2,687 research outputs found

    Group algebras acting on LpL^p-spaces

    Full text link
    For p∈[1,∞)p\in [1,\infty) we study representations of a locally compact group GG on LpL^p-spaces and QSLpQSL^p-spaces. The universal completions Fp(G)F^p(G) and FQSp(G)F^p_{\mathrm{QS}}(G) of L1(G)L^1(G) with respect to these classes of representations (which were first considered by Phillips and Runde, respectively), can be regarded as analogs of the full group \ca{} of GG (which is the case p=2p=2). We study these completions of L1(G)L^1(G) in relation to the algebra FΞ»p(G)F^p_\lambda(G) of pp-pseudofunctions. We prove a characterization of group amenability in terms of certain canonical maps between these universal Banach algebras. In particular, GG is amenable if and only if FQSp(G)=Fp(G)=FΞ»p(G)F^p_{\mathrm{QS}}(G)=F^p(G)=F^p_\lambda(G). One of our main results is that for 1≀p<q≀21\leq p< q\leq 2, there is a canonical map Ξ³p,q ⁣:Fp(G)β†’Fq(G)\gamma_{p,q}\colon F^p(G)\to F^q(G) which is contractive and has dense range. When GG is amenable, Ξ³p,q\gamma_{p,q} is injective, and it is never surjective unless GG is finite. We use the maps Ξ³p,q\gamma_{p,q} to show that when GG is discrete, all (or one) of the universal completions of L1(G)L^1(G) are amenable as a Banach algebras if and only if GG is amenable. Finally, we exhibit a family of examples showing that the characterizations of group amenability mentioned above cannot be extended to LpL^p-operator crossed products of topological spaces.Comment: Version 1: 27 pages. Version 2: lots of minor corrections, and we got rid of the second-countability assumption on the groups. 31 page
    • …
    corecore