6 research outputs found
Research of China-Us K-wave based decision making
Most prominent works on the subject, including k-wave theory-based research, do not elaborate on the topic of interconnectivity between economy and research on a microeconomic scale, instead of focusing on general innovation theory and macroeconomic stimuli. Present paper aims to discover k-wave theory-based decision making and potential explanation in R&D standoff between the United States, leader of fifth technological paradigm, and China β emerging leader of sixth technological paradigm. Overall conducted research shows fundamental divergence and a variety of interpretations within the framework of the k-wave theory itself, the proposed change in recourse flow stands true which in turn signifies the importance of k-wave theory in the modern decision-making process
ΠΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΉ Π΄Π»Ρ Β«ΠΠ²ΡΠΎΠ·ΠΎΠ½ΡΒ»: Π²Π°ΡΠΈΠ°Π½ΡΡ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΡΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΈΒ ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΈ Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΡΒ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ Π ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΈ
Topic. The article reviews the legal possibility of full or partial EMU breakup (EURO-crack). The authors conducted jurisprudential researches of the European experience and compare both the provisions of the EU and Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) documents (Treaty, Protocol 15) and integration processes maturity of the latter.Purpose. The purpose of the article is to consider possible mechanisms and consequences of European Union (EU) member states exit from the economic and monetary union (EMU); to assess the applicability of the European experience to the development of monetary and economic integration among member states of Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU).Methodology. The authors of the article use scenario analysis method to assess legal grounds, procedures, mechanisms and consequences of EU member states exit from the economic and monetary union for the ongoing one (Brexit) and the most probable options.Results. The authors systematize and conduct consistent analysis of prerequisites, the chronology of formation of various European integration associations, fundamental legal documents and key milestones in the formation of monetary integration in the EU, the stages of European EMU development in its contemporary form. They include an exit from Eurozone: with further immediate application for repeat accession without taking part in the monetary union; retaining the EU membership based on the provisions of Vienna Convention regarding the law of treaties and that arising out of the Treaty on the functioning of the EU.Conclusions. The authors conclude that the modern system of international law provides an effective denouncement mechanism of the Treaty on European Union and its individual provisions. They argue the possibility of changing the legal status of member States with varying degrees of participation in EMU and, on the example of Italy, criticized the initiative for a unilateral exit of a member state of the EMU.Jurisprudential researches of the European experience conducted by the authors, allowed them to compare the provisions of the documents of the EU and the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) (Treaty, Protocol 15)), and the degree of maturity of the integration processes of the latter. Conclusions made by the authors about the prospects of economic and monetary integration of member States of the EAEU are the base of recommendations for action concerning deepening economic integration and creation of common financial market of the EEU. Conclusions made by the authors are also relevant to state authorities of the Russian Federation, including economic authorities and organs of diplomacy.ΠΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΌΠ΅Ρ. ΠΒ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΡΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄Π° ΠΈΠ· ΠΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΒ Π²Π°Π»ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΡΠ·Π° (ΠΠΠ‘) ΡΡΡΠ°Π½ ΠΠ‘. Π‘Β ΡΡΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡ Π°Π²ΡΠΎΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π»ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΠΏΡΡΠ° Π΅Π²ΡΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΠΉΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΡΡΠ°Ρ
ΠΈΒ ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΡ
Π΄ΠΎΠΊΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΠ‘ ΠΈΒ ΠΠ²ΡΠ°Π·ΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΡΠ·Π° (ΠΠΠΠ‘) (Π’ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ°Ρ, ΠΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ» β 15), Π°Β ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ Π·ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ² Π²Β ΠΠΠΠ‘.Π¦Π΅Π»Ρ. Π Π°ΡΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΌΠ΅Ρ
Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠ² ΠΈΒ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠΉ Π²ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄Π° Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ²-ΡΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ² ΠΠ²ΡΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΡΠ·Π° (ΠΠ‘) ΠΈΠ· ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΒ Π²Π°Π»ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΡΠ·Π° (ΠΠΠ‘), ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠ° ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π΅Π²ΡΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠΏΡΡΠ° Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ Π²Π°Π»ΡΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΡΡΠ°Π½ ΠΠ²ΡΠ°Π·ΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΡΠ·Π° (ΠΠΠΠ‘).ΠΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ. ΠΠ²ΡΠΎΡΡ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΡΡΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ, ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡ, ΠΌΠ΅Ρ
Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠ² ΠΈΒ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠΉ Π²ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄Π° Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ²-ΡΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ² ΠΠ‘ ΠΈΠ· ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΒ Π²Π°Π»ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΡΠ·Π° Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΠΆΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΠΎ (Brexit) ΠΈΒ Π½Π°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ Π²Π΅ΡΠΎΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π²Π°ΡΠΈΠ°Π½ΡΠΎΠ².Π Π΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ: ΠΠ»Ρ ΡΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π°Π²ΡΠΎΡΡ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΡΡΡ ΠΈΒ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ»ΠΊΠΈ, Ρ
ΡΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΠ²ΡΠΎΠΏΡ, ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ»Π°Π³Π°ΡΡΠΈΠ΅ ΡΡΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ Π΄ΠΎΠΊΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡ ΠΈΒ ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π²ΡΠ΅ Π²Π΅Ρ
ΠΈ ΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π²Π°Π»ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π²Β ΠΠ‘, ΡΡΠ°ΠΏΡ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π²Β ΠΠ²ΡΠΎΠΏΠ΅ ΠΠΠ‘ Π²Β Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΌ Π²ΠΈΠ΄Π΅. ΠΒ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π²Π΅ΡΠΎΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΠ°Π΄Π° ΠΠΠ‘ (EURO-crack). ΠΒ ΠΈΡ
ΡΠΈΡΠ»Π΅ Π²ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ ΠΈΠ· ΠΠ²ΡΠΎΠ·ΠΎΠ½Ρ: ΡΒ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΡΡΠΈΠΌ Π½Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π΄Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠΌ Π½Π°ΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ Π·Π°ΡΠ²ΠΊΠΈ Π½Π° ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ Π²ΡΡΡΠΏΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅, Π±Π΅Π· ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡ Π²Β Π²Π°Π»ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΎΡΠ·Π΅; ΡΒ ΡΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΠ»Π΅Π½ΡΡΠ²Π° Π²Β ΠΠ‘ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠΌ, ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠΌ ΠΠ΅Π½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΠ½Π²Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΎΒ ΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π΅ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΡΠ½Π°ΡΠΎΠ΄Π½ΡΡ
Π΄ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡΠΎΠ² ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π²ΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠΌ ΠΈΠ· ΠΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡΠ° ΠΎΒ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΠ‘.ΠΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΄Ρ. ΠΠ²ΡΠΎΡΡ Π΄Π΅Π»Π°ΡΡ Π²ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΠΎΒ ΡΠΎΠΌ, ΡΡΠΎ ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½Π°Ρ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ° ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΡΠ½Π°ΡΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π° ΡΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠΈΡ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ
Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌ Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ½ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡΠ° ΠΎΒ ΠΠ‘ ΠΈΒ ΠΎΡΠ΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ. ΠΡΠ³ΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΡΡΡ ΠΎΠ½ΠΈ ΠΈΒ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠ° Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ²-ΡΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ² ΡΒ ΡΠ°Π·Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅Π½ΡΡ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡ Π²Β ΠΠΠ‘ ΠΈ,Β Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ΅ ΠΡΠ°Π»ΠΈΠΈ, ΠΏΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡ ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΡ ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠΈΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Ρ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Π½Π΅ΠΌΡ Π²ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄Ρ Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ²Π°-ΡΠ»Π΅Π½Π° ΠΈΠ· ΠΠΠ‘.ΠΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π΅Π²ΡΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠΏΡΡΠ°, ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ Π°Π²ΡΠΎΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ, ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ»ΠΎ ΠΈΠΌ ΡΠΎΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΡΡ ΠΈΒ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π΄ΠΎΠΊΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΠ‘ ΠΈΒ ΠΠ²ΡΠ°Π·ΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΡΠ·Π° (ΠΠΠΠ‘) (ΠΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡΠ°, ΠΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ»Π° 15), ΠΈΒ ΡΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅Π½Ρ Π·ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅Π΄Π½Π΅Π³ΠΎ. Π‘Π΄Π΅Π»Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ Π°Π²ΡΠΎΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ Π²ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΠΎΒ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π°Ρ
