Incidence of Delirium and Associated Mortality in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Patients

AbstractDelirium has been associated with a high risk of mortality in medical patients. Despite the high incidence of delirium in patients who undergo hemapoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), delirium as a risk factor for death has not been examined in this population. Thirty adult patients undergoing HSCT who were admitted to the University of Iowa Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program inpatient unit were assessed prospectively from 1 to 2 weeks before transplantation, throughout their inpatient stay, and at 100 days after transplantation. The Delirium Rating Scale and Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale were used twice weekly during the inpatient period to assess delirium severity and occurence. Patients’ self-reports of medical history, computerized medical records, and neuropsychological and psychiatric assessments were used to identify pretransplantation risk factors. The incidence of delirium (Delirium Rating Scale score >12 or Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale score ≥8) was 43% and occurred with highest frequency in the first 2 weeks after transplantion. The presence of delirium at any point during hospitalization after transplantation and transplant type (allogeneic) were highly predictive of mortality (p < .0005; odds ratios, 14.0 and 14.4). In conclusion, this study highlights the importance of monitoring for delirium during the acute recovery period after transplantation and suggests that early or even prophylactic treatment for delirium should be studied. Studies to determine the factors that connect delerium soon after transplantation to mortality are highly warranted

The Indiana Faces in Places Test: Preliminary Findings on a New Visuospatial Memory Test in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment

Memory assessment is an important component of a neuropsychological evaluation, but far fewer visual than verbal memory instruments are available. We examined the preliminary psychometric properties and clinical utility of a novel, motor-free paper and pencil visuospatial memory test, the Indiana faces in places test (IFIPT). The IFIPT and general neuropsychological performance were assessed in 36 adults with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) and 113 older adults with no cognitive impairment at baseline, 1 week, and 1 year. The IFIPT is a visual memory test with 10 faces paired with spatial locations (three learning trials and non-cued delayed recall). Results showed that MCI participants scored lower than controls on several variables, most notably total learning (p < .001 at all three time points), delayed recall (baseline p = .03, 1 week p < .001, 1 year p < .001), and false-positive errors (range p = .03 to <0.001). The IFIPT showed similar test–retest reliability at 1-week and 1-year follow-up to other neuropsychological tests (r = 0.71–0.84 for MCI and 0.53–0.72 for controls). Diagnostic accuracy was modest for this sample (areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve between 0.64 and 0.66). Preliminary psychometric analyses support further study of the IFIPT. The measure showed evidence of clinical utility by demonstrating group differences between this sample of healthy adults and those with MCI

The Neuropsychological Course of Acute Delirium in Adult Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Patients

Although delirium is a common medical comorbidity with altered cognition as its defining feature, few publications have addressed the neuropsychological prodrome, profile, and recovery of patients tested during delirium. We characterize neuropsychological performance in 54 hemapoietic stem cell/bone marrow transplantation (BMT) patients shortly before, during, and after delirium and in BMT patients without delirium and 10 healthy adults. Patients were assessed prospectively before and after transplantation using a brief battery. BMT patients with delirium performed more poorly than comparisons and those without delirium on cross-sectional and trend analyses. Deficits were in expected areas of attention and memory, but also in psychomotor speed and learning. The patients with delirium did not return to normative “average” on any test during observation. Most tests showed a mild decline in the visit before delirium, a sharp decline with delirium onset, and variable performance in the following days. This study adds to the few investigations of neuropsychological performance surrounding delirium and provides targets for monitoring and early detection; Trails A and B, RBANS Coding, and List Recall may be useful for delirium assessment

Using a Brief Intervention to Improve Decisional Capacity in Schizophrenia Research

Studies have shown that individuals with psychiatric or general medical illness can benefit from interventions designed to enhance decisional capacity for research informed consent. In some cases, interventions have been rather lengthy or complex. The current study was designed to determine whether a brief intervention could improve decisional capacity in people with schizophrenia. Thirty individuals with schizophrenia and 30 healthy comparison participants were presented with a hypothetical research scenario. Decisional capacity was assessed with the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool–Clinical Research version. Those with schizophrenia received a brief intervention aimed at improving understanding of the research protocol, after which decisional capacity was reassessed. A neuropsychological battery and symptom rating scales were also administered. At baseline, the schizophrenia group earned significantly lower scores than the comparison group on 2 aspects of decisional capacity (understanding, appreciation). At follow-up, the schizophrenia group had improved significantly on understanding and was no longer significantly different from the comparison group on any of the 4 dimensions of decisional capacity. Follow-up analyses also showed a significant effect of the intervention on a subset of the schizophrenia group who had performed most poorly at baseline. Participants with schizophrenia earned significantly lower scores than those in the comparison group across multiple neuropsychological domains. These findings add to the existing literature indicating that brief interventions can improve decisional capacity in individuals with schizophrenia, despite the fact that the illness typically causes significant cognitive dysfunction. The use of such interventions will enable a larger number of people with schizophrenia to make informed decisions regarding research participation