Treatment of Closed Femoral Shaft Fractures in Children Aged 6 to 10

BACKGROUND: Management of pediatric femoral shaft fractures remains controversial, particularly in children between the ages of 6 and 10. In the current push toward cost containment, hospital type, and surgeon subspecialization have emerged as important factors influencing this treatment decision. Thus, in the present study, we use a nationwide pediatric inpatient database to compare the: (a) incidence; (b) demographic characteristics; (c) hospital costs; (d) length of stay; and (e) treatment method of pediatric closed femoral shaft fractures admitted to general versus children\u27s hospitals. METHODS: The Kids\u27 Inpatient Database (KID) was queried for all patients aged 6 to 10 who sustained a closed femoral shaft fracture in 2009 or 2012, and patient records were stratified into children\u27s hospitals and general hospitals. Primary outcome measures included method of treatment, total hospital costs, and length of stay. Student/Welch t testing and χ analysis were utilized to compare continuous and categorical outcomes, respectively, between hospital types. RESULTS: The total incidence of closed femoral shaft fractures decreased between 2009 and 2012 (1919 to 1581 patients; P=0.020), as did the proportion of patients treated in children\u27s hospitals (58.6% to 32.3%; P CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates a decrease in the incidence of closed femoral shaft fractures in 6- to 10-year old patients from 2009 to 2012, as well as decreased definitive management in children\u27s hospitals and increased selection of operative treatment. In addition, treatment in a nonchildren\u27s hospital was associated with decreased total inpatient costs and decreased treatment with closed reduction with internal fixation in favor of open reduction with internal fixation. Future studies should seek to identify the specific surgical procedures performed and match patients more closely based specific fracture pattern. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic level II

Short-term Outcomes of the Supine Muscle-sparing Anterolateral Versus Direct Lateral Approach to Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND: Although total hip arthroplasty (THA) is among the most successful orthopaedic procedures, it is not without complications. As such, finding the optimal surgical approach has become an area of particular interest. In this study, we compare: (1) pain intensity; (2) opioid consumption; (3) lengths of stay (LOS); (4) complication rates; (5) discharge destination; and (6) ambulatory function between patients who underwent THA via the supine muscle-sparing anterolateral (MS-ALA) and conventional direct lateral (DLA) approaches. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 220 consecutive patients who received primary THA using the supine MS-ALA (n = 101) or DLA (n = 119) between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2016. Outcomes included postoperative pain intensity, opioid consumption, LOS, discharge destination, complications, additional procedures, and time to independent ambulation. RESULTS: We demonstrated significantly lower opioid consumption on postoperative days (POD) 1 and 2 (mean differences, -32.0 and -28.4 mg, respectively; p ⩽ 0.001) and decreased pain intensity during the second 24 hours of the hospital stay (mean difference, -22.0; p \u3c 0.001) in patients receiving the MS-ALA. Relative to the DLA cohort, patients in the MS-ALA cohort were 2.04 times more likely to be discharged to home (p = 0.028) and 1.91 times less likely to experience postoperative abductor insufficiency (p = 0.039). CONCLUSION: The present study is the 1st to compare postoperative outcomes, particularly pain intensity and opioid consumption, between the supine muscle-sparing anterolateral and direct lateral THA approaches. Further research should investigate the effect of surgical approach on quality and cost of care, include larger sample sizes, and involve longer-term follow-up

Global Budget Revenue on a Single Institution\u27s Costs and Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty

Background: The state of Maryland was granted a waiver by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services to implement a Global Budget Revenue (GBR) reimbursement model. This study aims to compare (1) costs of inpatient hospital stays; (2) postacute care costs; (3) lengths of stay (LOS); and (4) discharge disposition who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty at a single Maryland-based orthopedic institution before and after the implementation of GBR. Methods: The Maryland Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services database was queried to obtain all Medicare patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty at a single institution before and after the implementation of GBR. We compared the differences in costs for the following: inpatient care, the postacute care period, and readmissions. In addition, we evaluated differences in LOS, discharge disposition, and complication rates. Results: There was a significant decrease in inpatient costs ($26,575 vs$23,712), an increase in mean home health costs ($627 vs 1608), and a decrease in mean durable medical equipment costs ($604 vs $82) and LOS (2.92 days vs 2.33 days). There was an increase in discharge to home rates (72.3% vs 78.9%) and a decrease in discharge to acute rehabilitation (4.3% vs 1.8%) Conclusion: Under the GBR model, our institution experienced significant cost savings during the inpatient and postacute care episodes. Thus, GBR may serve as a viable solution to reducing costs to Medicare for high-volume arthroplasty institutions with a large Medicare population. Multicentered studies are needed to verify our results