Π²Π°Π»ΡΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ²-ΡΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ² ΠΠΠΠ‘ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ ΠΈΠΌΠΈ Π²Β ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Ρ ΡΠ΅ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΄Π°ΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠΎ ΡΠ³Π»ΡΠ±Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ, ΡΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΡΠΈΠ½Π°Π½ΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΠ° ΠΠΠΠ‘. ΠΡΠΈΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ Π²Β ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ Π²ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΠΈΒ ΡΠ΅ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΄Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ Π΄Π»Ρ Π΄Π°Π»ΡΠ½Π΅ΠΉΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΡΠ³Π»ΡΠ±Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΒ Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ²Π°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΠ²ΡΠ°Π·ΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΡΠ·Π° (ΠΠΠΠ‘) Π°ΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½Ρ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΎΠ² Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π²Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ Π ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π€Π΅Π΄Π΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ, Π²Β ΡΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΈΡΠ»Π΅ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π²Π»Π°ΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΈΒ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΎΠ² Π΄ΠΈΠΏΠ»ΠΎΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ
Eurozone Crisis Scenario: Possible Developments and Lessons forΒ Economic Integration Communities withΒ Participation of Russia
Topic. The article reviews the legal possibility of full or partial EMU breakup (EURO-crack). The authors conducted jurisprudential researches of the European experience and compare both the provisions of the EU and Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) documents (Treaty, Protocol 15) and integration processes maturity of the latter.Purpose. The purpose of the article is to consider possible mechanisms and consequences of European Union (EU) member states exit from the economic and monetary union (EMU); to assess the applicability of the European experience to the development of monetary and economic integration among member states of Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU).Methodology. The authors of the article use scenario analysis method to assess legal grounds, procedures, mechanisms and consequences of EU member states exit from the economic and monetary union for the ongoing one (Brexit) and the most probable options.Results. The authors systematize and conduct consistent analysis of prerequisites, the chronology of formation of various European integration associations, fundamental legal documents and key milestones in the formation of monetary integration in the EU, the stages of European EMU development in its contemporary form. They include an exit from Eurozone: with further immediate application for repeat accession without taking part in the monetary union; retaining the EU membership based on the provisions of Vienna Convention regarding the law of treaties and that arising out of the Treaty on the functioning of the EU.Conclusions. The authors conclude that the modern system of international law provides an effective denouncement mechanism of the Treaty on European Union and its individual provisions. They argue the possibility of changing the legal status of member States with varying degrees of participation in EMU and, on the example of Italy, criticized the initiative for a unilateral exit of a member state of the EMU.Jurisprudential researches of the European experience conducted by the authors, allowed them to compare the provisions of the documents of the EU and the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) (Treaty, Protocol 15)), and the degree of maturity of the integration processes of the latter. Conclusions made by the authors about the prospects of economic and monetary integration of member States of the EAEU are the base of recommendations for action concerning deepening economic integration and creation of common financial market of the EEU. Conclusions made by the authors are also relevant to state authorities of the Russian Federation, including economic authorities and organs of diplomacy
Legal and Regulatory Framework for AI Solutions in Healthcare in EU, US, China, and Russia: New Scenarios after a Pandemic
The COVID-19 crisis has exposed some of the most pressing challenges affecting healthcare and highlighted the benefits that robust integration of digital and AI technologies in the healthcare setting may bring. Although medical solutions based on AI are growing rapidly, regulatory issues and policy initiatives including ownership and control of data, data sharing, privacy protection, telemedicine, and accountability need to be carefully and continually addressed as AI research requires robust and ethical guidelines, demanding an update of the legal and regulatory framework all over the world. Several recently proposed regulatory frameworks provide a solid foundation but do not address a number of issues that may prevent algorithms from being fully trusted. A global effort is needed for an open, mature conversation about the best possible way to guard against and mitigate possible harms to realize the potential of AI across health systems in a respectful and ethical way. This conversation must include national and international policymakers, physicians, digital health and machine learning leaders from industry and academia. If this is done properly and in a timely fashion, the potential of AI in healthcare will be realized