34 research outputs found

    Polθ promotes the repair of 5\u27-DNA-protein crosslinks by microhomology-mediated end-joining

    Get PDF
    DNA polymerase θ (Polθ) confers resistance to chemotherapy agents that cause DNA-protein crosslinks (DPCs) at double-strand breaks (DSBs), such as topoisomerase inhibitors. This suggests Polθ might facilitate DPC repair by microhomology-mediated end-joining (MMEJ). Here, we investigate Polθ repair of DSBs carrying DPCs by monitoring MMEJ in Xenopus egg extracts. MMEJ in extracts is dependent on Polθ, exhibits the MMEJ repair signature, and efficiently repairs 5\u27 terminal DPCs independently of non-homologous end-joining and the replisome. We demonstrate that Polθ promotes the repair of 5\u27 terminal DPCs in mammalian cells by using an MMEJ reporter and find that Polθ confers resistance to formaldehyde in addition to topoisomerase inhibitors. Dual deficiency in Polθ and tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 2 (TDP2) causes severe cellular sensitivity to etoposide, which demonstrates MMEJ as an independent DPC repair pathway. These studies recapitulate MMEJ in vitro and elucidate how Polθ confers resistance to etoposide

    A protective role for BRCA2 at stalled replication forks

    Get PDF
    The hereditary breast and ovarian cancer predisposition genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 account for the lion's share of heritable breast cancer risk in the human population. Loss of function of either gene results in defective homologous recombination (HR) and triggers genomic instability, accelerating breast tumorigenesis. A long-standing hypothesis proposes that BRCA1 and BRCA2 mediate HR following attempted replication across damaged DNA, ensuring error-free processing of the stalled replication fork. A recent paper describes a new replication fork protective function of BRCA2, which appears to collaborate with its HR function to suppress genomic instability

    Structural Basis for a Polθ Helicase Small-Molecule Inhibitor Revealed by Cryo-EM

    Get PDF
    DNA polymerase theta (Polθ) is a DNA helicase-polymerase protein that facilitates DNA repair and is synthetic lethal with homology-directed repair (HDR) factors. Thus, Polθ is a promising precision oncology drug-target in HDR-deficient cancers. Here, we characterize the binding and mechanism of action of a Polθ helicase (Polθ-hel) small-molecule inhibitor (AB25583) using cryo-EM. AB25583 exhibits 6 nM IC50 against Polθ-hel, selectively kills BRCA1/2-deficient cells, and acts synergistically with olaparib in cancer cells harboring pathogenic BRCA1/2 mutations. Cryo-EM uncovers predominantly dimeric Polθ-hel:AB25583 complex structures at 3.0-3.2 Å. The structures reveal a binding-pocket deep inside the helicase central-channel, which underscores the high specificity and potency of AB25583. The cryo-EM structures in conjunction with biochemical data indicate that AB25583 inhibits the ATPase activity of Polθ-hel helicase via an allosteric mechanism. These detailed structural data and insights about AB25583 inhibition pave the way for accelerating drug development targeting Polθ-hel in HDR-deficient cancers

    Parg Is Essential for Polθ-Mediated Dna End-Joining by Removing Repressive Poly-Adp-Ribose Marks

    Get PDF
    DNA polymerase theta (Polθ)-mediated end-joining (TMEJ) repairs DNA double-strand breaks and confers resistance to genotoxic agents. How Polθ is regulated at the molecular level to exert TMEJ remains poorly characterized. We find that Polθ interacts with and is PARylated by PARP1 in a HPF1- independent manner. PARP1 recruits Polθ to the vicinity of DNA damage via PARylation dependent liquid demixing, however, PARylated Polθ cannot perform TMEJ due to its inability to bind DNA. PARG-mediated de-PARylation of Polθ reactivates its DNA binding and end-joining activities. Consistent with this, PARG is essential for TMEJ and the temporal recruitment of PARG to DNA damage corresponds with TMEJ activation and dissipation of PARP1 and PAR. In conclusion, we show a two-step spatiotemporal mechanism of TMEJ regulation. First, PARP1 PARylates Polθ and facilitates its recruitment to DNA damage sites in an inactivated state. PARG subsequently activates TMEJ by removing repressive PAR marks on Polθ

    Discovery of a Small-Molecule Inhibitor that Traps Polθ on DNA and Synergizes with PARP Inhibitors

