12 research outputs found
The Economics of Smoking Bans
While the empirical literature on smoking bans is extensive, little theory has been developed. This paper examines the welfare impact of smoking bans in an economy where smokers’ utility is reduced by a workplace/public place ban. The government has two instruments - increasing the price through taxation, or limiting when the product can be consumed through a ban. Its ability to reduce smoking through taxation is limited by a black market where cigarettes are not taxed. We show that the quantity instrument (ban) is always welfareenhancing. The model has application to other addictive activities.smoking, workplace ban, public place ban, government control, taxation
Introducing the Peer Group Effect: Why Decentralization is Bad for Efficiency (But Good for Equity)
Peer Group, Decentralization, Voting, Second-Best Inefficiency, Equity
LOW INCOME HOUSING ASSISTANCE: THE EFFECT OF COMMUNITY COMPOSITION ON PUBLIC EXPENDITURES AND WELFARE
voting ; fiscal policy ; prices ; housing market
INTERPRETING "THE RAMSEY EQUATIONS" OF OPTIMAL TAX THEORY
fiscal policy ; social welfare ; economic models
THE INEQUITY OF AN EFFICIENT INDIRECT TAX STRUCTURE
household ; demand ; productivity ; social welfare
Social Insurance and Population Uncertainty: Demographic Bias and Implications for Social Security
Population uncertainty, overlapping-generation model, demographics
Tax competition and the creation of redundant products
There are products that are assembled from kits but that, once assembled, are identical to other products. An example is the roll-your-own cigarette. Because the kit requires time to assemble, it is more costly than the assembled product; in the absence of tax competition, the kit is not bought or is `redundant.' I show that tax competition between regions supports strategies that tax the `redundant' product at a lower tax rate than its assembled counterpart, and it is bought. A welfare loss is thereby created.