Global Budget Revenue on a Single Institution\u27s Costs, Outcomes, and Patient Quality Metrics in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND: Maryland was granted a waiver to implement a Global Budget Revenue (GBR) reimbursement model. Statewide results for combined medical and surgical services have been reported for fiscal years 2015 and 2016. A paucity of studies exists exploring the change in care costs and outcomes for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) recipients under GBR. This study aims to assess the effects of GBR on cost of care and resource utilization related to TKA at a single institution before and after GBR. METHODS: The Maryland Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services database was used to find Medicare patients who underwent TKA at a single institution before (2012-2013) and after (2014-2015) GBR. A total of 150 and 161 TKAs were performed in 2012 and 2015. Cost differences were compared for each inpatient care episode, postacute care period, and readmissions. We also evaluated differences in length of stay, discharge disposition, and complication rates. RESULTS: Mean inpatient cost was significantly lower in 2015 vs 2012 (P = .0014); however, analysis of postacute costs showed a nonsignificant increase in price between years (P = .1008). We demonstrated significant increase in home health (P \u3c .0001) and significant decrease in acute rehabilitation (P = .0481). Durable medical equipment costs significantly decreased (P = .0087). CONCLUSION: We demonstrate lower mean inpatient costs since GBR initiation. We reveal increased mean postacute care costs, which may be due to increased acuity for patients needing postacute care. Our results show nonsignificant reductions in length of stay, complications, and increased rate of home discharge, suggesting GBR may be effective in orchestrating reduced costs for TKA at high-volume institutions

An Analysis of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Service Payment in Maryland: Can a Global Budget Revenue Model Save Money in Lower Extremity Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: Maryland is the only state utilizing the Global Budget Revenue (GBR) model to reduce costs. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether the GBR payment model effectively reduced the following: (1) costs of inpatient hospital stays; (2) post-acute care costs; (3) lengths of stay (LOS); (4) readmission rates; and (5) discharge disposition in patients who underwent primary total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA and TKA). METHODS: We evaluated the Maryland Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Service database for THAs and TKAs performed at 6 hospitals 1 year prior to (2012) and after the initiation of GBR (2015). We compared differences in costs for each inpatient care episode, post-acute care periods (total costs, acute rehabilitation, short-term nursing facility, home health, durable medical equipment), readmissions, LOS, and discharge disposition. RESULTS: Hospitals had a significant reduction in mean inpatient care costs for THA and TKA (P \u3c .0001). There was a significant reduction in total post-acute care costs following THA (P \u3c .001). Home healthcare had a significant increase in cost following THA and TKA (P \u3c .0001). There was a significant reduction in durable medical equipment costs for THA (P \u3c .0001). There was a significant decrease in LOS for THA and TKA (P \u3c .0001). There was a significant increase in patients discharged home (THA, P = .0262; TKA, P = .0058). CONCLUSION: The Maryland healthcare model may be associated with a reduction in inpatient and post-acute care costs. Furthermore, implementation of GBR may result in reductions in LOS and readmission rates

Utilisation of calcium sulphate beads in one-stage aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) affects many revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients, contributing to a concomitant rise in revision costs. Means of decreasing the risk of PJI include the use of antibiotic adjuncts, such as calcium sulphate beads (CSBs). Mixed with antibiotics, the potential benefits of CSBs include dissolvability and antibiotic drug elution. However, information comparing them in aseptic revision is scarce. Therefore, this study investigated CSB utilisation for infection prevention in aseptic revision THA. Specifically, we compared (1) infection rates; (2) lengths of stay; (3) subsequent infection procedures; and (4) final surgical outcome in 1-stage aseptic revision THA patients who did received CSBs to 1-stage aseptic revision THA patients who did not. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed to identify all patients who underwent an aseptic revision THA between January 2013 and December 2017. Patients who received CSBs (n = 48) were compared to non-CSB patients (n = 58) on the following outcomes: postoperative infections, lengths of stay (LOS), subsequent irrigation and debridements (I+Ds), and final surgical outcome, classified as successful THA reimplantation, retained antibiotic spacer, or Girdlestone procedure. Chi-square and t-testing were used to analyse the variables. RESULTS: There was no significant differences found between CSB patients and non-CSB patients in postoperative infections (p = 0.082), LOS (p = 0.179), I+Ds (p = 0.068), and final surgical outcome (p = 0.211). CONCLUSION: This study did not find any statistical difference between CSBs and standard of care in infection rates and surgical outcomes. The advantage of these beads for 1-stage aseptic revisions is questionable

Decline in allogeneic blood transfusion usage in total hip arthroplasty patients: National Inpatient Sample 2009 to 2013

Introduction: Although total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an effective treatment for end-stage arthritis, it is also associated with substantial blood loss that may require allogeneic blood transfusion. However, these transfusions may increase the risk of certain complications. The purpose of our study is to evaluate: (i) the incidence/trends of allogeneic blood transfusion; (ii) the associated risk factors and adverse events; and (iii) the discharge disposition, length of stay (LOS), and costs for these patients between 2009 and 2013. Methods: The National Inpatient Sample database was used to identify 1,542,366 primary THAs performed between 2009 and 2013. Patients were stratified based on demographics, economic data, hospital characteristics, comorbidities, and whether or not allogeneic transfusion was received. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate the risk factors for transfusion and postoperative complications. Results: From 2009 to 2013, allogeneic transfusions were used in 16.9% of primary THAs, with a declining annual incidence. Except for obesity, all comorbidities were associated with increased likelihood of receiving a transfusion. Allogeneic transfusion patients were more likely to experience surgical site infections or pulmonary complications (p Conclusions: While the observed decline in allogeneic transfusion usage is encouraging, further efforts should focus on preoperative patient optimisation. Given the projected increase in demand for primary THAs, orthopaedic surgeons must be familiar with safe and effective blood conservation protocols

