Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Properties of Lafutidine after Postprandial Oral Administration in Healthy Subjects: Comparison with Famotidine

Lafutidine, a histamine H2-receptor antagonist, inhibits gastric acid secretion during the daytime, however, the relationship between the plasma concentration and the drug response remains unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of lafutidine and famotidine following postprandial oral administration. After a lafutidine tablet (10 mg), famotidine tablet (20 mg), or water only (control) was administered, blood samples were taken and intragastric pH was measured. The plasma concentrations of lafutidine and famotidine were determined by HPLC, and the median intragastric pH values per 30 min were used as the degrees of gastric acid suppression. Data were analyzed based on a one-compartment pharmacokinetic model and a sigmoid Emax pharmacodynamic model. Lafutidine plasma concentrations rapidly increased after administration; famotidine required some time to increase the plasma concentrations, requiring an absorption lag time in the pharmacokinetic model. Between the plasma concentration and ΔpH (the difference in intragastric pH by the drug vs. control), lafutidine showed an anticlockwise hysteresis loop which indicated equilibration delay between the plasma concentration and effect site, requiring an effect site compartment in the pharmacodynamic model; famotidine showed more parallel relationship. These results indicated that the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of lafutidine after postprandial oral administration were different from those of famotidine at least 4.5 h after dosing

The Pharmacokinetics of Low-Dose Thalidomide in Japanese Patients with Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Thalidomide has been used for the treatment of refractory multiple myeloma, the dosage in Japan is lower than in other countries; however, there is little information on the pharmacokinetics and their relationship with the drug response. The aim of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics of low-dose thalidomide in Japanese patients with refractory multiple myeloma, and to examine the relationship between pharmacokinetics and adverse events. On the first and second days, a 100 mg capsule was administered to 8 Japanese patients after breakfast and blood samples were obtained. The plasma concentrations were measured using HPLC and analyzed based on a one-compartment model. If intolerable adverse events were not observed for 14 d, the dose was increased to 200 mg. The average apparent volume of distribution (Vd/F), apparent total clearance (CL/F) and area under the plasma concentration–time curve from 0 to infinity (AUC0—∞), which were 45.3 l, 5.5 l/h and 21.7 μg·h/ml, respectively, with smaller Vd/F and CL/F and larger AUC0—∞ than in Caucasian populations. This pharmacokinetic difference may explain the dose difference between Japan and other countries. Adverse events were associated with AUC0—∞, which was best correlated with plasma concentration at 12 h after administration. The 12-h time point was suggested to be a capable indicator for “safety-oriented” therapeutic drug monitoring of thalidomide

Pulmonary Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Ampicillin/Sulbactam Regimens for Pneumonia Caused by Various Bacteria, including <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i>

This study aimed to assess the dosing regimens of ampicillin/sulbactam for pneumonia based on pulmonary pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) target attainment. Using the literature data, we developed pulmonary PK models and estimated the probabilities of attaining PK/PD targets in lung tissue. Against bacteria other than A. baumannii (the general treatment), the PK/PD target was set as both 50% time above the minimum inhibitory concentration (T > MIC) for ampicillin and 50% T > 0.5 MIC for sulbactam. For the A. baumannii treatment, the PK/PD target was set as 60% T > MIC for sulbactam. The pulmonary PK/PD breakpoint was defined as the highest minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) at which the target attainment probability in the lung tissue was ≥90%. The lung tissue/serum area under the drug concentration–time curve from 0 to 3 h (AUC0–3h) ratios for ampicillin and sulbactam were 0.881 and 0.368, respectively. The ampicillin/sulbactam AUC0–3h ratio in the lung tissue was 3.89. For the general treatment, the pulmonary PK/PD breakpoint for ampicillin/sulbactam at 3 g four times daily in typical patients with creatinine clearance (CLcr) of 60 mL/min was 2 μg/mL, which covered the MIC90s (the MICs that inhibited the growth of 90% of the strains) of most gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. For the A. baumannii treatment, the pulmonary PK/PD breakpoint for ampicillin/sulbactam at 9 g 4-h infusion three times daily (27 g/day) in patients with a CLcr of 60 mL/min was 4 μg/mL, which covered the MIC90 of A. baumannii. A PK/PD evaluation for pneumonia should be performed in the lung tissue (the target site) rather than in the blood because sulbactam concentrations are lower in lung tissue. These findings should facilitate the selection of ampicillin/sulbactam regimens for pneumonia caused by various bacteria, including A. baumannii

Pulmonary Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Ampicillin/Sulbactam Regimens for Pneumonia Caused by Various Bacteria, including Acinetobacter baumannii

