COBE Constraints on a Local group X-ray Halo

We investigate the effect of a putative X-ray emitting halo surrounding the Local Group of galaxies, and specifically the possible temperature anisotropies induced in the COBE-DMR four-year sky maps by an associated Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect. By fitting the isothermal spherical halo model proposed by Suto et.al. (1996) to the coadded four-year COBE-DMR 53 and 90 GHz sky maps in Galactic coordinates, we find no significant evidence of a contribution. We therefore reject the claim that such a halo can affect the estimation of the primordial spectral index and amplitude of density perturbations as inferred from the DMR data. We find that correlation with the DMR data imposes constraints on the plausible contribution of such an X-ray emitting halo to a distortion in the CMB spectrum (as specified by the Compton-y parameter), up to a value for R -- the ratio of the core radius of the isothermal halo gas distribution to the distance to the Local Group centroid -- of 0.68. For larger values of R, the recent cosmological upper limit derived by COBE-FIRAS provides stronger constraints on the model parameters. Over the entire parameter space for R, we find an upper limit to the inferred sky-RMS anisotropy signal of 14 microKelvin (95% c.l.), a negligible amount relative to the 35 microKelvin signal observed in the COBE-DMR data.Comment: 4 pages, 3 figures; accepted for publication in MNRAS pink page

Where is the COBE maps' non-Gaussianity?

We review our recent claim that there is evidence of non-Gaussianity in the 4 Year COBE DMR data. We present some new results concerning the effect of the galactic cut upon the non-Gaussian signal. These findings imply a localization of the non-Gaussian signal on the Northern galactic hemisphere.Comment: Proceedings of COSMO98 Asiloma

The 4 Year COBE DMR data is non-Gaussian

I review our recent claim that there is evidence of non-Gaussianity in the 4 Year COBE DMR data. I describe the statistic we apply, the result we obtain and make a detailed list of the systematics we have analysed. I finish with a qualitative understanding of what it might be and its implications.Comment: Proceedings of Rome 3K conference, 5 pages, 3 figure