Polarized HLA Class I Expression on Renal Tubules Hinders the Detection of Donor-Specific Urinary Extracellular Vesicles

Liang Wu,1,2 Martijn H van Heugten,3 Thierry PP van den Bosch,4 Hans Duimel,5 Carmen López-Iglesias,5 Dennis A Hesselink,2 Carla C Baan,2 Karin Boer2 1Department of Nephrology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shaoyang University, Shaoyang, Hunan, People’s Republic of China; 2Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; 3University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; 4Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; 5The Microscopy CORE Laboratory at the Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the NetherlandsCorrespondence: Liang Wu, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Rotterdam Erasmus MC, Room No. Na-514, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, Tel +31 0622145029, Email [email protected]: Kidney transplantation is the optimal treatment for patients with end-stage kidney disease. Donor-specific urinary extracellular vesicles (uEVs) hold potential as biomarkers for assessing allograft status. We aimed to develop a method for identifying donor-specific uEVs based on human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatching with the kidney transplant recipients (KTRs).Patients and Methods: Urine and plasma were obtained from HLA-A2+ donors and HLA-A2- KTRs pre-transplant. CD9 (tetraspanin, EV marker) and HLA-A2 double-positive (CD9+ HLA-A2+) EVs were quantified using isolation-free imaging flow cytometry (IFCM). Healthy individuals’ urine was used to investigate CD9+ HLA-class-I+ uEV quantification using IFCM, time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay (TR-FIA), and immunogold staining cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM). Culture-derived CD9+ HLA-class-I+ EVs were spiked into the urine to investigate urine matrix effects on uEV HLA detection. Deceased donor kidneys and peritumoral kidney tissue were used for HLA class I detection with histochemistry.Results: The concentrations of CD9+ HLA-A2+ EVs in both donor and recipient urine approached the negative (detergent-treated) control levels for IFCM and were significantly lower than those observed in donor plasma. In parallel, universal HLA class I+ uEVs were similarly undetectable in the urine and uEV isolates compared with plasma, as verified by IFCM, TR-FIA, and cryogenic electron microscopy. Culture supernatant containing HLA class I+ vesicles from B, T, and human proximal tubule cells were spiked into the urine, and these EVs remained stable at 37°C for 8 hours. Immunohistochemistry revealed that HLA class I was predominantly expressed on the basolateral side of renal tubules, with limited expression on their urine/apical side.Conclusion: The detection of donor-specific uEVs is hindered by the limited release of HLA class I+ EVs from the kidney into the urine, primarily due to the polarized HLA class I expression on renal tubules. Identifying donor-specific uEVs requires further advancements in recognizing transplant-specific uEVs and urine-associated markers.Keywords: kidney transplantation, donor-specific biomarker, HLA, extracellular vesicles, human urine, renal tubul

Translational toxicology in setting occupational exposure limits for dusts and hazard classification – a critical evaluation of a recent approach to translate dust overload findings from rats to humans

Background We analyze the scientific basis and methodology used by the German MAK Commission in their recommendations for exposure limits and carcinogen classification of “granular biopersistent particles without known specific toxicity” (GBS). These recommendations are under review at the European Union level. We examine the scientific assumptions in an attempt to reproduce the results. MAK’s human equivalent concentrations (HECs) are based on a particle mass and on a volumetric model in which results from rat inhalation studies are translated to derive occupational exposure limits (OELs) and a carcinogen classification. Methods We followed the methods as proposed by the MAK Commission and Pauluhn 2011. We also examined key assumptions in the metrics, such as surface area of the human lung, deposition fractions of inhaled dusts, human clearance rates; and risk of lung cancer among workers, presumed to have some potential for lung overload, the physiological condition in rats associated with an increase in lung cancer risk. Results The MAK recommendations on exposure limits for GBS have numerous incorrect assumptions that adversely affect the final results. The procedures to derive the respirable occupational exposure limit (OEL) could not be reproduced, a finding raising considerable scientific uncertainty about the reliability of the recommendations. Moreover, the scientific basis of using the rat model is confounded by the fact that rats and humans show different cellular responses to inhaled particles as demonstrated by bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) studies in both species. Conclusion Classifying all GBS as carcinogenic to humans based on rat inhalation studies in which lung overload leads to chronic inflammation and cancer is inappropriate. Studies of workers, who have been exposed to relevant levels of dust, have not indicated an increase in lung cancer risk. Using the methods proposed by the MAK, we were unable to reproduce the OEL for GBS recommended by the Commission, but identified substantial errors in the models. Considerable shortcomings in the use of lung surface area, clearance rates, deposition fractions; as well as using the mass and volumetric metrics as opposed to the particle surface area metric limit the scientific reliability of the proposed GBS OEL and carcinogen classification.International Carbon Black Associatio

Non-Japanese Residents and the Earthquake : Reflections on our work thus far (Research Group on Non-Japanese Residents and the Earthquake)

BACKGROUND: Renal tubular epithelial cells (TECs) are one of the main targets of inflammatory insults during interstitial nephritis and kidney transplant rejection. While Th1 cells are know to be essential in the pathogenesis of rejection, the role of Th17 is still under debate. We hypothesize that TECs modulate the outcome of rejection process by production of distinct chemokines and cytokines that determine the attraction of different T-cell subsets. Therefore, we studied differential effects of activated human renal epithelial cells on T-cell migration. METHODS: Human primary TECs were stimulated by IFN-γ and TNF-α in vitro. Chemokines and cytokines produced by activated TECs were measured using Luminex or ELISA. Chemotaxis assay was performed using activated peripheral blood mononuclear cells composed of CD4+CXCR3+ and CD4+CCR6+ T cells migrating towards stimulated and unstimulated TECs. RESULTS: While activated TECs secreted abundant amounts of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and IL-8, the T helper cell differentiation cytokines IL-1β, IL-12p70, IL-23 or TGF-β1 were not produced. The production of Th1 chemokines CXCL9, CXCL10 and CCL5 were significantly upregulated after TEC stimulation. In contrast, Th17 chemokine CCL20 could not be detected. Finally, activated TECs attracted significantly higher numbers of CD4+CXCR3+ T cells as compared to unstimulated TECs. No migration of CD4+CCR6+ T cells could be observed. CONCLUSION: Activated primary renal tubular epithelial cells do not attract Th17 cells nor produce cytokines promoting Th17 cell differentiation in our experimental system mimicking the proinflammatory microenvironment of rejection