Integration of FM and asset management expertise in digital 3D building models

Purpose: The research establishes a Conceptual Process Model (CPM) as shown in Figure 1 which shows how Facility Management (FM) and Asset Management (AM) know-how, 3D laser scanning and Building Information Modelling (BIM) can be combined with virtual design and simulation techniques to help managers make better decisions about feasibility report options and to add value and optimize existing buildings performance and quality. Design methodology and approach: Mixed methods were used including a review of BIM literature and industry best practice. Seven semi-structured interviews were held with stakeholders from different stages in the BIM process. The initial CPM was subsequently refined during the research project based on feedback from the interviews. The 3D laser scanning element of the CPM was tested using two ZHAW university buildings and the findings triangulated with a feedback mechanism to further improve the model. Originality and findings: The findings helped to develop a model which can be used by key stakeholders as a guide when considering the integration of FM and AM know-how, with 3D scanning in the creation of a BIM model for existing buildings, which constitute approximately 98% of the building stock. The focus is on combining existing know-how with the BIM process and simulation techniques to identify, simulate and evaluate the best building improvement options for feasibility reports prior to a decision to proceed. The CPM meets the need to develop a workflow with a focus on digitalisation of the existing built environment and creation of appropriate BIM model(s). The models can then be used for simulation purposes looking at cost benefit optimisation, energy efficiency, life cycle costing (LCC) etc. as well as creating virtual walk through models that can be viewed by end users, Facility Managers (FMs) and Asset Managers (AMs) to improve workplace environments and FM and AM operation

The evolution of Facility Management (FM) in the Building Information Modelling (BIM) process : an opportunity to use Critical Success Factors (CSF) for optimising built assets

The work is available online at LJMU and also via ResearchGate (https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Simon-Ashworth-4)Purpose: To explore the evolution of Facility Management (FM) in the Building Information Modelling (BIM) process. The research aimed to establish Critical Success Factors (CSF) which help deliver successful BIM projects, and to present these in a ‘FM-BIM Mobilisation Framework’. Background: Inefficiencies, poor collaboration and a focus on short-term costs in the construction industry, combined with a lack of innovation and digital competency when ordering projects, have resulted in a failure to deliver assets which have sustainable outcomes over their whole-life. Methodology: A mixed methods concurrent convergent design, incorporating side-by-side narrative text analysis was adopted to merge qualitative/quantitative findings. Critical Success Themes (CST) from literature were then used to establish CSF through; 19 interviews with FM/BIM experts, and a questionnaire to gauge FM industry awareness of BIM (using UK and international inputs). The final merged CSF were incorporated into a framework. This was validated using a two-stage process with a focus group using some of the same FM/BIM experts. Key findings: 10 CSF Main-Themes (MT), with a 100 Sub-Themes (ST) were identified covering important digital skills, knowledge and competences people require to contribute to the BIM process. Clients and Facility Mangers (FMs) must engage early if the full benefits of BIM are to be realised in the operational phase. They must clearly define their information requirements to align with business processes, and collaborate with the delivery team to ensure information is captured/transferred into the relevant management systems. Originality/value: The comprehensive end-to-end framework combines FM and BIM CSF into one online interactive tool which provides a wealth of useful knowledge, sources, benefits and practical examples. Although based on the UK BIM Framework, the alignment with ‘ISO 19650’ ensures it will also benefit an international audience

Digitally transforming facility management in healthcare : a systematic review of key digital technologies and systems

