12 research outputs found
ΠΠ΅ΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΈ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΈ Ρ ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡ Π½Π°ΡΠ΅ΡΠ° Π²ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΊΠ΅ ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠ΅: ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π²ΠΈΠ΄ΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈ
ΠΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π²ΠΈΠ΄ΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ°ΡΠ° Π°ΡΡ
Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ° Π·Π°ΡΠ½ΠΈΠ²Π° ΡΠ΅ Π½Π°
ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ, ΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π²ΠΈΡΠ°ΡΡ Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ Π½Π΅ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π½Π°ΡΠΎΠ³
Π°ΡΡ
Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ Π½Π°Π»Π°Π·ΠΈΡΡΠ° Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Ρ ΠΎΠ΄Π°Π±ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠ° ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΡ
Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ° Ρ
ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π°Π½ΠΎΡ ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ. ΠΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΌΠ΅Ρ ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠΊΠΎ-ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΠ° Ρ Π½Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΠΌ
ΡΠΌΠΈΡΠ»Ρ ΡΠ΅ΡΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈ Π½Π°ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°Π²Π°ΡΠ° Ρ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΌ Π³Π΅ΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΡΠ°ΠΌΠ° Π½Π°
ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΈ ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ° Π²ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΊΠ΅ ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠ΅ Ρ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ° Π‘Π»ΡΠΆΠ΅ΡΠΈ
ΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π²ΠΈΠ΄ΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈ, ΠΊΠΎΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ Π·Π°ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎ ΠΈΠ·ΡΠ°ΠΆΠ°Π²Π°ΡΠ΅ Π²Π΅ΡΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠ΅
Π΄Π΅ΡΠ°Π²Π°ΡΠ°/ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ°ΡΠ° Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ° ΠΏΠΎΠΊΡΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΊΠΎ ΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈ
ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ° ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΎΠ΄Π°Π±ΠΈΡΡ Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ Π·Π° ΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅ Ρ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΡΡ Π½Π°
ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π°Π·Π½Π΅ ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅, ΠΎΠ΄ ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΊΠΎ Π΄ΡΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ
, ΠΏΠ° ΡΠ°ΠΊ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΄Π° ΠΈ
ΠΈΠ½Π΄ΠΈΠ²ΠΈΠ΄ΡΠ°Π»Π½ΠΈΡ
. Π‘Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ° Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ
Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ° Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈ ΠΎΠ΄ ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΊΠΎ-Π³Π΅ΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ° ΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·ΡΡΠ΅ Π΄Π° Π»ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΠΊΠ΅ Ρ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΌΠ° ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΠ½Π΅
ΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π΅ ΠΈ Π΄Π° Π»ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Π΄Π½ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ Π΄ΡΡΡΡΠ²ΠΎ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊΠ²ΠΎ ΡΠ΅ Π±ΠΈΠ»ΠΎ Π΄ΡΡΡΡΠ²ΠΎ Π²ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΊΠ΅
ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ΅Π΄Π½Π°ΠΊΠΎ ΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΡΠΈΡ
ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠ° ΠΏΡΠΈΠ»ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΎΠ΄Π°Π±ΠΈΡΠ° Π½Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠ³ ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π° Π·Π°
Π½Π°ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°Π²Π°ΡΠ΅.
