Dosimetric feasibility of hypofractionation for metastatic bone/bone marrow lesions from paediatric solid tumours

Background and purpose: The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of hypofractionated schedules for metastatic bone/bone marrow lesions in children and to investigate dosimetric differences to the healthy surrounding tissues compared to conventional schedules. Methods: 27 paediatric patients (mean age, 7 years) with 50 metastatic bone/bone marrow lesions (n = 26 cranial, n = 24 extra-cranial) from solid primary tumours (neuroblastoma and sarcoma) were included. The PTV was a 2 mm expansion of the GTV. A prescription dose of 36 and 54 Gy EQD2 α / β =10 was used for neuroblastoma and sarcoma lesions, respectively. VMAT plans were optimized for each single lesion using different fractionation schedules: conventional (30/20 fractions, V 95% ≥ 99%, D 0.1cm 3 ≤ 107%) and hypofractionated (15/10/5/3 fractions, V 100% ≥ 95%, D 0.1cm 3 ≤ 120%) . Relative EQD2 differences in OARs D mean between the different schedules were compared. Results: PTV coverage was met for all plans independently of the fractionation schedule and for all lesions (V 95% range 95.5–100%, V 100% range 95.1–100%), with exception of the vertebrae (V 100% range 63.5–91.0%). For most OARs, relative mean reduction in the D mean was seen for the hypofractionated plans compared to the conventional plans, with largest sparing in the 5 fractions (< 43%) followed by the 3 fractions schedule (< 40%). In case of PTV overlap with an OAR, a significant increase in dose for the OAR was observed with hypofractionation. Conclusions: For the majority of the cases, iso-effective plans with hypofractionation were feasible with similar or less dose in the OARs. The most suitable fractionation schedule should be personalised depending on the spatial relationship between the PTV and OARs and the prescription dose

Biological Role and Clinical Implications of MYOD1L122R Mutation in Rhabdomyosarcoma

Major progress in recent decades has furthered our clinical and biological understanding of rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) with improved stratification for treatment based on risk factors. Clinical risk factors alone were used to stratify patients for treatment in the European Pediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG) RMS 2005 protocol. The current EpSSG overarching study for children and adults with frontline and relapsed rhabdomyosarcoma (FaR-RMS NCT04625907) includes FOXO1 fusion gene status in place of histology as a risk factor. Additional molecular features of significance have recently been recognized, including the MYOD1L122R gene mutation. Here, we review biological information showing that MYOD1L122R blocks cell differentiation and has a MYC-like activity that enhances tumorigenesis and is linked to an aggressive cellular phenotype. MYOD1L122R mutations can be found together with mutations in other genes, such as PIK3CA, as potentially cooperating events. Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, ten publications in the clinical literature involving 72 cases were reviewed. MYOD1L122R mutation in RMS can occur in both adults and children and is frequent in sclerosing/spindle cell histology, although it is also significantly reported in a subset of embryonal RMS. MYOD1L122R mutated tumors most frequently arise in the head and neck and extremities and are associated with poor outcome, raising the issue of how to use MYOD1L122R in risk stratification and how to treat these patients most effectively

Long-term nephrotoxicity in irradiated pediatric kidney tumor survivors: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE: Nephrotoxicity can occur as a side effect after treatment for kidney tumor in childhood. The use of radiotherapy (RT) has a potential additional effect. METHODS: A systematic electronic literature search that combined childhood kidney cancer with different treatments and nephrotoxicity terms was performed in EMBASE. Studies were included based on the reporting of nephrotoxicity occurrence after treatment for kidney tumor during pediatric age, with 75% of participants being under the age of 25 years at the time of diagnosis, and having been treated with any type of kidney surgery, chemotherapy, and/or RT. RESULTS: A pooled analysis did not show significant difference in estimated glomerular filtration rate between the group of patients who received RT compared with the group treated without RT (SMD -0.11 [95% CI -1.07-0.84] p = .733). CONCLUSION: The current literature suggests that the use of RT does not have a significant impact on the decline of kidney function as independent factor

Outcome of patients with undifferentiated embryonal sarcoma of the liver treated according to European soft tissue sarcoma protocols

