The Role of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Early-Stage and Oligometastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Evidence for Changing Paradigms

A compelling body of non-randomized evidence has established stereotactic ablative lung radiotherapy (SABR) as a standard of care for medically inoperable patients with peripheral early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This convenient outpatient therapy, which is typically delivered in 3-8 fractions, is also well tolerated by elderly and frail patients, makes efficient use of resources and is feasible using standard commercial equipment. The introduction of lung SABR into large populations has led to an increased utilization of radiotherapy, a reduction in the proportion of untreated patients and an increase in overall survival. In selected patients, the same ablative technology can now achieve durable local control of NSCLC metastases in a variety of common locations including the adrenal glands, bone, brain, and liver. At the same time as this, advances in prognostic molecular markers and targeted systemic therapies mean that there is now a subgroup of patients with stage IV NSCLC and a median survival of around 2 years. This creates opportunities for new trials that incorporate SABR and patient-specific systemic strategies. This selective mini-review focuses on the emerging role of SABR in patients with early-stage and oligometastatic NSCLC

Patterns of Disease Recurrence after SABR for Early Stage Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Optimizing Follow-Up Schedules for Salvage Therapy

Introduction:Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy is a guideline-recommended treatment for early stage non–small-cell lung cancer. We report on incidence and salvage of local recurrences (LR) and second primary lung cancers (SPLC) in a large series of patients with long-term follow-up, to generate data for evidence-based follow-up regimens.Methods:We excluded all patients with double tumors, TNM-stages other than T1-T2N0M0, biologically effective dose less than 100 Gy10 and previous treatment for the index tumor from our institutional database. LR was defined as recurrence in/adjacent to the planning target volume. A diagnosis of SPLC was determined using criteria described by Martini et al.Results:The 855 patients included had a median follow-up of 52 months. Forty-six patients developed LR after a median of 22 months (range 7–87 months). Actuarial local control rates at 3 and 5 years were 92.4% and 90.9%, respectively. Fifty-four percent had isolated LR and 13% had LR in combination with regional recurrences. Ten patients underwent radical salvage treatment; surgery (N = 6), high-dose radiotherapy (N = 3), or chemoradiation (N = 1). Median overall survival following LR was 13 months, but it was 36 months in patients who underwent radical salvage. A SPLC was diagnosed in 79 patients, after a median interval of 34 months. Actuarial cumulative incidences of SPLC at 3 and 5 years were 11.7% and 16.7%, respectively. Radical salvage for SPLC was performed in 63 patients (80%).Conclusions:Both the timing of LR and persistent risk of SPLC serve as rationale for long-term follow-up using computed tomography scans in patients fit enough to undergo any radical treatment

Dose distribution prediction for head-and-neck cancer radiotherapy using a generative adversarial network: influence of input data

PurposeA three-dimensional deep generative adversarial network (GAN) was used to predict dose distributions for locally advanced head and neck cancer radiotherapy. Given the labor- and time-intensive nature of manual planning target volume (PTV) and organ-at-risk (OAR) segmentation, we investigated whether dose distributions could be predicted without the need for fully segmented datasets.Materials and methodsGANs were trained/validated/tested using 320/30/35 previously segmented CT datasets and treatment plans. The following input combinations were used to train and test the models: CT-scan only (C); CT+PTVboost/elective (CP); CT+PTVs+OARs+body structure (CPOB); PTVs+OARs+body structure (POB); PTVs+body structure (PB). Mean absolute errors (MAEs) for the predicted dose distribution and mean doses to individual OARs (individual salivary glands, individual swallowing structures) were analyzed.ResultsFor the five models listed, MAEs were 7.3 Gy, 3.5 Gy, 3.4 Gy, 3.4 Gy, and 3.5 Gy, respectively, without significant differences among CP-CPOB, CP-POB, CP-PB, among CPOB-POB. Dose volume histograms showed that all four models that included PTV contours predicted dose distributions that had a high level of agreement with clinical treatment plans. The best model CPOB and the worst model PB (except model C) predicted mean dose to within ±3 Gy of the clinical dose, for 82.6%/88.6%/82.9% and 71.4%/67.1%/72.2% of all OARs, parotid glands (PG), and submandibular glands (SMG), respectively. The R2 values (0.17/0.96/0.97/0.95/0.95) of OAR mean doses for each model also indicated that except for model C, the predictions correlated highly with the clinical dose distributions. Interestingly model C could reasonably predict the dose in eight patients, but on average, it performed inadequately.ConclusionWe demonstrated the influence of the CT scan, and PTV and OAR contours on dose prediction. Model CP was not statistically different from model CPOB and represents the minimum data statistically required to adequately predict the clinical dose distribution in a group of patients

Predictors of Radiotherapy Induced Bone Injury (RIBI) after stereotactic lung radiotherapy