Use of new interactive patient-provider software improves patient satisfaction and outcomes—a retrospective single-center study

Background: While a number of studies have explored patient- and provider-related factors contributing to quality of care, few studies have explored the role of technology in improving quality and optimizing patient-provider communication. This study explores the use of an interactive patient-provider software platform (IPSP) at a single institution. Specifically, we compared: (1) patient satisfaction scores, (2) complication rates, and (3) readmission rates before and after the use of an IPSP on patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty. Material and Methods: A retrospective review was performed on all total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty patients who completed a Press Ganey survey at a single institution between the years 2014 and 2017. Primary outcomes included Press Ganey patient satisfaction scores and 90-day complication and readmission rates. Mann-Whitney U testing and chi-squared analyses were conducted to assess continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Results: Analysis revealed an improvement in median Clinician and Group Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (89 vs 97) and Hospital for Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems scores (9 vs 10; P < .001) between pre-IPSP and post-IPSP. There was a decrease in 90-day complication rates (17.3 vs 11.2%; P = .035) but no decrease in readmission rates (0.30 vs 0.18%, P = .322) between the 2 time points. Conclusions: The use of an IPSP proved instrumental in improving patient satisfaction and lowering 90-day complication rates at a single institution. The implementation of an IPSP may prove beneficial to arthroplasty surgeons and health-care institutions alike seeking to optimize the quality of care. Larger multicenter studies are necessary to validate the results of the present study. Keywords: Health-care reform, Total joint arthroplasty, Interactive patient-provider software platform, Inpatient prospective payment system, Outpatient prospective payment syste

National Trends for Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty After the Affordable Care Act: An Analysis From 2011 to 2015.

Few studies have investigated nationwide patient trends and health care costs for reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) after 2014. This study uses a large validated nationwide database to retrospectively assess changes in patient and hospital demographic features, hospital costs, and hospital charges for inpatient RSA procedures before and after implementation of the Affordable Care Act. The National Inpatient Sample database was used to identify all patients who underwent RSA between January 2011 and December 2015, yielding 163,171 patients (63.4% female; mean age, 72 years). Categorical data were assessed with chi-square/Fisher\u27s exact test, and continuous data were assessed with analysis of variance. There was an increased proportion of RSA recipients identifying as Hispanic (4.1% to 4.8%) and Native American (0.1% to 0.4%; P\u3c.0001). The proportion of patients who had Medicaid (1.4% to 2.4%) and private insurance (15.1% to 16.6%) increased as well (P\u3c.0001). A decrease in mean hospital costs occurred between 2011 and 2015 (-$256; P=.002), whereas an increase occurred in hospital charges (+$6,314; P\u3c.001). These findings provide insight on RSA use and patient demographic trends in the United States. Additionally, these results help to capture the effects of extended health coverage and new reimbursement models on hospital costs and charges

Articulating Spacers as a Modified One-Stage Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Preliminary Analysis

INTRODUCTION: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a challenging complication for surgeons and patients alike. Although two-stage revision arthroplasty remains the gold standard PJI management in the United States, one-stage revision has had success in many parts of Europe. The aim of this study was to retrospectively review: 1) ultimate treatment success; 2) necessary antibiotic duration; 3) change in knee range of motion (ROM); and 4) final Knee Society Scores (KSS) in a case series of patients managed with retention of articulating antibiotic spacers following PJI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on all patients treated for chronic PJI after primary TKA with retention of articulating antibiotic spacers at a minimum of one-year follow-up. Descriptive analysis was utilized to evaluate demographic characteristics, discharge destination, follow-up and antibiotic durations, Knee Society Score (KSS), and rates of treatment failure. Paired-Samples t-Tests were utilized to evaluate mean changes in flexion and extension between the preoperative and postoperative time periods. RESULTS:Our final cohort included 29 patients who were managed with articulating spacer retention at a mean follow-up of 16.8 (range, 12.0 to 23.1) months, with 21 patients (72.4%) medically unfit for multiple surgeons and eight patients (27.6%) satisfied with their function. Mean age was 61.3 (range, 41 to 85) years and mean Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was 6.1 (mean, 0 to 12). The predominant infecting organism was Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), which was involved in eight patients (27.6%). There was a significant increase in postoperative knee flexion (+14.7°; p DISCUSSION: One-stage exchange arthroplasty offers the advantage of a single procedure with analogous failure rates compared to two-stage exchange, decreases hospitalization, and improves cost-effectiveness, which is paramount in today\u27s healthcare environment. To our knowledge, this is the first study in the United States to evaluate outcome scores, function, and success rate of a modified one-stage revision TKA technique. Although we are unable to make definitive conclusions based on the small sample size, the outcomes in this study are encouraging