Gender and Leadership Positions in Spanish Dentistry

The Research Ethics Committee of the University of Granada issued a favorable report in relation to the present research under number 2430/CEIH/2021.Data Availability The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.Dentists in Spain reached equal gender representation in 2012 and the number of female dentists has continued to grow (until 57.3% in 2020). This study aims to increase evidence about the gender distribution on the high responsibility positions and opinion leaders of the dental profession and academia. Composition of the executive comities of the main dental institutions of Spain (regional professional associations, national dental association, and scientific societies), members of the Faculty of Dentistry of the University of Granada in 2020 and speakers of the main dental congresses of 2019 (due to the lack of congress in 2020) were recorded and analyzed by genders using chi-squared test (P < .05). Mean representation of female dentists in executive committees of professional associations was 35.6%. More than 70% of presidents and vice-presidents of professional colleges and more than 60% of these positions in scientific societies were occupied by male dentists. None of dental congresses of 2019 reached equal gender participation, being 81.3% of lecturers presenting on main auditoriums male dentists. Although dental workforce in Spain is slightly overrepresented by females, leadership positions and figures among Spanish dentists doesn’t seem to reflect the gender distribution of the collective. There is a lack of women occupying highlevel positions in dentistry that proves the existence of the so-called “glass ceiling effect” on the profession. Further studies about sociodemographic aspects of dental workforce are needed to develop evidence-based policies for the collective.Research Projects of the Vice-rectorate of Equality, Inclusion and Sustainability of the University of Granada [grant number INV-IGU113-2020

Effect of Two Immediate Dentin Sealing Approaches on Bond Strength of Lava™ CAD/CAM Indirect Restoration

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Granada (Spain) (protocol code #1005/CEIH/2019 approved on 13 January 2020).Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the studyThe objective of this work was to compare the micro-tensile bond strength (mu TBS) of CAD/CAM (Computer-Aided Design/ Computer-Aided Manufacturing) specimens cemented with different pairing of adhesives and resin-cements using two Immediate Dentin Dealing (IDS) approaches in comparison with Delay Dentin Sealing (DDS). Coronal dentin from 108 molars were divided into nine groups (n = 12) depending on the adhesive/resin-cement (A-C) assigned. Lava (TM) Ultimate (4 x 10 x 10 mm) was cemented according to different strategies: IDS1(cementation after dentin sealing), DDS (dentin sealing and cementation at 2-weeks), IDS2 (immediate dentin sealing and cementation at 2-weeks). Samples were sectioned and tested until failure to determine the mu TBS. Failure mode was categorized as dentin/cement (DC), at Lava (TM) Ultimate/cement (LC) and hybrid (H). Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests and influence of the type of failure on the mu TBS by survival analysis with competing risk was explored. Mostly, mu TBS values were equal or higher in IDS2 than DDS. In general, A-Cs that showed higher mu TBS, have high percentages of LC failure. Survival analysis with competing risk between DC + H and LC values showed that some A-Cs would significantly increase the mu TBS values for IDS2. A-Cs with the highest adhesion values showed a high percentage of fractures at the LC interface, suggesting that the adhesion at the adhesive/dentin interface would be higher

Beyond the consultation room : Proposals to approach health promotion in primary care according to health-care users, key community informants and primary care centre workers

Primary health care () is the ideal setting to provide integrated services centred on the person and to implement health promotion () activities. To identify proposals to approach in the context of primary care according to health-care users aged 45-75 years, key community informants and primary care centre () workers. Descriptive-interpretive qualitative research with 276 participants from 14 of seven Spanish regions. A theoretical sampling was used for selection. A total of 25 discussion groups, two triangular groups and 30 semi-structured interviews were carried out. A thematic interpretive contents analysis was carried out. Participants consider that is not solely a matter for the health sector and they emphasize intersectoral collaboration. They believe that it is important to strengthen community initiatives and to create a healthy social environment that encourages greater responsibility and participation of health-care users in decisions regarding their own health and better management of public services and resources. , care in the community and demedicalization should be priorities for . Participants propose organizational changes in the to improve . workers are aware that falls within the scope of their responsibilities and propose to increase their training, motivation, competences and knowledge of the social environment. Informants emphasize that should be person-centred approach and empathic communication. activities should be appealing, ludic and of proven effectiveness. According to a socio-ecological and intersectoral model, services must get actively involved in together with community and through outreach interventions

Aportes a una antropología feminista de la salud: el estudio del ciclo menstrual

La antropología médica o de la salud centrada en el estudio de las mujeres sigue constituyendo una de las áreas principales del quehacer antropológico en el Estado español. A partir de los aportes de dos referentes de la antropología feminista de la salud como Marcia Inhorn y Mari Luz Esteban, se revisan los hallazgos de una investigación cualitativa sobre del ciclo menstrual, en la que se realizaron 20 entrevistas a mujeres de 16 a 44 años, entre 2013 y 2014, en el municipio de Madrid. El análisis muestra cómo la menstruación es un claro ejemplo de la esencialización reproductiva de las mujeres, del reduccionismo biológico, de la medicalización de los cuerpos de las mujeres y, sobre todo, de su uniformización. La visibilización y cuestionamiento de estos supuestos, a través de las voces de las mujeres entrevistadas, pone de manifiesto la relevancia de este campo dentro de la antropología médica.Medical or Health Anthropology focused on the study of women continues to be a main area of anthropological study in Spain. The contributions of two referential figures in feminist health anthropology, Marcia Inhorn and Mari Luz Esteban, are applied to review the findings of a qualitative research study on the menstrual cycle carried out through 20 interviews with women between the ages of 16 and 44 years, between 2013 and 2014, in the municipality of Madrid. The analysis shows that menstruation is a clear example of the reproductive essentialization of women, of biological reductionism, of the medicalization of women’s bodies and, above all, of the standardization of bodies. The visibilization and questioning of these assumptions through the voices of the women interviewed highlight the importance of this field within medical anthropology