Π‘Π° Π΄ΡΡΠ³Π΅ ΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π΅ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΌΠ΅Ρ Π΅ΠΌΠΏΠΈΡΠΈΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΠ° Π±ΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΡΠΈ Π½Π°ΡΠ΅ΡΠ° ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³
Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ° ΡΠ° ΡΠ²ΠΎΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΌ, Π°Π»ΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠ° ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΡΠΈΠΌ Π΄ΡΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΌ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΌΠ°
ΠΊΠΎΡΠΈ ΡΡ ΠΌΠΎΠ³Π»ΠΈ ΡΡΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠΈ Π½Π° ΠΎΠ΄Π°Π±ΠΈΡ Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ° ΠΏΡΠΈ Π½Π°ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°Π²Π°ΡΠ°. ΠΠ·ΡΠ°Π΄ΠΎΠΌ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Π°
ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π²ΠΈΠ΄ΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΡΡΠ°Π²Π°ΠΌΠΎ Π΄Π° ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΎ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ½Ρ, ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠΈΠ²Ρ
ΠΈΠΌΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡ Π°ΡΡ
Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠΊΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅, ΡΡ. ΡΡΠΈΡΠ°Ρ ΡΡΠ΄ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ ΠΏΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΠ°ΡΠ° (Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈ
ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅) Π½Π° Π°ΠΊΡΠΌΡΠ»Π°ΡΠΈΡΡ ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠ°Π»Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΠ° Π½Π° ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»Π½ΠΎΡ ΡΠ°Π·ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΈ.
ΠΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠΊΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½ Π°ΡΡ
Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΠ° ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ ΡΠ°Π΄Π° ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅ Π²ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΊΠ°
ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠ°, Π° ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½ ΠΎΠ²Π΅ ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ° ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ°Π»Π½Π΅ Π‘ΡΠ±ΠΈΡΠ΅, ΠΠΎΡΠΎΠ²Π°,
ΠΠΎΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ½Π΅, ΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠΌΡΠ½ΡΠΊΠΈ Π΄Π΅ΠΎ ΠΠ°Π½Π°ΡΠ°, ΠΠ»ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΈ Π’ΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΠ»Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅, ΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠ½Π° ΠΠΎΡΠ½Π°,
ΡΠ΅Π²Π΅ΡΠ½Π° Π¦ΡΠ½Π° ΠΠΎΡΠ° ΠΈ ΠΠ°ΠΊΠ΅Π΄ΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΠ°. Π£ Π΄ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠΈ ΡΡ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠ°Π½Π΅ ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ ΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³
ΠΠ°Π½Π°ΡΠ° ΠΎΠΊΠΎ ΠΡΡΡΠ° ΠΈ ΠΠ΅Π»Π΅ Π¦ΡΠΊΠ²Π΅ ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΡΡΠ΅ ΠΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠΊΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΡΠ»ΠΈΠ½Π΅ ΡΠ° Π³ΡΠ°Π΄ΠΎΠΌ
ΠΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌ Ρ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΡΡ. Π₯ΡΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎ Π΄ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ° ΡΠ΅ Π±Π°Π²ΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠΊΡΠΏΠ½ΠΈΠΌ
ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌ Π²ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΊΠ΅ ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠ΄ ΠΎΠΊΠΎ 5300-ΡΠ΅ Π΄ΠΎ 4600-ΡΠ΅ Π³ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ½Π΅ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ°
ΠΊΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ±ΡΠΈΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΠΌ 14C Π΄Π°ΡΡΠΌΠΈΠΌΠ°.Predictive modeling of the existence of archaeological sites is based on mathematical or more
precisely statistical prediction of the location of an unknown archaeological site based on the
previously selected parameters of the already known and established sites in the area of interest.
The subject of the theoretical and methodological research in the widest sense are the settlement
patterns of different geographic regions inhabited by the members of the VinΔa culture during
the late Neolithic period. Using predictive modeling, which in itself is the expression of
probability of occurrence/existence of sites I will try to establish conscientious patterns in
choosing site locations for settlement locations in regard to the various factors, from
environmental to social, and perhaps even individual. The selection of the locations to be
analyzed depends on their physical and geographical characteristics in an attempt to show the
difference in environmental factors amongst regions in order to establish whether a prehistoric
society such as VinΔa culture was equally aware of various impacts possible in choosing certain
regions for settling.
The subject of the empirical research is the relationship of the late Neolithic settlements with the
surrounding environment, but also the possible social factor influencing the process of choosing
the settlement location. The creation of a predictive model attempts to model a specific,
verifiable implication of an archaeological theory, i.e. the impact of human behavior (activity
and practice) on the accumulation of material data over a regional scale.
