The Ideal Age of Marriage as an Effort to Establish an Ideal Family

Marriage is intended to meet the needs of instincts and the instruction of religion. Hence, in order to carry out this worship, mental readiness is required. Yet, in Islam, there are no provisions on the ideal age of marriage. This study aims to analyse the ideal age of marriage in Indonesia based on the provisions of the Law and to identify the deviation of the provisions of marriage age. As results, it was revealed that the law sets the legal age of marriage at 19 years old as regulated in Article 7 paragraph (1) of Law No. 1 of 1974 in conjunction with Law No. 16 of 2019 concerning Marriage. Meanwhile, if there is a violation that deviates from the provisions stated in this Law, the guardian’s parents can submit an application on marriage dispensation (diskah) to the local court in order to be able to hold a marriage. This new provision has an implication for the effort to build a harmonious and ideal family as there is no discrimination on age limit between women and men which is also a form of gender equality. Idealitas Usia Pernikahan sebagai upaya Membangun Keluarga yang Ideal Perkawinan terbentuk melalui rasa untuk memenuhi kebutuhan nalurinya, dan juga untuk memenuhi petunjuk agamanya, maka dalam rangka untuk menjalankan ibadah tersebut diperlukan kesiapan mental baik jiwa dan raganya, akan tetapi dalam islam tidak terdapat ketentuan yang mensyaratkan idealnya usia menikah. Tujuan penelitian ini yaitu menanalisis bagaimana idealitas usia melaksanakan pernikahan di Indonesia sesuai dengan ketentuan Undang-Undang dan bagaimana menganalisis implementasi terhadap Penyimpangan ketentuan usia nikah. Penelitian yuridis normatif, dengan spesifikasi mengkaji implementasi kaidah-kaidah dan juga norma-norma yang terdapat dalam hukum positif, yang bersifat deskriptif. Hasil penelitian ditemukan bahwa undang-undang mensyaratkan kedua mempelai harus berumur 19 tahun sesuai dengan ketentuan pasal 7 (1) Undang-undang  Nomor  1 Tahun 1974 jo Undang-undang  Nomor  16 Tahun 2019 tentang perkawinan. Dan apabila terdapat pelanggaran yang menyimpang terhadap ketentuan yang ada pada pasal tersebut maka orang tua wali dapat mengajukan permohonan dispensasi nikah (diskah) kepada pengadilan setempat agar dapat melangsungkan pernikahan, dengan adanya ketentuan baru ini berimplikasi pada upaya membangun keluarga yang harmonis dan ideal bagi masyarakat karena tidak ada diskriminasi batas usia antara perempuan dan usia laki-laki serta hal ini merupakan bentuk kesamaan gender

