5 research outputs found
ΠΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ° ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π°Π΅Π½ΡΠ° Π² ΠΏΡΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠΈ
The article presents an overview of major Russian and foreign literature on the problems of compliance in patients with schizophrenia. The article describes key factors associated with the patient's refusal of the prescribed treatment. The article describes the basic methods of evaluation of compliance: experimental and psychological, with applied clinical significance. The article describes the main factors associated with the patient's refusal of the prescribed treatment, describes the contribution of low compliance not only to the patient's quality of life, but also to the health care costs associated with repeated hospitalizations of non-compliant patients. The article examines methods for overcoming non-compliance in patients with schizophrenia, for example, compliance therapy - a psychotherapeutic method that is short-lived, convenient and simple to use in clinical practice, and has shown rather high efficiency.Π Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ ΠΎΠ±Π·ΠΎΡ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈ Π·Π°ΡΡΠ±Π΅ΠΆΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡ, ΠΏΠΎΡΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ°ΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ (ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π°Π΅Π½ΡΠ°) Ρ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ², ΡΡΡΠ°Π΄Π°ΡΡΠΈΡ
ΠΏΡΠΈΡ
ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡΠΎΠΉΡΡΠ²Π°ΠΌΠΈ, Π² ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ. Π ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π½Ρ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΡ, Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ Ρ ΠΎΡΠΊΠ°Π·ΠΎΠΌ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΡ Π½Π°Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ, ΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π½ Π²ΠΊΠ»Π°Π΄ Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π°Π΅Π½ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π½Π΅ ΡΠΎΠ»ΡΠΊΠΎ Π² ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ ΠΆΠΈΠ·Π½ΠΈ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°, Π½ΠΎ ΠΈ Π² ΡΠ°ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ Π·Π΄ΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ, ΡΠ²ΡΠ·Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ Π³ΠΎΡΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ Π½Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π°Π΅Π½ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ². Π ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΡΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π°Π΅Π½ΡΠ°, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΡΠΊΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅, ΡΠ°ΠΊ ΠΈ ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎ-ΠΏΡΠΈΡ
ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅, ΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΊΠ»Π°Π΄Π½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ΅ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. ΠΡΠΎΠΌΠ΅ ΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ, Π² ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π½ΠΎΠ½ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π°Π΅Π½ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Ρ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ, Π½Π°ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Ρ, ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π°Π΅Π½Ρ-ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΡ - ΠΏΡΠΈΡ
ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠ΅Π²ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΊΠ°, ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠ°Π²ΡΠ°ΡΡΡ ΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΊΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡΡ, ΡΠ΄ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠΌ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΉ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π² ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠ΅ ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π²ΡΠ°Ρ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎ Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΡΡ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ
ΠΠ΅ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ Π°ΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ Π²ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΡ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΠΈ Π² ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΠ΅
The first results of psychiatric service reform in the Russian Federation using an example Moscow Clinical Psychiatric Hospital β 13 of the Moscow Healthcare Department are considered in the article. Main attention is paid to organization of activities and results of functioning of the hospital in new conditions, effectiveness of patient treatment for the period from 2015 to 2017 is determined. Distribution of patients treated in the hospital by nosological forms of mental illness, by age, gender and professional status is analyzed. Main indicators of the activity of a psychiatric hospital were examined: average duration of a patientβs stay in a hospital, bed occupation rate in a year, bed turnover, number of bed days. Attention is drawn to the primary disability of patients, number of repeated admissions to hospital, problems of involuntary hospitalization. Analysis of financing of inpatient psychiatric care for treated patients for the studied period is performed. The main direction for the provision of psychiatric care to patients at the present stage is defined as outpatient care, hospital-replacing services.Π ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΡΡ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΡΠ΅ ΠΈΡΠΎΠ³ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΈΡ
ΠΈΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ»ΡΠΆΠ±Ρ Π² Π ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΈ Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ΅ ΠΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠ²ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΈΡ
ΠΈΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΈΡΡ β 13 ΠΠ΅ΠΏΠ°ΡΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ° Π·Π΄ΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π³. ΠΠΎΡΠΊΠ²Ρ. ΠΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ΅ Π²Π½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π΄Π΅ΡΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΠ° Π² Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΡ
, ΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Π° ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π·Π° ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄ Ρ 2015 ΠΏΠΎ 2017 Π³. ΠΡΠΎΠ°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΎ ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ², ΠΏΡΠΎΠ»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π² ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΠ΅, ΠΏΠΎ Π½ΠΎΠ·ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΈΡ
ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π·Π½Π΅ΠΉ, ΠΏΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ°ΡΡΡ, ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½Π°Π΄Π»Π΅ΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌΡ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡ. ΠΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈ Π΄Π΅ΡΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΡ
ΠΈΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΠ°: ΡΡΠ΅Π΄Π½ΡΡ Π΄Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π±ΡΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π² ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΠ΅, ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ° ΠΊΠΎΠΉΠΊΠΈ Π² Π³ΠΎΠ΄Ρ, ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠΎΡ ΠΊΠΎΠΉΠΊΠΈ, ΡΠΈΡΠ»ΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΠΉΠΊΠΎ-Π΄Π½Π΅ΠΉ. ΠΠ±ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎ Π²Π½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π½Π° ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΠΉ Π²ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π½Π° ΠΈΠ½Π²Π°Π»ΠΈΠ΄Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ, ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π³ΠΎΡΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΉ Π² ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Ρ, ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΡ Π½Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ±ΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π³ΠΎΡΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ. ΠΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΡΠΈΠ½Π°Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΈΡ
ΠΈΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΠΈ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠΌ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ Π·Π° ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡΠΉ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈ. ΠΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π²Π΅ΠΊΡΠΎΡ ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΈΡ
ΠΈΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΠΈ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ Π½Π° ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΡΡΠ°ΠΏΠ΅ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π²Π½Π΅Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΠΉ, ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΠΎΠ·Π°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠΉ
Group Analysis in Patients with Somatoform Disorders: Clinical Effectiveness, the Dynamics of Quality of Life and Attitude Towards Disease and Treatment
Background: the application of group analysis for the treatment of somatoform disorders requires the substantiation of its clinical and psychological effectiveness in various differential diagnostic groups. Aim: the investigation of the dynamics of pathological bodily sensations, concomitant psychopathological symptoms, quality of life as well as beliefs about the disease and treatment in patients with somatoform disorders undergoing group analysis, in comparison with patients in the psychoeducation program. Patients and methods: 100 patients with somatoform disorders were randomized to group-analysis or psychoeducation. Before and after treatment, they filled Screening for Somatoform Symptoms, the Toronto Alexithymia Scale, the Illness Perception Questionnairie revised, Cognitions about Body and Health Questionnaire, Scale for the Assessment of Illness Behaviour, and Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnairie-18. Results: all patients demonstrated a decrease in the severity of somatoform symptoms and an improvement in the quality of life in various spheres of life, which is significantly more pronounced in patients receiving group-analysis compared to psychoeducation. The improvement of subjective state of patients having undergone psychotherapy during treatment was highly associated with a decrease in the severity of the emotional reaction to the disease, somatosensory amplification, beliefs in bodily weakness and intolerance to bodily sensations. The patients of the main group solely demonstrated a decrease in patterns of hypochondriacal behavior such as catastrophization regarding bodily sensations, revisiting general practitioners, and simultaneous distrust of the results of medical tests and prescriptions. When comparatively analyzing the separate diagnostic groups, patients with polymorphic somatoform disorder displayed the most pronounced clinical effect (a decrease in the severity of complaints) in the process of group analysis, and patients with somatized disorder showed the most pronounced psychological effect (an improvement in the quality of life, a decrease in the dramatization of bodily sensations, a decrease in medical retesting and diagnosis verification, the optimization of beliefs about health). Conclusions: group analysis demonstrated greater clinical and psychological effectiveness, in comparison with psychoeducation, in patients with somatoform disorders. Β© 202
Hypochondriac Beliefs and Behavior in Patients with Somatoform Disorders: Relationship to Somatic Complaints and Subjective Well-Being
Background: studies of the psychological mechanisms of perpetuation and quality of life in patients with somatoform disorders are important for identifying targets for psychological interventions and defining risk groups. Aim: to reveal specific hypochondriac beliefs and behavior in patients with somatoform disorders related to severity of somatic complaints and subjective well-being. Patients and methods: 100 patients with somatoform disorders were assessed by using Screening for Somatoform Symptoms, Toronto Alexithymia Scale, Cognitions About Body And Health Questionnaire, Scale for the Assessment of Illness Behaviour, and Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-18. Results: level of somatoform symptoms is higher in patients with a tendency to catastrophize bodily sensations, autonomic disfunction, mental scanning for bodily symptoms, and disturbances in daily activities due to illness. Regardless of somatoform symptomsβ severity, subjective well-being is lower in patients with belief in bodily weakness and somatosensory amplification, autonomic sensations, expression of symptoms, and changes in daily activities due to illness. Conclusions: the results are discussed in the context of possible psychological and behavioral factors in the perpetuation of somatoform disorders. Patients of older age are at risk of perpetuation of somatoform disorders due to a greater tendency to catastrophize bodily sensations and higher belief in bodily weakness. Β© 2021, Medicinskoe Informacionnoe agentstvo. All rights reserved
Π Π²ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΡ ΠΎΠ± Π°ΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΡ Π°ΠΌΠ±ΡΠ»Π°ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ»Ρ (ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ Π°ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡ)
Results of a sociological survey among doctors and patients on the implementation and operation of a new organizational form - outpatient psychiatric unit - operating on the basis of the Psychiatric clinical hospital No. 13, Moscow Healthcare Department, is presented in the article. Advantages of this organizational form in comparison with hospital treatment are shown: reduced treatment period, proximity, volumes of treatment comparable with hospital treatment, maximum social adaptation of patients. Some problematic issues of the unitβs operation are identified: lack of continuity in the interaction between the individual structures of the new organizational form, as well as with other health care organizations.Π ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Ρ ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ°, ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈ Π²ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΈ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ², ΠΎ Π²Π½Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ΅ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΡ - Π°ΠΌΠ±ΡΠ»Π°ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΈΡ
ΠΈΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ»Ρ, Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΡΡΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ Π½Π° Π±Π°Π·Π΅ ΠΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π±ΡΠ΄ΠΆΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π·Π΄ΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Β«ΠΡΠΈΡ
ΠΈΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΈΡΠ° β 13 ΠΠ΅ΠΏΠ°ΡΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ° Π·Π΄ΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π³ΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄Π° ΠΠΎΡΠΊΠ²ΡΒ». ΠΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½Ρ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΈΠΌΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π° Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΡ Π² ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΠΎ ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ: ΡΠΎΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ² Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ, ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½Π°Ρ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΡΠΏΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ, ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΎΠ² Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ, ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎ ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ, Π½Π°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ°Ρ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½Π°Ρ Π°Π΄Π°ΠΏΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
. ΠΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Ρ Π½Π΅ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ½ΡΠ΅ Π²ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΡ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΡ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ»Ρ: Π½Π΅Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΅ΠΌΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π²ΠΎ Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρ ΠΎΡΠ΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΡ, Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ Ρ Π΄ΡΡΠ³ΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