14 research outputs found

    Productivity and profitability of mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern. and Coss.] under varying levels of sulphur and boron application methods

    Get PDF
    Nearly 50.1 and 80.8% of soils in Odisha are deficient in sulphur and boron, respectively. These two nutrients play multiple roles in the nutrition of mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern. and Coss.]  crop. The  rapeseed and mustard productivity in Odisha is lower than the national average due to non-application of these two nutrients. Hence, an experiment was conducted at Bhubaneswar, India, during rabi season of 2021-22 to assess the effects of sulphur levels and boron application methods on the productivity and profitability of the crop. The treatments comprising four levels of sulphur (S0: 0, S1: 20, S2: 40 and S3: 60 kg ha-1) assigned in the main plots and four boron application methods (B1: 0.5 kg B ha-1 basal, B2: B1 + one foliar spray of boron 0.02%, B3: B1 + two foliar sprays of boron 0.02% and B4: 1.0 kg boron ha-1 basal) assigned in the sub plots were tried in split plot design replicated thrice. The application of 60 kg S ha-1 recorded the maximum mustard seed yield (1275 kg ha-1), which was at par with 40 kg S ha-1 (1262 kg ha-1). Among boron application methods, 50% RDB basal + two foliar sprays of boron (0.02%) recorded the maximum seed yield (1170 kg ha-1) and proved better than other methods. The combined application of 40 kg S ha-1 + 50% RDB basal with two foliar sprays of boron (0.02%) produced the maximum mustard seed yield (1283 kg ha-1), net return ( ₹ 26,470 or 330.88 USD  ha-1) and B: C ratio (0.64). 

    Study to Find Hemodynamic Changes and Complications Occurring with Propofol and Etomidate During General Anaesthesia: A Tertiary Care Institutional Based Study

    Full text link
    Background: Among general anesthesia induction drugs, etomidate is the only imidazole, and it has the most favourable therapeutic index for single bolus administration. Propofol is non-barbiturate short acting intravenous anaesthetic agent. It is a phenol derivative (2,6-Diisopropylphenol). Hence; the present study was undertaken for assessing the hemodynamic changes and complication occurring with propofol and etomidate during general anaesthesia. Materials & Methods: A total of 40 patients scheduled to undergo surgical procedure under general anesthesia were enrolled. All the patients were divided broadly into two study groups with 20 patients in each group as follows: Group 1: Propofol group, and Group 2: Etomidate group. Propofol group received propofol at 2 mg/kg and etomidate group received etomidate at 0.2 mg/kg. Pain on injection and myoclonic movements were recorded, if any at induction. As soon as the onset of unconsciousness occurs consumed dose of anaesthetic were recorded individually. All the results were recorded and analysed by SPSS software. Results: Mean heart rate among patients of group 1 at baseline, at induction and at 10 minutes was 85.6, 98.4 and 81.3 respectively. Mean heart rate among patients of group 2 at baseline, at induction and at 10 minutes was 84.2, 96.1 and 82.7 respectively. Mean arterial pressure among patients of group 1 at baseline, at induction and at 10 minutes was 89.3, 80.4 and 94.6 respectively. Mean arterial pressure among patients of group 2 at baseline, at induction and at 10 minutes was 90.1, 88.6 and 95.4 respectively. Significant results were obtained while comparing the mean arterial pressure at induction among the two study groups. Pain on injection was seen in 2 patients of group 1 and 1 patient of group 2. Conclusion: From the above results, the authors concluded that etomidate was better in comparison to propofol during general anaesthesia

    Not Available

    Full text link
    Not AvailableNot AvailableNot Availabl

    Intercropping—A Low Input Agricultural Strategy for Food and Environmental Security

