230 research outputs found

    Mindless Feeding: Is Maternal Distraction during Bottle-feeding Associated with Overfeeding?

    Get PDF
    Mindless eating, or eating while distracted by surrounding stimuli, leads to overeating. The present study explored whether “mindless feeding,” or maternal distraction during bottle-feeding, is associated with greater infant formula/milk intakes and lower maternal sensitivity to infant cues. Mothers and their ≤24-week-old bottle-feeding infants (N = 28) visited our laboratory for a video-recorded feeding observation. Infant intake was assessed by weighing bottles before and after the feedings. Maternal sensitivity to infant cues was objectively assessed by behavioral coding of video-records using the Nursing Child Assessment Feeding Scale. Maternal distraction was defined as looking away from the infant \u3e75% of the feeding; using a mobile device; conversing with another adult; or sleeping. Twenty-nine percent (n = 8) of mothers were distracted. While differences in intakes for infants of distracted vs. not distracted mothers did not reach significance (p = 0.24), the association between distraction and infant intake was modified by two dimensions of temperament: orienting/regulation capacity (p = 0.03) and surgency/extraversion (p = 0.04). For infants with low orienting/regulation capacity, infants of distracted mothers consumed more (177.1 ± 33.8 ml) than those of not distracted mothers (92.4 ± 13.8 ml). Similar findings were noted for infants with low surgency/extraversion (distracted: 140.6 ± 22.5 ml; not distracted: 78.4 ± 14.3 ml). No association between distraction and intake was seen for infants with high orienting/regulation capacity or surgency/extraversion. A significantly greater proportion of distracted mothers showed low sensitivity to infant cues compared to not distracted mothers (p = 0.04). In sum, mindless feeding may interact with infant characteristics to influence feeding outcomes; further experimental and longitudinal studies are needed

    4-(1H-Benzimidazol-2-ylmeth­oxy)-3-meth­oxy­benzaldehyde tetra­hydrate

    Get PDF
    In the title compound, C16H14N2O3·4H2O, the dihedral angle between the mean planes of the benzimidazole ring system and benzene ring is 2.9 (1)°. The aldehyde group is disordered over two sets of sites with refined occupancies of 0.559 (4) and 0.441 (4). In the crystal, extensive inter­molecular O—H⋯O, O—H⋯N and N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds in concert with weak π–π stacking inter­actions [centroid–centroid distances = 3.6104 (9), 3.6288 (9) and 3.9167 (10) Å] create a three-dimensional network

    Ethyl 2-amino-4,6-bis­(4-fluoro­phen­yl)cyclo­hexa-1,3-diene-1-carboxyl­ate

    Get PDF
    In the title compound, C21H19F2NO2, the cyclo­hexa-1,3-diene ring is in a distorted envelope conformation. The dihedral angles between the mean planes of the diene moiety and the two fluoro­phenyl rings are 42.8 (2) and 75.0 (5)°. The two fluoro­phenyl rings are inclined to one another by 87.0 (3)°. In the crystal, intra­molecular N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds and weak N—H⋯O and N—H⋯F inter­molecular inter­actions are observed forming an infinite two-dimensional network along [011]

    (2E)-1-(2,6-Dichloro-3-fluoro­phen­yl)-3-(4-meth­oxy­phen­yl)prop-2-en-1-one

    Get PDF
    There are two independent mol­ecules in the asymmetric unit of the title compound, C16H11Cl2FO2. The F atom equally populates both meta positions of the 6-dichloro-3-fluoro­phenyl ring in each mol­ecule, resulting in 0.5 occupancy for both the F and H atoms in these positions. The dihedral angle between the mean planes of the benzene rings are 77.5 (2) and 89.8 (8)°in the two mol­ecules. In the crystal, weak C—H⋯F and C—H⋯O inter­actions involving the half-occupied H and F atoms are observed. Weak π–π stacking inter­actions [centroid—centroid distance = 3.150 (2) Å] also contribute to the crystal stability

    N-(3-Chloro-4-fluoro­phen­yl)-2-(naphthalen-1-yl)acetamide

    Get PDF
    In the title compound, C18H13ClFNO, the dihedral angle between the mean planes of the chloro- and fluoro-substituted benzene ring and the naphthalene ring system is 60.5 (8)°. In the crystal, mol­ecules are linked by N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, forming a zigzag chain along [101]

    (2E)-1-(3,4-Dichloro­phen­yl)-3-(2-hy­droxy­phen­yl)prop-2-en-1-one

    Get PDF
    In the title compound, C15H10Cl2O2, the dihedral angle between the mean planes of the two benzene rings is 7.7 (6)°. The crystal packing is influenced by O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, which form chains along [010]. Weak π–π stacking inter­actions [centroid–centroid distance = 3.6697 (13) Å] are observed, which may contribute to the crystal packing stability

    4-(4-Chloro­phen­yl)-4-hy­droxy­piperidinium benzoate

    Get PDF
    In the title salt, C11H15ClNO+·C7H5O2 −, the dihedral angle between the mean planes of the chloro­phenyl ring of the cation and the benzene ring of the anion is 74.4 (1)°. In the cation, the six-membered piperazine ring adopts a chair conformation. The crystal packing is stabilized by inter­molecular N—H⋯O and O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, and weak inter­molecular C—H⋯O, C—H⋯Cl and C—H⋯π inter­actions

    Methyl 3,5-dibromo-2-diacetyl­amino­benzoate

    Get PDF
    The title methyl benzoate compound, C12H11Br2NO4, consists of an ortho-substituted diacetyl­amino group and meta-substituted Br atoms. The crystal packing is stabilized by weak inter­molecular C—H⋯O inter­actions

    1,3-Bis(biphenyl-4-yl)-2,2-dibromo-3-oxopropyl acetate

    Get PDF
    In the title compound, C29H22Br2O3, the dihedral angles between the mean planes of the benzene rings within each biphenyl group are 26.7 (8) and 30.9 (8)°. The mean planes of the terminal and inner benzene rings of the biphenyl groups bonded through a propan-1-one group in the V-shaped mol­ecule are oriented at angles of 66.1 (7) and 60.0 (8)°, respectively. The two Br atoms are opposite the propen-1-one group. Weak inter­molecular C—H⋯O and C—H⋯π inter­actions are observed in the crystal structure
    corecore