Background: To assess the outcomes of pediatric patients with undifferentiated embryonal sarcoma of the liver (UESL) and treatment including at least surgery and systemic chemotherapy. Methods: This study included patients aged up to 21 years with a pathological diagnosis of UESL prospectively enrolled from 1995 to 2016 in three European trials focusing on the effects of surgical margins, preoperative chemotherapy, use of radiotherapy (RT), and chemotherapy. Results: Out of 65 patients with a median age at diagnosis of 8.7 years (0.6–20.8), 15 had T2 tumors, and one had lymph node spread, 14 were Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study (IRS) I, nine IRS II, 38 IRS III, and four IRS IV. Twenty-eight upfront surgeries resulted in five operative spillages and 11 infiltrated surgical margins, whereas 37 delayed surgeries resulted in no spillages (p =.0119) and three infiltrated margins (p =.0238). All patients received chemotherapy, including anthracyclines in 47. RT was administered in 15 patients. With a median follow-up of 78.6 months, 5-year overall and event-free survivals (EFS) were 90.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 79.2–95.5) and 89.1% (95% CI: 78.4–94.6), respectively. Two out four local relapses had previous infiltrated margins and two out of three patients with metastatic relapses received reduced doses of alkylating agents. Infiltrated margins (p =.1607), T2 stage (p =.3870), use of RT (p =.8731), and anthracycline-based chemotherapy (p =.1181) were not correlated with EFS. Conclusions: Multimodal therapy improved the outcome of UESL. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for pediatric patients increases the probability of complete surgical resection. The role of anthracyclines and RT for localized disease remains unclear

Facial deformation following treatment for pediatric head and neck rhabdomyosarcoma; the difference between treatment modalities. Results of a trans-Atlantic, multicenter cross-sectional cohort study

Background: The four different local therapy strategies used for head and neck rhabdomyosarcoma (HNRMS) include proton therapy (PT), photon therapy (RT), surgery with radiotherapy (Paris-method), and surgery with brachytherapy (AMORE). Local control and survival is comparable; however, the impact of these different treatments on facial deformation is still poorly understood. This study aims to quantify facial deformation and investigates the differences in facial deformation between treatment modalities. Methods: Across four European and North American institutions, HNRMS survivors treated between 1990 and 2017, more than 2 years post treatment, had a 3D photograph taken. Using dense surface modeling, we computed facial signatures for each survivor to show facial deformation relative to 35 age–sex–ethnicity-matched controls. Additionally, we computed individual facial asymmetry. Findings: A total of 173 HNRMS survivors were included, survivors showed significantly reduced facial growth (p <.001) compared to healthy controls. Partitioned by tumor site, there was reduced facial growth in survivors with nonparameningeal primaries (p =.002), and parameningeal primaries (p ≤.001), but not for orbital primaries (p =.080) All patients were significantly more asymmetric than healthy controls, independent of treatment modality (p ≤.001). There was significantly more facial deformation in orbital patients when comparing RT to AMORE (p =.046). In survivors with a parameningeal tumor, there was significantly less facial deformation in PT when compared to RT (p =.009) and Paris-method (p =.007). Interpretation: When selecting optimal treatment, musculoskeletal facial outcomes are an expected difference between treatment options. These anticipated differences are currently based on clinicians’ bias, expertise, and experience. These data supplement clinician judgment with an objective analysis highlighting the impact of patient age and tumor site between existing treatment options

Locoregional control using highly conformal flank target volumes and volumetric-modulated arc therapy in pediatric renal tumors: Results from the Dutch national cohort

Background and purpose: In pediatric renal tumors, conventional two opposing photon beams have been used to cover the postoperative flank target volume for decades. This single center study describes the locoregional outcome using highly conformal flank target volumes adjusted for postoperative changes and intra-fraction motion combined with Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT). Materials and methods: Between 01-2015 and 12-2019, 36/161 newly diagnosed patients with renal tumors underwent flank only irradiation (n = 30) or flank + whole lung irradiation (n = 6) using highly conformal target volumes in line with the SIOP-RTSG consensus statement. VMAT consisted of full-arc 10MV photon beams optimized for constraints of the organs at risk. In case of locoregional relapses, image co-registration and dose reconstruction was performed. Each relapse was classified as either ‘infield’ (V95%relapse: ≥99.0%), ‘marginal’ (V95%relapse: 20.0–98.9%) or ‘outfield’ (V95%relapse: 0–19.9%). Results: At a median follow-up from diagnosis of 3.1 years (range:0.4–5.7), the estimated 2-year Locoregional Control Rate, Disease-Free Interval and Overall Survival were 94%, 91% and 94%, respectively. Locoregional relapse was observed in two patients. One patient had a combined tumor bed and regional recurrence, classified as infield (V95%relapse: 100%) and outfield (V95%relapse: 1.2%). The second patient had a regional relapse in the inferior vena cava classified as marginal recurrence (V95%relapse: 93%). Relapses would not have been adequately covered by conventional beams. Conclusions: This single center analysis provides encouraging evidence that excellent locoregional control can be obtained by using highly conformal flank target volumes with VMAT in pediatric renal tumors. The safety of this approach will be validated in a prospective multicenter study

Brachytherapy for rhabdomyosarcoma: Survey of international clinical practice and development of guidelines

