, respectively. In 20 events, surgical instruments were affecting vascular perfusion by compression. None of the covariates were statistically significant associated with lower limb hypoxemia. No patient developed a compartment syndrome. $\bf Conclusion$ Decrease in oxygen saturation of the lower extremities was observed frequently during RARP, without revealing any risk factors for its occurrence. Routine oximetry leads to an early detection of hypoxemia of the lower extremities, giving the anaesthesiologist and surgeon the opportunity to make adequate adjustments (increasing blood pressure and ending iliac vessel compression)

A randomized prospective study

To compare the outcome of a short-term insertion of a mono-J catheter for 6 h following ureteroscopic stone removal to a conventional double-J catheter. This single-center academic study (Fast Track Stent study 3) evaluated stenting in 108 patients with urinary calculi after ureterorenoscopy. Patients were prospectively randomized into two study arms before primary ureterorenoscopy: (1) mono-J insertion for 6 h after ureterorenoscopy and (2) double-J insertion for 3–5 days after ureterorenoscopy. Study endpoints were stent-related symptoms assessed by an ureteral stent symptom questionnaire (USSQ) and reintervention rates. Stone sizes and location, age, operation duration, BMI, and gender were recorded. Of 67 patients undergoing ureterorenoscopy, 36 patients were analyzed in the double-J arm and 31 patients in the mono-J arm. Mean operation time was 27.5 $\pm$ 1.3 min versus 24.0 $\pm$ 1.3 min, and stone size was 5.2 mm versus 4.5 mm for mono-J versus double-J, respectively ($\it p$ = 0.06 and $\it p$ = 0.15). FaST 3 was terminated early due to a high reintervention rate of 35.5% for the mono-J group and 16.7% for the double-J group ($\it p$ = 0.27). One day after ureterorenoscopy, USSQ scores were similar between the study arms (Urinary Index: $\it p$ = 0.09; Pain Index: $\it p$ = 0.67). However, after 3–5 weeks, the Pain Index was significantly lower in those patients who had a double-J inserted after ureterorenoscopy ($\it p$ = 0.04). Short-term insertion of mono-J post-ureterorenoscopy results in similar micturition symptoms and pain one day after ureterorenoscopy compared to double-J insertion. The reintervention rate was non-significant between the treatment groups most likely due to the early termination of the study ($\it p$ = 0.27). Ethics approval/Trail Registration: No. 18-6435, 201

Striking a balance

To evaluate factors affecting the outcomes of short-term Mono-J insertion for 6 h following ureteroscopic stone removal. Patients treated with a Mono-J for 6 h after ureterorenoscopy and stone removal were analysed. FaST 1 and 2 (Fast Track Stent Studies), two consecutive single academic centre studies, were conducted between August 2014 and April 2018. In each study, we randomized patients with renal or ureteral calculi to two groups before ureterorenoscopy. FaST 1 compared a Mono-J insertion for 6 h versus Double-J insertion for 3–5 days after ureterorenoscopy. FaST 2 compared a Mono-J insertion to a tubeless procedure in the same clinical setting. All patients were pre-stented for 3–5 days before URS. The study endpoint was stent-related symptoms as assessed by a validated questionnaire (USSQ). Results were stratified by clinical parameters, stone characteristics and operation details. 108 of 156 initially randomized patients undergoing ureterorenoscopy were included. USSQ scores covering the time 3–5 weeks after stone removal showed a significantly reduced urinary symptoms and pain index compared to the scores before ureterorenoscopy. USSQ results before and after stone removal did not correlate with stone size or operation time and did not differ significantly depending on stone localization, the treating endourologist, or ureterorenoscopic device used ($\it p$9 > 0.05). Six patients (5%) required reintervention. Following secondary ureterorenoscopy and ureteral drainage with a Mono-J for 6 h, quality of life is independent of stone size and localization, operation time, the treating endourologist, and the URS device used

Detection of acute tubular necrosis using blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) MRI

