285 research outputs found

    Traditional and modern pigments in Gino Severini's Swiss murals

    Get PDF
    Between 1924 and 1947, Gino Severini decorated five churches in the Romand region of Switzerland with monumental religious wall paintings. This mural art played an important role in the Italian artist's career despite being mostly unknown and not easily found. The painting methods and materials of these modern Swiss murals were characterized by combining historical and archival research with onsite visual and scientific examination. Most pigments were identified with noninvasive methods integrating mapping techniques (i.e., technical photography and digital microscopy) with point analysis (x-ray fluorescence and reflection FT-IR spectroscopy). The results of these portable techniques were completed with SEM-EDS, μFT-IR FPA imaging, and μRaman analyses on micro-samples which provided stratigraphic and compositional information to complement the noninvasive results. Overall, the data obtained show that Severini used both traditional pigments (e.g., Sangiovanni white and ochres/earths of various color) and modern ones, such as cadmium-based pigments, with different painting techniques (e.g., zinc white was applied exclusively a secco). Apart from cerulean blue (cobalt stannate) and Naples yellow (lead antimonate) found only in two locations, the same set of pigments was documented in all of Severini's Swiss murals. The characterization of the artist's palette is important to understand the technical painting process followed by Severini, his interest on new painting materials available on the market and, at the same time, loyalty towards traditional painting methods, such as painting a fresco

    PSYCHOPATHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PATIENTS WITH FIRST-EPISODE PSYCHOSIS AND CHRONIC SCHIZOPHRENIA: A DESCRIPTIVE COMPARISON

    Get PDF
    Only few studies have compared the psychopathological features in first episode psychosis (FEP) and chronic schizophrenia (CS) patients. The aim of our study was to compare sociodemographic and clinical aspects of FEP and CS inpatients using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) in order to better characterize FEP. We did not find significant socio-demographic differences between the two groups apart from age and nationality. About PANSS we found that conceptual disorganization, poor rapport and lack of insight items scores were significantly higher in patients with FEP. Related to BPRS the items of somatic concerns, grandiosity and motor hyperactivity were significantly higher in the CS group; uncooperativeness was significantly higher in FEP group. Our study offers a characterization of FEP patients that confirms evidence and adds some information from the current literature. FEP patients seem to be more uncooperative with a worse interpersonal empathy and insight into the illness than CS patients; this could reduce their compliance with the treatment

    DYSPHORIA DIMENSIONS: A PRELIMINARY INPATIENTS STUDY TO DIFFRENTIATE BORDERLINE PERSONALITY AND BIPOLAR DISORDER SPECTRUM

    Get PDF
    Background: Differentiating Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) from Bipolar Disorder (BD) represents a very difficult challenge for clinicians. Dysphoria could be a possible key to differentiate these disorders. We currently define dysphoria as a complex and disorganized emotional state with proteiform phenomenology, characterized by a multitude of symptoms. Among them irritability, discontent, interpersonal resentment and surrender prevail. These dimensions can be detected using the Neapen Dysphoria Scale - Italian version (NDS-I). Dysphoria role in BPD has been highlighted by the recent theorization of the Interpersonal Dysphoria Model, according to which dysphoria could represent the “psychopathological organizer” of the BPD. On the other side, dysphoria role in BD has not yet been established. This is simply considered as an aspect, and not fundamental, of the symptomatology characterizing BD, especially in mixed states patients. The phenomenological analysis of the dimensional spectrum of dysphoria within BPD and DB could provide a valuable aid in the differential diagnosis between BPD and BD. Aims: The aim of this paper is to verify if the dimensional spectrum of dysphoria differs between Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) and Bipolar Disorder Spectrum (BD) through an observational comparative study Subjects and methods: In this study, 65 adult patients, males and females between the ages of 18 and 65, were enrolled from the Psychiatric Service of the Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital in Perugia (PG), Italy, from January 1st 2018 to April 30th 2019. We have formed 2 groups. A BPD group composed of 33 patients (19 female patients, representing approximately 57.6 % of the sample) and a BD group composed of 32 patients (18 Female patients, representing approximately 56.2% of the sample). Patient’s comorbid with BD and BPD have been excluded from the study. After a preliminary assessment to exclude organic and psychiatric comorbidity, and after at least 72 hours from hospitalization, we administered them the Neapen Dysphoria Scale - Italian Version (NDS-I), a specific dimensional test for dysphoria. Starting from the dataset, with the aid of the statistical program SPSS 20, we have carried out a comparison between disorders groups selected and their NDS-I total score and subscales (irritability, discontent, interpersonal resentment, surrender); For this we have used the Mann-Whitney U test, a nonparametric test with 2 independent samples, by setting a significance level p<0.05. Conclusions: This study allowed us to explore and analyze dysphoria dimensions expressions in BPD and BD. Despite the small sample analyzed, the results show a significant different dimensional spectrum expression of the dysphoria between the two disorders. In particular, Irritability and Interpersonal Resentment dimensions show greater interest in BPD than BD spectrum. Further studies with a larger and stratified sample are needed to confirm these results