This study aimed to assess the dosing regimens of ampicillin/sulbactam for pneumonia based on pulmonary pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) target attainment. Using the literature data, we developed pulmonary PK models and estimated the probabilities of attaining PK/PD targets in lung tissue. Against bacteria other than A. baumannii (the general treatment), the PK/PD target was set as both 50% time above the minimum inhibitory concentration (T &gt; MIC) for ampicillin and 50% T &gt; 0.5 MIC for sulbactam. For the A. baumannii treatment, the PK/PD target was set as 60% T &gt; MIC for sulbactam. The pulmonary PK/PD breakpoint was defined as the highest minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) at which the target attainment probability in the lung tissue was &ge;90%. The lung tissue/serum area under the drug concentration&ndash;time curve from 0 to 3 h (AUC0&ndash;3h) ratios for ampicillin and sulbactam were 0.881 and 0.368, respectively. The ampicillin/sulbactam AUC0&ndash;3h ratio in the lung tissue was 3.89. For the general treatment, the pulmonary PK/PD breakpoint for ampicillin/sulbactam at 3 g four times daily in typical patients with creatinine clearance (CLcr) of 60 mL/min was 2 &mu;g/mL, which covered the MIC90s (the MICs that inhibited the growth of 90% of the strains) of most gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. For the A. baumannii treatment, the pulmonary PK/PD breakpoint for ampicillin/sulbactam at 9 g 4-h infusion three times daily (27 g/day) in patients with a CLcr of 60 mL/min was 4 &mu;g/mL, which covered the MIC90 of A. baumannii. A PK/PD evaluation for pneumonia should be performed in the lung tissue (the target site) rather than in the blood because sulbactam concentrations are lower in lung tissue. These findings should facilitate the selection of ampicillin/sulbactam regimens for pneumonia caused by various bacteria, including A. baumannii

Pharmacokinetics of Prophylactic Ampicillin–Sulbactam and Dosing Optimization in Patients Undergoing Cardiovascular Surgery with Cardiopulmonary Bypass

Antibiotic concentrations must be maintained at an adequate level throughout cardiovascular surgery to prevent surgical site infection. This study aimed to determine the most appropriate timing for intraoperative repeated dosing of ampicillin–sulbactam, a commonly used antibiotic prophylaxis regimen, to maintain adequate concentrations throughout the course of cardiovascular surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The total plasma concentrations of ampicillin were monitored in 8 patients after ampicillin (1 g)–sulbactam (0.5 g) administration via initial intravenous infusion and subsequent CPB priming. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated and used to predict the free plasma concentrations of ampicillin. The mean values for the volume of distribution, elimination rate constant, elimination half-life, and total clearance of ampicillin were 15.8±4.1 L, 0.505±0.186 h-1, 1.52±0.47 h, and 7.72±2.72 L/h, respectively. When ampicillin (1 g)–sulbactam (0.5 g) was intravenously administered every 3, 4, 6, and 12 h after the start of CPB, the predicted free trough plasma concentrations of ampicillin were 15.20, 8.25, 2.74, and 0.13 μg/mL, respectively. Therefore, an every-6-h regimen was needed to maintain the free ampicillin concentration at more than 2 μg/mL during cardiovascular surgery with CPB. We suggest that the dose and dosing interval for ampicillin–sulbactam should be adjusted to optimize the efficacy and safety of treatment, according to the minimum inhibitory concentrations for methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus isolates at each institution. Registration number: UMIN000007356

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Meropenem and Biapenem in Bile and Dosing Considerations for Biliary Tract Infections Based on Site-Specific Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment ▿

The present study investigated the pharmacokinetics of meropenem and biapenem in bile and estimated their pharmacodynamic target attainment at the site. Meropenem (0.5 g) or biapenem (0.3 g) was administered to surgery patients (n = 8 for each drug). Venous blood samples and hepatobiliary tract bile samples were obtained at the end of infusion (0.5 h) and for up to 5 h thereafter. Drug concentrations in plasma and bile were analyzed pharmacokinetically and used for a Monte Carlo simulation to predict the probability of attaining the pharmacodynamic target (40% of the time above the MIC). Both drugs penetrated similarly into bile, with mean bile/plasma ratios of 0.24 to 0.25 (maximum drug concentration) and 0.30 to 0.38 (area under the drug concentration-time curve). The usual regimens of meropenem (0.5 g every 8 h [q8h]) and biapenem (0.3 g q8h) (0.5-h infusions) achieved similar target attainment probabilities in bile (≥90%) against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Enterobacter cloacae isolates. However, against Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates, meropenem at 1 g q8h and biapenem at 0.6 g q8h were required for values of 80.7% and 71.9%, respectively. The biliary pharmacodynamic-based breakpoint (the highest MIC at which the target attainment probability in bile was ≥90%) was 1 mg/liter for 0.5 g q8h and 2 mg/liter for 1 g q8h for meropenem and 0.5 mg/liter for 0.3 g q8h and 1 mg/liter for 0.6 g q8h for biapenem. These results help to define the clinical pharmacokinetics of the two carbapenems in bile while also helping to rationalize and optimize the dosing regimens for biliary tract infections based on site-specific pharmacodynamic target attainment