Pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment of hypertension in dialysis patients

WOS: 000327884500020Hypertension is very common in dialysis patients. The most important cause of hypertension is hypervolemia. Fluid restriction and volume management with standard hemodialysis are effective strategies to achieve dry weight and blood pressure control without use of antihypertensive drugs. If the captopril test is positive, a renin-angiotensin system blocker should be started. The pre-dialysis blood pressure goal in hemodialysis patients should be < 140/90 mm Hg initially and < 130/80 mm Hg at 3-6 months of dialysis.Turkish Society of Hypertension and Renal DiseasesPublication costs for this article were supported by the Turkish Society of Hypertension and Renal Diseases, a nonprofit national organization in Turkey

Anti-Hepatitis E Antibody in Hemodialysis Patients

WOS: 00042516340002

Long-term outcome of kidney transplantation from elderly living and expanded criteria deceased donors

WOS: 000350554300014PubMed ID: 25470081The imbalance between organ demand and supply causes the increasing use of suboptimal donors. The aim of this study is to investigate the survival and allograft function of kidney transplantation from standard (SLD) and elderly living (ELD), standard criteria (SCDD) and expanded criteria deceased (ECDD) donors. All patients transplanted from 1997 to 2005 were investigated according to the donor characteristics. Data were collected retrospectively during the 83.4 +/- 43.1 months of follow-up period. ELD was defined as donor age >= 60 years. ECDD was defined as UNOS criteria. A total of 458 patients were divided into four groups: SLD (n:191), ELD (n:67), SCDD (n:154), and ECDD (n:46). Seven-year death-censored graft survival in SLD, ELD, SCDD, and ECDD were 81.6%, 64.8%, 84.7%, and 68.3%, respectively (p = 0.003). The death-censored graft survival in ELD group was lower than in SLD (p = 0.007) and SCDD (p = 0.007) groups, while in ECDD group it was lower than in SCDD group (p = 0.026). Patient survival was similar. In ECDD group, 83% of total deaths occurred within the first 3 years, mainly due to infections (66.6%) (p < 0.05). Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was lower in ELD (compared with SLD and SCDD); and ECDD (compared with SCDD) at last visit. In multivariate analysis, ELD, experience of an acute rejection episode and presence of delayed graft function were the independent predictors for death censored graft loss. Transplantation of a suboptimal kidney provides inferior graft survival and function. A higher number of deaths due to infection in the early post-transplant period in the ECDD group are noteworthy

Controversies and problems of volume control and hypertension in haemodialysis

WOS: 000379736100033PubMed ID: 27226131Extracellular volume overload and hypertension are important contributors to the high risk of cardiovascular mortality in patients undergoing haemodialysis. Hypertension is present in more than 90% of patients at the initiation of haemodialysis and persists in more than two-thirds, despite use of several antihypertensive medications. High blood pressure is a risk factor for the development of left ventricular hypertrophy, heart failure, and mortality, although there are controversies with some study findings showing poor survival with low-but not high-blood pressure. The most frequent cause of hypertension in patients undergoing haemodialysis is volume overload, which is associated with poor cardiovascular outcomes itself independent of blood pressure. Although antihypertensive medications might not be successful to control blood pressure, extracellular volume reduction by persistent ultrafiltration and dietary salt restriction can produce favourable results with good blood pressure control. More frequent or longer haemodialysis can facilitate volume and blood pressure control. However, successful volume and blood pressure control is also possible in patients undergoing conventional haemodialysis

The Evidence of Occult Hypervolemia; Improvement of Cardiac Functions After Kidney Transplantation

WOS: 000318951100019PubMed ID: 23560874The term cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) has been used to define interactions between acute or chronic dysfunction of the heart or kidney. When primary chronic kidney disease contribute to cardiac dysfunction, it is classified as type 4 CRS. Cardiac dilatation, valve regurgitations, and left ventricular dysfunction are observed in end-stage renal failure patients with uremic cardiomyopathy. Because of perioperative risks in these patients, they may not be considered a candidate for kidney transplantation. However, uremic cardiomyopathy can be corrected when volume control is achieved by appropriate dose and duration of ultrafiltration. By presenting two cases with occult hypervolemia in uremic cardiomyopathy whose cardiac functions improved early after kidney transplantation, attention is drawn to the importance of kidney transplantation on cardiac function in such patients primarily and the importance of strict volume control on cardiac function in dialysis patients waiting for kidney transplantation

