45 research outputs found

    Response rates for mail-out survey-driven studies in head and neck cancer patients

    No full text
    Background: Mail-out survey studies are becoming more prevalent in the head and neck literature. The objective of this paper is to summarize response rates in head and neck cancer patients, as well as to provide recommendations surrounding methodology used to design and implement mail-out survey questionnaires. Methods: The results of this paper are from a study assessing the measurement properties of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) in head and neck cancer patients. A modified Dillman tailored design approach was used. Results: The methods used yielded a response rate of 80% with this patient population. Conclusion: This is a considerably higher response rate than other reports in the oncology literature.Canadian Institutes of Health Researc

    Hemiglossectomy tongue reconstruction: Modeling of elevation, protrusion, and functional outcome using receiver operator characteristic curve

    Full text link
    Background The purpose of this study was to model >12 month speech and the oral phase of swallowing outcomes with the reconstructive metrics of tongue elevation and protrusion in patients reconstructed with the rectangle tongue template for a hemiglossectomy defect. Methods We conducted a study using 40 surviving patients (23 men, 17 women) treated between 2000 and 2012. Statistically significant correlations of elevation and protrusion with functional outcomes were modeled with receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves to understand the performance and reliability of the rectangle tongue reconstruction. Results Tongue elevation (1.8-1.9 cm) reliably produces best outcomes in nutritional mode, range of liquids, and ≥4/6 for range of solids. Greater tongue elevation (2.1-2.2 cm) reliably produces best outcomes for eating and speaking in public and understandability of speech. Tongue protrusion (0.8-1.0 cm) reliably produces best scores across all assessed outcomes except ≥4/6 for range of solids and ≥4/5 understandability of speech. Conclusion ROC curves are useful for assessing reliability and relating reconstructive objectives to functional outcomes.http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/191957/2/2016_Head Neck_Hemiglossectomy Functional Outcomes.pdfPublished versio

    Can IMRT or brachytherapy reduce dysphagia associated with chemoradiotherapy of head and neck cancer? The Michigan and Rotterdam experiences

    No full text
    PURPOSE: Dysphagia is a major late complication of intensive chemoradiotherapy of head and neck cancer. The initial clinical results of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), or brachytherapy, planned specifically to reduce dysphagia are presented. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Previous research at Michigan University has suggested that the pharyngeal constrictors and glottic and supraglottic larynx are likely structures whose damage by chemo-RT causes dysphagia and aspiration. In a prospective Michigan trial, 36 patients with oropharyngeal (n = 31) or nasopharyngeal (n = 5) cancer underwent chemo-IMRT. IMRT cost functions included sparing noninvolved pharyngeal constrictors and the glottic and supraglottic larynx. After a review of published studies, the retropharyngeal nodes at risk were defined as the lateral, but not the medial, retropharyngeal nodes, which facilitated sparing of the swallowing structures. In Rotterdam, 77 patients with oropharyngeal cancer were treated with IMRT, three dimensional RT, or conventional RT; also one-half received brachytherapy. The dysphagia endpoints included videofluoroscopy and observer-assessed scores at Michigan and patient-reported quality-of-life instruments in both studies. RESULTS: In both studies, the doses to the upper and middle constrictors correlated highly with the dysphagia endpoints. In addition, doses to the glottic and supraglottic larynx were significant in the Michigan series. In the Rotterdam series, brachytherapy (which reduced the doses to the swallowing structures) was the only significant factor on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: The dose–response relationships for the swallowing structures found in these studies suggest that reducing their doses, using either IMRT aimed at their sparing, or brachytherapy, might achieve clinical gains in dysphagia
    corecore