The Concept of Deradicalization in an Effort to Prevent Terrorism in Indonesia

Radicalism is a paradigm to make a fundamental change in accordance with the understanding of the ideology adopted and believed. In general, the government and the society believe that terrorism is a phenomenon that cannot be easily eliminated. Deradicalization program essentially comes from the assumption that radicalism is the “root” of terrorism. Therefore, a concrete action as an effort to fight against terrorism will be (more) effective through deradicalization. The essence of deradicalization is to change the understanding (re-interpretation) of the paradigm that is considered wrong and “misleading”. The prevention of terrorism through the concept of deradicalization is a proactive action and requires caution because Indonesian society is plural and vulnerable to pluralism against social conflict. Thus, its application must be equipped by knowledge and understanding of  the development and patterns of terrorism and must be guided by the applicable legislations. This descriptive-analytic study applied statute approach, conceptual approach, historical approach and philosophical approach to investigate the legal issues under study. The collected data were analyzed by using qualitative juridical analysis method and the results are then presented thoroughly, systematically and in a integrated way in order to obtain clarity of the problem. The results showed that radicalism is an extreme idea to make a fundamental change based on subjective and exclusive ideological interpretations. Meanwhile, deradicalization is a pattern of handling terrorism which is essentially a process of reinterpretation of “deviated” beliefs or paradigms through efforts to reassure radical groups not to use violence (terror) as well as to create a sterile environment from radical movements which are “the root” of the growth of terrorism in Indonesia. Konsep Deradikalisasi dalam upaya Pencegahan Aksi Terorisme di Indonesia Radikalisme merupakan paradigma untuk melakukan suatu perubahan fundamental sesuai dengan pemahaman ideologi yang dianut dan diyakini . Pemerintah dan masyarakat pada umumnya meyakini bahwa (aksi) terorisme merupakan fenomena yang tidak mudah dihilangkan begitu saja. Program deradikalisasi hakikatnya berangkat dari asumsi bahwa radikalisme merupakan “akar” dari aksi-aksi terorisme. Oleh karenanya, bentu konkrit sebagai upaya memerangi terorisme akan (lebih) efektif melalui deradikalisasi. Esensinya adalah merubah pemahaman (re –interpretasi) atas paradigma yang dianggap keliru dan sesat “menyesatkan”.  Pencegahan terorisme dengan konsep deradikalisasi adalah tindakan proaktif serta membutuhkan kehati-hatian karena masyarakat Indonesia yang plural dan rentan kemajemukan terhadap konflik sosial. Upaya pemecahan masalah dalam deradikalisasi antara lain harus mengetahui dan memahami perkembangan dan pola tindak pidana terorisme sebagai bentuk penanggulangan  terorisme serta harus berpedoman pada peraturan perundang-undangan yang ada. Penelitian yang digunakan adalah deskriptif analitis dengan metode pendekatan yang digunakan yang digunakan untuk menjawab isu hukum dalam kajian ini adalah pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual, dan pendekatan historis serta pendekatan filosofis. Analisis data menggunakan metode analisis yuridis kualitatif, kemudian menyusun  secara menyeluruh, sistematis dan terintegrasi demi memperoleh kejelasan masalah.  Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa radikalisme merupakan gagasan ekstrim yaitu melakukan suatu perubahan secara fundamental menurut interpretasi ideologi secara subjektif dan eksklusif. Deradikalisasi merupakan pola penanganan terorisme yang hakekatnya merupakan proses re-interpretasi atas keyakinan atau paradigma “menyimpang” melalui upaya meyakinkan (kembali) terhadap kelompok-kelompok radikal untuk tidak menggunakan dan meninggalkan kekerasan (teror) , serta menciptakan lingkungan yang steril dari gerakan radikal yang merupakan akar penyebab tumbuhnya gerakan radikal (terorisme) di Indonesia

Legal Reconstruction on Fiduciary Guarantee Execution That Has Executorial Power Based on Justice

Based on the provisions of Article 29 paragraph 1 (a) of Law Number 42 year 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees based on the Almighty God, this gives an executive title that aligns the power of the deed with the Court’s decision. So the debtor is lack of legal protection when s/he conducts a default. Through the constructive paradigm, this research was directed to produce various constructive understandings, with themes of trustworthiness and authenticity. The approach method used was socio-legal research as an effort to understand the law in context, namely the context of the community so that great expectations can support the reconstruction of social reality. It was done by prioritizing the interaction between researchers and what was studied through sources and informants, and paying attention to the context. The results of the study found that the Reconstruction of fiduciary collateral certificate law that has executive power based on the law of consumer protection was carried out on Article 15 paragraph (3) of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 42 year 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees in which there is a balanced position between creditors and debtors. The matter of the execution of fiduciary guarantees is carried out in consultation, so as justice can be felt by both parties

The Authority of Interview in the Framework of Protecting Human Rights

Investigative actions including wiretapping must respect Human Rights (HAM) which provide justice for a person, as emphasized in Article 28 D paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution. This study aims to analyze and discover the reconstruction of wiretapping authority regulations in the context of protecting human rights based on the value of justice. The research method used is normative legal research, using the constructivism paradigm. The approach method used in this research is social legal research. This research uses primary data and secondary data. Data collection techniques through literature studies, interviews and questionnaires. The data collected was analyzed qualitatively. The results of the study found that the reconstruction of the value of justice in wiretapping authority regulations is clear, complete, uniform, there is a judge's authority in assessing whether wiretapping is legal or not and wiretapping efforts are empowered to prevent criminal acts from occurring. As for the reconstruction of the legal norms of wiretapping authority in the context of protecting human rights based on the value of justice, namely Article 1, Article 77, and Article 79 and Article 81 of Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), and the addition of provisions on empowering wiretapping for the purpose of preventing wiretapping criminal acts in Law Number 5 of 1997 concerning Psychotropics, Law Number 15 of 2003 concerning Eradication of Criminal Acts of Terrorism, Law Number 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission, Law Number 21 of 2007 concerning the Eradication of the Crime of Trafficking in Persons, Law Number 8 of 2007 2010 concerning Prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering Crimes, and Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. Keywords: Reconstruction, Regulation, Wiretapping, Justice DOI: 10.7176/JLPG/131-04 Publication date: April 30th 202