The culture β historical domain of the archaeological research in this dissertation is VinΔa
culture, whilst the spatial domain lies within the boundaries of central Serbia, Kosovo,
Vojvodina, the Romanian regions of Banat, Oltenia and Transilvania, eastern Bosnia, northern
Montenegro and Macedonia. However, within the dissertation, only two regions, the area of east
Banat centered between the towns of VrΕ‘ac and Bela Crkva and the area of Leskovac valley
with the city of Leskovac in the center are being analyzed. Chronologically, this dissertation
analyzes the period of VinΔa culture, dated between 5300 and 4600 cal. BC
ΠΠ΅ΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΈ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΈ Ρ ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡ Π½Π°ΡΠ΅ΡΠ° Π²ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΊΠ΅ ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠ΅: ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π²ΠΈΠ΄ΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈ
ΠΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π²ΠΈΠ΄ΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ°ΡΠ° Π°ΡΡ
Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ° Π·Π°ΡΠ½ΠΈΠ²Π° ΡΠ΅ Π½Π°ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ, ΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π²ΠΈΡΠ°ΡΡ Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ Π½Π΅ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π½Π°ΡΠΎΠ³Π°ΡΡ
Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ Π½Π°Π»Π°Π·ΠΈΡΡΠ° Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Ρ ΠΎΠ΄Π°Π±ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠ° ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΡ
Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ° ΡΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π°Π½ΠΎΡ ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ. ΠΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΌΠ΅Ρ ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠΊΠΎ-ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΠ° Ρ Π½Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΠΌΡΠΌΠΈΡΠ»Ρ ΡΠ΅ΡΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈ Π½Π°ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°Π²Π°ΡΠ° Ρ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΌ Π³Π΅ΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΡΠ°ΠΌΠ° Π½Π°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΈ ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ° Π²ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΊΠ΅ ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠ΅ Ρ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ° Π‘Π»ΡΠΆΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π²ΠΈΠ΄ΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈ, ΠΊΠΎΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ Π·Π°ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎ ΠΈΠ·ΡΠ°ΠΆΠ°Π²Π°ΡΠ΅ Π²Π΅ΡΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅ΡΠ°Π²Π°ΡΠ°/ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ°ΡΠ° Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ° ΠΏΠΎΠΊΡΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΊΠΎ ΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ° ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΎΠ΄Π°Π±ΠΈΡΡ Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ Π·Π° ΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅ Ρ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΡΡ Π½Π°ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π°Π·Π½Π΅ ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅, ΠΎΠ΄ ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΊΠΎ Π΄ΡΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ
, ΠΏΠ° ΡΠ°ΠΊ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΄Π° ΠΈΠΈΠ½Π΄ΠΈΠ²ΠΈΠ΄ΡΠ°Π»Π½ΠΈΡ
. Π‘Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ° Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ
Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ° Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈ ΠΎΠ΄ ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΊΠΎ-Π³Π΅ΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ° ΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·ΡΡΠ΅ Π΄Π° Π»ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΠΊΠ΅ Ρ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΌΠ° ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΠ½Π΅ΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π΅ ΠΈ Π΄Π° Π»ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Π΄Π½ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ Π΄ΡΡΡΡΠ²ΠΎ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊΠ²ΠΎ ΡΠ΅ Π±ΠΈΠ»ΠΎ Π΄ΡΡΡΡΠ²ΠΎ Π²ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΊΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ΅Π΄Π½Π°ΠΊΠΎ ΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΡΠΈΡ
ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠ° ΠΏΡΠΈΠ»ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΎΠ΄Π°Π±ΠΈΡΠ° Π½Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠ³ ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π° Π·Π°Π½Π°ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°Π²Π°ΡΠ΅.Π‘Π° Π΄ΡΡΠ³Π΅ ΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π΅ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΌΠ΅Ρ Π΅ΠΌΠΏΠΈΡΠΈΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΠ° Π±ΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΡΠΈ Π½Π°ΡΠ΅ΡΠ° ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ° ΡΠ° ΡΠ²ΠΎΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΌ, Π°Π»ΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠ° ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΡΠΈΠΌ Π΄ΡΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΌ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΌΠ°ΠΊΠΎΡΠΈ ΡΡ ΠΌΠΎΠ³Π»ΠΈ ΡΡΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠΈ Π½Π° ΠΎΠ΄Π°Π±ΠΈΡ Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ° ΠΏΡΠΈ Π½Π°ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°Π²Π°ΡΠ°. ΠΠ·ΡΠ°Π΄ΠΎΠΌ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Π°ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π²ΠΈΠ΄ΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΡΡΠ°Π²Π°ΠΌΠΎ Π΄Π° ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΎ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ½Ρ, ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠΈΠ²ΡΠΈΠΌΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡ Π°ΡΡ
Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠΊΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅, ΡΡ. ΡΡΠΈΡΠ°Ρ ΡΡΠ΄ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ ΠΏΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΠ°ΡΠ° (Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅) Π½Π° Π°ΠΊΡΠΌΡΠ»Π°ΡΠΈΡΡ ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠ°Π»Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΠ° Π½Π° ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»Π½ΠΎΡ ΡΠ°Π·ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΈ.ΠΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠΊΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½ Π°ΡΡ
Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΠ° ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ ΡΠ°Π΄Π° ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅ Π²ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΊΠ°ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠ°, Π° ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½ ΠΎΠ²Π΅ ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ° ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ°Π»Π½Π΅ Π‘ΡΠ±ΠΈΡΠ΅, ΠΠΎΡΠΎΠ²Π°,ΠΠΎΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ½Π΅, ΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠΌΡΠ½ΡΠΊΠΈ Π΄Π΅ΠΎ ΠΠ°Π½Π°ΡΠ°, ΠΠ»ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΈ Π’ΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΠ»Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅, ΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠ½Π° ΠΠΎΡΠ½Π°,ΡΠ΅Π²Π΅ΡΠ½Π° Π¦ΡΠ½Π° ΠΠΎΡΠ° ΠΈ ΠΠ°ΠΊΠ΅Π΄ΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΠ°. Π£ Π΄ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠΈ ΡΡ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠ°Π½Π΅ ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ ΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΠ°Π½Π°ΡΠ° ΠΎΠΊΠΎ ΠΡΡΡΠ° ΠΈ ΠΠ΅Π»Π΅ Π¦ΡΠΊΠ²Π΅ ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΡΡΠ΅ ΠΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠΊΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΡΠ»ΠΈΠ½Π΅ ΡΠ° Π³ΡΠ°Π΄ΠΎΠΌΠΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌ Ρ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΡΡ. Π₯ΡΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎ Π΄ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ° ΡΠ΅ Π±Π°Π²ΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠΊΡΠΏΠ½ΠΈΠΌΡΠ°ΡΠΏΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌ Π²ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΊΠ΅ ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠ΄ ΠΎΠΊΠΎ 5300-ΡΠ΅ Π΄ΠΎ 4600-ΡΠ΅ Π³ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ½Π΅ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ°ΠΊΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ±ΡΠΈΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΠΌ 14C Π΄Π°ΡΡΠΌΠΈΠΌΠ°.Predictive modeling of the existence of archaeological sites is based on mathematical or moreprecisely statistical prediction of the location of an unknown archaeological site based on thepreviously selected parameters of the already known and established sites in the area of interest.The subject of the theoretical and methodological research in the widest sense are the settlementpatterns of different geographic regions inhabited by the members of the VinΔa culture duringthe late Neolithic period. Using predictive modeling, which in itself is the expression ofprobability of occurrence/existence of sites I will try to establish conscientious