Cream tests and butter quality

A question often put to butter factory managers and operatives by the producers is, What test do you want in cream delivered at the factory? The word test in this case refers to the richness of the cream, or in other words to the percentage of butterfat it contains

Is your water supply safe?

THERE can be no doubt in anyone\u27s mind that the need for a clean, safe and adequate water supply is essential for the production of high quality milk and cream. It naturally follows, that, even though every possible care has been taken in an endeavour to produce clean, germ-free milk and cream, contamination by bad water can render these efforts void

Some recent rural radio talks

Cream stirring is important. - D.C. Mickle Crossbreeding in pig production. - P. Beck Salmonella infection in sheep. - I.J. Miller Useful sprays for the home garden. A.A. Holland Tapeworm of dogs and cats. P.B. Lewis The poison plant and the animal. - R.D. Royce Sire surveys to prove bulls. K. Needham Peat as a substitute for horse manure. - L.T. Jone

Recent radio talks

Recent Rural Radio Talks Dairy Hygiene is Important; - D.C. Mickle Farm Water Supplies; - K. Needham Handling the Apple Crop; - K. Whitely Renovation of Irrigated Pastures; - Dairying division More About Lupinosis; - H. W. Bennetts Progress in Doublegee Control; - Norman Halse Changing Practices in Tobacco Growing in W.A.; - G. A. Pearce Progress in doublegee control; - G.A. Pearce Some Uses of Radio Isotopes in Agriculture; - E. N. Fitzpatrick Guildford Grass—Sign of a Run-Down Pasture; - R. A. Bettenay Silage and when to feed it; - R. Bettenay Ants in the Apiary; - R. S. Coleman Bacterial Canker of Stone Fruits; - Olga M. Goss Poison Plants in the Home Garden; - R. D. Royce The Cabbage White Butterfly; - C. F. H. Jenkins Summer Treatments for San Jose Scale; - C. F. H. Jenkins Preparations for Fodder Conservation; - H.G. Cariss Sudan Grass Survived Dry Summer; - R.A. Bettenay Root Maggot Flies; - J. A. Button Fallowing for Cropping; - A.S. Wild Feeding for Milk Quality; - L. C. Snook The Rabbit— Friend or Foe. A. R. Tomlinso

Some recent rural radio talks

Current experiments with vegetable crops - By T. WACHTEL, Agricultural Adviser, Horticultural Division Pedigree seed planting - By H. G. CARISS, B.Sc. (Agric), Regional Agricultural Adviser The Ruakura round farrowing house - By P. BECK, Field Assistant, Dairying Division How the random sample laying test could affect the poultry industry - By R. H. MORRIS, Officer-in-Charge, Poultry Branch Feeding the milking goat - By K. NEEDHAM, Dairy Cattle Husbandry Officer Fertilisers for vegetables in summer months - By J. P. FALLON, Senior Adviser (Vegetables), Horticultural Division Pastures and their carrying capacity - By H. G. ELLIOTT, Assistant Superintendent of Dairying Pollination - By J. CRIPPS, Adviser, Horticultural Division Aeroplanes and insect pest control - By P. N. FORTE, Senior Entomologist Kill those flies - By H. MASLIN, Dairy Instructor, Busselton Grazing for pigs - By P. BECK, Field Assistant, Dairying Division Feed flavours in cream - By an officer of the Dairying Division. Those old milk and cream cans - By D. C. MICKLE, Dairy Instructor, Bunbury Overrun in butter making and quality in home-made butter - By A. H. HOBBS, Dairy Produce Inspector Milk flow indicators - By G. W. SCOTT, Dairy Instructor, Head Offic

The reliability of plantar pressure assessment during barefoot level walking in children aged 7-11 years

