Budesonide inhalation suspension versus methylprednisolone for treatment of moderate bronchial asthma attacks

Background Owing to their side effects, administration of steroids for bronchial asthma attacks should be minimized. We investigated whether budesonide inhalation suspension (BIS) could replace intravenous steroid administration for the treatment of moderate bronchial asthma attacks.Subjects and Methods The subjects were children aged 5 years and younger hospitalized for moderate bronchial asthma attacks. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: 20 patients received methylprednisolone (mPSL) and 20 were treated with BIS. The mPSL group began treatment with inhalation of procaterol hydrochloride (0.3 mL) and disodium cromoglycate (2 mL) three times a day and systemic administration of mPSL (1 mg/kg) three times a day. The BIS group began treatment with inhalation of procaterol hydrochloride (0.3 mL) and BIS (0.5 mg) three times a day. The frequency of inhalations and steroid administration was adjusted according to the severity of symptoms. The cortisol level at discharge was measured.Results There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the severity of attacks and duration of management, or in terms of therapeutic efficacy, duration of wheezing, or period of hospitalization. The frequency of inhalations on days 3 to 6 of hospitalization was lower in the BIS group than in the mPSL group, and the cortisol level at discharge was significantly higher in the BIS group (13.9 ± 6.1 μg/dL) than in the mPSL group (8.0 ± 2.1 μg/dL) (p = 0.008).Conclusion In patients with recurrent wheezing or bronchial asthma of <5 years, the efficacy of BIS is equivalent or better than mPSL for moderate bronchial asthma attacks, and in contrast to steroid treatment, BIS treatment do not suppress adrenocortical function. Keywords: Asthma, Methylprednisolone, Budesonide, Inhalation, Cortisol, Procatero

The Skin Prick Test is Not Useful in the Diagnosis of the Immediate Type Food Allergy Tolerance Acquisition

Background: : Some studies have been reported about positioning of SPT in the diagnosis of food allergy. On the other hand, it is not yet clear about the positioning of SPT in the diagnosis of tolerance acquisition of the immediate type food allergy. Methods: The retrospective study had been conducted for 236 egg allergic children (51.3 months in mean), 127 milk allergic children (53.4 months), and 96 wheat allergic children (42.6 months). The retrospective analysis of serum nonspecific and antigen-specific IgE levels, SPT, and OFC had been conducted for each allergic patient. All OFC had been conducted to verify the acquisition of tolerance against eliminated food. Results: The OFC was positive in 61 (25.8%) hen's egg allergies, 34 (26.8%) milk allergies and 33 (34.4%) wheat allergies. The greatest AUC for each allergen is as following; hen's egg for egg white specific IgE at 0.745, milk/histamine (wheal) index at 0.718, and wheat for wheal size at 0.597. For the predictive decision points, the highest accuracy rate was at 25.8% for an egg white wheal of 9.5 mm, at 26.8% for a milk wheal of 9.5 mm, and at 34.4% for a wheal of 6.5 mm. Conclusions: As a result of this analysis, the diagnostic accuracy of SPT had not been satisfactory to judge the acquisition of tolerance in allergic children for eggs, milk and wheat. Therefore, this is not a strong evidence to testify the tolerance of the immediate type food allergy

Oral challenge tests for soybean allergies in Japan: A summary of 142 cases

Background: Soybeans are one of causative foods for infantile onset allergies in Japan. This study aimed to analyze the results of soybean challenge tests that were conducted over approximately 7 years at our institution. Using the test data, we sought to identify the responses and clinical profiles of patients with soybean allergies, and to investigate the relationship between the responses and soybean sensitization status. Methods: Between July 2004 and May 2010, 142 cases (125 patients) underwent food challenge tests (100 g of silken tofu) for the diagnosis of soybean allergy or confirmation of their tolerance. The patients' characteristics, soybean sensitization status, and responses to the challenge tests were retrospectively evaluated. Results: Among the subjects who underwent the soybean challenge test, the male/female ratio was 1.6 (87/55), and the mean age at the test was 2.8 ± 1.7 years. The positive rate for the challenge test was 38.7%. Induced symptoms were observed in the skin (81.8%), respiratory system (50.9%), and gastrointestinal system/mucosal membrane/anaphylaxis (12.7%). Intramuscular epinephrine was administered to all 7 patients who experienced an anaphylactic reaction. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic efficiency of soybean-specific IgE titers were low for predicting the responses to the challenge test. Conclusions: Soybean allergies were diagnosed in only 18% of the subjects with positive sensitization to soybeans. Therefore, soybean-specific IgE titers are not an effective predictor of a positive response to the challenge test