Spirometric phenotypes from early childhood to young adulthood : a Chronic Airway Disease Early Stratification study

Acknowledgements Cohort-specific acknowledgements are presented in the supplementary material. We also acknowledge collaboration with the EXPANSE consortium (funded by the EU H2020 programme, grant number 874627). We thank Elise Heuvelin, European Respiratory Society, Lausanne, Switzerland, for her assistance on the current project.Peer reviewedPublisher PD

PFAS levels and exposure determinants in sensitive population groups

Background: Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are persistent organic pollutants. The first exposure to PFAS occurs in utero, after birth it continues via breast milk, food intake, environment, and consumer products that contain these chemicals. Our aim was to identify determinants of PFAS concentrations in sensitive population subgroups- pregnant women and newborns. Methods: Nine European birth cohorts provided exposure data on PFAS in pregnant women (INMA-Gipuzkoa, Sabadell, Valencia, ELFE and MoBa; total N = 5897) or newborns (3xG study, FLEHS 2, FLEHS 3 and PRENATAL; total N = 940). PFOS, PFOA, PFHxS and PFNA concentrations were measured in maternal or cord blood, depending on the cohort (FLEHS 2 measured only PFOS and PFOA). PFAS concentrations were analysed according to maternal characteristics (age, BMI, parity, previous breastfeeding, smoking, and food consumption during pregnancy) and parental educational level. The association between potential determinants and PFAS concentrations was evaluated using multiple linear regression models. Results: We observed significant variations in PFAS concentrations among cohorts. Higher PFAS concentrations were associated with higher maternal age, primipara birth, and educational level, both for maternal blood and cord blood. Higher PFAS concentrations in maternal blood were associated with higher consumption of fish and seafood, meat, offal and eggs. In cord blood, higher PFHxS concentrations were associated with daily meat consumption and higher PFNA with offal consumption. Daily milk and dairy consumption were associated with lower concentrations of PFAS in both, pregnant women and newborns. Conclusion: High detection rates of the four most abundant PFAS demonstrate ubiquitous exposure of sensitive populations, which is of concern. This study identified several determinants of PFAS exposure in pregnant women and newborns, including dietary factors, and these findings can be used for proposing measures to reduce PFAS exposure, particularly from dietary sources.This work was supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Grant agreement No 733032 HBM4EU (http://www.hbm4eu.eu), and received co-funding from the authors' organizations: 3xG: The 3xG study was financed and steered by NIRAS and the local partnerships MONA and STORA. ELFE: The Elfe survey is a joint project between the French Institute for Demographic Studies (INED) and the National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM), in partnership with the French blood transfusion service (Etablissement français du sang, EFS), Santé publique France, the National Institute for Statistics and Economic Studies (INSEE), the Direction générale de la santé (DGS, part of the Ministry of Health and Social Affairs), the Direction générale de la prévention des risques (DGPR, Ministry for the Environment), the Direction de la recherche, des études, de l’évaluation et des statistiques (DREES, Ministry of Health and Social Affairs), the Département des études, de la prospective et des statistiques (DEPS, Ministry of Culture), and the Caisse nationale des allocations familiales (CNAF), with the support of the Ministry of Higher Education and Research and the Institut national de la jeunesse et de l’éducation populaire (INJEP). Via the RECONAI platform, it receives a government grant managed by the National Research Agency under the “Investissements d'avenir” programme (ANR-11-EQPX-0038 and ANR-19-COHO-0001). FLEHS: The Flemish Environment and Health studie (FLEHS) were commissioned, financed and steered by the Flemish Government (Department of Economy, Science and Innovations, Agency for Care and Health and Department of Environment). INMA Valencia: This study was funded by Grants from UE (FP7-ENV-2011 cod 282,957 and HEALTH.2010.2.4.5–1), Spain: ISCIII (Red INMA G03/176, CB06/02/0041; FIS-FEDER: PI03/1615, PI04/1509, PI04/1112, PI04/1931, PI05/1079, PI05/1052, PI06/1213, PI07/0314, PI09/02647, PI11/01007, PI11/02591, PI11/02038, PI13/1944, PI13/2032, PI14/00891, PI14/01687, PI16/1288, and PI17/00663; Miguel Servet-FEDER CP11/00178, CP15/00025, and CPII16/00051), Generalitat Valenciana: FISABIO (UGP 15–230, UGP-15-244, and UGP-15-249), and Alicia Koplowitz Foundation 2017

