10 research outputs found

    SWEGRAM : A Web-Based Tool for Automatic Annotation and Analysis of Swedish Texts

    No full text
    We present SWEGRAM, a web-based tool for the automatic linguistic annotation and quantitative analysis of Swedish text, enabling researchers in the humanities and social sciences to annotate their own text and produce statistics on linguistic and other text-related features on the basis of this annotation. The tool allows users to upload one or several documents, which are automatically fed into a pipeline of tools for tokenization and sentence segmentation, spell checking, part-of-speech tagging and morpho-syntactic analysis as well as dependency parsing for syntactic annotation of sentences. The analyzer provides statistics on the number of tokens, words and sentences, the number of parts of speech (PoS), readability measures, the average length of various units, and frequency lists of tokens, lemmas, PoS, and spelling errors. SWEGRAM allows users to create their own corpus or compare texts on various linguistic levels.SWE-CLARI

    SWEGRAM : A Web-Based Tool for Automatic Annotation and Analysis of Swedish Texts

    No full text
    We present SWEGRAM, a web-based tool for the automatic linguistic annotation and quantitative analysis of Swedish text, enabling researchers in the humanities and social sciences to annotate their own text and produce statistics on linguistic and other text-related features on the basis of this annotation. The tool allows users to upload one or several documents, which are automatically fed into a pipeline of tools for tokenization and sentence segmentation, spell checking, part-of-speech tagging and morpho-syntactic analysis as well as dependency parsing for syntactic annotation of sentences. The analyzer provides statistics on the number of tokens, words and sentences, the number of parts of speech (PoS), readability measures, the average length of various units, and frequency lists of tokens, lemmas, PoS, and spelling errors. SWEGRAM allows users to create their own corpus or compare texts on various linguistic levels.SWE-CLARI

    SWEGRAM: Annotering och analys av svenska texter

    No full text
    Dokumentet syftar till att beskriva verktyget swegram med vars hjälp du kan genomföra automatisk annotering och lingvistisk analys av svenska och engelska texter eller skapa din egen, lingvistiskt annoterade textsamling, en så kallad korpus. Vi presenterar verktygets beståndsdelar och ger förslag på hur man kan genomföra storskalig, empirisk språklig analys med hjälp av verktyget.  swe-clari

    SWEGRAM: Annotering och analys av svenska texter

    No full text
    Dokumentet syftar till att beskriva verktyget swegram med vars hjälp du kan genomföra automatisk annotering och lingvistisk analys av svenska och engelska texter eller skapa din egen, lingvistiskt annoterade textsamling, en så kallad korpus. Vi presenterar verktygets beståndsdelar och ger förslag på hur man kan genomföra storskalig, empirisk språklig analys med hjälp av verktyget.  swe-clari

    SWEGRAM : A Web-Based Tool for Automatic Annotation and Analysis of Swedish Texts

    No full text
    We present SWEGRAM, a web-based tool for the automatic linguistic annotation and quantitative analysis of Swedish text, enabling researchers in the humanities and social sciences to annotate their own text and produce statistics on linguistic and other text-related features on the basis of this annotation. The tool allows users to upload one or several documents, which are automatically fed into a pipeline of tools for tokenization and sentence segmentation, spell checking, part-of-speech tagging and morpho-syntactic analysis as well as dependency parsing for syntactic annotation of sentences. The analyzer provides statistics on the number of tokens, words and sentences, the number of parts of speech (PoS), readability measures, the average length of various units, and frequency lists of tokens, lemmas, PoS, and spelling errors. SWEGRAM allows users to create their own corpus or compare texts on various linguistic levels.SWE-CLARI

    Swe-Clarin : Language Resources and Technology for Digital Humanities

    No full text
    CLARIN is a European Research Infrastructure Consortium (ERIC), which aims at (a) making extensive language-based materials available as primary research data to the humanities and social sciences (HSS); and (b) offering state-of-the-art language technology (LT) as an eresearch tool for this purpose, positioning CLARIN centrally in what is often referred to as the digital humanities (DH). The Swedish CLARIN node Swe-Clarin was established in 2015 with funding from the Swedish Research Council. In this paper, we describe the composition and activities of Swe-Clarin, aiming at meeting the requirements of all HSS and other researchers whose research involves using text and speech as primary research data, and spreading the awareness of what Swe-Clarin can offer these research communities. We focus on one of the central means for doing this: pilot projects conducted in collaboration between HSS researchers and Swe-Clarin, together formulating a research question, the addressing of which requires working with large language-based materials. Four such pilot projects are described in more detail, illustrating research on rhetorical history, second-language acquisition, literature, and political science. A common thread to these projects is an aspiration to meet the challenge of conducting research on the basis of very large amounts of textual data in a consistent way without losing sight of the individual cases making up the mass of data, i.e., to be able to move between Moretti’s “distant” and “close reading” modes. While the pilot projects clearly make substantial contributions to DH, they also reveal some needs for more development, and in particular a need for document-level access to the text materials. As a consequence of this, work has now been initiated in Swe-Clarin to meet this need, so that Swe-Clarin together with HSS scholars investigating intricate research questions can take on the methodological challenges of big-data language-based digital humanities

    Differences between included and excluded patients.

    No full text
    *<p>Nonparticipants include low DNA level (n = 51, 18%) and unable to collect the endoscopic biopsy (n = 26, 9%). Excluded participants include tumour misclassification (n = 3, 1%), tumour detected at autopsy (n = 11, 3%) and unavailable endoscopic material (n = 53, 15%).</p><p>#Tumour location was similar in the participants and non-participant/excluded groups (p = 0.113, Fisheŕs exact test) except for more missing in the non-participant/excluded group p<0.001, Fisheŕs exact test).</p
    corecore