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Plantar pressure assessment can provide information pertaining to the dynamic loading of the foot, as well as information specific to each region in contact with the ground. There have been few studies which have considered the reliability of plantar pressure data and therefore the purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability of assessing plantar pressure variables in a group of typically developing children, during barefoot level walking.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Forty-five participants, aged 7 to 11 years, were recruited from local primary and secondary schools in East London. Data from three walking trials were collected at both an initial and re-test session, taken one week apart, to determine both the within- and between-session reliability of selected plantar pressure variables. The variables of peak pressure, peak force, pressure-time and force-time integrals were extracted for analysis in the following seven regions of the foot; lateral heel, medial heel, midfoot, 1st metatarsophalangeal joint, 2nd-5th metatarsophalangeal joint, hallux and the lesser toes. Reliability of the data were explored using Intra Class Correlation Coefficients (ICC 3,1 and 3,2) and variability with Coefficients of Variation (CoV's).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The measurements demonstrated moderate to good levels of within-session reliability across all segments of the foot (0.69-0.93), except the lesser toes, which demonstrated poor reliability (0.17-0.50). CoV's across the three repeated trials ranged from 10.12-19.84% for each of the measured variables across all regions of the foot, except the lesser toes which demonstrated the greatest variability within trials (27.15-56.08%). The between-session results demonstrated good levels of reliability across all foot segments (0.79-0.99) except the lesser toes; with moderate levels of reliability reported at this region of the foot (0.58-0.68). The CoV's between-sessions demonstrated that the midfoot (16.41-36.23%) and lesser toe region (29.64-56.61) demonstrated the greatest levels of variability across all the measured variables.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>These findings indicate that using the reported protocols, reliable plantar pressure data can be collected in children, aged 7 to 11 years in all regions of the foot except the lesser toes which consistently reported poor-to-moderate levels of reliability and increased variability.</p

Cohort Randomised Controlled Trial of a Multifaceted Podiatry Intervention for the Prevention of Falls in Older People (The REFORM Trial)

BACKGROUND: Falls are a major cause of morbidity among older people. A multifaceted podiatry intervention may reduce the risk of falling. This study evaluated such an intervention. DESIGN: Pragmatic cohort randomised controlled trial in England and Ireland. 1010 participants were randomised (493 to the Intervention group and 517 to Usual Care) to either: a podiatry intervention, including foot and ankle exercises, foot orthoses and, if required, new footwear, and a falls prevention leaflet or usual podiatry treatment plus a falls prevention leaflet. The primary outcome was the incidence rate of self-reported falls per participant in the 12 months following randomisation. Secondary outcomes included: proportion of fallers and those reporting multiple falls, time to first fall, fear of falling, Frenchay Activities Index, Geriatric Depression Scale, foot pain, health related quality of life, and cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: In the primary analysis were 484 (98.2%) intervention and 507 (98.1%) control participants. There was a small, non statistically significant reduction in the incidence rate of falls in the intervention group (adjusted incidence rate ratio 0.88, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.05, p = 0.16). The proportion of participants experiencing a fall was lower (49.7 vs 54.9%, adjusted odds ratio 0.78, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.00, p = 0.05) as was the proportion experiencing two or more falls (27.6% vs 34.6%, adjusted odds ratio 0.69, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.90, p = 0.01). There was an increase (p = 0.02) in foot pain for the intervention group. There were no statistically significant differences in other outcomes. The intervention was more costly but marginally more beneficial in terms of health-related quality of life (mean quality adjusted life year (QALY) difference 0.0129, 95% CI -0.0050 to 0.0314) and had a 65% probability of being cost-effective at a threshold of £30,000 per QALY gained. CONCLUSION: There was a small reduction in falls. The intervention may be cost-effective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN ISRCTN68240461

Preferential Re-Replication of Drosophila Heterochromatin in the Absence of Geminin

To ensure genomic integrity, the genome must be duplicated exactly once per cell cycle. Disruption of replication licensing mechanisms may lead to re-replication and genomic instability. Cdt1, also known as Double-parked (Dup) in Drosophila, is a key regulator of the assembly of the pre-replicative complex (pre-RC) and its activity is strictly limited to G1 by multiple mechanisms including Cul4-Ddb1 mediated proteolysis and inhibition by geminin. We assayed the genomic consequences of disregulating the replication licensing mechanisms by RNAi depletion of geminin. We found that not all origins of replication were sensitive to geminin depletion and that heterochromatic sequences were preferentially re-replicated in the absence of licensing mechanisms. The preferential re-activation of heterochromatic origins of replication was unexpected because these are typically the last sequences to be duplicated in a normal cell cycle. We found that the re-replication of heterochromatin was regulated not at the level of pre-RC activation, but rather by the formation of the pre-RC. Unlike the global assembly of the pre-RC that occurs throughout the genome in G1, in the absence of geminin, limited pre-RC assembly was restricted to the heterochromatin by elevated cyclin A-CDK activity. These results suggest that there are chromatin and cell cycle specific controls that regulate the re-assembly of the pre-RC outside of G1