A complex medical phenotype in a patient with triplication of 2q12.3 to 2q13 characterized with oligonucleotide array CGH

We report an adult female with a left polycystic kidney, patent ductus arteriosus, left streak ovary, bicornuate uterus and deafness who presented with infertility. She has an intrachromosomal triplication of bands 2q12.3 to 2q13, with inversion of the central segment, which arose de novo from a paternal interchomosomal event. The triplication contains 68 known genes within the 7.28 Mb of DNA between base pairs 107,140,721 and 114,416,131. All intrachromosomal triplications are rare and, while partial duplications of 2q have been previously described, this patient is a unique surviving case of a triplication of proximal 2

A novel pseudo-dicentric variant of 16p11.2-q11.2 contains Euchromatin from 16p11.2-p11.1 and resembles pathogenic duplications of proximal 16q

An unusually large G-light band between 2 G-dark bands in the proximal long arm of chromosome 16 was found in a boy of 5 years of age ascertained with growth retardation, microcephaly, and dysmorphic features. Dual color bacterial artificial chromosome fluorescence in situ hybridization (BAC FISH) and oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization (oaCGH) were used to show that these bands contained a euchromatic duplication of a minimum of 940 kb between base pairs 34,197,413–35,137,025 in 16p11.2–p11.1 as well as a duplication of the centromere and major 16qh/16p11.2 heterochromatic block, covering a minimum of 12.3 Mb. The same pseudo-dicentric chromosome was found in the father who has attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The euchromatic region is not known to be subject to imprinting and overlaps multiple large copy number variations (CNVs) in the Database of Genomic Variants as well as similar CNVs that are benign or of uncertain significance in the International Standards for Cytogenomic Arrays database. We conclude that this family has a novel pseudo-dicentric euchromatic variant of chromosome 16 that is unlikely to be the cause of the variable phenotype in father and son but needs to be distinguished from heterochromatic variants or pathogenic duplications of proximal 16q.<br/