Tackling climate change through wastewater reuse in agriculture: A prioritization methodology

Water shortages, exacerbated by climate change, are posing a major global challenge, particularly impacting the agricultural sector. A growing interest is raised towards reclaimed wastewater (RWW) as an alternative irrigation source, capable of exploiting also the nutrient content through the fertigation practice. However, a prioritization methodology for selecting the most appropriate wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) for implementing direct RWW reuse is currently missing. Such prioritization would benefit water utilities, often managing several WWTPs, and policymakers in optimizing economic asset allocation. In this work, a prioritization framework is proposed to evaluate WWTPs' suitability for implementing direct RWW reuse considering both WWTP and surrounding territory characteristics. This procedure consists of four key steps. Firstly, a techno-economic model was developed, in which monthly mass balances on water and nutrients are solved by matching crop requirements, rainfall conditions, and effluent characteristics. Economic suitability was quantified considering economic benefits due to savings in freshwater resource, mineral fertilizers and avoided greenhouse gases emissions, but also losses in crop yield due to RWW salinity content. Secondly, a classification procedure was coded to select representative WWTPs among a set of WWTPs, based on their size, presence of nutrient removal processes, and type of crops in their surroundings. The techno-economic model was then applied to these selected WWTPs. Thirdly, input parameters' relevance in determining WWTP suitability for RWW reuse was ranked. Finally, scenario analyses were conducted to study the influence of rainfall patterns and nutrient treatment removal on the RWW reuse feasibility. The type of crops surrounding the WWTPs and RWW salinity content resulted to be crucial elements in determining WWTPs suitability for RWW reuse implementation. The proposed methodology proved to be an effective support tool for policymakers and water utilities to assess the techno-economic feasibility of direct RWW reuse, generalizing results to several combinations of WWTPs and crops

PFAS in textile wastewater: An integrated scenario analysis for interventions prioritization to reduce environmental risk

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are used in several industrial applications, such as in textile manufacturing, and are known as "forever chemicals" due to their spread, stability and (eco-)toxicity, gaining increasing concern. To avoid PFAS spread in the environment, reducing the environmental risk on receiving surface water, prevention and removal strategies should be implemented at multiple levels, comprising both textile factories and municipal wastewater treatment plants (WWTP). This study presents an integrated scenario analysis to compare and prioritize prevention and removal strategies based on their potential in risk minimization. Field monitoring campaigns, lab- and pilot-scale experiments on two established removal processes (pressure-driven membrane separation, adsorption on activated carbon) were combined, and environmental risk was assessed due to a mixture of 15 PFAS. About prevention, substitution of long-chain PFAS with short-chain PFAS were considered, as well as the reduction of PFAS used in textile processing. The proposed approach was applied in a textile district in northern Italy without PFAS spikes in the tested wastewaters. This approach has proven to be beneficial in determining the optimal combination of actions to be implemented across different levels of the industrial district (including textile factories and/or municipal WWTP). This methodology provides a clear indication of the environmental advantages, specifically in minimizing risks, resulting from the implementation of diverse PFAS reduction strategies. Compared to the current scenario, resulting in an unacceptable risk (risk quotient, RQ=2.2), the risk can be reduced below the acceptable threshold (RQ=0.9) by the combination of (i) PFAS reduction/replacement in textile processing, (ii) treatment of wastewater discharged by textile factories through membrane separation prior to the discharge in the sewer, and (ii) WWTP upgrade through an activated carbon adsorption downstream the ozonation ste

Tecniche di modellazione di reattori di disinfezione con agenti chimici: dall’IDDF alla CFD

Il processo di disinfezione ricopre un ruolo fondamentale negli impianti di potabilizzazione e depurazione. Un importante strumento di supporto alla progettazione e all’ottimizzazione di questa fase è la modellazione del processo, basata su un approccio convenzionale, come l’Integrated Disinfection Design Framework (IDDF), o su un approccio avanzato, come la fluidodinamica computazionale (Computational Fluid Dynamics, CFD). Nel presente lavoro, le due tecniche modellistiche, IDDF e CFD, sono state applicate per la modellazione a scala pilota di un reattore di contatto aperto a setti, confrontando le loro prestazioni nella descrizione del processo di disinfezione e svolgendo un’analisi di sensitività sui principali parametri operativi e cinetici. Una prima parte del lavoro si è concentrata sulla corretta applicazione delle due tecniche modellistiche, utilizzando i dati sperimentali disponibili per scopi di calibrazione, mentre nella seconda parte le due tecniche modellistiche sono state confrontate. Entrambi gli approcci sono risultati strumenti efficaci nel caso si disponga di dati sperimentali affidabili, indispensabili per la messa a punto e la corretta applicazione dei modelli. La scelta dell’approccio più idoneo non è univoca, ma dipende fondamentalmente dell’obiettivo del lavoro e dalle risorse computazionali disponibili. Per quanto un approccio semplificato come l’IDDF abbia dimostrato di essere uno strumento efficace per la stima dei fenomeni coinvolti nei processi di decadimento dell’ipoclorito di sodio, inattivazione batterica e formazione di sottoprodotti, questo tralascia qualsiasi informazione circa gli effetti locali, a differenza della CFD che ha invece evidenziato come la loro identificazione sia indispensabile per determinare e quantificare possibili fonti di non idealità

Adsorption on activated carbon combined with ozonation for the removal of contaminants of emerging concern in drinking water