Interplay of volume, blood pressure, organ ischemia, residual renal function, and diet: certainties and uncertainties with dialytic management

WOS: 000409301100009PubMed ID: 28581677Extracellular fluid volume overload and its inevitable consequence, hypertension, increases cardiovascular mortality in the long term by leading to left ventricular hypertrophy, heart failure, and ischemic heart disease in dialysis patients. Unlike antihypertensive medications, a strict volume control strategy provides optimal blood pressure control without need for antihypertensive drugs. However, utilization of this strategy has remained limited because of several factors, including the absence of a gold standard method to assess volume status, difficulties in reducing extracellular fluid volume, and safety concerns associated with reduction of extracellular volume. These include intradialytic hypotension; ischemia of heart, brain, and gut; loss of residual renal function; and vascular access thrombosis. Comprehensibly, physicians are hesitant to follow strict volume control policy because of these safety concerns. Current data, however, suggest that a high ultrafiltration rate rather than the reduction in excess volume is related to these complications. Restriction of dietary salt intake, increased frequency, and/or duration of hemodialysis sessions or addition of temporary extra sessions during the process of gradually reducing postdialysis body weight in conventional hemodialysis and discontinuation of antihypertensive medications may prevent these complications. We believe that even if an unwanted effect occurs while gradually reaching euvolemia, this is likely to be counterbalanced by favorable cardiovascular outcomes such as regression of left ventricular hypertrophy, prevention of heart failure, and, ultimately, cardiovascular mortality as a result of the eventual achievement of normal extracellular fluid volume and blood pressure over the long term

STUDY OF DIFFERENT EXPRESSION PROFILES OF "TRANSIENT RECEPTOR POTENTIAL ION CHANNEL (TRPC) GENE FAMILY" IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING RENAL BIOPSY WITH CLINICAL SUSPECTED GLOMERULONEPHRITIS

57th ERA-EDTA Congress -- JUN 06-09, 2020 -- ELECTR NETWORKWOS: 000562392100047[No abstract available]ERA, EDT

Relationship Between Severity of Renal Amyloid Deposition and Clinical Outcomes in Non-AA Amyloidosis

Objective: Renal involvement is a common manifestation of systemic amyloidosis. Amyloid load can be predicted by histopathological grading of amyloid deposits in renal biopsy specimens. This study aimed to determine the relationship of renal amyloid deposition grade with clinical manifestations and outcomes in patients with biopsy-proven renal non-AA amyloidosis. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 74 subjects with renal non-AA amyloidosis (52 light chain amyloidosis and 22 unclassified amyloidosis). Baseline characteristics and follow-up data were recorded. Pattern and quantity of amyloid deposition in glomeruli, interstitium, vessels, and tubulointerstitial changes were scored. Renal Amyloid Prognostic Score was obtained by addition of all scores and divided into 3 grades (Renal Amyloid Prognostic Score grades I, II, III). Results: In light chain amyloidosis group, the median follow-up was 11 (4-45) months. The baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate was significantly lower among patients with Renal Amyloid Prognostic Score grade III. Death-censored Renal survival was significantly lower among patients with Renal Amyloid Prognostic Score grade III. Renal Amyloid Prognostic Score grade III was a significant predictor of lower renal survival. Patient survival was not significantly different according to Renal Amyloid Prognostic Score grade. Receiving autologous stem cell transplantation treatment was associated with better patient survival. The type of amyloid could not be determined in 22 patients. In this group, baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate was significantly lower in patients with Renal Amyloid Prognostic Score grade III. Conclusions: In patients with light chain amyloidosis, baseline renal function is associated with Renal Amyloid Prognostic Score grade. Renal survival is significantly lower in patients with the highest Renal Amyloid Prognostic Score grade. However, patient survival is not significantly different according to Renal Amyloid Prognostic Score grade