    DYSPHORIA AS A PSYCHIATRIC SYNDROME: A PRELIMINARY STUDY FOR A NEW TRANSNOSOGRAPHIC DIMENSIONAL APPROACH

    Get PDF
    Background: We currently define dysphoria as a complex and disorganized emotional state with proteiform phenomenology, characterized by a multitude of symptoms. Among them prevail irritability, discontent, interpersonal resentment and surrender. Dysphoria, in line with the most recent Interpersonal Dysphoria Model, could represent a “psychopathological organizer” of the Borderline Personality Disorder. We would like to extend this theoretical concept to other psychiatric disorders in order to consider dysphoria as a possible psychopathological nucleus, a syndrome on its own. This syndromic vision may open up the possibility of new paths both in the differential diagnosis and in the therapeutic approach to the various disorders. Aims: The goal of this paper is to understand if the dimensional spectrum that composes dysphoria differs from the different psychiatric disorders. Specifically, we would like to assess if the phenomenological expression of dysphoria differs in patients with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD), Mixed State Bipolar Disorder (BDM) and Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) through an observational comparative study. Subjects and methods: In this study, 30 adult patients, males and females between the ages of 18 and 65, were enrolled from the Psychiatric Service of the Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital in Perugia (PG), Italy, from January 1st to June 30th, 2018. The aim was to form 3 groups each one composed of 10 individuals affected respectively with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD), with Bipolar Disorder, Mixed State (BPM) and Major Depression Disorder (MDD). After a preliminary assessment to exclude organic and psychiatric comorbidity, we administered them the Neapen Dysphoria Scale – Italian Version (NDS-I), a specific dimensional test for dysphoria. Starting from the dataset, with the aid of the statistical program SPSS 20, we have obtained graphs showing the comparison between disorders groups selected and NDS-I total score and subscales (irritability, discontent, interpersonal resentment, surrender). Finally, a comparison was made, taking two groups at a time, between the means of single groups for total scores and for single subscales considered into the NDS-I test. We made it using the Mann-Whitney U test, a nonparametric test with 2 independent samples, by setting a significance level =0.05. Conclusions: This study, through a transnosographic-dimensional approach, allowed us to explore dysphoria and its expressions in different psychopathological groups, despite analyzing a small sample. Differences between means of values obtained through NDS-I subscales were statistically significant in patients with BPD, BDM and MDD (p<0.05). Among the latter, the group of BPD patients has greater pervasiveness and severity of dysphoria symptoms

    DYSPHORIA DIMENSIONS: A PRELIMINARY INPATIENTS STUDY TO DIFFRENTIATE BORDERLINE PERSONALITY AND BIPOLAR DISORDER SPECTRUM

