9 research outputs found

    Long-term outcome of liver transplantation for unresectable liver metastases from neuroendocrine neoplasms: a Belgian retrospective multi-centre study

    Full text link
    peer reviewedBackground: Liver transplantation (LT) is the only curative treatment for unresectable liver metastases from neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN-Liver-Mets). While recurrence is frequent after LT, there is limited data available in the literature on the outcome of recurrent patients. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients who underwent LT by NEN-Mets at the six LT centres in Belgium from 1986 to 2020. Patient and tumour characteristics, indication for transplantation, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and tumour recurrence and outcomes were analysed. Results: Forty patients underwent a LT for NEN-Liver-Mets in Belgium. Twenty-nine patients were male (74.2%) with a mean age of 41.9 and 47.1 years at the time of NEN diagnosis and LT, respectively. WHO classification was available for 32 patients and changed over time (see table below). OS post-LT at 1-, 5-, and 10-years are: 84,3%, 65,0% and 54,6% respectively, while the overall DFS are: 76.3%, 44.5% and 38.2% in the same intervals. Patients transplanted after 2010 showed better OS at 5-and 10-years (74.8% and 74.8%) when compared with patients transplanted before (60,0% and 49.5%). Twenty patients (50%) presented a NEN recurrence, of this, 14 (70%) were transplanted before 2010 and only 6 (30%) were transplanted afterwards (p=0.03). The median time for recurrence diagnosis was 12.3 months (range: 5.1 to 69.2). The most frequent recurrence treatments were surgical resection, somatostatin analogs, chemotherapy, and sunitinib therapy (8, 6, 6, and 4 patients, respectively). Survival rates were 89.5% and 56.1% at 1- and 5-years after recurrence diagnosis.Conclusions: Patients transplanted for unresectable NEN-Liver metastases had good long-term survival. Although the total recurrence rate is high, it decreased dramatically after 2010, probably due to better patient selection. Furthermore, recurrence treatment should be recommended as it may prolong patient survival

    Hepatic Vein (HV) Reconstruction (HVR) for Liver Tumors Involving Hepatocaval Confluence (HCO) Is Safe and Feasible to Achieve R0 Resection

    No full text
    Purpose: Surgical resection remains the cornerstone treatment for liver tumors. Local recurrence risk is determined by surgery radicality which forces significant parenchymal sacrifice or R1 resection in case of vascular involvement. Jump-graft between intra-parenchymal origin and superior stump HVR might be necessary to preserve remnant liver adequate outflow when radical surgery requires a resection at HCo. Methods: Monocentric retrospective analysis of intraoperative data and outcomes in 16patients who underwent HVR(2018-2021) was performed. After tumor dissection under ultrasound control, proximal and distal HV stumps were clamped and involved hepatocaval segment resected in single block. Reconstruction was performed by interposition of vascular graft between both stumps. Results: Patients presented with different conditions: liver metastasis (n=13), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (n=1), hepatocellular carcinoma (n=2). Non-frozen ABO-compatible venous homograft (n=12), autologous peritoneal patch/tube (n=3), autologous veins (n=1) were used as jump-grafts. Median HV clamping duration was 63min(54-90min). Pedicular clamping was only performed when HVR was associated to IVC replacement(n=2). Double HVR was also performed (n=3). HVR patency at day7 was 94%(15/16), at 3months 81%(13/16). Median blood loss was 1100ml(837-1700ml), R0 resection was achieved in 13/16(81%). Severe morbidity (Clavien III-IV) reached 25%(4/16). Small for size syndrome was null. Day90 mortality was null. Conclusion: In our series, R0 resection rate was high as well as early and late graft patency. Morbi-mortality was acceptable. HVR technique allows replacement of a single or double HV without significant bleeding nor need for pedicle clamping (if not associated to IVC replacement). Therefore, HVR should be considered as a realistic option in parenchymal-sparing strategy or radical surgery

    The use of autologous peritoneum in surgery of portal hypertension: H-shape splenorenal shunt using simple layer peritoneal tube.

    No full text
    The management of portal hypertension complicated by iterative gastro-intestinal bleeding remains challenging, especially in a low-income environment. Interventional radiology and endoscopic treatments are not always accessible, and a definitive surgical option may prove to be lifesaving. We report a new technique of surgical portosystemic shunt that can be performed in all contexts. We describe the surgical technique of a H-shaped splenorenal shunt using autologous rolled up peritoneum as a vascular graft

    Liver hypodense infectious lesions: Is it only bacteria, parasites or fungi?

    No full text
    No abstract availabl

    In-depth Clinical, Haemodynamic and Volumetric Assessment of the RAPID-type Auxiliary Liver Transplantation; Are We Simply Dealing with a Transplant Model of ALPPS?

    No full text
    Purpose: RAPID (Resection And Partial Liver Transplantation with Delayed total hepatectomy) consists of a left hepatectomy associated with orthotopic implantation of a left lobe. The rapid volumetric increase of the graft allows a right completion hepatectomy within 15 days. The technical difficulties encountered in this complex procedure are significant and there are still few cases described in the literature. Methods: Six donors and 6 recipients undergoing RAPID transplantation were included in a prospective single-centre protocol. We analyse the early kinetics growth rate (eKGR) by comparing it to that observed in patients receiving a partial graft alone. We performed intraoperative flow and pressure measurements in all patients. Data on conventional Living Donor Liver Transaplantation (LDLT) recipient were extracted retrospectively. We performed sequential hepatobiliary scintigraphy. Results: The indication for transplantation was colorectal and neuroendocrine metastases. Mean Graft-Recipient Weight Ratio was 0,41. No patient presented with Small-for-Size syndrome. 90 days mortality was 16.6%. The mean follow-up for the 5 living recipients was 648 days without associated morbidity. The clinical course of the donors was unremarkable. There was no difference in eKGR between RAPID and LDLT grafts. The indexed portal flow was significantly higher in RAPID than in LDLT. The technique exposes small volume grafts (GRWR <0.5) to full porto-mesenteric flow but this hyperflow only requires surgical modulation in 1 in 6 cases.Sequential analysis eKGR shows no linearity. It was greater in the first week than in the second week after transplantation: mean volume increase of 70.17±27.13% versus 24±12.77%. Conclusions: We highlight the excellent clinical results of the RAPID surgical technique despite initial graft volumes well below those recommended for conventional LDLT. The initial hypothesis of accelerated surgical liver regeneration has not been established: the growth rate of the grafts in the RAPID model corresponds to that found in LDLT

    Innovations in liver transplantation in 2020, position of the Belgian Liver Intestine Advisory Committee (BeLIAC).

    No full text
    Liver transplantation (LT) remains the only curative option for patients suffering from end-stage liver disease, acute liver failure and selected hepatocellular carcinomas and access to the LT-waiting list is limited to certain strict indications. However, LT has shown survival advantages for patients in certain indications such as acute alcoholic hepatitis, hepatocellular carcinoma outside Milan criteria and colorectal cancer metastases. These newer indications increase the pressure in an already difficult context of organ shortage. Strategies to increase the transplantable organ pool are therefore needed. We will discuss here the use of HCV positive grafts as the use of normothermic isolated liver perfusion. Belgian Liver Intestine Advisory Committee (BeLIAC) from the Belgian Transplant Society (BTS) aims to guarantee the balance between the new indications and the available resources
    corecore