462 research outputs found
Beyond Desartes and Newton: Recovering life and humanity
Attempts to ‘naturalize’ phenomenology challenge both traditional phenomenology and traditional approaches to cognitive science. They challenge Edmund Husserl’s rejection of naturalism and his attempt to establish phenomenology as a foundational transcendental discipline, and they challenge efforts to explain cognition through mainstream science. While appearing to be a retreat from the bold claims made for phenomenology, it is really its triumph. Naturalized phenomenology is spearheading a successful challenge to the heritage of Cartesian dualism. This converges with the reaction against Cartesian thought within science itself. Descartes divided the universe between res cogitans, thinking substances, and res extensa, the mechanical world. The latter won with Newton and we have, in most of objective science since, literally lost our mind, hence our humanity. Despite Darwin, biologists remain children of Newton, and dream of a grand theory that is epistemologically complete and would allow lawful entailment of the evolution of the biosphere. This dream is no longer tenable. We now have to recognize that science and scientists are within and part of the world we are striving to comprehend, as proponents of endophysics have argued, and that physics, biology and mathematics have to be reconceived accordingly. Interpreting quantum mechanics from this perspective is shown to both illuminate conscious experience and reveal new paths for its further development. In biology we must now justify the use of the word “function”. As we shall see, we cannot prestate the ever new biological functions that arise and constitute the very phase space of evolution. Hence, we cannot mathematize the detailed becoming of the biosphere, nor write differential equations for functional variables we do not know ahead of time, nor integrate those equations, so no laws “entail” evolution. The dream of a grand theory fails. In place of entailing laws, a post-entailing law explanatory framework is proposed in which Actuals arise in evolution that constitute new boundary conditions that are enabling constraints that create new, typically unprestatable, Adjacent Possible opportunities for further evolution, in which new Actuals arise, in a persistent becoming. Evolution flows into a typically unprestatable succession of Adjacent Possibles. Given the concept of function, the concept of functional closure of an organism making a living in its world, becomes central. Implications for patterns in evolution include historical reconstruction, and statistical laws such as the distribution of extinction events, or species per genus, and the use of formal cause, not efficient cause, laws
No entailing laws, but enablement in the evolution of the biosphere
Biological evolution is a complex blend of ever changing structural
stability, variability and emergence of new phenotypes, niches, ecosystems. We
wish to argue that the evolution of life marks the end of a physics world view
of law entailed dynamics. Our considerations depend upon discussing the
variability of the very "contexts of life": the interactions between organisms,
biological niches and ecosystems. These are ever changing, intrinsically
indeterminate and even unprestatable: we do not know ahead of time the "niches"
which constitute the boundary conditions on selection. More generally, by the
mathematical unprestatability of the "phase space" (space of possibilities), no
laws of motion can be formulated for evolution. We call this radical emergence,
from life to life. The purpose of this paper is the integration of variation
and diversity in a sound conceptual frame and situate unpredictability at a
novel theoretical level, that of the very phase space. Our argument will be
carried on in close comparisons with physics and the mathematical constructions
of phase spaces in that discipline. The role of (theoretical) symmetries as
invariant preserving transformations will allow us to understand the nature of
physical phase spaces and to stress the differences required for a sound
biological theoretizing. In this frame, we discuss the novel notion of
"enablement". This will restrict causal analyses to differential cases (a
difference that causes a difference). Mutations or other causal differences
will allow us to stress that "non conservation principles" are at the core of
evolution, in contrast to physical dynamics, largely based on conservation
principles as symmetries. Critical transitions, the main locus of symmetry
changes in physics, will be discussed, and lead to "extended criticality" as a
conceptual frame for a better understanding of the living state of matter
- …