    Get PDF
    The DNA damage response (DDR) protein DNA Polymerase θ (Polθ) is synthetic lethal with homologous recombination (HR) factors and is therefore a promising drug target in BRCA1/2 mutant cancers. We discover an allosteric Polθ inhibitor (Polθi) class with 4-6 nM IC50 that selectively kills HR-deficient cells and acts synergistically with PARP inhibitors (PARPi) in multiple genetic backgrounds. X-ray crystallography and biochemistry reveal that Polθi selectively inhibits Polθ polymerase (Polθ-pol) in the closed conformation on B-form DNA/DNA via an induced fit mechanism. In contrast, Polθi fails to inhibit Polθ-pol catalytic activity on A-form DNA/RNA in which the enzyme binds in the open configuration. Remarkably, Polθi binding to the Polθ-pol:DNA/DNA closed complex traps the polymerase on DNA for more than forty minutes which elucidates the inhibitory mechanism of action. These data reveal a unique small-molecule DNA polymerase:DNA trapping mechanism that induces synthetic lethality in HR-deficient cells and potentiates the activity of PARPi

    Molecular basis of microhomology-mediated end-joining by purified full-length Polθ

    Get PDF
    DNA polymerase θ (Polθ) is a unique polymerase-helicase fusion protein that promotes microhomology-mediated end-joining (MMEJ) of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). How full-length human Polθ performs MMEJ at the molecular level remains unknown. Using a biochemical approach, we find that the helicase is essential for Polθ MMEJ of long ssDNA overhangs which model resected DSBs. Remarkably, Polθ MMEJ of ssDNA overhangs requires polymerase-helicase attachment, but not the disordered central domain, and occurs independently of helicase ATPase activity. Using single-particle microscopy and biophysical methods, we find that polymerase-helicase attachment promotes multimeric gel-like Polθ complexes that facilitate DNA accumulation, DNA synapsis, and MMEJ. We further find that the central domain regulates Polθ multimerization and governs its DNA substrate requirements for MMEJ. These studies identify unexpected functions for the helicase and central domain and demonstrate the importance of polymerase-helicase tethering in MMEJ and the structural organization of Polθ

    Tissue polarity meets nuclear function: Polarity as a modulator of cell proliferation and DNA repair

    No full text
    Establishment of baso-apical polarity, a fundamental property of tissue architecture in epithelial cells is involved in the maintenance of tissue homeostasis. Recent data suggests that nuclear organization also participates in tissue homeostasis. I have used three-dimensional (3D) culture system that can reproduce different levels of polarity to explore the relationship between nuclear organization and tissue polarity in the control of cell fate. The HMT-3522 non-neoplastic mammary epithelial cells (S1) differentiate to form baso-apically polarized structures (acini) in 3D culture in the presence of laminin rich basement membrane (BM). Under similar 3D culture conditions, tumor (T4-2) cells form tumor-like nodules and upon induction of phenotypic reversion, T4-2 cells form tissue structures (spheroids) that have basal, but no apical polarity (RT4-2). I show that RT4-2 cells display nuclear structural characteristics of acinar differentiation. Alteration of nuclear organization in S1 acini and RT4-2 spheroids by treatment with anti-NuMA (nuclear mitotic apparatus protein) antibodies leads to loss of differentiation. However, while non-neoplastic cells subsequently undergo apoptosis, reverted tumor cells enter the cell cycle. My results demonstrate that the impact of nuclear organization on cell fate depends on the status of tissue polarity. Cell contact with the BM is required for the establishment of basal polarity. Loss of cell-BM interaction in cancer is characterized by accumulation of genomic instability in the form of mutations. I asked whether cell-BM interaction will affect DNA repair in mammary epithelial cells. My results demonstrate that basally polarized S1 and RT4-2 cells undergo DNA repair and the DNA damage response in S1 and RT4-2 cells involves activation of ATM and p53. Furthermore, inhibition of PI3 kinase decreased DNA repair in S1 and RT4-2 cells. When RT4-2 cells were cultured in the absence of BM, the DNA repair activity was decreased. Blocking alpha 6 integrin signaling in RT4-2 cells also resulted in decrease in DNA repair activity. The above results demonstrate the importance of cell-BM interaction in the DNA repair of RT4-2 cells. Overall, the results from this thesis reinforce the importance of tissue polarity in nuclear function
    corecore