Ecological dynamics of macrolepidoptera feeding on box elder (Acer negundo L.)

Understanding species abundances and distributions is a major goal of ecology. Although manipulative experiments can reveal mechanistic properties of interactions among a small number of species, and macroecological studies can draw fundamental insights from patterns at a large scale, inference about local communities as a whole requires a combination of these approaches. I used a suite of techniques to better understand the ecological dynamics of a group of insect herbivores, the assemblage of moth caterpillars feeding on box elder, a common riparian tree. I examined the landscape ecology of the assemblage to determine the degree of turnover at multiple scales, and how diversity of the assemblage depended on host plant context. I found apparent homogeneity of caterpillar diversity masked important differences in co-occurrence even at small scales, though the expected influence of host plant diversity was not observed. Examining the species through time, I investigated how species abundance was related to body size, intrinsic population growth rate, and diet breadth. Whereas body size did not scale significantly with abundance in this group of species, and diet breadth had a complex relationship with abundance, the population growth rate developed in association with the host plant explained the differential abundance of species on the plant quite well. Finally, I quantified elemental content of species in the group, to determine how stoichiometric constraints related to size and growth rates of caterpillars in the assemblage. I found some support for a theory connecting elemental composition to ecological interactions, though the results were species-dependent. Throughout these investigations I explicitly considered the evolutionary relatedness of co-occurring species using phylogenetic methods. By merging ecological and phylogenetic data, a more unified picture of the important mechanisms underlying species properties can be obtained. Through tests of theory at the landscape, community, and individual level, I have presented a clearer picture of the forces structuring this assemblage of caterpillars, and provided a template for investigations of community dynamics at a similar scale

Novel Weapons Testing: Are Invasive Plants More Chemically Defended than Native Plants?

Background: Exotic species have been hypothesized to successfully invade new habitats by virtue of possessing novel biochemistry that repels native enemies. Despite the pivotal long-term consequences of invasion for native food-webs, to date there are no experimental studies examining directly whether exotic plants are any more or less biochemically deterrent than native plants to native herbivores. Methodology/Principal Findings: In a direct test of this hypothesis using herbivore feeding assays with chemical extracts from 19 invasive plants and 21 co-occurring native plants, we show that invasive plant biochemistry is no more deterrent (on average) to a native generalist herbivore than extracts from native plants. There was no relationship between extract deterrence and length of time since introduction, suggesting that time has not mitigated putative biochemical novelty. Moreover, the least deterrent plant extracts were from the most abundant species in the field, a pattern that held for both native and exotic plants. Analysis of chemical deterrence in context with morphological defenses and growth-related traits showed that native and exotic plants had similar trade-offs among traits. Conclusions/Significance: Overall, our results suggest that particular invasive species may possess deterrent secondary chemistry, but it does not appear to be a general pattern resulting from evolutionary mismatches between exotic plants and native herbivores. Thus, fundamentally similar processes may promote the ecological success of both native and exotic species

Survival of patients with small cell lung cancer undergoing lung resection in England, 1998–2009

Introduction: Chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy is the recommended treatment for small cell lung cancer (SCLC), except in stage I disease where clinical guidelines state there may be a role for surgery based on favourable outcomes in case series. Evidence supporting adjuvant chemotherapy in resected SCLC is limited but this is widely offered. Methods: Data on 359 873 patients who were diagnosed with a first primary lung cancer in England between 1998 and 2009 were grouped according to histology (SCLC or non-SCLC (NSCLC)) and whether they underwent a surgical resection. We explored their survival using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression, adjusting for age, sex, comorbidity and socioeconomic status. Results: The survival of 465 patients with resected SCLC was lower than patients with resected NSCLC (5-year survival 31% and 45%, respectively), but much higher than patients of either group who were not resected (3%). The difference between resected SCLC and NSCLC diminished with time after surgery. Survival was superior for the subgroup of 198 'elective' SCLC cases where the diagnosis was most likely known before resection than for the subgroup of 267 'incidental' cases where the SCLC diagnosis was likely to have been made after resection. Conclusions: These data serve as a natural experiment testing the survival after surgical management of SCLC according to NSCLC principles. Patients with SCLC treated surgically for early stage disease may have survival outcomes that approach those of NSCLC, supporting the emerging clinical practice of offering surgical resection to selected patients with SCLC