European birth cohorts for environmental health research

BACKGROUND: Many pregnancy and birth cohort studies investigate the health effects of early-life environmental contaminant exposure. An overview of existing studies and their data is needed to improve collaboration, harmonization, and future project planning. OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to create a comprehensive overview of European birth cohorts with environmental exposure data. METHODS: Birth cohort studies were included if they a) collected data on at least one environmental exposure, b) started enrollment during pregnancy or at birth, c) included at least one follow-up point after birth, d) included at least 200 mother-child pairs, and e) were based in a European country. A questionnaire collected information on basic protocol details and exposure and health outcome assessments, including specific contaminants, methods and samples, timing, and number of subjects. A full inventory can be searched on www.birthcohortsenrieco.net. RESULTS: Questionnaires were completed by 37 cohort studies of > 350,000 mother-child pairs in 19 European countries. Only three cohorts did not participate. All cohorts collected biological specimens of children or parents. Many cohorts collected information on passive smoking (n = 36), maternal occupation (n = 33), outdoor air pollution (n = 27), and allergens/biological organisms (n = 27). Fewer cohorts (n = 12-19) collected information on water contamination, ionizing or nonionizing radiation exposures, noise, metals, persistent organic pollutants, or other pollutants. All cohorts have information on birth outcomes; nearly all on asthma, allergies, childhood growth and obesity; and 26 collected information on child neurodevelopment. CONCLUSION: Combining forces in this field will yield more efficient and conclusive studies and ultimately improve causal inference. This impressive resource of existing birth cohort data could form the basis for longer-term and worldwide coordination of research on environment and child health.This work was supported by Environmental Health Risks in European Birth Cohorts (ENRIECO), a project conducted within the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (Theme 6, Environment, including climate change), grant agreement 22628

Admixture mapping of severe asthma exacerbations in Hispanic/Latino children and youth

Background: In the USA, genetically admixed populations have the highest asthma prevalence and severe asthma exacerbations rates. This could be explained not only by environmental factors but also by genetic variants that exert ethnic-specific effects. However, no admixture mapping has been performed for severe asthma exacerbations. Objective: We sought to identify genetic variants associated with severe asthma exacerbations in Hispanic/Latino subgroups by means of admixture mapping analyses and fine mapping, and to assess their transferability to other populations and potential functional roles. Methods: We performed an admixture mapping in 1124 Puerto Rican and 625 Mexican American children with asthma. Fine-mapping of the significant peaks was performed via allelic testing of common and rare variants. We performed replication across Hispanic/Latino subgroups, and the transferability to non-Hispanic/Latino populations was assessed in 1001 African Americans, 1250 Singaporeans and 941 Europeans with asthma. The effects of the variants on gene expression and DNA methylation from whole blood were also evaluated in participants with asthma and in silico with data obtained through public databases. Results: Genomewide significant associations of Indigenous American ancestry with severe asthma exacerbations were found at 5q32 in Mexican Americans as well as at 13q13-q13.2 and 3p13 in Puerto Ricans. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs1144986 (C5orf46) showed consistent effects for severe asthma exacerbations across Hispanic/Latino subgroups, but it was not validated in non-Hispanics/Latinos. This SNP was associated with DPYSL3 DNA methylation and SCGB3A2 gene expression levels. Conclusions: Admixture mapping study of asthma exacerbations revealed a novel locus that exhibited Hispanic/Latino-specific effects and regulated DPYSL3 and SCGB3A2.This work was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and the European Regional Development Fund 'ERDF A way of making Europe' by the European Union grant [SAF2017-83417R], and by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 [grant PID2020-116274RB-I00]. Whole-genome sequencing for the TOPMed (Trans-Omics in Precision Medicine) program was supported by the NHLBI. Whole-genome sequencing for GALA II (NHLBI TOPMed: Genes-environments and Admixture in Latino Americans) Study (phs000920) was performed at the New York Genome Center [3R01HL117004-01S3]. Centralised read mapping and genotype calling, along with variant quality metrics and filtering, were provided by the TOPMed Informatics Research Center [3R01HL-117626-02S1]. Phenotype harmonization, data management, sample-identity quality control, and general study coordination were provided by the TOPMed Data Coordinating Center [3R01HL-120393-02S1]. WGS of part of GALA II was performed by New York Genome Center under The Centers for Common Disease Genomics of the Genome Sequencing Program (GSP) Grant [UM1 HG008901]. The GSP Coordinating Center [U24 HG008956] contributed to cross-program scientific initiatives and provided logistical and general study coordination. GSP is funded by the National Human Genome Research Institute, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, and the National Eye Institute [NA]. This work was also supported by the Sandler Family Foundation[NA], the American Asthma Foundation [NA], the RWJF Amos Medical Faculty Development Program [NA], Harry Wm. and Diana V. Hind Distinguished Professor in Pharmaceutical Sciences II [NA], the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health [R01HL117004, R01HL128439, R01HL135156, X01HL134589, R01HL155024, R01AI079139, R01HL141845, R01HL118267 and R01DK113003], the National Institute of Health and Environmental Health Sciences [R01ES015794 and R21ES24844], the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities [R01MD010443 and R56MD013312], the Tobacco-Related Disease Research Program [Award Number 24RT-0025 and 27IR-0030]. The BAMSE study was funded by the Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation and the Swedish Research Council and Region Stockholm (ALF project and database maintenance). The INMA study was funded by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III [Red INMA G03/176, CB06/02/0041], Spanish Ministry of Health [FIS-FEDER PI16/1288, FIS-FEDER PI19/1338; Miguel Servet FEDER 15/0025 and 20/0006], Generalitat Valenciana [BEST/2020/ 059]. This work was also partially funded by Fundación Canaria Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Canarias [PIFIISC19/17]. JV was funded by ISCIII and the European Regional Development Fund 'ERDF A way of making Europe' by the European Union [PI16/00049 and PI19/00141]. MP-Y was funded by the Ramón y Cajal Program [RYC-2015-17205] by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by the European Social Fund 'ESF Investing in your future' and by the EAACI Allergopharma Award 2021. JV and M.P.-Y were funded Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) [CB06/06/1088]. EH-L was supported by a fellowship awarded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by 'ESF Investing in your future' [PRE2018-083837]. JP-G was supported by a fellowship awarded by the Spanish Ministry of Universities [FPU19/02175]