    Get PDF
    Background: Differentiating Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) from Bipolar Disorder (BD) represents a very difficult challenge for clinicians. Dysphoria could be a possible key to differentiate these disorders. We currently define dysphoria as a complex and disorganized emotional state with proteiform phenomenology, characterized by a multitude of symptoms. Among them irritability, discontent, interpersonal resentment and surrender prevail. These dimensions can be detected using the Neapen Dysphoria Scale - Italian version (NDS-I). Dysphoria role in BPD has been highlighted by the recent theorization of the Interpersonal Dysphoria Model, according to which dysphoria could represent the “psychopathological organizer” of the BPD. On the other side, dysphoria role in BD has not yet been established. This is simply considered as an aspect, and not fundamental, of the symptomatology characterizing BD, especially in mixed states patients. The phenomenological analysis of the dimensional spectrum of dysphoria within BPD and DB could provide a valuable aid in the differential diagnosis between BPD and BD. Aims: The aim of this paper is to verify if the dimensional spectrum of dysphoria differs between Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) and Bipolar Disorder Spectrum (BD) through an observational comparative study Subjects and methods: In this study, 65 adult patients, males and females between the ages of 18 and 65, were enrolled from the Psychiatric Service of the Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital in Perugia (PG), Italy, from January 1st 2018 to April 30th 2019. We have formed 2 groups. A BPD group composed of 33 patients (19 female patients, representing approximately 57.6 % of the sample) and a BD group composed of 32 patients (18 Female patients, representing approximately 56.2% of the sample). Patient’s comorbid with BD and BPD have been excluded from the study. After a preliminary assessment to exclude organic and psychiatric comorbidity, and after at least 72 hours from hospitalization, we administered them the Neapen Dysphoria Scale - Italian Version (NDS-I), a specific dimensional test for dysphoria. Starting from the dataset, with the aid of the statistical program SPSS 20, we have carried out a comparison between disorders groups selected and their NDS-I total score and subscales (irritability, discontent, interpersonal resentment, surrender); For this we have used the Mann-Whitney U test, a nonparametric test with 2 independent samples, by setting a significance level p<0.05. Conclusions: This study allowed us to explore and analyze dysphoria dimensions expressions in BPD and BD. Despite the small sample analyzed, the results show a significant different dimensional spectrum expression of the dysphoria between the two disorders. In particular, Irritability and Interpersonal Resentment dimensions show greater interest in BPD than BD spectrum. Further studies with a larger and stratified sample are needed to confirm these results

    DYSPHORIA AS A PSYCHIATRIC SYNDROME: A PRELIMINARY STUDY FOR A NEW TRANSNOSOGRAPHIC DIMENSIONAL APPROACH

    Get PDF
    Background: We currently define dysphoria as a complex and disorganized emotional state with proteiform phenomenology, characterized by a multitude of symptoms. Among them prevail irritability, discontent, interpersonal resentment and surrender. Dysphoria, in line with the most recent Interpersonal Dysphoria Model, could represent a “psychopathological organizer” of the Borderline Personality Disorder. We would like to extend this theoretical concept to other psychiatric disorders in order to consider dysphoria as a possible psychopathological nucleus, a syndrome on its own. This syndromic vision may open up the possibility of new paths both in the differential diagnosis and in the therapeutic approach to the various disorders. Aims: The goal of this paper is to understand if the dimensional spectrum that composes dysphoria differs from the different psychiatric disorders. Specifically, we would like to assess if the phenomenological expression of dysphoria differs in patients with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD), Mixed State Bipolar Disorder (BDM) and Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) through an observational comparative study. Subjects and methods: In this study, 30 adult patients, males and females between the ages of 18 and 65, were enrolled from the Psychiatric Service of the Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital in Perugia (PG), Italy, from January 1st to June 30th, 2018. The aim was to form 3 groups each one composed of 10 individuals affected respectively with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD), with Bipolar Disorder, Mixed State (BPM) and Major Depression Disorder (MDD). After a preliminary assessment to exclude organic and psychiatric comorbidity, we administered them the Neapen Dysphoria Scale – Italian Version (NDS-I), a specific dimensional test for dysphoria. Starting from the dataset, with the aid of the statistical program SPSS 20, we have obtained graphs showing the comparison between disorders groups selected and NDS-I total score and subscales (irritability, discontent, interpersonal resentment, surrender). Finally, a comparison was made, taking two groups at a time, between the means of single groups for total scores and for single subscales considered into the NDS-I test. We made it using the Mann-Whitney U test, a nonparametric test with 2 independent samples, by setting a significance level =0.05. Conclusions: This study, through a transnosographic-dimensional approach, allowed us to explore dysphoria and its expressions in different psychopathological groups, despite analyzing a small sample. Differences between means of values obtained through NDS-I subscales were statistically significant in patients with BPD, BDM and MDD (p<0.05). Among the latter, the group of BPD patients has greater pervasiveness and severity of dysphoria symptoms

    BIPOLAR AND BORDERLINE PERSONALITY DISORDERS: A DESCRIPTIVE COMPARISON OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGICAL ASPECTS IN PATIENTS DISCHARGED FROM AN ITALIAN INPATIENT UNIT USING PANSS AND BPRS