patterns inchoosing site locations for settlement locations in regard to the various factors, fromenvironmental to social, and perhaps even individual. The selection of the locations to beanalyzed depends on their physical and geographical characteristics in an attempt to show thedifference in environmental factors amongst regions in order to establish whether a prehistoricsociety such as VinΔa culture was equally aware of various impacts possible in choosing certainregions for settling.The subject of the empirical research is the relationship of the late Neolithic settlements with thesurrounding environment, but also the possible social factor influencing the process of choosingthe settlement location. The creation of a predictive model attempts to model a specific,verifiable implication of an archaeological theory, i.e. the impact of human behavior (activityand practice) on the accumulation of material data over a regional scale.The culture β historical domain of the archaeological research in this dissertation is VinΔaculture, whilst the spatial domain lies within the boundaries of central Serbia, Kosovo,Vojvodina, the Romanian regions of Banat, Oltenia and Transilvania, eastern Bosnia, northernMontenegro and Macedonia. However, within the dissertation, only two regions, the area of eastBanat centered between the towns of VrΕ‘ac and Bela Crkva and the area of Leskovac valleywith the city of Leskovac in the center are being analyzed. Chronologically, this dissertationanalyzes the period of VinΔa culture, dated between 5300 and 4600 cal. BC
Bioremediation of groundwater contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons applied at a site in Belgrade (Serbia)
Due to their extensive use, petroleum hydrocarbons are among the most common groundwater contaminants. Compared to the traditional methods of physical pumping of contamination from the aquifer and subsequent treatment (i.e., pump and treat), bioremediation is an economically cost-effective technology. The aim of this remediation approach is to transform biologically contaminants, most often by microbiological activity, into non-toxic compounds. More precisely, it is an active remediation process that involves biostimulation (increase of aquifer oxygenation, addition of nutrients) and/or bioaugmentation (injection of a concentrated and specialized population of microorganisms). Using both biostimulation and bioaugmentation, enhanced in situ groundwater bioremediation was applied at a hydrocarbon-contaminated site in Belgrade. The bioremediation treatment, applied over twelve months, was highly efficient in reducing the concentrations of total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) to acceptable levels. The concentration of TPH in the piezometer P-5 was reduced by 98.55 %, in the piezometer P-6 by 98.30 % and in the piezometer P-7 by 98.09 %. These results provided strong evidence on the potential of this remediation approach to overcome site-limiting factors and enhance microbiological activity in order to reduce groundwater contamination. [Project of the Serbian Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development, Grant no. III 43004
Prirodno preΔiΕ‘Δavanje podzemnih voda zagaΔenih naftnim ugljovodonicima - mehanizam, koncepcija istraΕΎivanja, primena u praksi
Natural attenuation includes a number of processes that cause the reduction of groundwater contamination by petroleum hydrocarbons. Among these processes biodegradation often plays a major role, since microorganisms use petroleum hydrocarbons as the source of energy and carbon. Application of natural attenuation as a remediation approach requires detailed hydrogeological characterization of the contaminated site and monitoring of attenuation processes. This paper presents the results of monitored natural attenuation at the site of historical contamination by kerosene near Kraljevo. In order to demonstrate effects of biodegradation, following parameters in groundwater were measured: total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), electron acceptors (O2, NO3, SO4 2-), metabolic products of biodegradation (Mn, Fe), and redox potential (Eh). Obtained results and methodological approach can be considered useful in conceptualizing future studies of this type.Prirodno preΔiΕ‘Δavanje objedinjuje niz procesa koji dovode do smanjenja zagaΔenja podzemnih voda naftnim ugljovodonicima. Biodegradacija Δesto ima glavnu ulogu meΔu ovim procesima, poΕ‘to mikroorgranizmi koriste naftne ugljovodonike kao izvor energije i ugljenika. Primena prirodnog preΔiΕ‘Δavanja kao remedijacionog tretmana podrazumeva detaljnu hidrogeoloΕ‘ku karakterizaciju zagaΔene lokacije i osmatranje procesa kojim dolazi do smanjenja zagaΔenja. U radu su prikazani rezultati osmatranja prirodnog preΔiΕ‘Δavanja na lokaciji istorijskog zagaΔenja kerozinom kod Kraljeva. U cilju osmatranja efekata biodegradacije, u podzemnim vodama su vrΕ‘ena merenja sledeΔih parametara: ukupnih naftnih ugljovodonika (TPH), elektron akceptora (O2, NO3 -, SO4 2-), metaboliΔkih produkata biodegradacije (Mn, Fe) i redoks potencijala (Eh). Dobijeni rezultati i metodoloΕ‘ki pristup mogu se smatrati korisnim kod koncipiranja buduΔih istraΕΎivanja ovog tipa