Occupational exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals and birth weight and length of gestation: A european meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Women of reproductive age can be exposed to endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) at work, and exposure to EDCs in pregnancy may affect fetal growth. OBJECTIVES: We assessed whether maternal occupational exposure to EDCs during pregnancy as classified by application of a job exposure matrix was associated with birth weight, term low birth weight (LBW), length of gestation, and preterm delivery. METHODS: Using individual participant data from 133,957 mother-child pairs in 13 European cohorts spanning births from 1994 through 2011, we linked maternal job titles with exposure to 10 EDC groups as assessed through a job exposure matrix. For each group, we combined the two levels of exposure categories (possible and probable) and compared birth outcomes with the unexposed group (exposure unlikely). We performed meta-analyses of cohort-specific estimates. RESULTS: Eleven percent of pregnant women were classified as exposed to EDCs at work during pregnancy, based on job title. Classification of exposure to one or more EDC group was associated with an increased risk of term LBW [odds ratio (OR) = 1.25; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.49], as were most specific EDC groups; this association was consistent across cohorts. Further, the risk increased with increasing number of EDC groups (OR = 2.11; 95% CI: 1.10, 4.06 for exposure to four or more EDC groups). There were few associations (p < 0.05) with the other outcomes; women holding job titles classified as exposed to bisphenol A or brominated flame retardants were at higher risk for longer length of gestation. CONCLUSION: Results from our large population-based birth cohort design indicate that employment during pregnancy in occupations classified as possibly or probably exposed to EDCs was associated with an increased risk of term LBW.This work was supported by the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (grants FP7/2007-2013, 226285, 241604) as part of the Environmental Health Risks in European Birth Cohorts project (http://www.enrieco.org) and the Developing a Child Cohort Research Strategy for Europe project (http://www.chicosproject.eu); and by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (grant CD12/00563). Funding per cohort: ABCD: This work was supported by the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (grant 2100.0076). BAMSE: This work was supported by the Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation; Stockholm County Council; Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare; and the European Commission’s Seventh Framework 29 Program: the Mechanisms of the Development of Allergy (grant 261357). DNBC: This work was supported by the Danish Epidemiology of Science Centre; Pharmacy Foundation; Egmont Foundation; March of Dimes Birth Defect Foundation; Agustinus Foundation; and the Health Foundation. Generation R: This work was supported by the Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam; Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development; European Commission Seventh Framework Programme; and the Contaminant Mixtures and Human Reproductive Health Project (grant 212502); V.J. received an additional grant from the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (grant VIDI 016.136.361) and Consolidator Grant from the European Research Council (grant ERC-2014-CoG-648916). Generation XXI: This work was supported by the Programa Operacional de Saúde – Saúde XXI; Quadro Comunitário de Apoio III; Administração Regional de Saúde Norte (Regional Department of Ministry of Health); Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology; Fundo Europeu de Desenvolvimento Regional, and the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation. INMA_Granada: This work was supported by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (grants G03/176, CB06/02/0041); Spanish Ministry of Health (grant FIS-07/0252); European Union Commission (grants QLK4-1999-01422, QLK4-2002-00603, FP7-ENV-212502); and the Consejería de Salud de la Junta de Andalucía (grant 183/07; 0675-2010). INMA_New: This work was supported by the European Union (grants FP7-ENV-2011, 282957, HEALTH.2010.2.4.5-1); Instituto de Salud Carlos III (grants G03/176, CB06/02/0041, FIS-FEDER 03/1615, 04/1509, 04/1112, 04/1931, 05/1079, 05/1052, 06/1213, 07/0314, 09/02647, 11/01007, 11/02591, CP11/00178, FIS-PI06/0867, FIS-PS09/00090); Conselleria de Sanitat Generalitat Valenciana; Spanish Ministry of Health (grants FIS-PI041436, FIS- PI081151, FIS-PI042018, FIS-PI09/02311); Generalitat de Catalunya (grants CIRIT1999SGR, 00241); Obre Social Cajastur; Universidad de Oviedo; Department of Health of the Basque Government (grants 2005111093, 2009111069); and the Provincial Government of Gipuzkoa (grants DFG06/004, DFG08/001). KANC: This work was supported by the European Commission (grant FP6-036224). MoBa: This work was supported by the Norwegian Ministry of Health; National Institutes of Health; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (grant N01-ES–85433); National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (grant 1 UO1 NS 047537); Norwegian Research Council; Functional Genomics (grant 151918/S10); and Environmental Exposures and Health Outcomes (grant 213148). NINFEA: This work was supported by the Compagnia San Paolo Foundation, and by the Piedmont Region. Pélagie: This work was supported by the National Institute of Health and Medical Research; the French Ministry of Health; the French Ministry of Labor; French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety; French National Research Agency; and the French Institute for Public Health Surveillance. REPRO_PL: This work was supported by the National Centre for Research and Development, Poland (grants PBZ-MEiN-/8/2/2006, K140/P01/2007/1.3.1.1); the Norwegian Financial Mechanism within the PolishNorwegian Research Fund (grant PNRF-218-AI-1/07); and European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (grant FP7/2007-2013, 603946). Rhea: This work was supported by the European Union Integrated Project NewGeneris, 6th Framework Programme, (grant FOOD-CT-2005-016320); and the Health Impacts of Long-term Exposure to Disinfection By-products in Drinking Water project (grant Food-CT-2006-036224)