    Get PDF
    Background: There is current scientific debate in consideration of the possibility to consider the Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) as a mood disorder within the bipolar spectrum furthermore, authors reported about the challenging differential diagnosis of BPD and Bipolar Disorder (BD). Subjects and methods: 32 patients hospitalized in the Inpatient Psychiatric Unit in Perugia, discharged with a diagnosis of BD or BPD, were included. Factor analyses of BPRS and PANSS items were performed. Association between socio-demographic, clinical and psychopathological variables was tested using bivariate analyses. Results: Factor analysis identified 6 Factors, explaining 67.6% of the variance, interpreted as follow: 1) Euphoric Mania, 2) Psychosis, 3) Inhibited Depression, 4) Disorganization, 5) Psychosomatic features, and 6) Mixed features. Bivariate analyses identified statistically significant differences between BPD and BD according to: PANSS positive symptoms domain, BPRS total score, Euphoric Mania and Disorganization. No statistically significant differences came up on socio-demographic and clinical aspects. Conclusion: Even though the sample is small, interesting findings came out from our investigation. Our findings are in line with the current literature. Euphoric mood, is one of the aspects which best differentiated BD from BPD. Higher scores in Disorganization, BPRS and PANSS positive symptoms in BD may be related to the fact that our sample is a group of patients from an acute inpatient unit, so the impact of the symptoms severity for BD may be remarkable

    COMPARISON OF ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF SUICIDAL RISK FOR ACUTE PSYCHIATRIC ASSESSMENT BETWEEN TWO STATE SPONSORED HOSPITALS IN ENGLAND AND ITALY

    Get PDF
    The risk of suicide is one of the most important risk factors looked into for acute psychiatric assessments that influences the management plan. The prevalence of suicide is on a rise across European countries; as a consequence, the different countries have created specific guidelines and policies in order to prevent suicides in the acute settings. These guidelines are based on both different cultural aspects as well as the different organization of the mental health system in the different countries. This paper wants to present the comparison between the guidelines of two European countries, England and Italy, in order to evaluate the systems, understand differences and common contact points. The different European countries could learn one from the other and a European shared point of view may be a way forward to create better understanding and preventing the risk of suicide across the population

    CIRCADIAN RHYTHMS DISRUPTIONS AND EATING DISORDERS: CLINICAL IMPACT AND POSSIBLE PSYCHOPATHOLOGICAL CORRELATES

    Get PDF
    Background: A link between abnormalities in circadian rhythms and the development of eating disorders was extensively hypothesized, mainly in consideration of the influence of the circadian clock on eating behavior. The present review is aimed at summarizing the evidence about biological rhythms disruptions in eating disorders, possibly clarifying their impact on the psychopathological profile of such patients. Methods: Electronic database MEDLINE/PubMed/Index Medicus was systematically searched for original articles examining the prevalence of circadian rhythms disruptions in eating disorders (anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder). Results: Studies included in the review confirmed the hypothesis of a high prevalence of circadian disruptions in eating disorders. The analyzed research mainly focused on sleep-wake cycle, rest-activity abnormalities and hormonal secretion, whilst literature about other circadian rhythms was scanty. Altered biological rhythms presented higher association with specific psychopathological features, but such relationship was assessed in few studies. Conclusions: Circadian rhythms disruptions were confirmed to be relevant aspects in the context of eating disorders. Further research is needed in order to clarify the role of biological rhythms in such illnesses, in the attempt to address adjunctive treatment strategies with the possible focus of circadian abnormalities

    CIRCADIAN RHYTHMS DISRUPTIONS AND EATING DISORDERS: CLINICAL IMPACT AND POSSIBLE PSYCHOPATHOLOGICAL CORRELATES

    Get PDF
    Background: A link between abnormalities in circadian rhythms and the development of eating disorders was extensively hypothesized, mainly in consideration of the influence of the circadian clock on eating behavior. The present review is aimed at summarizing the evidence about biological rhythms disruptions in eating disorders, possibly clarifying their impact on the psychopathological profile of such patients. Methods: Electronic database MEDLINE/PubMed/Index Medicus was systematically searched for original articles examining the prevalence of circadian rhythms disruptions in eating disorders (anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder). Results: Studies included in the review confirmed the hypothesis of a high prevalence of circadian disruptions in eating disorders. The analyzed research mainly focused on sleep-wake cycle, rest-activity abnormalities and hormonal secretion, whilst literature about other circadian rhythms was scanty. Altered biological rhythms presented higher association with specific psychopathological features, but such relationship was assessed in few studies. Conclusions: Circadian rhythms disruptions were confirmed to be relevant aspects in the context of eating disorders. Further research is needed in order to clarify the role of biological rhythms in such illnesses, in the attempt to address adjunctive treatment strategies with the possible focus of circadian abnormalities
    corecore