Probiotics [LGG-BB12 or RC14-GR1] versus placebo as prophylaxis for urinary tract infection in persons with spinal cord injury [ProSCIUTTU]: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

© 2016 Lee et al. Background: Urinary tract infections [UTIs] are very common in people with Spinal Cord Injury [SCI]. UTIs are increasingly difficult and expensive to treat as the organisms that cause them become more antibiotic resistant. Among the SCI population, there is a high rate of multi-resistant organism [MRO] colonisation. Non-antibiotic prevention strategies are needed to prevent UTI without increasing resistance. Probiotics have been reported to be beneficial in preventing UTIs in post-menopausal women in several in vivo and in vitro studies. The main aim of this study is to determine whether probiotic therapy with combinations of Lactobacillus reuteri RC-14 + Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 [RC14-GR1] and/or Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG + Bifidobacterium BB-12 [LGG-BB12] are effective in preventing UTI in people with SCI compared to placebo. Method: This is a multi-site randomised double-blind double-dummy placebo-controlled factorial design study conducted in New South Wales, Australia. All participants have a neurogenic bladder as a result of spinal injury. Recruitment started in April 2011. Participants are randomised to one of four arms, designed for factorial analysis of LGG-BB12 and/or RC14-GR1 v Placebo. This involves 24 weeks of daily oral treatment with RC14-GR1 + LGG-BB12, RC14-GR1 + placebo, LGG-BB12 + placebo or two placebo capsules. Randomisation is stratified by bladder management type and inpatient status. Participants are assessed at baseline, three months and six months for Short Form Health Survey [SF-36], microbiological swabs of rectum, nose and groin; urine culture and urinary catheters for subjects with indwelling catheters. A bowel questionnaire is administered at baseline and three months to assess effect of probiotics on bowel function. The primary outcome is time from randomisation to occurrence of symptomatic UTI. The secondary outcomes are change of MRO status and bowel function, quality of life and cost-effectiveness of probiotics in persons with SCI. The primary outcome will be analysed using survival analysis of factorial groups, with Cox regression modelling to test the effect of each treatment while allowing for the other, assuming no interaction effect. Hazard ratios and Kaplan-Meier survival curves will be used to summarise results. Discussion: If these probiotics are shown to be effective in preventing UTI and MRO colonisation, they would be a very attractive alternative for UTI prophylaxis and for combating the increasing rate of antibiotic resistance after SCI. Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry [ ACTRN 12610000512022 ]. Date of registration: 21 June 2010

The SF-36 walk-wheel: a simple modification of the SF-36 physical domain improves its responsiveness for measuring health status change in spinal cord injury.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity and responsiveness of a modified SF-36 within a spinal cord-injured (SCI) population. STUDY DESIGN: SF-36 scores collected at baseline and on completion of a randomized controlled trial in 305 patients with SCI and neuropathic bladder. SETTING: New South Wales, Australia. METHODS: Subjects were administered the standard SF-36 plus three additional questions, in which 'walk' was replaced with 'wheel' for three of the physical function (PF) questions. Discriminant validity was determined by comparing participants with paraplegia and tetraplegia using the effect size (ES). Responsiveness was assessed in the subset of patients who developed a urinary tract infection (UTI) during the trial using the standardized response mean (SRM). RESULTS: Compared with the standard SF-36, the SF-36 walk-wheel modification (SF-36ww) increased the mean PF score from 18 to 39 (P<0.001) and the physical composite score from 33 to 37 (P<0.001). Discriminant validity was similar for both versions (PF paraplegia/tetraplegia: ES 1.09(SF-36) vs 1.08(SF-36ww), n=305). Among 138 SCI patients who developed a UTI, the SF-36ww almost doubled PF responsiveness for all neurological levels (SRM increased from 0.36 to 0.68), more so in tetraplegic (SRM, 0.11 vs 0.58; n=77) than paraplegic groups (SRM, 0.77 vs 0.86; n=61). CONCLUSION: The SF-36ww is a simple, pragmatic modification of the SF-36 PF items, which addresses some problems of content validity and floor effect for SCI subjects and greatly improves responsiveness, particularly for those with tetraplegia. Because it comprises a simple addition to the standard SF-36, external comparisons are preserved

