6 research outputs found

    Research of China-Us K-wave based decision making

    Get PDF
    Most prominent works on the subject, including k-wave theory-based research, do not elaborate on the topic of interconnectivity between economy and research on a microeconomic scale, instead of focusing on general innovation theory and macroeconomic stimuli. Present paper aims to discover k-wave theory-based decision making and potential explanation in R&D standoff between the United States, leader of fifth technological paradigm, and China – emerging leader of sixth technological paradigm. Overall conducted research shows fundamental divergence and a variety of interpretations within the framework of the k-wave theory itself, the proposed change in recourse flow stands true which in turn signifies the importance of k-wave theory in the modern decision-making process

    ΠšΡ€ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠ½Ρ‹ΠΉ сцСнарий для Β«Π•Π²Ρ€ΠΎΠ·ΠΎΠ½Ρ‹Β»: Π²Π°Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π½Ρ‚Ρ‹ развития событий ΠΈΒ ΡƒΡ€ΠΎΠΊΠΈ для экономичСских ΠΈΠ½Ρ‚Π΅Π³Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½Ρ‹Ρ… объСдинСний с участиСм России

    Get PDF
    Topic. The article reviews the legal possibility of full or partial EMU breakup (EURO-crack). The authors conducted jurisprudential researches of the European experience and compare both the provisions of the EU and Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) documents (Treaty, Protocol 15) and integration processes maturity of the latter.Purpose. The purpose of the article is to consider possible mechanisms and consequences of European Union (EU) member states exit from the economic and monetary union (EMU); to assess the applicability of the European experience to the development of monetary and economic integration among member states of Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU).Methodology. The authors of the article use scenario analysis method to assess legal grounds, procedures, mechanisms and consequences of EU member states exit from the economic and monetary union for the ongoing one (Brexit) and the most probable options.Results. The authors systematize and conduct consistent analysis of prerequisites, the chronology of formation of various European integration associations, fundamental legal documents and key milestones in the formation of monetary integration in the EU, the stages of European EMU development in its contemporary form. They include an exit from Eurozone: with further immediate application for repeat accession without taking part in the monetary union; retaining the EU membership based on the provisions of Vienna Convention regarding the law of treaties and that arising out of the Treaty on the functioning of the EU.Conclusions. The authors conclude that the modern system of international law provides an effective denouncement mechanism of the Treaty on European Union and its individual provisions. They argue the possibility of changing the legal status of member States with varying degrees of participation in EMU and, on the example of Italy, criticized the initiative for a unilateral exit of a member state of the EMU.Jurisprudential researches of the European experience conducted by the authors, allowed them to compare the provisions of the documents of the EU and the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) (Treaty, Protocol 15)), and the degree of maturity of the integration processes of the latter. Conclusions made by the authors about the prospects of economic and monetary integration of member States of the EAEU are the base of recommendations for action concerning deepening economic integration and creation of common financial market of the EEU. Conclusions made by the authors are also relevant to state authorities of the Russian Federation, including economic authorities and organs of diplomacy.ΠŸΡ€Π΅Π΄ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚. Π’Β ΡΡ‚Π°Ρ‚ΡŒΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡƒΡŽΡ‚ΡΡ ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹Π΅ возмоТности ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ частичного Π²Ρ‹Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄Π° ΠΈΠ· ЭкономичСского ΠΈΒ Π²Π°Π»ΡŽΡ‚Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ союза (Π­Π’Π‘) стран Π•Π‘. Б этой Ρ†Π΅Π»ΡŒΡŽ Π°Π²Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π»ΠΈ правовСдчСскиС исслСдования ΠΎΠΏΡ‹Ρ‚Π° СвропСйских страх и сравнили полоТСния основных Π΄ΠΎΠΊΡƒΠΌΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² Π•Π‘ и Евразийского экономичСского союза (ЕАЭБ) (Π’Ρ€Π°ΠΊΡ‚Π°Ρ‚, ΠŸΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ» β„– 15), Π°Β Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ Π·Ρ€Π΅Π»ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ ΠΈΠ½Ρ‚Π΅Π³Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½Ρ‹Ρ… процСссов в ЕАЭБ.ЦСль. РассмотрСниС Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΌΠ΅Ρ…Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠ² и послСдствий Π²Ρ‹Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄Π° государств-Ρ‡Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ² ЕвропСйского союза (Π•Π‘) ΠΈΠ· экономичСского ΠΈΒ Π²Π°Π»ΡŽΡ‚Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ союза (Π­Π’Π‘), ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΊΠ° примСнимости СвропСйского ΠΎΠΏΡ‹Ρ‚Π° для развития Π²Π°Π»ΡŽΡ‚Π½ΠΎ-экономичСской ΠΈΠ½Ρ‚Π΅Π³Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ стран Евразийского экономичСского союза (ЕАЭБ).ΠœΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ. Авторы ΡΡ‚Π°Ρ‚ΡŒΠΈ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ·ΡƒΡŽΡ‚ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄ сцСнарного Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° для ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹Ρ… оснований, ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π΄ΡƒΡ€, ΠΌΠ΅Ρ…Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠ² и послСдствий Π²Ρ‹Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄Π° государств-Ρ‡Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ² Π•Π‘ ΠΈΠ· экономичСского ΠΈΒ Π²Π°Π»ΡŽΡ‚Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ союза для ΡƒΠΆΠ΅ Ρ€Π΅Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΡƒΠ΅ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΠΎ (Brexit) ΠΈΒ Π½Π°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ вСроятных Π²Π°Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ².Π Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹: Для этого Π°Π²Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹ ΡΠΈΡΡ‚Π΅ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ€ΡƒΡŽΡ‚ ΠΈΒ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ€ΡƒΡŽΡ‚ прСдпосылки, Ρ…Ρ€ΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡŽ формирования Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΈΠ½Ρ‚Π΅Π³Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½Ρ‹Ρ… объСдинСний Π•Π²Ρ€ΠΎΠΏΡ‹, ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ»Π°Π³Π°ΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΠ΅ ΡŽΡ€ΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΡ‡Π΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ Π΄ΠΎΠΊΡƒΠΌΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Ρ‹ ΠΈΒ ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π΅Π²Ρ‹Π΅ Π²Π΅Ρ…ΠΈ становлСния Π²Π°Π»ΡŽΡ‚Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ½Ρ‚Π΅Π³Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ Π²Β Π•Π‘, этапы формирования Π²Β Π•Π²Ρ€ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ Π­Π’Π‘ Π²Β Π΅Π³ΠΎ соврСмСнном Π²ΠΈΠ΄Π΅. Π’Β ΡΡ‚Π°Ρ‚ΡŒΠ΅ рассматриваСтся Π²Π΅Ρ€ΠΎΡΡ‚Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ частичного распада Π­Π’Π‘ (EURO-crack). Π’Β ΠΈΡ… числС Π²Ρ‹Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄ ΠΈΠ· Π•Π²Ρ€ΠΎΠ·ΠΎΠ½Ρ‹: ΡΒ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡƒΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΠΌ Π½Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π΄Π»Π΅Π½Π½Ρ‹ΠΌ Π½Π°ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ заявки Π½Π° ΠΏΠΎΠ²Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€Π½ΠΎΠ΅ вступлСниС, Π±Π΅Π· участия Π²Β Π²Π°Π»ΡŽΡ‚Π½ΠΎΠΌ союзС; с сохранСниСм члСнства Π²Β Π•Π‘ ΠΏΠΎ основаниям, прСдусмотрСнным ВСнской ΠΊΠΎΠ½Π²Π΅Π½Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ ΠΎΒ ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²Π΅ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΡƒΠ½Π°Ρ€ΠΎΠ΄Π½Ρ‹Ρ… Π΄ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ² ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π²Ρ‹Ρ‚Π΅ΠΊΠ°ΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΠΌ ΠΈΠ· Π”ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡ€Π° ΠΎΒ Ρ„ΡƒΠ½ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π•Π‘.Π’Ρ‹Π²ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹. Авторы Π΄Π΅Π»Π°ΡŽΡ‚ Π²Ρ‹Π²ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹ ΠΎΒ Ρ‚ΠΎΠΌ, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ соврСмСнная систСма ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΡƒΠ½Π°Ρ€ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²Π° содСрТит эффСктивный ΠΌΠ΅Ρ…Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌ дСнонсации Π”ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡ€Π° ΠΎΒ Π•Π‘ ΠΈΒ ΠΎΡ‚Π΄Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ. ΠΡ€Π³ΡƒΠΌΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΈΡ€ΡƒΡŽΡ‚ ΠΎΠ½ΠΈ ΠΈΒ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ измСнСния ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ статуса государств-Ρ‡Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ² с разной ΡΡ‚Π΅ΠΏΠ΅Π½ΡŒΡŽ участия Π²Β Π­Π’Π‘ ΠΈ,Β Π½Π° ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Ρ€Π΅ Π˜Ρ‚Π°Π»ΠΈΠΈ, приводят ΠΊΡ€ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΡƒ ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ†ΠΈΠ°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ²Ρ‹ ΠΏΠΎ одностороннСму Π²Ρ‹Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄Ρƒ государства-Ρ‡Π»Π΅Π½Π° ΠΈΠ· Π­Π’Π‘.ΠŸΡ€Π°Π²ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΅ исслСдованиС СвропСйского ΠΎΠΏΡ‹Ρ‚Π°, ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ Π°Π²Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€Π°ΠΌΠΈ, ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ»ΠΎ ΠΈΠΌ ΡΠΎΠΏΠΎΡΡ‚Π°Π²ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ и полоТСния Π΄ΠΎΠΊΡƒΠΌΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² Π•Π‘ и Евразийского экономичСского союза (ЕАЭБ) (Π”ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡ€Π°, ΠŸΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ»Π° 15), ΠΈΒ ΡΡ‚Π΅ΠΏΠ΅Π½ΡŒ зрСлости ΠΈΠ½Ρ‚Π΅Π³Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½Ρ‹Ρ… процСссов послСднСго. Π‘Π΄Π΅Π»Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ Π°Π²Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€Π°ΠΌΠΈ Π²Ρ‹Π²ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹ о пСрспСктивах Π²Π°Π»ΡŽΡ‚Π½ΠΎ-экономичСской ΠΈΠ½Ρ‚Π΅Π³Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ государств-Ρ‡Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ² ЕАЭБ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ‹ ΠΈΠΌΠΈ в основу Ρ€Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΄Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠΎ ΡƒΠ³Π»ΡƒΠ±Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡŽ экономичСской ΠΈΠ½Ρ‚Π΅Π³Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ, созданию ΠΎΠ±Ρ‰Π΅Π³ΠΎ финансового Ρ€Ρ‹Π½ΠΊΠ° ЕАЭБ. ΠŸΡ€ΠΈΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ Π²Β ΡΡ‚Π°Ρ‚ΡŒΠ΅ Π²Ρ‹Π²ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹ ΠΈΒ Ρ€Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΄Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ½ΡΡ‚ΠΈΡŽ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ€ для дальнСйшСго углублСния экономичСской ΠΈΠ½Ρ‚Π΅Π³Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ с государствами Евразийского экономичСского союза (ЕАЭБ) Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΡƒΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ для ΠΎΡ€Π³Π°Π½ΠΎΠ² государствСнной власти Российской Π€Π΅Π΄Π΅Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ, Π²Β Ρ‚ΠΎΠΌ числС экономичСских властСй ΠΈΒ ΠΎΡ€Π³Π°Π½ΠΎΠ² Π΄ΠΈΠΏΠ»ΠΎΠΌΠ°Ρ‚ΠΈΠΈ