Π medieval burial from the site of Π‘upska: an anthropological and contextual analysis of the skeletal remains from grave 1
In 1956, the Institute of Archaeology and the National Museum in Belgrade
carried out excavations at the site of Supska, near Δuprija, in Central Serbia. Based on
the material culture findings, the site is mostly known as a Late Neolithic one; however, archaeological findings from other periods were discovered too. In the 1956 excavations, the cultural layers, and archaeological features with the VinΔa culture archaeological materials were examined, as well as one grave, marked as Grave 1. The results of this excavation have been previously published in one monograph; however, an anthropological analysis of the individual found in Grave 1 has not been conducted before. In this paper, we present the results of contextual, bioanthropological, stable isotopes and C14 analyses of human skeletal remains found in Grave 1. The results showed that a young adult, who had experienced nonspecific metabolic stress during childhood, as evidenced by traces of linear enamel hypoplasia and porotic hyperostosis, was buried in this grave. AMS date revealed that this individual lived between 1280β1390 cal. AD, while the results of the stable isotope analyses suggested that it had mixed diet
based on C4 plants (such as millet) and/or C3 plants, with larger amounts of animal
protein, possible deriving from freshwater fish
The Tisza divide: the missing late Neolithic transformation in the north BaΔka region of Serbia
In the paper we will introduce the results of several recent archaeological surveys in the area of Novi KneΕΎevac, Δoka and Kikinda municipalities on the north Banat side of Tisza and KanjiΕΎa and Senta municipalities on the BaΔka side of the River. The north BaΔka region of Serbia is physically divided by the waters of the Tisza River from the north Banat region, but both were greatly influenced by its everchanging course throughout (pre)history. The surveys have yielded new information about the middle and late Neolithic in the north of Serbia, but have also brought to light numerous interesting facts.
The earliest evidence of human habitation in the area date to KΓΆrΓΆs-StarΔevo period of the middle Neolithic with multiple sites of various sizes discovered on both sides of the River. Surface collection indicates that these sites are mostly short time, single period settlements, without prominent vertical stratigraphies or tell like formations. While the north Banat area on the left bank of Tisza was continuously occupied and transformed unhindered from middle to late Neolithic traditions with several multi-layered telloid sites attested in the period, having KΓΆrΓΆs-StarΔevo, Sakalhat and early VinΔa presence, on the opposite bank, in the north BaΔka area, the late Neolithic period remains elusive. In the paper, we will analyse and compare several aspects of the living environment, the landscape and subsistence strategies to compare two neighbouring regions and attempt to isolate and identify factors that may have influenced the absence of the late Neolithic in the area of Serbian north BaΔka
ΠΠ΅ΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΈ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΈ Ρ ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡ Π½Π°ΡΠ΅ΡΠ° Π²ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΊΠ΅ ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠ΅: ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π²ΠΈΠ΄ΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈ
ΠΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π²ΠΈΠ΄ΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ°ΡΠ° Π°ΡΡ
Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ° Π·Π°ΡΠ½ΠΈΠ²Π° ΡΠ΅ Π½Π°
ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ, ΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π²ΠΈΡΠ°ΡΡ Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ Π½Π΅ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π½Π°ΡΠΎΠ³
Π°ΡΡ
Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ Π½Π°Π»Π°Π·ΠΈΡΡΠ° Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Ρ ΠΎΠ΄Π°Π±ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠ° ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΡ
Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ° Ρ
ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π°Π½ΠΎΡ ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ. ΠΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΌΠ΅Ρ ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠΊΠΎ-ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΠ° Ρ Π½Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΠΌ
ΡΠΌΠΈΡΠ»Ρ ΡΠ΅ΡΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈ Π½Π°ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°Π²Π°ΡΠ° Ρ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΌ Π³Π΅ΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΡΠ°ΠΌΠ° Π½Π°
ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΈ ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ° Π²ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΊΠ΅ ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠ΅ Ρ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ° Π‘Π»ΡΠΆΠ΅ΡΠΈ
ΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π²ΠΈΠ΄ΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈ, ΠΊΠΎΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ Π·Π°ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎ ΠΈΠ·ΡΠ°ΠΆΠ°Π²Π°ΡΠ΅ Π²Π΅ΡΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠ΅
Π΄Π΅ΡΠ°Π²Π°ΡΠ°/ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ°ΡΠ° Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ° ΠΏΠΎΠΊΡΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΊΠΎ ΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈ
ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ° ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΎΠ΄Π°Π±ΠΈΡΡ Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ Π·Π° ΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅ Ρ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΡΡ Π½Π°
ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π°Π·Π½Π΅ ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅, ΠΎΠ΄ ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΊΠΎ Π΄ΡΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ
, ΠΏΠ° ΡΠ°ΠΊ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΄Π° ΠΈ
ΠΈΠ½Π΄ΠΈΠ²ΠΈΠ΄ΡΠ°Π»Π½ΠΈΡ
. Π‘Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ° Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ
Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ° Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈ ΠΎΠ΄ ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΊΠΎ-Π³Π΅ΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ° ΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·ΡΡΠ΅ Π΄Π° Π»ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΠΊΠ΅ Ρ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΌΠ° ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΠ½Π΅
ΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π΅ ΠΈ Π΄Π° Π»ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Π΄Π½ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ Π΄ΡΡΡΡΠ²ΠΎ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊΠ²ΠΎ ΡΠ΅ Π±ΠΈΠ»ΠΎ Π΄ΡΡΡΡΠ²ΠΎ Π²ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΊΠ΅
ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ΅Π΄Π½Π°ΠΊΠΎ ΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΡΠΈΡ
ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠ° ΠΏΡΠΈΠ»ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΎΠ΄Π°Π±ΠΈΡΠ° Π½Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠ³ ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π° Π·Π°
Π½Π°ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°Π²Π°ΡΠ΅.
Π‘Π° Π΄ΡΡΠ³Π΅ ΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π΅ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΌΠ΅Ρ Π΅ΠΌΠΏΠΈΡΠΈΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΠ° Π±ΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΡΠΈ Π½Π°ΡΠ΅ΡΠ° ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³
Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ° ΡΠ° ΡΠ²ΠΎΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΌ, Π°Π»ΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠ° ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΡΠΈΠΌ Π΄ΡΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΌ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΌΠ°
ΠΊΠΎΡΠΈ ΡΡ ΠΌΠΎΠ³Π»ΠΈ ΡΡΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠΈ Π½Π° ΠΎΠ΄Π°Π±ΠΈΡ Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ° ΠΏΡΠΈ Π½Π°ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°Π²Π°ΡΠ°. ΠΠ·ΡΠ°Π΄ΠΎΠΌ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Π°
ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π²ΠΈΠ΄ΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΡΡΠ°Π²Π°ΠΌΠΎ Π΄Π° ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΎ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ½Ρ, ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠΈΠ²Ρ
ΠΈΠΌΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡ Π°ΡΡ
Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠΊΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅, ΡΡ. ΡΡΠΈΡΠ°Ρ ΡΡΠ΄ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ ΠΏΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΠ°ΡΠ° (Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈ
ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅) Π½Π° Π°ΠΊΡΠΌΡΠ»Π°ΡΠΈΡΡ ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠ°Π»Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΠ° Π½Π° ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»Π½ΠΎΡ ΡΠ°Π·ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΈ.
ΠΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠΊΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½ Π°ΡΡ
Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΠ° ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ ΡΠ°Π΄Π° ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅ Π²ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΊΠ°
ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠ°, Π° ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½ ΠΎΠ²Π΅ ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ° ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ°Π»Π½Π΅ Π‘ΡΠ±ΠΈΡΠ΅, ΠΠΎΡΠΎΠ²Π°,
ΠΠΎΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ½Π΅, ΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠΌΡΠ½ΡΠΊΠΈ Π΄Π΅ΠΎ ΠΠ°Π½Π°ΡΠ°, ΠΠ»ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΈ Π’ΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΠ»Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅, ΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠ½Π° ΠΠΎΡΠ½Π°,
ΡΠ΅Π²Π΅ΡΠ½Π° Π¦ΡΠ½Π° ΠΠΎΡΠ° ΠΈ ΠΠ°ΠΊΠ΅Π΄ΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΠ°. Π£ Π΄ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠΈ ΡΡ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠ°Π½Π΅ ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ ΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³
ΠΠ°Π½Π°ΡΠ° ΠΎΠΊΠΎ ΠΡΡΡΠ° ΠΈ ΠΠ΅Π»Π΅ Π¦ΡΠΊΠ²Π΅ ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΡΡΠ΅ ΠΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠΊΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΡΠ»ΠΈΠ½Π΅ ΡΠ° Π³ΡΠ°Π΄ΠΎΠΌ
ΠΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌ Ρ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΡΡ. Π₯ΡΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎ Π΄ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ° ΡΠ΅ Π±Π°Π²ΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠΊΡΠΏΠ½ΠΈΠΌ
ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌ Π²ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΊΠ΅ ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠ΄ ΠΎΠΊΠΎ 5300-ΡΠ΅ Π΄ΠΎ 4600-ΡΠ΅ Π³ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ½Π΅ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ°
ΠΊΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ±ΡΠΈΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΠΌ 14C Π΄Π°ΡΡΠΌΠΈΠΌΠ°.Predictive modeling of the existence of archaeological sites is based on mathematical or more
precisely statistical prediction of the location of an unknown archaeological site based on the
previously selected parameters of the already known and established sites in the area of interest.
The subject of the theoretical and methodological research in the widest sense are the settlement
patterns of different geographic regions inhabited by the members of the VinΔa culture during
the late Neolithic period. Using predictive modeling, which in itself is the expression of
probability of occurrence/existence of sites I will try to establish conscientious patterns in
choosing site locations for settlement locations in regard to the various factors, from
environmental to social, and perhaps even individual. The selection of the locations to be
analyzed depends on their physical and geographical characteristics in an attempt to show the
difference in environmental factors amongst regions in order to establish whether a prehistoric
society such as VinΔa culture was equally aware of various impacts possible in choosing certain
regions for settling.
The subject of the empirical research is the relationship of the late Neolithic settlements with the
surrounding environment, but also the possible social factor influencing the process of choosing
the settlement location. The creation of a predictive model attempts to model a specific,
verifiable implication of an archaeological theory, i.e. the impact of human behavior (activity
and practice) on the accumulation of material data over a regional scale.
The culture β historical domain of the archaeological research in this dissertation is VinΔa
culture, whilst the spatial domain lies within the boundaries of central Serbia, Kosovo,
Vojvodina, the Romanian regions of Banat, Oltenia and Transilvania, eastern Bosnia, northern
Montenegro and Macedonia. However, within the dissertation, only two regions, the area of east
Banat centered between the towns of VrΕ‘ac and Bela Crkva and the area of Leskovac valley
with the city of Leskovac in the center are being analyzed. Chronologically, this dissertation
analyzes the period of VinΔa culture, dated between 5300 and 4600 cal. BC