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to address the lack of published data on the use of brachytherapy in pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma by describing current practice as starting point to develop consensus guidelines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An international expert panel on the treatment of pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma comprising 24 (pediatric) radiation oncologists, brachytherapists and pediatric surgeons met for a Brachytherapy Workshop hosted by the European paediatric Soft tissue Sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG). The panel's clinical experience, the results of a previously distributed questionnaire, and a review of the literature were presented. RESULTS: The survey indicated the most common use of brachytherapy to be in combination with tumor resection, followed by brachytherapy as sole local therapy modality. HDR was increasingly deployed in pediatric practice, especially for genitourinary sites. Brachytherapy planning was mostly by 3D imaging based on CT. Recommendations for patient selection, treatment requirements, implant technique, delineation, dose prescription, dose reporting and clinical management were defined. CONCLUSIONS: Consensus guidelines for the use of brachytherapy in pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma have been developed through multicenter collaboration establishing the basis for future work. These have been adopted for the open EpSSG overarching study for children and adults with Frontline and Relapsed RhabdoMyoSarcoma (FaR-RMS)

The survival disparity between children and adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with Ewing sarcoma in the Netherlands did not change since the 1990s despite improved survival: A population-based study

Background: Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with Ewing sarcoma have a worse prognosis than children. Population-based survival evaluations stratifying findings by important clinical factors are, however, limited. This Dutch population study comprehensively compared survival of children and AYAs with Ewing sarcoma over three decades considering diagnostic period, tissue of origin, tumor site, and disease stage. Methods: Data on all children (0–17 years, N = 463) and AYAs (18–39 years, N = 379) diagnosed with Ewing sarcoma in the Netherlands between 1990–2018 were collected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry with follow-up until February 2023. Five-year relative survival was calculated using the cohort method. Multivariable analyses were conducted through Poisson regression. Results: Children with Ewing sarcoma had a significantly higher 5-year relative survival than AYAs (65 % vs. 44 %). An increasing trend in survival was noted reaching 70 % in children and 53 % in AYAs in 2010–2018. Results were similar for Ewing bone sarcoma and extraosseous Ewing sarcoma. AYAs had a poorer prognosis than children for most tumor sites and regardless of disease stage. Survival probabilities were 60 % vs. 78 % for localized disease and 20 % vs. 33 % for metastatic disease. Multivariable-regression analysis, adjusted for follow-up time, diagnostic period, sex, disease stage, and tumor site, confirmed increased excess mortality among AYAs compared with children (excess HR: 1.7, 95 % CI: 1.3–2.1). Conclusions: Despite survival improvements since the 1990s, AYAs with Ewing sarcoma in the Netherlands continue to fare considerably worse than children

Correction to: Imaging in rhabdomyosarcoma: a patient journey

The original published online version stated: "For primary tumour size, 2-dimensional (D) measurements according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (RECIST) 1.1 are recommended in the European guideline and used for international studies [17, 24]." This was an error, and the sentence should read: "For primary tumour size, 1-dimensional (D) measurements according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (RECIST) 1.1 are recommended in the European guideline and used for international studies [17, 24]." The original article has been corrected

Imaging in rhabdomyosarcoma: a patient journey

Rhabdomyosarcoma, although rare, is the most frequent soft tissue sarcoma in children and adolescents. It can present as a mass at nearly any site in the body, with most common presentations in the head and neck, genitourinary tract and extremities. The optimal diagnostic approach and management of rhabdomyosarcoma require a multidisciplinary team with multimodal treatment, including chemotherapy and local therapy. Survival has improved over the last decades; however, further improvement in management is essential with current 5-year overall survival ranging from 35% to 100%, depending on disease and patient characteristics. In the full patient journey, from diagnosis, staging, management to follow-up after therapy, the paediatric radiologist and nuclear physician are essential members of the multidisciplinary team. Recently, guidelines of the European paediatric Soft tissue sarcoma Study Group, the Cooperative Weichteilsarkom Studiengruppe and the Oncology Task Force of the European Society of Paediatric Radiology (ESPR), in an ongoing collaboration with the International Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Database Consortium, provided guidance for high-quality imaging. In this educational paper, given as a lecture during the 2022 postgraduate ESPR course, the multi-disciplinary team of our national paediatric oncology centre presents the journey of two patients with rhabdomyosarcoma and discusses the impact on and considerations for the clinical (paediatric) radiologist and nuclear physician. The key learning points of the guidelines and their implementation in clinical practice are highlighted and up-to-date insights provided for all aspects from clinical suspicion of rhabdomyosarcoma and its differential diagnosis, to biopsy, staging, risk stratification, treatment response assessment and follow-up