    Eurozone Crisis Scenario: Possible Developments and Lessons forΒ Economic Integration Communities withΒ Participation of Russia

    Get PDF
    Topic. The article reviews the legal possibility of full or partial EMU breakup (EURO-crack). The authors conducted jurisprudential researches of the European experience and compare both the provisions of the EU and Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) documents (Treaty, Protocol 15) and integration processes maturity of the latter.Purpose. The purpose of the article is to consider possible mechanisms and consequences of European Union (EU) member states exit from the economic and monetary union (EMU); to assess the applicability of the European experience to the development of monetary and economic integration among member states of Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU).Methodology. The authors of the article use scenario analysis method to assess legal grounds, procedures, mechanisms and consequences of EU member states exit from the economic and monetary union for the ongoing one (Brexit) and the most probable options.Results. The authors systematize and conduct consistent analysis of prerequisites, the chronology of formation of various European integration associations, fundamental legal documents and key milestones in the formation of monetary integration in the EU, the stages of European EMU development in its contemporary form. They include an exit from Eurozone: with further immediate application for repeat accession without taking part in the monetary union; retaining the EU membership based on the provisions of Vienna Convention regarding the law of treaties and that arising out of the Treaty on the functioning of the EU.Conclusions. The authors conclude that the modern system of international law provides an effective denouncement mechanism of the Treaty on European Union and its individual provisions. They argue the possibility of changing the legal status of member States with varying degrees of participation in EMU and, on the example of Italy, criticized the initiative for a unilateral exit of a member state of the EMU.Jurisprudential researches of the European experience conducted by the authors, allowed them to compare the provisions of the documents of the EU and the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) (Treaty, Protocol 15)), and the degree of maturity of the integration processes of the latter. Conclusions made by the authors about the prospects of economic and monetary integration of member States of the EAEU are the base of recommendations for action concerning deepening economic integration and creation of common financial market of the EEU. Conclusions made by the authors are also relevant to state authorities of the Russian Federation, including economic authorities and organs of diplomacy

    Legal and Regulatory Framework for AI Solutions in Healthcare in EU, US, China, and Russia: New Scenarios after a Pandemic

    Full text link
    The COVID-19 crisis has exposed some of the most pressing challenges affecting healthcare and highlighted the benefits that robust integration of digital and AI technologies in the healthcare setting may bring. Although medical solutions based on AI are growing rapidly, regulatory issues and policy initiatives including ownership and control of data, data sharing, privacy protection, telemedicine, and accountability need to be carefully and continually addressed as AI research requires robust and ethical guidelines, demanding an update of the legal and regulatory framework all over the world. Several recently proposed regulatory frameworks provide a solid foundation but do not address a number of issues that may prevent algorithms from being fully trusted. A global effort is needed for an open, mature conversation about the best possible way to guard against and mitigate possible harms to realize the potential of AI across health systems in a respectful and ethical way. This conversation must include national and international policymakers, physicians, digital health and machine learning leaders from industry and academia. If this is done properly and in a timely fashion, the potential of AI in healthcare will be realized
    corecore