High prevalence of frailty in end-stage renal disease

Purpose Prognosis of the increasing number of elderly patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is poor with high risk of functional decline and mortality. Frailty seems to be a good predictor for those patients that will not benefit from dialysis. Varying prevalences between populations are probably related to the instrument used. The aim of this study was to measure the prevalence of frailty among ESRD patients with two different validated instruments. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted among patients, aged >= 18 years, receiving hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis and pre-dialysis care between September 2013 and December 2013 in a single dialysis center in Apeldoorn, the Netherlands. Frailty was measured with the frailty index (FI) and frailty phenotype (FP). Results Prevalence of frailty by the FI was 36.8 % among 95 participants with ESRD (age: 65.2 years, SD +/- 12.0). Frailty prevalence among participants aged >= 65 and <65 years was 43.6 and 27.5 %, respectively. Female sex [odds ratio (OR) 3.3, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.3-8.0] and a Charlson comorbidity index score of >= 5 (OR 2.6, 95 % CI 1.0-6.6) were associated with frailty. The FI identified different but overlapping participants as frail compared with the FP; 62.5 % of frail participants according to FI were also frail according to the FP. Conclusions Prevalence of frailty among young and elderly ESRD patients is high; being female and having more comorbidity was associated with frailty. Use of a broader definition of frailty, like the FI, gives a higher estimation of prevalence among ESRD patients compared with a physical frailty assessment

Discriminative value of frailty screening instruments in end-stage renal disease

Background: Numerous frailty screening instruments are available, but their applicability for identifying frailty in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is unknown. We aimed to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of three instruments used for frailty screening in an ESRD population. Methods: The study was conducted in 2013 in a teaching hospital in The Netherlands and included patients receiving haemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis and pre-dialysis care. We determined the sensitivity and specificity of three screening instruments: the Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI), the Identification of Seniors at Risk-Hospitalized Patients (ISAR-HP) and the Veiligheidsmanagementsysteem (VMS), which is a safety management system for vulnerable elderly patients. The Frailty Index was the gold standard used. Results: The prevalence of frailty was 37% in a total of 95 participants with ESRD [mean age 65.2 years (SD 12.0), 57% male]. Frailty prevalence in participants ?65 years of age and <65 years of age was 44% and 28%, respectively (P = 0.11). Sensitivity and specificity for frailty of the GFI were 89% and 57%, respectively; ISAR-HP 83% and 77%, respectively; and VMS 77% and 67%, respectively. Conclusions: Although the GFI showed the highest sensitivity, it is not yet possible to propose a firm choice for one of these screening instruments or specific items due to the small scale of the study. Since there is a high prevalence of frailty in ESRD patients, translation and testing of the effectiveness of screening using the GFI in the prognostication and prevention of development or deterioration of frailty in this population should be the next step

Characteristics and prognostic factors of bacterial meningitis in the intensive care unit: a prospective nationwide cohort study

Abstract Background Patients with bacterial meningitis can be severely ill necessitating intensive care unit (ICU) treatment. Here, we describe clinical features and prognostic factors of adults with bacterial meningitis admitted to the ICU in a nationwide prospective cohort study. Methods We prospectively assessed clinical features and outcome of adults (age > 16 years) with community-acquired bacterial meningitis included in the MeninGene study between March 1, 2006 and July 1, 2022, that were initially admitted to the ICU. We identified independent predictors for initial ICU admission and for unfavourable outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale score between 1–4) by multivariable logistic regression. Results A total of 2709 episodes of bacterial meningitis were included, of which 1369 (51%) were initially admitted to the ICU. We observed a decrease in proportion of patients being admitted to the ICU during the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020 (decreased to 39%, p = 0.004). Median age of the 1369 patients initially admitted to the ICU was 61 years (IQR 49–69), and the rates of unfavourable outcome (47%) and mortality (22%) were high. During the Covid-19 pandemic, we observed a trend towards an increase in unfavourable outcome. Prognostic factors predictive for initial ICU admission were younger age, immunocompromised state, male sex, factors associated with pneumococcal meningitis, and those indicative of systemic compromise. Independent predictors for unfavourable outcome in the initial ICU cohort were advanced age, admittance to an academic hospital, cranial nerve palsies or seizures on admission, low leukocyte count in blood, high C-reactive protein in blood, low CSF: blood glucose ratio, listerial meningitis, need for mechanical ventilation, circulatory shock and persistent fever. 204 of 1340 episodes (15%) that were initially not admitted to the ICU were secondarily transferred to the ICU. The rates of unfavourable outcome (66%) and mortality (30%) in this group were high. Conclusions The majority of patients with community-acquired bacterial meningitis are admitted to the ICU, and the unfavourable outcome and mortality rates of these patients remain high. Patients that are initially admitted to non-ICU wards but secondarily transferred to the ICU also had very high rates of unfavourable outcome