Early-life respiratory tract infections and the risk of school-age lower lung function and asthma: a meta-analysis of 150 000 European children

Background: Early-life respiratory tract infections might affect chronic obstructive respiratory diseases, but conclusive studies from general populations are lacking. Our objective was to examine if children with early-life respiratory tract infections had increased risks of lower lung function and asthma at school age. Methods: We used individual participant data of 150 090 children primarily from the EU Child Cohort Network to examine the associations of upper and lower respiratory tract infections from age 6 months to 5 years with forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), FEV1/FVC, forced expiratory flow at 75% of FVC (FEF75%) and asthma at a median (range) age of 7 (4-15) years. Results: Children with early-life lower, not upper, respiratory tract infections had a lower school-age FEV1, FEV1/FVC and FEF75% (z-score range: -0.09 (95% CI -0.14- -0.04) to -0.30 (95% CI -0.36- -0.24)). Children with early-life lower respiratory tract infections had a higher increased risk of school-age asthma than those with upper respiratory tract infections (OR range: 2.10 (95% CI 1.98-2.22) to 6.30 (95% CI 5.64-7.04) and 1.25 (95% CI 1.18-1.32) to 1.55 (95% CI 1.47-1.65), respectively). Adjustment for preceding respiratory tract infections slightly decreased the strength of the effects. Observed associations were similar for those with and without early-life wheezing as a proxy for early-life asthma. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that early-life respiratory tract infections affect development of chronic obstructive respiratory diseases in later life, with the strongest effects for lower respiratory tract infections.A comprehensive list of grant funding is available on the ALSPAC website (www.bristol.ac.uk/alspac/external/documents/grant-acknowledgements.pdf). BAMSE: BAMSE was funded by the Swedish Research Council, the Swedish Heart Lung Foundation, ALF Region Stockholm and SFO Epidemiology Karolinska Institutet. E. Mélen is supported by a European Research Council grant (TRIBAL, 757919). BiB (Born in Bradford): BiB is only possible because of the enthusiasm and commitment of the children and parents in BiB. We are grateful to all the participants, practitioners and researchers who have made BiB happen. The BiB study presents independent research commissioned by the National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Applied Health Research and Care (NIHR CLAHRC) and the Programme Grants for Applied Research funding scheme (RP-PG-0407-10044). Core support for BiB is also provided by the Wellcome Trust (WT101597MA). BILD: This study was funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (320030_163311). CoNER: Funds were obtained from the special programme (Programmi speciali – Art.12 bis, comma 6 D.lgs.229/99 Sanitaria e della Vigilanza sugli Enti) funded by the Italian Ministry of Health. Approval for the study was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the S. Orsola-Malpighi Teaching Hospital in April 2004 (52/2004/U/Tess). COPSAC 2000 and COPSAC 2010: All funding received by COPSAC is listed on www.copsac.com. The Lundbeck Foundation (R16-A1694), Ministry of Health (903516), Danish Council for Strategic Research (0603-00280B) and Capital Region Research Foundation have provided core support to the COPSAC research centre. We express our deepest gratitude to the children and families of the COPSAC 2000 and COPSAC 2010 cohort studies for all their support and commitment. We acknowledge and appreciate the unique efforts of the COPSAC research team. DNBC (Danish National Birth Cohort): The authors would like to thank the participants, the first Principal Investigator of DNBC, Jørn Olsen, the scientific managerial team and DNBC secretariat for being, establishing, developing and consolidating the DNBC. The DNBC was established with a significant grant from the Danish National Research Foundation. Additional support was obtained from the Danish Regional Committees, Pharmacy Foundation, Egmont Foundation, March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation, Health Foundation and other minor grants. The DNBC Biobank has been supported by the Novo Nordisk Foundation and Lundbeck Foundation. Follow-up of mothers and children has been supported by the Danish Medical Research Council (SSVF 0646, 271-08-0839/06-066023, O602-01042B, 0602-02738B), Lundbeck Foundation (195/04, R100-A9193), Innovation Fund Denmark 0603-00294B (09-067124), Nordea Foundation (02-2013-2014), Aarhus Ideas (AU R9-A959-13-S804), University of Copenhagen Strategic Grant (IFSV 2012) and Danish Council for Independent Research (DFF-4183-00594, DFF-4183-00152). A. Pinot de Moira is funded by a Lundbeck Foundation grant (R264-2017-3099). EDEN: We thank the EDEN mother–child cohort study group (I. Annesi-Maesano, J.Y. Bernard, J. Botton, M.A. Charles, P. Dargent-Molina, B. de Lauzon-Guillain, P. Ducimetière, M. de Agostini, B. Foliguet, A. Forhan, X. Fritel, A. Germa, V. Goua, R. Hankard, B. Heude, M. Kaminski, B. Larroque†, N. Lelong, J. Lepeule, G. Magnin, L. Marchand, C. Nabet, F. Pierre, R. Slama, M.J. Saurel-Cubizolles, M. Schweitzer and O. Thiebaugeorges). We thank all funding sources for the EDEN study (not allocated for the present study but for the cohort): Foundation for Medical Research (FRM), National Agency for Research (ANR), National Institute for Research in Public health (IRESP: TGIR cohorte santé 2008 programme), French Ministry of Health (DGS), French Ministry of Research, INSERM Bone and Joint Diseases National Research (PRO-A) and Human Nutrition National Research Programs, Paris-Sud University, Nestlé, French National Institute for Population Health Surveillance (InVS), French National Institute for Health Education (INPES), the