Translating advances in reading comprehension research to educational practice

The authors review five major findings in reading comprehension and their implications for educational practice. First, research suggests that comprehension skills are separable from decodingprocesses and important at early ages, suggesting that comprehension skills should be targeted early, even before the child learns to read. Second, there is an important distinction between readingprocesses and products, as well as their causal relationship: processes lead to certain products. Hence, instructional approaches and strategies focusing on processes are needed to improve students’reading performance (i.e., product). Third, inferences are a crucial component of skilled comprehension. Hence, children need scaffolding and remediation to learn to generate inferences, even when they know little about the text topic. Fourth, comprehension depends on a complex interaction between the reader, the characteristics of the text, and the instructional task, highlighting the need for careful selection of instructional materials for individual students and specific groups of students. Finally, educators may benefit from heightened awareness of the limitations and inadequacies of standardized reading comprehension assessments, as well as the multidimensionality of comprehension to better understand their students’ particular strengths and weaknesses

Working Memory in Text Comprehension: Interrupting Difficult Text

We compare the effects of interrupting text dealing with familiar or unfamiliar domains with either arithmetic or sentence reading tasks. Readers were interrupted after each of the eight sentences, at the end of each sentence, or in the middle of each sentence. Previous findings of minimal effects of interruptive tasks on comprehension measures (eg . fllanzer & Nolan, 1986) were replicated in this study. Also, as found by Glanzer and his colleagues, interruptions after each sentence of a familiar text by an unrelated sentence increased reading times by approximately 400 ms per sentence. In contrast, for difficult, unfamiliar texts, mid-scnience interruptions significantly lengthened reading times by 1262 ms for sentence and 1784 ms for arithmetic interruptions. These findings arc explained in terms of Enesson and Kintsch's (1995) memory model which proposes that skilled memory performance relies on the use of long-term memory as an extension of working memory, or long-term working memory

Text-based recall and extra-textual generations resulting from simplified and authentic texts

This study uses a moving windows self-paced reading task to assess text comprehension of beginning and intermediate-level simplified texts and authentic texts by L2 learners engaged in a text-retelling task. Linear mixed effects (LME) models revealed statistically significant main effects for reading proficiency and text level on the number of text-based propositions recalled: More proficient readers recalled more propositions. However, text level was a stronger predictor of propositional recall than reading proficiency. LME models also revealed main effects for language proficiency and text level on the number of extra-textual propositions produced. Text level, however, emerged as a stronger predictor than language proficiency. Post-hoc analyses indicated that there were more irrelevant elaborations for authentic texts and intermediate and authentic texts led to a greater number of relevant elaborations compared to beginning texts

Training Reading Strategies

Readers who self-explain texts aloud understand more from a text and construct better mental models of the content. This study examined the effects of providing self-explanation training on text comprehension, as well as course grades. Effects of prior knowledge and reading skill were also examined in relation to the benefits of self-explaining and self-explanation training. In general, low-knowledge readers gained more from training than did high-knowledge readers

Linguistic Signatures of Cognitive Processes during Writing

The relationship between working memory capacity andwriting ability was examined via a linguistic analysis ofstudent essays. Undergraduate students (n = 108) wrotetimed, prompt-based essays and completed a battery ofcognitive assessments. The surface- and discourse-levellinguistic features of students’ essays were then analyzedusing natural language processing tools. The results indicatedthat WM capacity was related to surface-level, but notdiscourse-level features of student essays. Additionally, theresults suggest that these relationships were attenuated forstudents with high inferencing skills, as opposed to those withlower inferencing skill

iSTART: Interactive Strategy Training for Active Reading and Thinking

Interactive Strategy Training for Active Reading and Thinking (iSTART) is a Web-based application that provides young adolescent to college-age students with high-level reading strategy training to improve comprehension of science texts. iSTART is modeled after an effective, human-delivered intervention called self-explanation reading training (SERT), which trains readers to use active reading strategies to self-explain difficult texts more effectively. To make the training more widely available, the Web-based trainer has been developed. Transforming the training from a human-delivered application to a computer-based one has resulted in a highly interactive trainer that adapts its methods to the performance of the students. The iSTART trainer introduces the strategies in a simulated classroom setting with interaction between three animated characters—an instructor character and two student characters— and the human trainee. Thereafter, the trainee identifies the strategies in the explanations of a student character who is guided by an instructor character. Finally, the trainee practices self-explanation under the guidance of an instructor character. We describe this system and discuss how appropriate feedback is generated

Text readability and intuitive simplification: A comparison of readability formulas

Texts are routinely simplified for language learners with authors relying on a variety of approaches and materials to assist them in making the texts more comprehensible. Readability measures are one such tool that authors can use when evaluating text comprehensibility. This study compares the Coh-Metrix Second Language (L2) Reading Index, a readability formula based on psycholinguistic and cognitive models of reading, to traditional readability formulas on a large corpus of texts intuitively simplified for language learners. The goal of this study is to determine which formula best classifies text level (advanced, intermediate, beginner) with the prediction that text classification relates to the formulas’ capacity to measure text comprehensibility. The results demonstrate that the Coh-Metrix L2 Reading Index performs significantly better than traditional readability formulas, suggesting that the variables used in this index are more closely aligned to the intuitive text processing employed by authors when simplifying texts

What's so simple about simplified texts? A computational and psycholinguistic investigation of text comprehension and text processing

This study uses a moving windows self-paced reading task to assess both text comprehension and processing time of authentic texts and these same texts simplified to beginning and intermediate levels. Forty-eight second language learners each read 9 texts (3 different authentic, beginning, and intermediate level texts). Repeated measures ANOVAs reported linear effects of text type on reading time (normalized for text length) and true/false comprehension scores indicating that beginning level texts were processed faster and were more comprehensible than intermediate level and authentic texts. The linear effect of text type on comprehension remained significant within an ANCOVA controlling for language proficiency (i.e., TOEFL scores), reading proficiency (i.e., Gates-MacGinitie scores), and background knowledge, but not for reading time. Implications of these findings for materials design, reading pedagogy, and text processing and comprehension are discussed

Cohesive Features of Deep Text Comprehension Processes

This study investigates how cohesion manifests in readers’thought processes while reading texts when they areinstructed to engage in self-explanation, a strategy associatedwith deeper, more successful comprehension. In Study 1,college students (n = 21) were instructed to either paraphraseor self-explain science texts. Paraphrasing was characterizedby greater cohesion in terms of lexical overlap whereas self-explanation included greater lexical diversity and moreconnectives to specify relations between ideas. In Study 2,adolescent students (n = 84) were provided with instructionand practice in self-explanation and reading strategies across8 sessions. Self-explanations increased in lexical diversity butbecame more causally and semantically cohesive over time.Together, these results suggest that cohesive featuresexpressed in think alouds are indicative of the depth ofstudents’ comprehension processes