Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Gynecologic Procedures in a Fellowship Training Program

An early evaluation of the feasibility of training fellows in robotic surgery suggests that it is feasible to incorporate a systematic approach to robotic-assisted laparoscopic training at the onset of incorporating this technology into current practice

Utility Scores and Treatment Preferences for Clinical Early-Stage Cervical Cancer

AbstractObjectivesTo determine utility scores for health states relevant to the treatment of early-stage, high-risk cervical cancer.MethodsSeven descriptive health states incorporating the physical and emotional aspects of medical treatment, recovery, and prognosis were developed. Forty-five female volunteers valuated each health state using the visual analogue score (VAS) and time trade off (TTO) methods. Treatment options were ranked by mean and median TTO scores. The 95% confidence intervals were calculated to determine the statistical significance of ranking preferences. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare central tendencies related to age, race, parity, and subject history of abnormal cervical cytology.ResultsVAS and TTO scores were highly correlated. Volunteers ranked minimally invasive radical hysterectomy with low-risk features as most preferred (mean TTO = 0.96; median TTO = 1.00) and aborted radical hysterectomy followed by chemoradiation as least preferred (mean TTO = 0.69; median TTO = 0.83). Health states that included radical surgery were ranked higher than those that included chemoradiation, either in the adjuvant or primary setting. When survival was comparable, volunteers rated radical hysterectomy with high-risk pathology followed by adjuvant chemoradiation (mean TTO = 0.78; median TTO = 0.92; 95% CI: 0.69–0.87) similarly to chemoradiation alone (mean TTO = 0.76; median TTO 0.90; 95% CI: 0.66–0.86; p = NS). Utility scores for the majority of health states were not significantly associated with age, race, parity, or subject history of abnormal cervical cytology.ConclusionSubjects consistently preferred surgical excision to treat early-stage, high-risk cervical cancer and chose a minimally invasive approach. Such utility scores can be used to incorporate quality-of-life effects into comparative-effectiveness models for cervical cancer

Patient and physician factors associated with participation in cervical and uterine cancer trials: An NRG/GOG247 study

AbstractPurposeThe aim of this study was to identify patient and physician factors related to enrollment onto Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) trials.MethodsProspective study of women with primary or recurrent cancer of the uterus or cervix treated at a GOG institution from July 2010 to January 2012. Logistic regression examined probability of availability, eligibility and enrollment in a GOG trial. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for significant (p<0.05) results reported.ResultsSixty institutions, 781 patients, and 150 physicians participated, 300/780 (38%) had a trial available, 290/300 had known participation status. Of these, 150 women enrolled (59.5%), 102 eligible did not enroll (35%), 38 (13%) were ineligible. Ethnicity and specialty of physician, practice type, data management availability, and patient age were significantly associated with trial availability. Patients with >4 comorbidities (OR 4.5; CI 1.7–11.8) had higher odds of trial ineligibility. Non-White patients (OR 7.9; CI 1.3–46.2) and patients of Black physicians had greater odds of enrolling (OR 56.5; CI 1.1–999.9) in a therapeutic trial. Significant patient therapeutic trial enrollment factors: belief trial may help (OR 76.9; CI 4.9–>1000), concern about care if not on trial (OR12.1; CI 2.1–71.4), pressure to enroll (OR .27; CI 0.12–.64), caregiving without pay (OR 0.13; CI .02–.84). Significant physician beliefs were: patients would not do well on standard therapy (OR 3.6; CI 1.6–8.4), and trial would not be time consuming (OR 3.3; CI 1.3–8.1).ConclusionsTrial availability, patient and physician beliefs were factors identified that if modified could improve enrollment in cancer cooperative group clinical trials

Patient and physician factors associated with participation in cervical and uterine cancer trials: An NRG/GOG247 study

To identify patient and physician factors related to enrollment onto Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) trials

Cost-effectiveness analysis of annual screening strategies for endometrial cancer

Objective The objective of the study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of annual screening tests for endometrial cancer. Study Design Markov state transition model of the natural history of endometrial cancer used as the design for the study. Incidence was modeled for the general population and high risk groups (obese, body mass index [BMI] of =3D 30 kg/m2; tamoxifen users). Strategies evaluated were no screening, annual endometrial biopsy, annual endovaginal ultrasound, and annual serum screening. Serum screening was based on a recently described biomarker panel (sensitivity of 0.98, specificity of 0.98). Results In the general population model, no screening was least expensive, whereas annual serum screening age at 50-75 years had incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $60,363 per year of life saved (YLS) compared with no screening. In a high-risk population (obesity, BMI of =3D 30 kg/m2), annual serum screening at age 45-80 years had ICER of$41,226 per YLS compared with no screening. Annual endometrial biopsy and annual transvaginal ultrasound were dominated. Conclusion Annual serum screening for endometrial cancer has the potential to be cost effective when applied to high-risk populations

Palliative and hospice care in gynecologic cancer: A review

Despite the increasing availability of palliative care, oncology providers often misunderstand and underutilize these resources. The goals of palliative care are relief of suffering and provision of the best possible quality of life for both the patient and her family, regardless of where she is in the natural history of her disease. Lack of understanding and awareness of the services provided by palliative care physicians underlie barriers to referral. Oncologic providers spend a significant amount of time palliating the symptoms of cancer and its treatment; involvement of specialty palliative care providers can assist in managing the complex patient. Patients with gynecologic malignancies remain an ideal population for palliative care intervention. This review of the literature explores the current state of palliative care in the treatment of gynecologic cancers and its implications for the quality and cost of this treatment. © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved