Functional differences between the human LINE retrotransposon and retroviral reverse transcriptases for in vivo mRNA reverse transcription.

We have analysed the reverse transcriptase (RT) activity of the human LINE retrotransposon and that of two retroviruses, using an in vivo assay within mammalian (murine and human) cells. The assay relies on transfection of the cells with expression vectors for the RT of the corresponding elements and PCR analysis of the DNA extracted 2-4 days post-transfection using primers bracketing the intronic domains of co-transfected reporter genes or of cellular genes. This assay revealed high levels of reverse-transcribed cDNA molecules, with the intron spliced out, with expression vectors for the LINE. Generation of cDNA molecules requires LINE ORF2, whereas ORF1 is dispensable. Deletion derivatives within the 3.8 kb LINE ORF2 allowed further delineation of the RT domain: > 0.7 kb at the 5'-end of the LINE ORF2 is dispensable for reverse transcription, consistent with this domain being an endonuclease-like domain, as well as 1 kb at the 3'-end, a putative RNase H domain. Conversely, the RT of the two retroviruses tested, Moloney murine leukemia virus and human immunodeficiency virus, failed to produce similar reverse transcripts. These experiments demonstrate a specific and high efficiency reverse transcription activity for the LINE RT, which applies to RNA with no sequence specificity, including those from cellular genes, and which might therefore be responsible for the endogenous activity that we previously detected within mammalian cells through the formation of pseudogene-like structures

Retrotransposition of a marked Drosophila line-like I element in cells in culture.

We have marked a Drosophila transposable element--the LINE-like I element--with an intron-containing indicator gene inserted in place of a large deletion in the I element second ORF encompassing the reverse transcriptase domain, and this marked element was placed downstream to a potent actin promoter. An expression vector for the I element ORFs was also constructed, under the same heterologous promoter. The indicator gene contains a lacZ reporter gene the expression of which is conditioned by retrotransposition of the marked element, thus allowing detection of transposition events by testing for either beta-galactosidase expression or occurrence of spliced DNA molecules. The marked I element was introduced into Drosophila melanogaster cells in culture by transfection. Spliced DNA copies of the marked element and specifically stained beta-galactosidase-expressing cells were detected only upon co-transfection with the I expression vector, thus indicating that an ORF2-deleted element can be complemented in trans for transposition. This simple assay for retrotransposition in Drosophila cells in culture provides a tool for the rapid analysis of the mechanism of I transposition in its cis and trans sequence requirements

Human L1 Retrotransposition: cis Preference versus trans Complementation

Long interspersed nuclear elements (LINEs or L1s) comprise approximately 17% of human DNA; however, only about 60 of the ∼400,000 L1s are mobile. Using a retrotransposition assay in cultured human cells, we demonstrate that L1-encoded proteins predominantly mobilize the RNA that encodes them. At much lower levels, L1-encoded proteins can act in trans to promote retrotransposition of mutant L1s and other cellular mRNAs, creating processed pseudogenes. Mutant L1 RNAs are mobilized at 0.2 to 0.9% of the retrotransposition frequency of wild-type L1s, whereas cellular RNAs are mobilized at much lower frequencies (ca. 0.01 to 0.05% of wild-type levels). Thus, we conclude that L1-encoded proteins demonstrate a profound cis preference for their encoding RNA. This mechanism could enable L1 to remain retrotransposition competent in the presence of the overwhelming number of nonfunctional L1s present in human DNA

Laboratory Methods for the Analysis of Primate Mobile Elements

Mobile elements represent a unique and powerful set of tools for understanding the variation in a genome. Methods exist not only to utilize the polymorphisms among and within taxa to various ends but also to investigate the mechanism through which mobilization occurs. The number of methods to accomplish these ends is ever growing. Here, we present several protocols designed to assay mobile element-based variation within and among individual genomes. © 2010 Springer Science + Business Media, LLC