Transforming the American experience of death: What dreams may come?

There is no means to evaluate the death experience in the US healthcare system. Other countries have established population-wide measures to evaluate and improve the dying experience for patients and their families. With an increasing population of advanced-age persons, changes in sites of death, and a continually fractured healthcare delivery system, there is a need to establish a universal assessment of the quality of death in the US. In this commentary, we outline the need for such an assessment and build off of previous literature on the various existing assessments of the quality of death that have typically been reserved for end-of-life care specialties. Based on the aforementioned reasons and poor performance relative to other nations, there is a need for political attention to assessing the quality of American death experiences for patients and for their families. Absent such a measure, there will never be an incentive to improve the quality of death for patients and their families and the US healthcare system will continue to neglect this important aspect of American life. Experience Framework This article is associated with the Policy & Measurement lens of The Beryl Institute Experience Framework (https://theberylinstitute.org/experience-framework/). Access other PXJ articles related to this lens. Access other resources related to this lens

Activity of Daily Living Trajectories Surrounding Acute Hospitalization of Long‐Stay Nursing Home Residents

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/101804/1/jgs12511.pd

WP 2019-397

Nursing home care is arguably the largest financial risk for the elderly without private or social insurance coverage. The annual out-of-pocket expenditure can easily exceed $70,000. Despite the substantial financial burdens on the elderly, the understanding of nursing home self-pay prices is rather sparse due to data limitation. To bridge the gap in the literature, we collected a unique and longitudinal price dataset from eight states, spanning from 2005 to 2010, to advance the understanding of the determinants and geographical variations of nursing home price and price growth. Overall, nursing home prices have consistently outpaced the inflation of consumer prices, particularly in California and Oregon. We also see faster price growth in markets where they face stricter capacity constraints and have higher for-profit market shares. Organizational structures are also significantly associated with price variations. We find that nonprofit nursing homes have higher prices than for-profit nursing homes and that chain-affiliated nursing homes charge higher prices than nonchains counterparts.U.S. Social Security Administration through the University of Michigan Retirement Research Center, award RRC08098401-09https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/151935/1/wp397.pdfDescription of wp397.pdf : Working pape

Organizational Culture and High Medicaid Nursing Homes Financial Performance

Background and Objectives: This paper investigates the relationship between organizational culture and financial performance in under-resourced nursing homes (85% or higher Medicaid residents). Research Design and Methods: We tested whether the type of organizational culture (clan, adhocracy, market, and hierarchical) was associated with higher financial performance, measured by the operating margin. Survey data of 341 nursing home administrators were collected in 2017–2018 and merged with secondary datasets with facility and market characteristics. We used multiple regression analysis to test our hypotheses. Results: We found that a market culture was positively associated with higher operating margin. On the other hand, having a clan, hierarchical, or non-dominant culture was associated with lower financial performance, compared to a market culture. Discussion and Implications: Ensuring the financial viability of high-Medicaid nursing homes is important since they provide care to low-income residents and a high proportion of racial/ethnic minorities. Our findings suggest that having a market culture with an external orientation may be associated with better financial performance among these nursing homes

Associations among unit leadership and unit climates for implementation in acute care: a cross-sectional study

Abstract Background Nurse managers have a pivotal role in fostering unit climates supportive of implementing evidence-based practices (EBPs) in care delivery. EBP leadership behaviors and competencies of nurse managers and their impact on practice climates are widely overlooked in implementation science. The purpose of this study was to examine the contributions of nurse manager EBP leadership behaviors and nurse manager EBP competencies in explaining unit climates for EBP implementation in adult medical-surgical units. Methods A multi-site, multi-unit cross-sectional research design was used to recruit the sample of 24 nurse managers and 553 randomly selected staff nurses from 24 adult medical-surgical units from 7 acute care hospitals in the Northeast and Midwestern USA. Staff nurse perceptions of nurse manager EBP leadership behaviors and unit climates for EBP implementation were measured using the Implementation Leadership Scale and Implementation Climate Scale, respectively. EBP competencies of nurse managers were measured using the Nurse Manager EBP Competency Scale. Participants were emailed a link to an electronic questionnaire and asked to respond within 1 month. The contributions of nurse manager EBP leadership behaviors and competencies in explaining unit climates for EBP implementation were estimated using mixed-effects models controlling for nurse education and years of experience on current unit and accounting for the variability across hospitals and units. Significance level was set at α < .05. Results Two hundred sixty-four staff nurses and 22 nurse managers were included in the final sample, representing 22 units in 7 hospitals. Nurse manager EBP leadership behaviors (p < .001) and EBP competency (p = .008) explained 52.4% of marginal variance in unit climate for EBP implementation. Leadership behaviors uniquely explained 45.2% variance. The variance accounted for by the random intercepts for hospitals and units (p < .001) and years of nursing experience in current unit (p < .05) were significant but level of nursing education was not. Conclusion Nurse managers are significantly related to unit climates for EBP implementation primarily through their leadership behaviors. Future implementation studies should consider the leadership of nurse managers in creating climates supportive of EBP implementation.https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/143195/1/13012_2018_Article_753.pd

Do Market-Level Hospital and Physician Resources Affect Small Area Variation in Hospital Use?

This study evaluates the effect of market-level physician and hospital resources on hospital use. It is anticipated that higher hospital discharges are associated with (1) greater hospital and physician resources, (2) more differentiated hospital and physician resources, and (3) higher levels of teaching intensity in the community. Data on 14 modified diagnostically related groups (DRGs) and 58 hospital market communities in Michigan are analyzed during a 7-year period. Findings indicate that physician resources, hospital resources, differentiation of hospital and physician resources, and teaching intensity contribute only modestly to discharges, holding constant the socioeconomic attributes of the community and adjusting for the variation in hospital use over time. With the inclusion of hospital and physician resource variables, socioeconomic factors remain important determinants of the variation across market communities. Findings are discussed in terms of their implications for health care organizations, managed care programs, and cost control efforts in general.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/68450/2/6.pd

A critical review of recent US market level health care strategy literature

In this review, we argue that it would be profitable if the neoclassical economic theories that have dominated recent US market level health care strategy research could be complemented by greater use of sociological frameworks. Sociological theory can address three central questions that neoclassical economic theories have tended to slight: (1) how decision-makers' preferences are determined; (2) who the decision-makers are; and (3) how decision-makers' plans are translated into organizational action. We suggest five sociological frameworks that would enable researchers to address these issues better relative to market level strategy in health care. The frameworks are (1) institutional theory, (2) organizational ecology, (3) social movements, (4) social networks, and (5) internal organizational change. A recent global trend toward privatization of health care provision makes US market level strategy research increasingly applicable to non-US readers.Strategy US Health system Health markets