8 research outputs found
Age-Dependent in vitro Maturation Efficacy of Human Oocytes – Is There an Optimal Age?
In vitro maturation of oocytes from antral follicles seen during tissue harvesting is a fertility preservation technique with potential advantages over ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC), as mature frozen and later thawed oocyte used for fertilization poses decreased risk of malignant cells re-seeding, as compared to ovarian tissue implantation. We previously demonstrated that in vitro maturation (IVM) performed following OTC in fertility preservation patients, even in pre-menarche girls, yields a fair amount of oocytes available for IVM and freezing for future use. We conducted a retrospective cohort study, evaluating IVM outcomes in chemotherapy naïve patients referred for fertility preservation by OTC that had oocyte collected from the medium with attempted IVM. A total of 133 chemotherapy naïve patients aged 1–35 years were included in the study. The primary outcome was IVM rate in the different age groups – pre-menarche (1–5 and ≥6 years), post-menarche (menarche-17 years), young adults (18–24 years) and adults (25–29 and 30–35 years). We demonstrate a gradual increase in mean IVM rate in the age groups from 1 to 25 years [4.6% (1–5 years), 23.8% (6 years to menarche), and 28.4% (menarche to 17 years)], with a peak of 38.3% in the 18–24 years group, followed by a decrease in the 25–29 years group (19.3%), down to a very low IVM rate (8.9%) in the 30–35 years group. A significant difference in IVM rates was noted between the age extremes – the very young (1–5 years) and the oldest (30–35 years) groups, as compared with the 18–24-year group (p < 0.001). Importantly, number of oocytes matured, percent of patients with matured oocytes, and overall maturation rate differed significantly (p < 0.001). Our finding of extremely low success rates in those very young (under 6 years) and older (≥30 years) patients suggests that oocytes retrieved during OTC prior to chemotherapy have an optimal window of age that shows higher success rates, suggesting that oocytes may have an inherent tendency toward better maturation in those age groups
Time to menarche and final height after histrelin implant treatment for central precocious puberty
Objective To compare final height, change in body mass index (BMI), and time from end of treatment until menarche in girls with central precocious puberty treated with the histrelin implant versus depot gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist injections.Study design Chart review, interview, and final height measurements of 2 groups of girls with central precocious puberty; triptorelin depot (TD) group: 23 girls were treated from age 8.4 +/- 0.3 with monthly injections of TD, for 26.7 +/- 2.5 months; histrelin implant group: 11 girls were treated from age 8.7 +/- 0.3 years for 28.4 +/- 3.7 months, of whom 9 initially received monthly TD injections for 1.5-39 months. Final height, BMI (pretreatment vs recent), and time between either implant removal or last injection to menarche were compared.Results Time between removal of implant or last injection and menarche was 9.3 +/- 1.5 (histrelin implant group) versus 16.1 +/- 1.7 (TD group) months (P = .02). Predicted height at implant insertion was 156.8 +/- 2.6 cm, and final height was 161.1 +/- 2.0 cm (not significant [NS]). Predicted height for TD was 155.2 +/- 1.9 cm and final height was 157.9 +/- 1.7 cm (NS). Change from onset of treatment to final BMI-SDS for histrelin implant was -0.41 +/- 0.3, and for TD was -0.03 +/- 0.2 (NS).Conclusions Menarche occurred sooner after implant removal. There was no difference in final height or BMI outcomes between the 2 treatment modalities
What are the most common controversial clinical issues in fertility preservation? A content analysis of a collaborative professional online consultation group
Abstract Research question Clinicians involved in fertility preservation (FP) are often required to make prompt and consequential decisions despite the absence of evidence-based data. We established a collaborative professional online consultation group for fertility preservation issues. We sought to determine the main controversial clinical issues in FP as raised by participants of this group. Design Content analysis of a dedicated community of practice interacting via a messaging application (WhatsApp) and a survey of group participants. Results Between January 2019 and July 2022, group members posed 39 clinical questions which were discussed and debated by the group. Common themes included management of oncofertility cases (33%), potential gonadotoxicity of various therapies (23%), fertility preservation in women and girls with premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) (18%), and technical aspects of ovarian tissue cryopreservation (10%). All but one query received prompt response (mean time for first response for 95% of queries 7.1 ± 9.0 min) from a mean of 5.4 ± 3.2 members. An anonymous online survey of group members was conducted during August 2022 (n = 31, response rate 94%). The majority of respondents stated they gained knowledge and assistance in clinical decision making from participation in the discussion group (90% and 58% of respondents, respectively). Conclusions Management of clinical oncofertility cases, potential gonadotoxic effect of therapeutics and fertility preservation in women and girls with POI were the most common controversial issues in our fertility preservation community of practice. Intra-professional collaborative communication via a messaging application can aid in clinical management of fertility preservation and augment clinician’s knowledge
Recommended from our members
The association between history of retained placenta and success rate of misoprostol treatment for early pregnancy failure
Background: To date, the association between retained placenta and treatment success rate of misoprostol for early pregnancy failure has yet to be evaluated. The aim of this study was to evaluate this association and further investigated the connection between medical, clinical and sonographic parameters and treatment success. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women with early pregnancy failure treated with misoprostol from 2006 to 2021. The success rate of misoprostol treatment was compared between patients with history of retained placenta including women who underwent manual lysis of the placenta following delivery or patients who were found to have retained products of conception during their post-partum period (study group) and patients without such history (controls). Demographic, clinical, and sonographic characteristics as well as treatment outcomes were compared between the groups. Results: A total of 271 women were included in the study (34 women in the study group compared to 237 women in the control group). Two-hundred and thirty-three women (86.0%) presented with missed abortion, and 38 (14.0%) with blighted ovum. Success rates of misoprostol treatment were 61.8% and 78.5% for the study and control groups, respectively (p = 0.032). Univariate analysis performed comparing successful vs. failed misoprostol treatment showed advanced age, gravidity, parity and gestational sac size (mm) on TVUS were associated with higher misoprostol treatment failure rate. Following a multivariate logistic regression model these variables did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion: Women who have an event of retained placenta following childbirth appear to have decreased success rate of treatment with misoprostol for early pregnancy failure. Larger studies are needed to confirm this finding.</p
Artificial rupture of membranes as a mode for induction of labor in women with a previous cesarean section- a retrospective cohort study
Abstract Background Induction of labor in women with a previous cesarean section (CS) is associated with increased rates of uterine rupture and failed attempt for vaginal delivery. Prostaglandins use is contraindicated in this population, limiting available options for cervical ripening. Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of artificial rupture of membranes (AROM) as a mode of Induction of labor (IOL) in women with a previous cesarean section. Methods A retrospective cohort study conducted in a single tertiary care center between January 2015 and October 2020. Women with one previous cesarean section and a current singleton term pregnancy requiring IOL, with an unfavorable cervix, were included. The primary outcome was a successful vaginal delivery (VBAC); secondary outcomes were rates of chorioamnionitis, uterine rupture and low Apgar score ( 12 h after AROM) administration, there were no significant changes in the rates of successful VBAC or of chorioamnionitis. Conclusion AROM as a single mode of IOL in women with a previous CS is a safe and efficient practice with high rates of successful VBAC. When spontaneous labor does not develop, there is no advantage to delay the administration of oxytocin