Health status rated with the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey after spinal cord injury.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the health status of Australians with spinal cord injury (SCI). DESIGN: Survey. SETTING: Australian population-based sample. PARTICIPANTS: Participants (N=305) with SCI at recruitment to a randomized trial. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) health questionnaire. RESULTS: Compared with the general population, our sample reported significantly lower scores in 6 SF-36 domains (physical function, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, social function, vitality) and the physical component summary (PCS) score, but unexpectedly higher mental component summary (MCS) scores (difference in mean MCS scores, 4.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.4-6.8). Compared with people with tetraplegia, those with paraplegia had better physical function and PCS scores (difference, 21; 95% CI, 17-24; difference, 3; 95% CI, 1-5, respectively), and worse bodily pain scores (difference, 9; 95% CI, 2-15). Recent urinary infections were associated with worse general health, vitality, mental health, and MCS scores. Receiving family or external physical care was associated with worse physical function and PCS scores, but better mental health and MCS scores. Older age at injury was associated with lower bodily pain and PCS scores. CONCLUSIONS: Using the SF-36, Australians with SCI rate their physical (not mental) health status as worse than the general population

Validity, responsiveness, and minimal important difference for the SF-6D health utility scale in a spinal cord injured population.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility, acceptability, discriminative validity, responsiveness, and minimal important difference (MID) of the SF-6D for people with spinal cord injury (SCI). METHODS: A total of 305 people with SCI completed the SF-36 health status questionnaire at baseline and at subsequent occurrence of a urinary tract infection (UTI) or 6-month follow-up. Normative SF-36 data were obtained from the Australian Bureau of Statistics. SF-36 scores were transformed to SF-6D utility values using Brazier's algorithm. We used UTI as the external criterion of clinically important change to determine responsiveness and two categories of the SF-36 transition question ("somewhat worse" and "somewhat better") as the external criterion to determine the MID. Derived SF-12 responsiveness was also assessed. RESULTS: The mean SF-6D values were: 0.68 (SD 0.21, n = 305) all patients; 0.66 (SD 0.19, n = 167) tetraplegia; 0.72 (SD 0.26, n = 138) paraplegia; 0.57 (SD 0.15, n = 138) with UTI. The Australian normative SF-6D mean value was 0.80 (SD 0.14, n = 18,005). The SF-6D was able to discriminate between SCI and the Australian normative sample (effect size [ES] = 0.86), tetraplegia-paraplegia (ES = 0.23), and it was responsive to UTI (ES = 0.86 SF-36 variant, ES = 0.92 SF-12 variant). The MID for respondents who reported being somewhat worse or somewhat better at follow-up was 0.03 (SD 0.17, n = 108/305), while the MID for only those who were somewhat worse was 0.10 (SD 0.14, n = 58). CONCLUSIONS: The content of the SF-6D is more appropriate than that of the SF-36 for this physically impaired population. The SF-6D has discriminative power and is responsive to clinically important change because of UTI. The MID is consistent with published estimates for other disease groups

The effects of early or direct admission to a specialised spinal injury unit on outcomes after acute traumatic spinal cord injury