The presence of Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CECs) in drinking water is raising concern for potential negative effects on human health. Ozonation and adsorption on activated carbon are the most suitable processes for CECs removal in drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs). This study aims at evaluating the performance of ozonation and adsorption as in-series processes compared to those of the stand-alone processes, focusing on 18 compounds representative of various CECs families. No CECs spike was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of these processes towards CECs at their environmental concentrations. Adsorption isotherms were performed on water samples collected before and after the full-scale ozonation in a DWTP, testing different combinations of ozone and activated carbon doses. Generally, the combination of the two processes was beneficial (83% average removal) compared to adsorption and ozonation alone (71% and 34% average removal respectively). The effect of ozonation on adsorption depends on CECs reactivity with ozone, since ozonation improves the adsorption performance of poorly-oxidizable CECs, but worsens that of well-oxidizable compounds. The removal of organic matter, investigated by absorbance at 254 nm and fluorescence, by ozonation reduces competition for the subsequent CECs removal by adsorption (up to 20% increase of total CECs adsorption). Finally, the removal of both absorbance and fluorescence seems to be a good proxy variables for total CECs adsorption, with different relationships depending on the presence of ozonation. Conversely, it is not effective for ozonation, since the relationship depends on the reactivity of the specific CEC with ozone

Editorial: Ecotechnologies for Wastewater Treatment - Impacting the environment with innovation in wastewater treatment

n/

An integrated human health risk assessment framework for alkylphenols due to drinking water and edible crop consumption

INTRODUCTION The scarcity of clean freshwater is becoming a major issue for present and future generations, especially in densely urbanised areas. This situation promotes the potential cross-contamination of different environmental compartments by contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) which, in fact, have already been detected worldwide in surface water, groundwater and soils. In particular, the CECs released by wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) can end up both in the recipient surface water and groundwater, both of which are used as drinking water (DW) sources. Furthermore, if those water sources and reclaimed wastewater are used for irrigation, CECs can be directly absorbed by crops intended for human consumption or accumulate in soil and translocate to crops over time. Hence, both DW and edible crops are critical CEC exposure pathways for humans, the combined effect of which requires further investigation. This work is aimed at developing an integrated framework for a quantitative chemical risk assessment due to CECs in complex multiple-use scenarios, combining DW and edible crop consumption, as a decision-making support tool for optimising solutions to minimise risks and social costs. METHODOLOGY The developed procedure includes several steps. Firstly, the analysed system boundaries are defined, to evaluate all the phenomena affecting the fate of CECs from source to end user. Then, CEC migration (e.g. diffusion in surface water, infiltration in soil, uptake by food crops) and human exposure (via water and edible crop consumption) are modelled in an integrated framework as a function of boundary conditions, CECs and by-products characteristics, and proposed interventions. Exposure models are calibrated through literature data, field monitoring and lab tests where, for instance, the CECs’ fate and uptake by vegetables from contaminated soils have been investigated. In the hazard assessment step, a toxicological characterisation was performed to obtain single CEC adverse effect potencies, aimed at applying the Relative Potency Factors methodology for combining CECs that affect the same endpoint. Lastly, exposure and hazard assessment steps are combined to quantitatively estimate the risk to human health from a mixture of CECs, which includes uncertainty analyses to account for knowledge gaps and to provide decision-makers with the confidence level of the risk estimation. RESULTS The developed quantitative risk assessment procedure has been applied to a case study on the mixture of two alkylphenols, i.e. bisphenol-A (BPA) and nonylphenol (NP), used as reference CECs. Literature and field-monitoring data were used to feed the model, with an estimate of BPA and NP concentration in DW up to 0.1 and 0.35 μg/L, respectively, as a function of different system boundary conditions. As for their uptake in edible crops, lab tests with contaminated soil (BPA=75 μg/kg and NP=10 mg/kg, according to the range reported in literature for soil irrigated with reclaimed wastewater or amended with biosolids) demonstrated a significant transfer of NP from soil to vegetables, with concentrations of up to 230 μg/kg fresh weight (f.w.) in the edible parts. No BPA (<8 μg/kg f.w.) was found in vegetables, unlike its metabolite para-hydroxybenzoic acid (up to 56 μg/kg f.w). Those results highlight that both DW and edible crop consumption exposure pathways are critical for the risk to human health due to BPA, NP and their by-products. Several interventions in WWTPs or in DW treatment plants and distribution networks were simulated, demonstrating promising cumulative risk reduction. DISCUSSION Integrated modelling of the fate of CEC mixtures in complex multiple-use water systems, combined with quantitative risk assessment, has proven to be an effective tool to identify the main causes of risk for humans and to assign the various CEC source contributions. Lab tests proved to be useful to investigate the fate of CECs, including metabolites, in the soil system and potential transfer to food crops, corroborating the information from literature and monitoring data for model calibration. Integrated modelling also made it possible to explore several intervention strategies to be adopted at different points of the water system, identifying those that achieve the minimum overall mixture risk. Moreover, in addition to CEC toxicological characterisation, this procedure allows decision-makers to prioritise CECs to be regulated not only based on their exposure levels but looking at their contribution to the overall mixture risk. Lastly, uncertainty analysis made it possible to properly consider the availability and quality of CEC data, especially as regards their physical-chemical behaviour and toxicity, thereby providing the degree of confidence for the estimated risk, which is a key factor for taking informed decisions concerning CEC