European Union FP7 programmes (FP7/2007-2013, HELIX, ESCAPE, ENRIECO, MeDALL projects), Diabetes National Research Program (in collaboration with the French Association of Diabetic Patients (AFD)), French Agency for Environmental Health Safety (now ANSES), Mutuelle Générale de l'Education Nationale complementary health insurance (MGEN), French national agency for food security, and French speaking association for the study of diabetes and metabolism (ALFEDIAM). The funding source had no involvement in the conception of the present study. FLEHS: This study was conducted within the framework of the Flemish Centre of Expertise on Environment and Health, funded by the Dept of the Environment of the Flemish Government, Flemish Agency of Care and Health, and Flemish Dept of Economy, Science and Innovation. GASPII: The GASPII cohort was funded by the Italian Ministry of Health (2001), the research leading to these results has received funding from the European Community's Seventh Framework Program under grant agreement 261357 (MeDALL). Generation R: This study was funded by Erasmus MC Rotterdam, Erasmus University Rotterdam and the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development. V.W.V. Jaddoe received a grant from the European Research Council (ERC-2014-CoG-648916). L. Duijts received funding from cofunded ERA-Net on Biomarkers for Nutrition and Health (ERA HDHL), Horizon 2020 (696295; 2017), the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw; 529051014; 2017), Science Foundation Ireland (SFI/16/ERA-HDHL/3360), and European Union (ALPHABET project). The project received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (LIFECYCLE, 733206, 2016; EUCAN-Connect 824989; ATHLETE, 874583). The researchers are independent from the funders. The study sponsors had no role in the study design, data analysis, interpretation of data or writing of this report. Generation XXI: Generation XXI was supported by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) through the Operational Programme Competitiveness and Internationalization and national funding from the Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT), Portuguese Ministry of Science, Technology and Higher Education, and by the Unidade de Investigação em Epidemiologia – Instituto de Saúde Pública da Universidade do Porto (EPIUnit) (UIDB/04750/2020), Administração Regional de Saúde Norte (Regional Dept of Ministry of Health) and Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian. A.C. Santos is founded by FCT Investigator contracts IF/01060/2015. GINI: The GINIplus study was mainly supported for the first 3 years by the Federal Ministry for Education, Science, Research and Technology (interventional arm) and Helmholtz Zentrum München (former GSF) (observational arm). The 4- and 6-year follow-up examinations of the GINIplus study were covered from the respective budgets of the five study centres (Helmholtz Zentrum München (former GSF), Research Institute at Marien-Hospital, Wesel, LMU Munich, TU Munich and from 6 years onwards also from IUF – Leibniz Research Institute for Environmental Medicine at the University of Düsseldorf). HUMIS: We thank all mothers for participating in the HUMIS study. HUMIS was funded by a grant from the Norwegian Research Council (226402). The HUMIS study was approved by the Norwegian Data Inspectorate (2002/1398) and by the Regional Ethics Committee for Medical Research in Norway (S-02122), and the specific use in the current study was approved by the Ethics Committee as well (2010/1259/REK sør-øst). INMA: Gipuzkoa: This study was funded by grants from Instituto de Salud Carlos III (FIS-PI09/00090, FIS-PI18/01142 including FEDER funds), CIBERESP, Dept of Health of the Basque Government (2013111089) and annual agreements with the municipalities of the study area (Zumarraga, Urretxu, Legazpi, Azkoitia y Azpeitia and Beasain). Menorca: This study was funded by grants from Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Red INMA G03/176; CB06/02/0041; 97/0588; 00/0021-2, PI061756; PS0901958, PI14/00677 including FEDER funds), CIBERESP, Beca de la IV convocatoria de Ayudas a la Investigación en Enfemerdades Neurodegeneratives de La Caixa, and EC contract QLK4-CT-200-00263. Sabadell: This study was funded by grants from Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Red INMA G03/176; CB06/02/0041; PI041436; PI081151 including FEDER funds), Generalitat de Catalunya-CIRIT 1999SGR 00241 and Fundació La marató de TV3 (090430). ISGlobal is a member of the CERCA Programme, Generalitat de Catalunya. M. Casas holds a Miguel Servet fellowship (CP16/00128) funded by Instituto de Salud Carlos III and cofunded by the European Social Fund “Investing in your future”. Valencia: This study was funded by grants from the European Union (FP7-ENV-2011 cod 282957 and HEALTH.2010.2.4.5-1), Spain: Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Red INMA G03/176, CB06/02/0041; FIS-FEDER: PI03/1615, PI04/1509, PI04/1112, PI04/1931, PI05/1079, PI05/1052, PI06/1213, PI07/0314, PI09/02647, PI11/01007, PI11/02591, PI11/02038, PI13/1944, PI13/2032, PI14/00891, PI14/01687, PI16/1288, PI17/00663; Miguel Servet-FEDER CP11/00178, CP15/00025, CPII16/00051), Generalitat Valenciana: FISABIO (UGP 15-230, UGP-15-244, UGP-15-249), and Alicia Koplowitz Foundation 2017. Isle of Wight: This study was funded by grants from the National Institutes of Health USA (R01HL082925), Asthma UK (364), Isle of Wight NHS Trust and the British Medical Association. KOALA: The collection of data relevant for this study was funded by grants from the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw; 2100.0090) and the Netherlands Asthma Foundation (3.2.03.48, 3.2.07.022). The researchers are independent from the funders. The funders had no role in the study design, data analysis, interpretation of data or writing of this report. We thank the children