$\it Background/Aims:$ To date, there is no imaging technique to assess tubular function in vivo. Blood oxygen level-dependent magnetic resonance imaging (BOLD MRI) measures tissue oxygenation based on the transverse relaxation rate (R2*). The present study investigates whether BOLD MRI can assess tubular function using a tubule-specific pharmacological maneuver. $\it Methods:$ Cross sectional study with 28 participants including 9 subjects with ATNinduced acute kidney injury (AKI), 9 healthy controls, and 10 subjects with nephron sparing tumor resection (NSS) with clamping of the renal artery serving as a model of ischemia/reperfusion (I/R)-induced subclinical ATN (median clamping time 15 min, no significant decrease of eGFR, p=0.14). BOLD MRI was performed before and 5, 7, and 10 min after intravenous administration of 40 mg furosemide. $\it Results:$ Urinary neutrophil gelatinaseassociated lipocalin was significantly higher in ATN-induced AKI and NSS subjects than in healthy controls (p=0.03 and p=0.01, respectively). Before administration of furosemide, absolute medullary R2*, cortical R2*, and medullary/cortical R2* ratio did not significantly differ between ATN-induced AKI vs. healthy controls and between NSS-I/R vs. contralateral healthy kidneys (p>0.05 each). Furosemide led to a significant decrease in the medullary and cortical R2* of healthy subjects and NSS contralateral kidneys (p0.05 each). $\it Conclusion:$ BOLD-MRI is able to detect even mild tubular injury but necessitates a tubulespecific pharmacological maneuver, e.g. blocking the Na$^{+}$-K$^{+}$-2Cl- transporter by furosemide

Psychosocial distress in the early recovery period after radical prostatectomy

$\bf Purpose:$ This study aimed to evaluate psychosocial distress in the context of continence and oncological outcome during the early recovery period after radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer. $\bf Patients and Methods:$ Retrospectively collected data from 587 patients who underwent inpatient rehabilitation after RP in 2016 and 2017 were analyzed. Psychosocial distress (measured by using a Questionnaire on Stress in Cancer Patients [QSC-R10]) and continence status (urine loss on a 24-h pad test and urine volume on uroflowmetry) were evaluated at the beginning (T1) and end (T2) of a 3-week inpatient rehabilitation. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify predictors for high distress (QSC-R10 score $\geq$15). $\bf Results:$ The median patient age was 65 years. At the start of rehabilitation, 204 patients (34.8%) demonstrated high distress. Psychosocial distress decreased significantly ($\it p$ < 0.001) from a median of 11.0 at T1 (median 16 days after surgery) to a median of 6.0 at T2 (median 37 days after surgery). Complete continence increased significantly ($\it p$ < 0.001) from 39.0% at T1 to 58.9% at T2. The median urine volume increased significantly ($\it p$ < 0.001) from 161 mL at T1 to 230 mL at T2. Often, distress is higher in younger patients, whereas incontinence is higher in older patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified age $\leq$69 years ($\it p$ = 0.001) and tumor stage $\geq$pT3 ($\it p$ = 0.006) as independent predictors of high distress. $\bf Conclusions:$ Distress and incontinence decreased significantly during the 3 weeks of inpatient rehabilitation after RP. Patient age $\leq$69 years and tumor stage $\geq$pT3 are independent predictors of high psychosocial distress

Identification of patients at risk for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy with intra-operative frozen section

$\bf Objective$ To identify patients at risk for biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer (PCa) after radical prostatectomy (RP) with intra-operative whole-mount frozen section (FS) of the prostate. $\textbf {Material and Methods}$ We examined differences in BCR between patients with initial negative surgical margins at FS, patients with final negative surgical margins with initial positive margins at FS without residual PCa after secondary tumour resection, and patients with final negative surgical margins with initially positive margins at FS with residual PCa in the secondary tumour resection specimen. Institutional data of 883 consecutive patients undergoing RP were collected. Intra-operative whole-mount FS was routinely used to check for margin status and, if necessary, to resect more periprostatic tissue in order to achieve negative margins. Patients with lymph node-positive disease or final positive surgical margins were excluded from the analysis. Kaplan−Meier curves and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses adjusting for clinical covariates were employed to examine differences in biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) according to the resection status mentioned above. $\bf Results$ The median follow-up was 22.4 months. The 1- and 2-year BRFS rates in patients with (81.0% and 72.9%, respectively; $\it P$ = 0.001) and without residual PCa (90.3% and 82.3%, respectively; $\it P$ = 0.033) after secondary tumour resection were significantly lower compared to patients with initial R0 status (93.4% and 90.9%, respectively). On multivariable Cox regression only residual PCa in the secondary tumour resection was associated with a higher risk of BCR compared to initial R0 status (hazard ratio 1.99, 95% confidence interval 1.01–3.92; $\it P$ = 0.046). $\bf Conclusion$ Despite being classified as having a negative surgical margin, patients with residual PCa in the secondary tumour resection specimen face a high risk of BCR. These findings warrant closer post-RP surveillance of this particular subgroup. Further research of this high-risk subset of patients should focus on examining whether these patients benefit from early salvage therapy and how resection status impacts oncological outcomes in the changing landscape of PCa treatment