Improving the visibility of hydrological sciences from developing countries

The increasing level of competition in scientific publishing arguably has a greater negative impact on hydrologists from developing countries and specifically young scientists. This paper discusses the constraints they face and offers suggestions to authors and the hydrological community about how these may be mitigated. These include a lack of access to resources to assist with creating good publications, the difficulty of publishing research based on relatively scarce data, a common problem in many developing countries, and a lack of familiarity with the process of publishing scientific material together with limited access to mentorship from experienced authors. A key point is to ensure that the research question addressed has a broad interest beyond the local study area. However, the more limited hydrological knowledge and the water resources problems of developing countries represent opportunities for internationally relevant research, particularly within the nexus between hydrology and society, or between science and practice. Both of these are high on the international hydrological research agenda

Turismo acessível para todos, um paradigma emergente e um desafio para a oferta turística. O caso dos espaços museológicos e empreendimentos turísticos de Cascais.

Reflexão sobre o turismo acessível para todos, como modelo que se revela cada vez mais essencial para todo o sistema turístico, que se afirma não só pela sua relevância social, cívica e demográfica mas também pelas potencialidades económicas associadas. Todavia, o turismo acessível constitui um desafio de adaptação para a oferta turística instalada há vários anos, em destinos turísticos mais antigos, como é o caso de Cascais.Reflection on accessible tourism for all, as an increasingly essential model for the touristic system, that claims not only for its social, civic and demographic significance, but also for the economic potential associated. However, the accessible tourism is an adaptation challenge for the elderly tourism supply, at long-established tourism destinations, such as Cascais

Vadose zone model uncertainty as conditioned on geophysical data.

An approach to estimating the uncertainty in model descriptions based on a landscape space to model space mapping concept is described. The approach is illustrated by an application making use of plot scale geophysical estimates of changes in water content profiles to condition a model of recharge to the Sherwood Sandstone Aquifer in the United Kingdom. It is demonstrated that the mapping is highly uncertain and that many different parameter sets give acceptable simulations of the observations. Multiple profile measurements over time offer only limited additional constraints on the mapping. The resulting mapping weights may be used to evaluate uncertainty in the predictions of vadose zone flow dynamics for the site

A history of the concept of time of concentration

The concept of time of concentration in the analysis of catchment responses dates back over 150 years to the introduction of the rational method. Since then it has been used in a variety of ways in the formulation of both unit hydrograph and distributed catchment models. It is normally discussed in terms of the velocity of flow of a water particle from the furthest part of a catchment to the outlet. This is also the basis for the definition in the International Glossary of Hydrology. While conceptually simple, this definition is, however, wrong when applied to catchment responses where, in terms of how surface and subsurface flows produce hydrographs, it is more correct to discuss and teach the concept based on celerities and time to equilibrium. While this has been recognized since the 1960s, some recent papers and texts remain confused over the definition and use of the time of concentration concept. The paper sets out the history of its use and clarifies its relationship with time to equilibrium but suggests that both terms are not really useful in explaining hydrological responses. An Appendix is included that quantifies the differences between the definitions of response times for subsurface and surface flows under simple assumptions that might be useful in teaching. © Author(s) 2020