Major pancreatic resections for suspected cancer in a community-based teaching hospital: lessons learned.

BACKGROUND: The literature reports 4-10% mortality rate, 30-60% morbidity rate, and 9-29% anastomotic leak rate after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) performed for periampullary tumors. These data demonstrate a linear relationship between surgical volume and outcome. METHODS: The objective of this study was to evaluate the experience of a high-volume hospital with low-volume pancreatoduodenectomy for suspected cancer. The study was designed as a retrospective review of medical records of all patients who underwent pancreatoduodenal resection or total pancreatectomy for a suspected periampullary carcinoma between January 1994 and December 2003. The setting of the study was a community-based teaching hospital with a general surgery residency training program. RESULTS: A total of 63 patients underwent pancreatoduodenal resection or total pancreatectomy. All procedures were performed by a total of 15 different surgeons; however, 27 operations were performed by one surgeon. Pre-operative diagnosis in most cases was either a known malignancy-27 cases (43%) or a tumor of the head of the pancreas, suspicious for malignancy-36 cases (57%). One patient underwent a total pancreatectomy. In 62 patients a pancreatoduodenal resection (Whipple procedure) was performed. Post-operative 30-day mortality was 4.7% (three patients). Overall in-hospital mortality was 9.5% (six patients). Ten (16.1%) had a leak of the pancreato-jejunal anastomosis, six of which resolved with non-operative management. Of the remaining four patients, three died from peritonitis or consequences of erosive hemorrhage. CONCLUSIONS: Post-operative leak of the pancreatic anastomosis represents a technical challenge. Although most of the leaks can be treated non-operatively, those that lead to peritonitis or erosive hemorrhage warrant operative intervention. Major pancreatic resections can be performed safely with low rates of morbidity and operative mortality with careful selection of patients at a low-volume community-based teaching hospital

Hepatic resection at a major community-based teaching hospital can result in good outcome.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between volume and outcome has been established in the literature for several complex surgical procedures. Improved outcome has been suggested at high-volume hospitals or with high-volume surgeons. METHODS: The objective of this study was to evaluate the experience of a low-volume hospital with major liver resections. The setting of the study was a community-based teaching hospital with a surgical residency training program. RESULTS: A total of 46 major liver resections were performed between January 1992 and December 2002. Procedures performed were hepatic lobectomies (n = 15; right, n = 11; left, n = 4), trisegmentectomies (n = 5; right, n = 3; left, n = 2), segmentectomies (n = 16; left lateral, n = 12; right posterior, n = 4), and wedge resections (n = 10). Operations were performed by 14 different surgeons; however, 23 operations were performed by 1 surgeon. Sixteen patients (34%) developed 23 complications. The average length of hospital stay was 9.7 days. There were no 30-day postoperative mortalities. Out of 46 patients who underwent major liver resection over the last 10 years, 13 patients are still alive. Overall survival ranged from 3 to 84 months, with a median survival of 30.6 months. The actual 5-year survival was 36% (8 of 22) for all patients operated on \u3e5 years ago, and the actual 2-year survival was 61% (20 of 33). CONCLUSIONS: Major liver resection can be performed safely with low rates of morbidity and operative mortality with careful selection of patients at a low-volume community-based teaching hospital