and parents for their participation in the KOALA study. LRC (Leicestershire Respiratory Cohorts): This study was funded by grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF: 320030-182628, 320030-162820, 3233-069348, 3200-069349) and Asthma UK 07/048. Lifeways Cross-Generation Cohort Study: This study was funded by the Health Research Board, Ireland, and the Irish Dept of Health and Children's Health Promotion Policy Unit. LISA: The LISA study was mainly supported by grants from the Federal Ministry for Education, Science, Research and Technology and in addition from Helmholtz Zentrum München (former GSF), Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, Leipzig, Research Institute at Marien-Hospital Bad Honnef for the first 2 years. The 4-, 6-, 10- and 15-year follow-up examinations of the LISA study were covered from the respective budgets of the involved partners (Helmholtz Zentrum München (former GSF), Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, Leipzig, Research Institute at Marien-Hospital Wesel, Pediatric Practice, Bad Honnef, IUF – Leibniz Research Institute for Environmental Medicine at the University of Düsseldorf) and in addition by a grant from the Federal Ministry for Environment (IUF Düsseldorf, FKZ 20462296). Further, the 15-year follow-up examination of the LISA study was supported by the Commission of the European Communities, the Seventh Framework Program: MeDALL project. This project has received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (949906). LucKi: LucKi is supported by Child and Youth Health Care Zuyderland, Public Health Service South Limburg and Maastricht University. We thank all parents and children for their participation in LucKi. LUKAS: This study was funded by research grants from the Academy of Finland (139021, 287675, 296814, 296817, 308254); Juho Vainio Foundation; EVO/VTR funding; Päivikki and Sakari Sohlberg Foundation; Farmers’ Social Insurance Institution (Mela); Finnish Cultural Foundation; Foundation for Pediatric Research; European Union QLK4-CT-2001-00250; and Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Finland. MAS-90: This study was funded by grants from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (MBMF; 07015633m 07ALE27, 01EE9405/5, 01EE9406) and the German Research Foundation (DFG; KE1462/2-1). Millennium Cohort Study: This study was funded by the Economic and Social Research Council and a consortium of UK government funders. We are grateful to the participating families and the Centre for Longitudinal Studies (CLS), UCL Institute of Education, for the use of these data and to the UK Data Service for making them available. However, neither CLS nor the UK Data Service bear any responsibility for the analysis or interpretation of these data. This work was supported by the Welcome Trust (187389/B/08/Z). MoBa: The Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study is supported by the Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services and Ministry of Education and Research. We are grateful to all the participating families in Norway who take part in this ongoing cohort study. This research was supported by the Research Council of Norway through its Centres of Excellence funding scheme (262700). NINFEA: The authors are grateful to all the participants of the NINFEA cohort. The NINFEA study was partially funded by the Compagnia San Paolo Foundation. This research was partially funded by the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (LIFECYCLE, 733206). PELAGIE: We are grateful to the families who participated and continue to participate in the study. The cohort is supported by INSERM and received funding from the French National Research Agency, Fondation de France, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety, National Institute for Public Health Surveillance (InVS), French Ministry of Labour, and French Ministry of Ecology. PIAMA: This study was funded by the Netherlands Organisation of Health Research and Development, Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research, Netherlands Asthma Fund, Netherlands Ministry of Spatial Planning, Housing and the Environment, and Netherlands Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport. REPRO_PL: This study was funded by the National Science Center Poland (DEC-2014/15/B/N27/00998). Rhea: This study was funded by the European Union Social Fund and the Hellenic Ministry of Health (“Program of prevention and early diagnosis of obesity and neurodevelopment disorders in preschool age children in the prefecture of Heraklion, Crete, Greece”; MIS 349580, NSRF 2007–2013). Additional funding from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) supported L. Chatzi (R01ES030691, R01ES029944, R01ES030364, R21ES029681, R21ES028903, P30ES007048). STEPS: This study was funded by the University of Turku, Abo Akademi University, Turku University Hospital, Academy of Finland (123571, 140251, 277535) and Foundation for Pediatric Research Finland. SWS: This study was funded by the Medical Research Council, British Heart Foundation, Arthritis Research UK, Food Standards Agency, NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre and the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013), project EarlyNutrition (289346), and the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (LIFECYCLE, 733206). WHISTLER: The WHISTLER birth cohort was supported with a grant from the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (2001-1-1322) and by an unrestricted grant from GlaxoSmithKline Netherlands. GlaxoSmithKline had no role in study design, in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data, in the writing of the report, and in the decision to submit the report for publication. WHISTLER-Cardio was supported with an unrestricted strategic grant from the University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU)