Biovent Pada Rokok Sigaret Kretek Tangan Dari Perspektif Hukum

Perkembangan teknologi rokok terus berkembang, mulai sejak kemasan sendiri sampai penggunaan teknologi. Pro kontra penggunaan rokok tidak pernah berhenti. Rokok dikatakan makruh atau bahkan ada yang mengharamkan karena dianggap merusak kesehatan, tetapi juga yang mengatakan rokok sebagai teman mencari inspirasi dan sumber devisa negara yang terus mengalir tanpa henti. Berbagai teknologi rokok digunakan untuk mengurangi dampak negatif dengan memakai filter, bagi penikmat rokok filter mengurangi kenikmatan. Banyak yang masih menginginkan rokok kretek produk tangan, meskipun tampilan saat dirokok bagi sebagian orang dianggap jorok dan jauh dari estetika dengan ujung rokok yang basah karena air liur dicampur dengan serpihan tembakau. Di sinilah teknologi BIOVENT diharapkan dapat mengurangi kesan tidak baik sigaret kretek tangan (SKT). Penelitian menunjukkan, pemanfaatan BIOVENT tidak mengubah rasa dan kandungan SKT. Simpulan dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa komposisi kimia TPM, Nikotin, Water, Tar Coresta, Tar SNI, Puff Number, Eugenol, dan CO pada SKTO dan SKT-BIOVENT berbeda tidak nyata, namun komposisi kimia SKTO/ SKT-BIOVENT berbeda sangat nyata dengan SKTF-1. Validasi data dilakukan pada semua komposisi menggunakan SPSS dengan parameter Normalitas, uji One Sample dan uji Homogenitas dan menghasilkan bahwa BIOVENT tidak memberi pengaruh pada komposisi kimia yang terkandung di dalam SKTO. BIOVENT hanya mengubah penampilan menjadi menarik dan modern. Pada SKT-BIOVENT, kadar nikotin dan kandungan lain tidak berubah, tetapi hanya menjaga penampilan agar tampak elegan, bersih, tetapi tidak mengurangi kenikmatan standar Sigaret Kretek Tangan yang dituntut oleh perokoknya. BIOVENT merupakan inovasi baru yang dapat dikategorikan sebagai invensi yang dapat dipatenkan, karena BIOVENT di samping merupakan inovasi baru juga dapat diterapkan dalam dunia industri, khususnya pada rokok Sigaret Kretek Tangan

Reconstruction of Seafarer Certificate Ownership Regulations for Ship Crews Based on the Value of Justice

The Seafarers Workforce Report, which was last published in 2015, published forecasts for the growth of trade shipping, which said the sector would need an additional 89,510 seafarers by 2026. The purpose of this study was to analyze the various causes of regulation of ownership of seafarers' certificates for Ship's Crew ( ABK) is not based on the value of justice; To analyze the form of reconstruction of seafarer's certificate ownership regulations for Ship's Crew (ABK) based on the value of justice. In this research it is qualitative in nature with the approach method used is sociolegal research. The type of legal research used is doctrinal legal research. And the specification of the research conducted is analytical descriptive. The results of this study found that the regulation on ownership of certificates for Ship Crews (ABK) is not based on justice, because there are causal factors, namely inequality in terms of ownership of seafarer certificates, for example crew members who have BST KLM certificates cannot take part in BST Commerce training. Based on Government Regulation No. 7 of 2000 concerning maritime affairs stipulates that a seafarer who wants to become part of the Ship's Crew (ABK) must have skill qualifications which are stated in the form of certificates, one of which is the BST certificate (Basic Safety Training) which is a certificate that contains basic safety training and training. in preventing an unwanted disaster both on land and at sea. In issuing BST, it is divided into 2 (two) types, namely BST for KLM (Motor Sailboats) and BST for commercial ships. reconstruction of certificate ownership regulations for ship crew (ABK) with justice, among others; Creating job opportunities in the maritime sector evenly; carry out planning in determining and career development; The construction of regulations regarding the ownership of maritime certificates. Keywords: Regulation; Maritime Certificate;Ship's Crew;Value of Justice; DOI: 10.7176/JLPG/129-01 Publication date: February 28th 202