Gerbode Defect as a Result of Fungal Aortic Valve Endocarditis

A 63-year-old male patient with HIV disease presented with dyspnea and complete heart block, and was found to have aortic valve (AV) endocarditis secondary to Candida parapsilosis infection. Echocardiography demonstrated AV endocarditis and possible aortic root versus subannular abscess with moderate AV regurgitation (AR), a ventricular septal defect (VSD) and possible left ventricular to right atrial shunt (Gerbode defect). Large AV vegetations, subannular abscess with an acquired membranous VSD, Gerbode defect, and tricuspid annular abscess at the insertion of septal leaflet were noted intraoperatively. The patient underwent AV replacement with a stented bioprosthesis, two-sided VSD patch closure, and tricuspid valve (TV) repair with an annuloplasty ring. The left-sided patch closed the VSD and facilitated AV replacement, while the right-sided patch facilitated the TV repair

Single-Center Experience With Venovenous ECMO for Influenza-Related ARDS

Objectives: This study was designed to determine whether venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) reduced mortality in patients with influenza-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Design: A retrospective cohort study was performed. Baseline characteristics of participants were compared and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to compare survival at last medical center follow-up. Cox proportional hazards modeling also was performed to test for univariate associations between salient variables and mortality. Setting: A single-center ECMO referral university hospital. Participants: All patients admitted with influenza-related ARDS during the 2015 to 2016 influenza season. Interventions: Mechanical ventilation alone versus mechanical ventilation and ECMO cannulation. Measurements and Main Results: A total of 26 patients with influenza-related ARDS were included in the cohort. Thirteen patients were treated with VV ECMO while 13 were not. Twelve of the ECMO patients and 8 of the non-ECMO patients were transferred from outside hospitals. Patients treated with ECMO were younger and had less hypertension and diabetes mellitus. There was no difference in baseline sequential organ failure assessment score between the 2 groups. In-hospital mortality for ECMO patients was 15.4% versus 46.7% for patients not treated with ECMO. Survival at last medical center follow-up was better in patients treated with ECMO (p = 0.02). Age, highest blood carbon dioxide level, and treatment without ECMO were all associated with increased mortality. Conclusions: Influenza-related ARDS has a high mortality rate and patients treated only with mechanical ventilation have worse outcome than those managed with VV ECMO. More liberal use of ECMO should be considered in patients with influenza-related ARDS

Cost and Outcome of Minimally Invasive Techniques for Coronary Surgery Using Robotic Technology.

OBJECTIVE: Totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass (TECAB) with robotic distal anastomosis and robotic-assisted minimally invasive coronary artery bypass (RA-MIDCAB) with robotic internal mammary artery harvest and direct hand-sewn distal anastomosis via an anterior thoracotomy have both been reported as safe and efficacious. We compared hospital cost and short-term outcomes between these techniques. METHODS: Patients who underwent robotic-assisted minimally invasive single-vessel Coronary artery bypass grafting (2011-2014) were retrospectively reviewed. One hundred consecutive patients underwent either TECAB (n = 50) or RA-MIDCAB (n = 50). The two groups were sequential with TECAB performed by one surgeon in the first portion of the study interval and RA-MIDCAB by another surgeon in the latter. Demographics, short-term outcomes, and hospital cost data were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Patient demographics and preoperative risk factors were similar between the TECAB and RA-MIDCAB groups, as total operating room time. Cardiopulmonary bypass was used for 56% of TECAB and 0% of RA-MIDCAB cases (P \u3c 0.001). Intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay, along with postoperative morbidities, were similar between the two groups. Operative mortality was 2% in the TECAB and 0% in the RA-MIDCAB group (P = NS). Total hospital cost was significantly higher with TECAB compared with RA-MIDCAB (US $33,769 vs.$22,679, P \u3c 0.001), which was primarily driven by operative costs (US $17,616 vs.$26,803, P \u3c 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass and RA-MIDCAB both demonstrated excellent short-term clinical outcomes. However, TECAB was associated with significantly higher hospital costs. Further comparisons, including long-term outcomes, patient satisfaction, and functional status, are needed to evaluate whether this additional cost is justified

Von Willebrand Factor Concentrate Administration for Acquired Von Willebrand Syndrome- Related Bleeding During Adult Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Objective: To review the use of Von Willebrand Factor (VWF) concentrate for treatment of acquired Von Willebrand syndrome (VWS)-related bleeding in adult extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients and determine if it was associated with improved VWF laboratory parameters. Design: Retrospective observational cohort study. Setting: Tertiary care academic medical center. Participants: Adult ECMO patients who received VWF concentrate for treatment of acquired VWS- related bleeding. Interventions: None, observational study. Measurements and Main Results: Ten adult ECMO patients received VWF concentrate for treatment of bleeding with evidence of acquired VWS over a 15-month period. Six patients were on veno-arterial ECMO and 4 were on veno-venous ECMO. The most common site of bleeding was airway or tracheal bleeding. The mean dose of VWF concentrate was 41 IU/kg. Mean VWF antigen was 263 ± 93 IU/dL before treatment and 394 ± 54 after treatment. Mean ristocetin cofactor activity was 127 ± 47 IU/dL before treatment and 240 ± 33 after treatment. The mean VWF ristocetin cofactor activity antigen ratio increased from 0.52 ± 0.14 before treatment to 0.62 ± 0.04 after treatment. Four of 10 patients had complete resolution of their bleeding within 24 hours, and 6 of 10 had complete resolution of their bleeding within 2- to- 4 days. There were 3 patients who had thrombotic events potentially related to VWF concentrate administration. No patient had an arterial thrombosis, stroke, or myocardial infarction. Conclusions: VWF concentrate administration increases VWF function in adult ECMO patients, but also may be associated with increased thrombotic risk. Larger studies are needed to determine VWF concentrate\u27s safety, efficacy, and optimal dosing in adult ECMO patients

Venovenous Versus Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Adult Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Requiring Precannulation Hemodynamic Support: A Review of the ELSO Registry

Background In addition to severe hypoxia and hypercapnia, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) can present with substantial hemodynamic compromise, requiring inotropic or vasopressor support or both. Either venovenous (VV) or venoarterial (VA) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can be offered in this situation. However, a contemporary comparison of these two cannulation strategies has yet to be well described. Methods The Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry was reviewed for all cases of adult ARDS in patients that required inotropic agents or vasopressors or both before ECMO initiation (2009 to 2013). Pre-ECMO clinical data, ECMO variables, and outcomes were compared, based on initial cannulation strategy (VV or VA ECMO). Results Of 717 ECMO runs, there were 591 VV ECMO and 126 VA ECMO cases. Over the study period, the proportion of VA ECMO cases decreased from 20% (n = 37 of 184, 2009 to 2010) to 19% (n = 59 of 312, 2011 to 2012) to 14% (n = 30 of 221, 2013). Conversion from VV ECMO to VA ECMO was 4%. VV ECMO was associated with less gastrointestinal bleeding and hemolysis, but overall rates of bleeding, stroke, and renal failure were similar. Survival to discharge was 58% for VV ECMO in contrast to 43% for VA ECMO (p = 0.002). Multivariable regression analysis revealed VV ECMO to be an independent predictor of survival to discharge relative to VA ECMO. Conclusions In this review of ARDS patients requiring pre-ECMO hemodynamic support, VV ECMO was not associated with worse survival or complication rates compared with VA ECMO. These data suggest that, in appropriately selected patients, it may be reasonable to initially institute VV ECMO support, reserving VA ECMO for conversion for refractory hypotension