Associations of early-life pet ownership with asthma and allergic sensitization: A meta-analysis of more than 77,000 children from the EU Child Cohort Network

Background: Studies examining associations of early-life cat and dog ownership with childhood asthma have reported inconsistent results. Several factors could explain these inconsistencies, including type of pet, timing, and degree of exposure. Objective: Our aim was to study associations of early-life cat and dog ownership with asthma in school-aged children, including the role of type (cat vs dog), timing (never, prenatal, or early childhood), and degree of ownership (number of pets owned), and the role of allergic sensitization. Methods: We used harmonized data from 77,434 mother-child dyads from 9 birth cohorts in the European Union Child Cohort Network when the child was 5 to 11 years old. Associations were examined through the DataSHIELD platform by using adjusted logistic regression models, which were fitted separately for each cohort and combined by using random effects meta-analysis. Results: The prevalence of early-life cat and dog ownership ranged from 12% to 45% and 7% to 47%, respectively, and the prevalence of asthma ranged from 2% to 20%. There was no overall association between either cat or dog ownership and asthma (odds ratio [OR] = 0.97 [95% CI = 0.87-1.09] and 0.92 [95% CI = 0.85-1.01], respectively). Timing and degree of ownership did not strongly influence associations. Cat and dog ownership were also not associated with cat- and dog-specific allergic sensitization (OR = 0.92 [95% CI = 0.75-1.13] and 0.93 [95% CI = 0.57-1.54], respectively). However, cat- and dog-specific allergic sensitization was strongly associated with school-age asthma (OR = 6.69 [95% CI = 4.91-9.10] and 5.98 [95% CI = 3.14-11.36], respectively). There was also some indication of an interaction between ownership and sensitization, suggesting that ownership may exacerbate the risks associated with pet-specific sensitization but offer some protection against asthma in the absence of sensitization. Conclusion: Our findings do not support early-life cat and dog ownership in themselves increasing the risk of school-age asthma, but they do suggest that ownership may potentially exacerbate the risks associated with cat- and dog-specific allergic sensitization

Integrating -omics approaches into population-based studies of endocrine disrupting chemicals: A scoping review

