22,891 research outputs found

    χc0ω\chi_{c0} \, \omega production in e+ee^+e^- annihilation through ψ(4160)\psi(4160)

    Full text link
    We argue that the recent BESIII data on the cross section for the process e+eχc0ωe^+e^- \to \chi_{c0} \, \omega in the center of mass energy range 4.21 - 4.42 GeV can be described by the contribution of the known charmonium-like resonance ψ(4160)\psi(4160) with the mass of about 4190\,MeV. The value of the coupling in the transition ψ(4160)χc0ω\psi(4160) \to \chi_{c0} \, \omega needed for this mechanism is comparable to that in another known similar transition χc0(2P)J/ψω\chi_{c0}(2P) \to J/\psi \, \omega. The suggested mechanism also naturally explains the reported relative small value of the cross section for the final states χc1ω\chi_{c1} \, \omega and χc2ω\chi_{c2} \, \omega above their respective thresholds.Comment: 6 page

    Bose-Einstein condensation in an optical lattice

    Full text link
    In this paper we develop an analytic expression for the critical temperature for a gas of ideal bosons in a combined harmonic lattice potential, relevant to current experiments using optical lattices. We give corrections to the critical temperature arising from effective mass modifications of the low energy spectrum, finite size effects and excited band states. We compute the critical temperature using numerical methods and compare to our analytic result. We study condensation in an optical lattice over a wide parameter regime and demonstrate that the critical temperature can be increased or reduced relative to the purely harmonic case by adjusting the harmonic trap frequency. We show that a simple numerical procedure based on a piecewise analytic density of states provides an accurate prediction for the critical temperature.Comment: 10 pages, 5 figure

    Paid Peering, Settlement-Free Peering, or Both?

    Full text link
    With the rapid growth of congestion-sensitive and data-intensive applications, traditional settlement-free peering agreements with best-effort delivery often do not meet the QoS requirements of content providers (CPs). Meanwhile, Internet access providers (IAPs) feel that revenues from end-users are not sufficient to recoup the upgrade costs of network infrastructures. Consequently, some IAPs have begun to offer CPs a new type of peering agreement, called paid peering, under which they provide CPs with better data delivery quality for a fee. In this paper, we model a network platform where an IAP makes decisions on the peering types offered to CPs and the prices charged to CPs and end-users. We study the optimal peering schemes for the IAP, i.e., to offer CPs both the paid and settlement-free peering to choose from or only one of them, as the objective is profit or welfare maximization. Our results show that 1) the IAP should always offer the paid and settlement-free peering under the profit-optimal and welfare-optimal schemes, respectively, 2) whether to simultaneously offer the other peering type is largely driven by the type of data traffic, e.g., text or video, and 3) regulators might want to encourage the IAP to allocate more network capacity to the settlement-free peering for increasing user welfare
    corecore