U.S. cross-border derivatives data: a user's guide

Introduces the U.S. data on transactions in, and holdings of, cross-border derivatives, which have been collected through the Treasury International Capital (TIC) reporting system since March 2005. The article discusses the ways in which the data will improve U.S. external-sector reports, introduces the form on which the data are collected (TIC form D), and summarizes the information collected on the form. It also presents the 2006 data and explains their relation to the derivatives data reported by other countries. The article concludes with a discussion of the use of the data to estimate risk exposures.Derivative securities ; International finance

The Stability of Large External Imbalances: The Role of Returns Differentials

Were the U.S. to persistently earn substantially more on its foreign investments ("U.S. claims") than foreigners earn on their U.S. investments ("U.S. liabilities"), the likelihood that the current environment of sizeable global imbalances will evolve in a benign manner increases. However, utilizing data on the actual foreign equity and bond portfolios of U.S. investors and the U.S. equity and bond portfolios of foreign investors, we find that the returns differential of U.S. claims over U.S. liabilities is essentially zero. Ending our sample in 2005, the differential is positive, whereas through 2004 it is negative; in both cases the differential is statistically indecipherable from zero. Moreover, were it not for the poor timing of investors from developed countries, who tend to shift their U.S. portfolios toward (or away from) equities prior to the subsequent underperformance (or strong performance) of equities, the returns differential would be even lower. Thus, in the context of equity and bond portfolios we find no evidence that the U.S. can count on earning more on its claims than it pays on its liabilities.

Globalization and the Reach of Multinationals Implications for Portfolio Exposures, Capital Flows, and Home Bias

The growing use of low-tax jurisdictions as locations for firm headquarters, proliferation of offshore financing vehicles, and growing size, number, and geographic diversity of multinational firms have clouded the view of capital flows and investor exposures from standard sources such as the IMF Balance of Payments and the Coordinated Portfolio Investment Survey. We use detailed, security-level information on U.S. cross-border portfolio investment to uncover the extent of distortions in the official U.S. statistics. We find that nearly a third of U.S. cross border portfolio investment is allocated to a country different from its primary economic exposure by standard reporting conventions. About one-fourth of the stock of global cross-border portfolio investment is similarly distorted, with exposures to emerging markets likely understated by about a third. Estimates of the international exposures of U.S. investors are even larger when we distribute exposure according to the geographic distributions of firm-level sales. Our results have implications for conclusions we draw about the factors influencing capital flows, in particular those to emerging markets

Decomposing the U.S. External Returns Differential

We decompose the returns differential between U.S. portfolio claims and liabilities into the composition, return, and timing effects. Our most striking and robust finding is that foreigners exhibit poor timing when reallocating between bonds and equities within their U.S. portfolios. The poor timing of foreign investors--caused primarily by deliberate trading, not a lack of portfolio rebalancing--contributes positively to the U.S. external returns differential. We find no evidence that the poor timing is driven by mechanical reserve accumulation by emerging market countries; rather, it is driven almost entirely by the poor timing of rich, developed (mainly European) countries. Finally, while poor foreign timing appears to be persistent across subsamples, other terms in our decomposition (the composition and return effects and U.S. timing abroad), as well as the overall differential, are sometimes negative, sometimes positive, and usually indistinguishable from zero.

Current Account Sustainability and Relative Reliability

The sustainability of the large and persistent U.S. current account deficits is one of the biggest issues currently being confronted by international macroeconomists. Some very plausible theories suggest that the substantial global imbalances can continue in a benign manner, other equally plausible theories predict a disorderly resolution, and in general it is very difficult to discern between competing theories. To inform the debates, we view competing theories through the perspective of the relative reliability of the data the theories rely on. Our analysis of the dark matter theory is cursory; from a relative reliability perspective, it fails as it is built on the assumption that an item that is largely unmeasured is the most accurate component of the entire set of international accounts. Similarly, the best data currently available suggest that U.S. returns differentials are much smaller than implied by the exorbitant privilege theory. Our analysis opens up questions about potential inconsistencies in the international accounts, which we address by providing rough estimates of various holes in the accounts.

U.S. International Equity Investment and Past and Prospective Returns

Counter to extant stylized facts, using newly available data on country allocations in U.S. investors’ foreign equity portfolios we find that (i) U.S. investors do not exhibit returns-chasing behavior, but, consistent with partial portfolio rebalancing, tend to sell past winners; and (ii) U.S. investors increase portfolio weights on a country’s equity market just prior to its strong performance, behavior inconsistent with an informational disadvantage. Over the past two decades, U.S. investors’ foreign equity portfolios outperformed a value-weighted foreign benchmark by 160 basis points per year.