3 research outputs found

    Biokinetics of buccal spray insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes

    No full text
    Metabolism. 2005 Jul;54(7):930-4. Biokinetics of buccal spray insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes. Pozzilli P, Manfrini S, Costanza F, Coppolino G, Cavallo MG, Fioriti E, Modi P. Source Department of Endocrinoplogy and Diabetes, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy. [email protected] Abstract OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the metabolic effect of buccal spray insulin compared with subcutaneous regular insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This study compared plasma glucose, insulin, and C-peptide levels in 18 patients with type 1 diabetes treated with subcutaneous regular or buccal spray insulin on 2 consecutive mornings. On day 1, patients were treated with their usual subcutaneous regular insulin regimens. On day 2, patients received buccal spray insulin. In the morning of both days 1 and 2, patients received a standard meal of 630 kJ. No intermediate or long-acting insulin was administered to patients on the morning of the test. Blood samples were collected for up to 4 hours for biokinetic analysis. In a subset of 3 patients, premeal buccal spray insulin was administered for 2 entire consecutive days. In these patients, glucose levels were monitored using the glucose sensor monitoring system. RESULTS: Overall, there were no statistically significant differences in glucose, insulin, or C-peptide levels measured after administration of subcutaneous vs buccal spray insulin. However, at 90 and 120 minutes after subcutaneous regular insulin administration, significantly higher insulin levels and more prolonged hypoglycemic effect were detected compared with buccal spray insulin administration. In the 3 patients who received 1 day of regular and 2 entire days of buccal spray insulin, no significant differences were observed in glucose levels during the 3 days of glucose sensor monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: Insulin administered via the buccal spray formulation is as effective as the subcutaneous route in lowering blood glucose levels

    Percutaneous ultrasound-guided ablation of BW7756-hepatoma using ethanol or acetic acid in a rat model

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>To compare tumor necrosis in hepatoma induced in rats by a single percutaneous injection of ethanol (PEI) or acetic acid (PAI).</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>BW7756 hepatomas of 1 mm<sup>3 </sup>were implanted in the liver of 40 male healthy rats. After 14 days, the 36 surviving rats were treated, in a single session, by ultrasound-guided injection of 300 μl of 95% ethanol (n = 17) or 100 μl of 50% acetic acid (n = 19). They were sacrificed 14 days after treatment and explanted tumoral livers were examined. The same PAI procedure was repeated on 13 additional rats to exclude a suspected occurrence of technical failures during the experiment, due to a surprisingly high rate of deaths within 30 minutes after PAI.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Four rats died within four days after tumor implantation; after PEI, 1/17 (6%) died, whereas after PAI 9/19 (47%) died. The remaining 26 rats, after 14 days post-percutaneous ablation, were sacrificed. Gross and microscopic examinations showed that the hepatoma's nodules treated with PEI had 45.3 ± 19.4% tumor necrosis compared to 49 ± 23.3% (P = NS) for those treated with PAI. Complete tumor necrosis was not found in any animal. Peritoneal invasion was present in 4/16 (25%) and 2/10 (20%) rats treated with PEI or PAI, respectively (P = NS). Autopsy was performed in the 5 additional rats that died within 30 minutes after PAI.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Our results show that there is no significant difference in the percentage of tumor necrosis between two local ablation methods in spite of the different dosages used. However, mortality in the PAI-treated group was greater than in PEI-treated group, presumably due to greater acetic acid systemic diffusion and its metabolic side effects. In human subjects, HCC occurs in the setting of cirrhosis, where the non-tumoral tissue is firmer than the tumor structure, with consequent reduction of drug diffusion. This could be the reason why some human studies have concluded similar or even better safety and efficacy with PAI compared to PEI.</p
    corecore