Health effects of endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) are challenging to detect in the general population. Omics technologies become increasingly common to identify early biological changes before the apparition of clinical symptoms, to explore toxic mechanisms and to increase biological plausibility of epidemiological associations. This scoping review systematically summarises the application of omics in epidemiological studies assessing EDCs-associated biological effects to identify potential gaps and priorities for future research. Ninety-eight human studies (2004-2021) were identified through database searches (PubMed, Scopus) and citation chaining and focused on phthalates (34 studies), phenols (19) and PFASs (17), while PAHs (12) and recently-used pesticides (3) were less studied. The sample sizes ranged from 10 to 12,476 (median = 159), involving non-pregnant adults (38), pregnant women (11), children/adolescents (15) or both latter populations studied together (23). Several studies included occupational workers (10) and/or highly exposed groups (11) focusing on PAHs, PFASs and pesticides, while studies on phenols and phthalates were performed in the general population only. Analysed omics layers included metabolic profiles (30, including 14 targeted analyses), miRNA (13), gene expression (11), DNA methylation (8), microbiome (5) and proteins (3). Twenty-one studies implemented targeted multi-assays focusing on clinical routine blood lipid traits, oxidative stress or hormones. Overall, DNA methylation and gene expression associations with EDCs did not overlap across studies, while some EDC-associated metabolite groups, such as carnitines, nucleotides and amino acids in untargeted metabolomic studies, and oxidative stress markers in targeted studies, were consistent across studies. Studies had common limitations such as small sample sizes, cross-sectional designs and single sampling for exposure biomonitoring. In conclusion, there is a growing body of evidence evaluating the early biological responses to exposure to EDCs. This review points to a need for larger longitudinal studies, wider coverage of exposures and biomarkers, replication studies and standardisation of research methods and reporting.The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreements no. 825712 [OBERON] and no. 874583 [ATHLETE]

Spirometric phenotypes from early childhood to young adulthood: a Chronic Airway Disease Early Stratification study

Background: The prevalences of obstructive and restrictive spirometric phenotypes, and their relation to early-life risk factors from childhood to young adulthood remain poorly understood. The aim was to explore these phenotypes and associations with well-known respiratory risk factors across ages and populations in European cohorts. Methods: We studied 49 334 participants from 14 population-based cohorts in different age groups (≤10, >10-15, >15-20, >20-25 years, and overall, 5-25 years). The obstructive phenotype was defined as forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) z-score less than the lower limit of normal (LLN), whereas the restrictive phenotype was defined as FEV1/FVC z-score ≥LLN, and FVC z-score <LLN. Results: The prevalence of obstructive and restrictive phenotypes varied from 3.2-10.9% and 1.8-7.7%, respectively, without clear age trends. A diagnosis of asthma (adjusted odds ratio (aOR=2.55, 95% CI 2.14-3.04), preterm birth (aOR=1.84, 1.27-2.66), maternal smoking during pregnancy (aOR=1.16, 95% CI 1.01-1.35) and family history of asthma (aOR=1.44, 95% CI 1.25-1.66) were associated with a higher prevalence of obstructive, but not restrictive, phenotype across ages (5-25 years). A higher current body mass index (BMI was more often observed in those with the obstructive phenotype but less in those with the restrictive phenotype (aOR=1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.06 and aOR=0.81, 95% CI 0.78-0.85, per kg·m-2 increase in BMI, respectively). Current smoking was associated with the obstructive phenotype in participants older than 10 years (aOR=1.24, 95% CI 1.05-1.46). Conclusion: Obstructive and restrictive phenotypes were found to be relatively prevalent during childhood, which supports the early origins concept. Several well-known respiratory risk factors were associated with the obstructive phenotype, whereas only low BMI was associated with the restrictive phenotype, suggesting different underlying pathobiology of these two phenotypes.The project received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (LIFECYCLE, grant agreement number 733206, 2016; EUCAN-Connect grant agreement number 824989; and ATHLETE, grant agreement number 874583). The researchers are independent from the funders. The study sponsors had no role in the study design, data analysis, interpretation of data, or writing of this report. Consulting fees received for an opponent PhD defence committee at Copenhagen University, outside the submitted work

Maternal occupation during pregnancy, birth weight, and length of gestation: combined analysis of 13 European birth cohorts

Objectives. We assessed whether maternal employment during pregnancy – overall and in selected occupational sectors – is associated with birth weight, small for gestational age (SGA), term low birth weight (LBW), length of gestation, and preterm delivery in a population-based birth cohort design. Methods. We used data from >200 000 mother-child pairs enrolled in 13 European birth cohorts and compared employed versus non-employed women. Among employees, we defined groups of occupations representing the main sectors of employment for women where potential reproductive hazards are considered to be present. The comparison group comprised all other employed women not included in the occupational sector being assessed. We performed meta-analyses of cohort-specific estimates and explored heterogeneity. Results. Employees had a lower risk of preterm delivery than non-employees [adjusted odds ratio (ORadj) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.81–0.91]. Working in most of the occupational sectors studied was not associated with adverse birth outcomes. Being employed as a nurse was associated with lower risk SGA infants (ORadj 0.91, 95% CI 0.84–0.99) whereas food industry workers had an increased risk of preterm delivery (ORadj 1.50, 95% CI 1.12–2.02). There was little evidence for heterogeneity between cohorts. Conclusions. This study suggests that, overall, employment during pregnancy is associated with a reduction in the risk of preterm birth and that work in certain occupations may affect pregnancy outcomes. This exploratory study provides an important platform on which to base further prospective studies focused on the potential consequences of maternal occupational exposures during pregnancy on child development.The authors would particularly like to thank all the cohort participants for their collaboration. The authors declare no conflicts of interest. This work has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme under grant agreement CHICOS nº 241604 and ENRIECO nº226285