Aportes a una antropología feminista de la salud: el estudio del ciclo menstrual

Medical or Health Anthropology focused on the study of women continues to be a main area of anthropological study in Spain. The contributions of two referential figures in feminist health anthropology, Marcia Inhorn and Mari Luz Esteban, are applied to review the findings of a qualitative research study on the menstrual cycle carried out through 20 interviews with women between the ages of 16 and 44 years, between 2013 and 2014, in the municipality of Madrid. The analysis shows that menstruation is a clear example of the reproductive essentialization of women, of biological reductionism, of the medicalization of women’s bodies and, above all, of the standardization of bodies. The visibilization and questioning of these assumptions through the voices of the women interviewed highlight the importance of this field within medical anthropologyLa antropología médica o de la salud centrada en el estudio de las mujeres sigue constituyendo una de las áreas principales del quehacer antropológico en el Estado español. A partir de los aportes de dos referentes de la antropología feminista de la salud como Marcia Inhorn y Mari Luz Esteban, se revisan los hallazgos de una investigación cualitativa sobre del ciclo menstrual, en la que se realizaron 20 entrevistas a mujeres de 16 a 44 años, entre 2013 y 2014, en el municipio de Madrid. El análisis muestra cómo la menstruación es un claro ejemplo de la esencialización reproductiva de las mujeres, del reduccionismo biológico, de la medicalización de los cuerpos de las mujeres y, sobre todo, de su uniformización. La visibilización y cuestionamiento de estos supuestos, a través de las voces de las mujeres entrevistadas, pone de manifiesto la relevancia de este campo dentro de la antropología médic

Beyond the consultation room : Proposals to approach health promotion in primary care according to health-care users, key community informants and primary care centre workers

Primary health care () is the ideal setting to provide integrated services centred on the person and to implement health promotion () activities. To identify proposals to approach in the context of primary care according to health-care users aged 45-75 years, key community informants and primary care centre () workers. Descriptive-interpretive qualitative research with 276 participants from 14 of seven Spanish regions. A theoretical sampling was used for selection. A total of 25 discussion groups, two triangular groups and 30 semi-structured interviews were carried out. A thematic interpretive contents analysis was carried out. Participants consider that is not solely a matter for the health sector and they emphasize intersectoral collaboration. They believe that it is important to strengthen community initiatives and to create a healthy social environment that encourages greater responsibility and participation of health-care users in decisions regarding their own health and better management of public services and resources. , care in the community and demedicalization should be priorities for . Participants propose organizational changes in the to improve . workers are aware that falls within the scope of their responsibilities and propose to increase their training, motivation, competences and knowledge of the social environment. Informants emphasize that should be person-centred approach and empathic communication. activities should be appealing, ludic and of proven effectiveness. According to a socio-ecological and intersectoral model, services must get actively involved in together with community and through outreach interventions

Subcutaneous anti-COVID-19 hyperimmune immunoglobulin for prevention of disease in asymptomatic individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised clinical trialResearch in context

Summary: Background: Anti-COVID-19 hyperimmune immunoglobulin (hIG) can provide standardized and controlled antibody content. Data from controlled clinical trials using hIG for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19 outpatients have not been reported. We assessed the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous anti-COVID-19 hyperimmune immunoglobulin 20% (C19-IG20%) compared to placebo in preventing development of symptomatic COVID-19 in asymptomatic individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods: We did a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, in asymptomatic unvaccinated adults (≥18 years of age) with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection within 5 days between April 28 and December 27, 2021. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive a blinded subcutaneous infusion of 10 mL with 1 g or 2 g of C19-IG20%, or an equivalent volume of saline as placebo. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants who remained asymptomatic through day 14 after infusion. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of individuals who required oxygen supplementation, any medically attended visit, hospitalisation, or ICU, and viral load reduction and viral clearance in nasopharyngeal swabs. Safety was assessed as the proportion of patients with adverse events. The trial was terminated early due to a lack of potential benefit in the target population in a planned interim analysis conducted in December 2021. ClinicalTrials.gov registry: NCT04847141. Findings: 461 individuals (mean age 39.6 years [SD 12.8]) were randomized and received the intervention within a mean of 3.1 (SD 1.27) days from a positive SARS-CoV-2 test. In the prespecified modified intention-to-treat analysis that included only participants who received a subcutaneous infusion, the primary outcome occurred in 59.9% (91/152) of participants receiving 1 g C19-IG20%, 64.7% (99/153) receiving 2 g, and 63.5% (99/156) receiving placebo (difference in proportions 1 g C19-IG20% vs. placebo, −3.6%; 95% CI -14.6% to 7.3%, p = 0.53; 2 g C19-IG20% vs placebo, 1.1%; −9.6% to 11.9%, p = 0.85). None of the secondary clinical efficacy endpoints or virological endpoints were significantly different between study groups. Adverse event rate was similar between groups, and no severe or life-threatening adverse events related to investigational product infusion were reported. Interpretation: Our findings suggested that administration of subcutaneous human hyperimmune immunoglobulin C19-IG20% to asymptomatic individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection was safe but did not prevent development of symptomatic COVID-19. Funding: Grifols