Inclusion of Host Quality Data Improves Predictions of Herbivore Phenology

Understanding the correspondence between ambient temperature and insect development is necessary to forecast insect phenology under novel environments. In the face of climate change, both conservation and pest control efforts require accurate phenological predictions. Here, we compare a suite of degree-day models to assess their ability to predict the phenology of a common, oligophagous butterfly, the silver-spotted skipper, Epargyreus clarus (Cramer) (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae). To estimate model parameters, we used development time of eggs and larvae reared in the laboratory at six constant temperatures ranging from 8 to 38 °C and on two host plants of contrasting quality (kudzu and wisteria). We employed three approaches to determine the base temperature to calculate degree days: linear regression, modified reduced major axis regression, and application of a generic base temperature value of 10 °C, which is commonly used in the absence of laboratory data. To calculate the number of degree days required to complete a developmental stage, we used data from caterpillars feeding on high- and low-quality hosts, both in the field and in the laboratory. To test model accuracy, we predicted development time of seven generations of larvae reared in the field on the same host plants across 3 years (2014–2016). To compare performance among models, we regressed predicted vs. observed development time, and found that r2 values were significantly larger when accounting for host plant quality. The accuracy of development time predictions varied across the season, with estimates of the first two generations being more accurate than estimates of the third generation, when ambient temperatures dropped outside the range in which development rate and temperature have a linear relationship. Overall, we show that accounting for variation in host plant quality when calculating development time in the field is more important than the choice of the base temperature for calculating degree days

How do nutrients change flowering in prairies?

Farmers today apply more synthetic fertilizers to farm fields than ever before – but not all of these nutrients are used by crops: some fertilizer escapes through the air, soil, or water. Nitrogen, phosphorous, and potassium flow off farm fields when it rains, billow into the air when fields are plowed, and drift with the wind to other areas. Extra nutrients are also released to the air when people burn fossil fuels. We wanted to find out: what happens when these extra nutrients land on wild prairie ecosystems? How do its wild plants respond? Do they all just grow better? Or could there be any negative side effects? To answer these questions, we systematically added nutrients to experimental patches of prairie. We found that these added nutrients (specifically nitrogen) made early-season plants thrive while reducing the amount of late-season plants, but only in some prairie types. This change could have serious implications for the way prairie ecosystems function

Impacts of Time Restricted Feeding on Peak Volume of Oxygen Uptake and Substrate Utilization

Time Restricted Feeding (TRF) is a type of Intermittent Fasting, which refers to the finite time to intake calories during the day. TRF has become a dietary approach that is used for weight loss and overall health. Individuals that partake in TRF may experience a decrease in peak volume of oxygen uptake (VO2peak) due to minimization of glycolytic stores. To date, few studies have compared the impact of TRF on VO2peak. PURPOSE: The current study aimed to further investigate the metabolic impact of TRF. METHODS: Twenty one participants, ages 18-60, completed an eleven week longitudinal study to examine differences in VO2peak, substrate utilization crossover, and resting substrate utilization. Participants self-reported diet, exercise, sleep, and medications over two separate four week periods. The first four weeks were without TRF and the following four were with TRF. A maximal exercise test and a resting metabolic test were performed three times, four weeks apart from each other. A repeated measures ANOVA was performed to determine within subject differences. A post-hoc analysis was performed to determine the time effect. RESULTS: VO2peak was significantly lower after implementing TRF (phttps://openriver.winona.edu/urc2019/1012/thumbnail.jp