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The purpose of this study was to identify clinical and dosimetric factors associated with radiotherapy induced bone injury (RIBI) following stereotactic lung radiotherapy.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Inoperable patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer, treated with SBRT, who received 54 or 60 Gy in 3 fractions, and had a minimum of 6 months follow up were reviewed. Archived treatment plans were retrieved, ribs delineated individually and treatment plans re-computed using heterogeneity correction. Clinical and dosimetric factors were evaluated for their association with rib fracture using logistic regression analysis; a dose-event curve and nomogram were created.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>46 consecutive patients treated between Oct 2004 and Dec 2008 with median follow-up 25 months (m) (range 6 – 51 m) were eligible. 41 fractured ribs were detected in 17 patients; median time to fracture was 21 m (range 7 – 40 m). The mean maximum point dose in non-fractured ribs (n = 1054) was 10.5 Gy ± 10.2 Gy, this was higher in fractured ribs (n = 41) 48.5 Gy ± 24.3 Gy (p < 0.0001). On univariate analysis, age, dose to 0.5 cc of the ribs (D_0.5), and the volume of the rib receiving at least 25 Gy (V₂₅), were significantly associated with RIBI. As D_0.5 and V₂₅ were cross-correlated (Spearman correlation coefficient: 0.57, p < 0.001), we selected D_0.5 as a representative dose parameter. On multivariate analysis, age (odds ratio: 1.121, 95% CI: 1.04 – 1.21, p = 0.003), female gender (odds ratio: 4.43, 95% CI: 1.68 – 11.68, p = 0.003), and rib D_0.5 (odds ratio: 1.0009, 95% CI: 1.0007 – 1.001, p < 0.0001) were significantly associated with rib fracture.</p> <p>Using D_0.5, a dose-event curve was constructed estimating risk of fracture from dose at the median follow up of 25 months after treatment. In our cohort, a 50% risk of rib fracture was associated with a D_0.5 of 60 Gy.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Dosimetric and clinical factors contribute to risk of RIBI and both should be included when modeling risk of toxicity. A nomogram is presented using D_0.5, age, and female gender to estimate risk of RIBI following SBRT. This requires validation.</p

An international expert survey on the indications and practice of radical thoracic reirradiation for non-small cell lung cancer

Purpose: Thoracic re-irradiation for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with curative intent is potentially associated with severe toxicity. There are limited prospective data on the best method to deliver this treatment. We sought to develop expert consensus guidance on the safe practice of treating NSCLC with radiotherapy in the setting of prior thoracic irradiation. Methods and materials: Twenty-one thoracic radiation oncologists were invited to participate in an international Delphi consensus process. Guideline statements were developed and refined over four rounds on the definition of re-irradiation, appropriate patients and pre-treatment assessments, planning of radiotherapy, and cumulative dose constraints. Consensus was achieved once ≥75% of respondents agreed with a statement. Statements that did not reach consensus in the initial survey rounds were revised based on respondents’ comments and re-presented in subsequent rounds. Results: Fifteen radiation oncologists participated in the four surveys between September 2019 and March 2020. The first three rounds had a 100% response rate, and the final round was completed by 93% of participants. 33 out of 77 statements across all rounds achieved consensus. Key recommendations are: (1) appropriate patients should have a good performance status, can have locally relapsed disease or second primary cancers, and there are no absolute lung function values that preclude re-irradiation; (2) a full diagnostic work-up should be performed in patients with suspected local recurrence and; (3) any re-irradiation should be delivered using optimal image-guidance and highly conformal techniques. In addition, consensus cumulative dose for the organs at risk in the thorax are described. Conclusion: These consensus statements provide practical guidance on appropriate patient selection for re-irradiation, appropriate radiotherapy techniques, and cumulative dose constraints

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for comprehensive treatment of oligometastatic tumors (SABR-COMET): Study protocol for a randomized phase II trial

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has emerged as a new treatment option for patients with oligometastatic disease. SABR delivers precise, high-dose, hypofractionated radiotherapy, and achieves excellent rates of local control. Survival outcomes for patients with oligometastatic disease treated with SABR appear promising, but conclusions are limited by patient selection, and the lack of adequate controls in most studies. The goal of this multicenter randomized phase II trial is to assess the impact of a comprehensive oligometastatic SABR treatment program on overall survival and quality of life in patients with up to 5 metastatic cancer lesions, compared to patients who receive standard of care treatment alone.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>After stratification by the number of metastases (1-3 vs. 4-5), patients will be randomized between Arm 1: current standard of care treatment, and Arm 2: standard of care treatment + SABR to all sites of known disease. Patients will be randomized in a 1:2 ratio to Arm 1:Arm 2, respectively. For patients receiving SABR, radiotherapy dose and fractionation depends on the site of metastasis and the proximity to critical normal structures. This study aims to accrue a total of 99 patients within four years. The primary endpoint is overall survival, and secondary endpoints include quality of life, toxicity, progression-free survival, lesion control rate, and number of cycles of further chemotherapy/systemic therapy.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>This study will provide an assessment of the impact of SABR on clinical outcomes and quality of life, to determine if long-term survival can be achieved for selected patients with oligometastatic disease, and will inform the design of a possible phase III study.</p> <p>Trial registration</p> <p>Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01446744</p