Objectives: For acute traumatic spinal cord injury (ATSCI), this study aimed to determine differences in outcomes between patient groups stratified by admission time (?24 vs 424 h) to the Spinal Injury Unit (SIU) and by the nature of the admission (direct admission to the SIU vs indirect admission via another hospital). We also aimed to measure the effect on time to admission of a 'nonrefusal' policy that triggered immediate acceptance of ATSCI cases to the SIU. Setting: New South Wales, Australia. Methods: Study population was all adult SCI patients admitted to the Prince of Wales SIU from 1 January 2001 to 31 December 2012. Patients admitted with chronic-stage SCI or with incomplete data for the duration of their stay were excluded. Comparison of outcomes was made between groups according to the setting of admission. Time to admission before and after initiation (2009) of the 'non-refusal' policy was compared. The prevalence of complications, lengths of stay (LOSs) and time to admission were compared by Mann'Whitney non-parametric methods. Count modelling was used to control for confounders of age and gender. Results: A total of 460 cases were identified and 76 were excluded. The early group had fewer pressure areas (41.8% vs 63.2%; P<0.001) and shorter LOS (136 vs 172 days; P<0.001) than the late group. The direct group had fewer pressure areas (35.2% vs 54.9%, P<0.001), deep vein thrombosis (9.9% vs 24.6%, P=0.003) and shorter LOS (124 vs 158 days, P=0.007) than those admitted indirectly. Time to admission was reduced after introduction of the 'non-refusal' policy (1.53 vs 0.63 days; P=0.001). Conclusions: Early and direct admission to SIU reduced complication rates and LOS. A non-refusal policy reduced time to admission

Effect of probiotics on multi-resistant organism colonisation in persons with spinal cord injury: secondary outcome of ProSCIUTTU, a randomised placebo-controlled trial.

STUDY DESIGN:Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial. OBJECTIVES:Multi-resistant organism (MRO) colonisation is common in people with SCI. We aimed to determine whether Lactobacillus reuteri RC-14 + Lactobacillus GR-1 (RC14-GR1) and/or Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG + Bifidobacterium BB-12 (LGG-BB12) are effective in preventing or clearing MRO colonisation. SETTING:New South Wales, Australia. METHODS:The 207 SCI participants were randomised to one of four arms: (i) RC14-GR1 + LGG-BB12, (ii) RC14-GR1 + placebo, (iii) LGG-BB12 + placebo or (iv) double placebos for 6 months. Microbiological samples of nose, groin, urine and bowel were taken at baseline, 3 and 6 months. Analysis was conducted for the presence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), multi-resistant gram-negative organisms (MRGNs) and vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE). The outcomes were clearance of, or new colonisation with MRSA, MRGN, VRE or MROs and whether participants remained free of MRSA, MRGN, VRE or MROs throughout the study. Risk factors associated with an outcome were adjusted for using nominal or binary logistic regression. RESULTS:There was a significant reduction in new MRGN colonisation compared with placebo for participants treated with RC14-GR1 (OR 0.10, 95% CI, 0.01-0.88, P = 0.04), after allowing that inpatients were more likely to be newly colonised (OR 21.41, 95% CI, 3.98-115.13, P < 0.0001). Participants who intermittent self-catheterised (IMC) were more likely to remain MRO-free than those utilising SPC or IDCs (OR 2.80, 95% CI, 1.41-5.54, P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS:Probiotics are ineffective at clearing MROs in people with SCI. However, RC14-GR1 is effective at preventing new colonisation with MRGNs. The use of IMC significantly improves the chance of remaining MRO-free

Assays for insulin and insulin-like activity based on adipocytes.

Data from the metabolic assays (and signaling assays; see below) are calculated as stimulation factor above basal activity (absence of insulin/compound/drug candidate) for processes stimulated (e.g., lipogenesis, glucose transport, and GLUT4 translocation) or as difference between the basal and insulin/compound/drug candidate-induced values for processes downregulated (e.g., lipolysis). In each case, these data, which reflect the responsiveness of the metabolic effector system studied toward the respective stimulus (insulin/compound/drug candidate), are normalized to the basal (set at 0 %) and maximal insulin action (set at 100 %; elicited by maximally effective concentration of insulin). For characterization of the sensitivity of the metabolic effector system toward the respective stimulus, effective concentrations for the induction of 150 % (or higher) of the basal activity (set at 100 %) can be given. These so-called EC150-values facilitate the insulin-independent comparison of the relative potency of the insulin-like activity between compounds/drug candidates, in general, and in particular for those frequently observed stimuli, which do not elicit the same maximal response in % stimulation or inhibition and/or fail to approach the maximal insulin response