    Full text link
    Intensive agriculture is based on the use of high-energy inputs and quality planting materials with assured irrigation, but it has failed to assure agricultural sustainability because of creation of ecological imbalance and degradation of natural resources. On the other hand, intercropping systems, also known as mixed cropping or polyculture, a traditional farming practice with diversified crop cultivation, uses comparatively low inputs and improves the quality of the agro-ecosystem. Intensification of crops can be done spatially and temporally by the adoption of the intercropping system targeting future need. Intercropping ensures multiple benefits like enhancement of yield, environmental security, production sustainability and greater ecosystem services. In intercropping, two or more crop species are grown concurrently as they coexist for a significant part of the crop cycle and interact among themselves and agro-ecosystems. Legumes as component crops in the intercropping system play versatile roles like biological N fixation and soil quality improvement, additional yield output including protein yield, and creation of functional diversity. But growing two or more crops together requires additional care and management for the creation of less competition among the crop species and efficient utilization of natural resources. Research evidence showed beneficial impacts of a properly managed intercropping system in terms of resource utilization and combined yield of crops grown with low-input use. The review highlights the principles and management of an intercropping system and its benefits and usefulness as a low-input agriculture for food and environmental security

    Developing Rice with High Yield under Phosphorus Deficiency: Pup1 Sequence to Application1[W][OA]

    Get PDF
    The major quantitative trait locus (QTL) Phosphorus uptake1 (Pup1) confers tolerance of phosphorus deficiency in soil and is currently one of the most promising QTLs for the development of tolerant rice (Oryza sativa) varieties. To facilitate targeted introgression of Pup1 into intolerant varieties, the gene models predicted in the Pup1 region in the donor variety Kasalath were used to develop gene-based molecular markers that are evenly distributed over the fine-mapped 278-kb QTL region. To validate the gene models and optimize the markers, gene expression analyses and partial allelic sequencing were conducted. The markers were tested in more than 80 diverse rice accessions revealing three main groups with different Pup1 allele constitution. Accessions with tolerant (group I) and intolerant (group III) Pup1 alleles were distinguished from genotypes with Kasalath alleles at some of the analyzed loci (partial Pup1; group II). A germplasm survey additionally confirmed earlier data showing that Pup1 is largely absent from irrigated rice varieties but conserved in varieties and breeding lines adapted to drought-prone environments. A core set of Pup1 markers has been defined, and sequence polymorphisms suitable for single-nucleotide polymorphism marker development for high-throughput genotyping were identified. Following a marker-assisted backcrossing approach, Pup1 was introgressed into two irrigated rice varieties and three Indonesian upland varieties. First phenotypic evaluations of the introgression lines suggest that Pup1 is effective in different genetic backgrounds and environments and that it has the potential to significantly enhance grain yield under field conditions

    Developing Rice with High Yield under Phosphorus Deficiency: Pup1 Sequence to Application1[W][OA]

    Get PDF
    The major quantitative trait locus (QTL) Phosphorus uptake1 (Pup1) confers tolerance of phosphorus deficiency in soil and is currently one of the most promising QTLs for the development of tolerant rice (Oryza sativa) varieties. To facilitate targeted introgression of Pup1 into intolerant varieties, the gene models predicted in the Pup1 region in the donor variety Kasalath were used to develop gene-based molecular markers that are evenly distributed over the fine-mapped 278-kb QTL region. To validate the gene models and optimize the markers, gene expression analyses and partial allelic sequencing were conducted. The markers were tested in more than 80 diverse rice accessions revealing three main groups with different Pup1 allele constitution. Accessions with tolerant (group I) and intolerant (group III) Pup1 alleles were distinguished from genotypes with Kasalath alleles at some of the analyzed loci (partial Pup1; group II). A germplasm survey additionally confirmed earlier data showing that Pup1 is largely absent from irrigated rice varieties but conserved in varieties and breeding lines adapted to drought-prone environments. A core set of Pup1 markers has been defined, and sequence polymorphisms suitable for single-nucleotide polymorphism marker development for high-throughput genotyping were identified. Following a marker-assisted backcrossing approach, Pup1 was introgressed into two irrigated rice varieties and three Indonesian upland varieties. First phenotypic evaluations of the introgression lines suggest that Pup1 is effective in different genetic backgrounds and environments and that it has the potential to significantly enhance grain yield under field conditions
    corecore