The COVID-19 pandemic led to an acceleration of digitalisation in healthcare institutions, not only in the medical field but also within non-medical, which includes facility management (FM). FM organisations are increasingly confronted with the need to digitally transform their operations and to implement new digital technologies. This paper aims at providing scholars and professionals with an overview of the various digital technologies and systems that are relevant in shaping the digital transformation. An integrative literature review has been chosen, as it provides a systematic approach to map, collate and report on key findings and concepts from the literature for researchers and practitioners. Overall, 33 articles were systematically reviewed. 22 different digital technologies and systems were identified in the literature and were added to so-called technology clusters. From all the described technologies, Building Information Modelling (BIM) is most prominently cited. Furthermore, Internet of Things (IoT), Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML), Digital Twins (DT), and Blockchain technologies are commonly found. Additional technologies and systems mentioned in the literature, though not further detailed, were also added within a separate cluster. This study also discusses the implications for the digital transformation which is important when introducing novel digital technologies in healthcare organisations. It is argued that FM in healthcare needs to focus on integrating technologies, both at a technological level, and particularly at an organisational and interorganisational level

FM-BIM Mobilisation Framework : critical success factors to help deliver successful BIM projects

The ‘FM-BIM Mobilisation Framework’ is based on my PhD work (https://doi.org/10.24377/LJMU.t.00014250) and associated research papers.The aim of this guide is to provide a series of Critical Success Factors (CSF), which can be used by Facility Management (FM) professionals and other stakeholders to help them better engage in Building Information Modelling (BIM) projects. By doing so we will all help deliver better project outcomes and the full benefits of BIM, enabling us to optimise built assets in operation for users, organisations and wider society. BIM has become the chosen route for procuring and delivering new built assets. In addition, the BIM process is increasingly being applied to existing built assets. Laser scanning and other data capture techniques are being used in the digitalisation of organisations’ real estate portfolios. The collection of information/data may also be used ‘where appropriate’ to set up retrospective BIM models. If well implemented, the BIM process has the potential to deliver significant benefits not only during the design and construction phases but also during the much longer operational phase. However, the benefits need to be clearly transparent, realistic and achievable. Working with the BIM process also presents its own challenges and concerns. If we are to deliver the full benefits of BIM across all the built asset’s life cycle phases these barriers need to be addressed and overcome. This ‘FM-BIM Mobilisation Framework’ presents ten CSF Main Themes (MT) with associated Sub-Themes (ST). These can be seen as a mobilisation checklist of actions with supporting explanations, examples and useful links to resources for support. If acted upon, they will help people engage more successfully with BIM projects to achieve their desired outcomes. The CSF and associated guidance are not intended to be a complete guide to BIM as there are many other resources already available which fulfil this requirement

Public Preferences to CCS:How does it Change Across Countries?

AbstractThe aim of this research was to extend an Australian developed large group process which proved effective in engaging the general public on issues related to climate change, energy technologies, and the overall shift towards a low carbon society. The results from Australia, the Netherlands, Canada and Scotland found that in each of the geographic locations the context varied, and participants reported different experiences and understanding of each topic. This paper explores how context may have impacted on the results, the differences that arise and discusses the implications for policy makers and research developers

The perception and management of risk in UK office property development

Risk is an ever-present aspect of business, and risk taking is necessary for profit and economic progress. Speculative property development is popularly perceived as a 'risky business' yet, like other entrepreneurs, developers have opportunities to manage the risks they face; techniques include phasing and joint ventures. The associated areas of investment portfolio risk, development risk analysis and construction risk management have all been addressed by research. This article presents new knowledge about how developers perceive risks and the means they subsequently adopt to manage them. The developers of office projects across the UK were sent questionnaires by post. Respondents were asked about their perceptions of risks at the first appraisal stage and currently and about the risk management techniques that they had adopted. In-depth interviews with a selection of respondents were then used to discuss and augment the findings. Developers were most concerned about market-based risks at both stages. Concern about production-orientated risks was lower and fell significantly between the two stages. A fixed price contract was the most common risk management technique. Risk management techniques were used more often outside London and the South East. Developer type affects both the perception and management of risk. While developers do manage risk, decisions are made on the basis of professional and business experience. These findings should help development companies manage risk in a more objective and analytical way

Academic Engagement in Public and Political Discourse: Proceedings from the Michigan Meeting

This report and the conference it summarizes are an examination of how we, as academics, practice our craft; how we work to make it more relevant to broader publics and responsive to pressing societal problems. In May 2015, more than 40 speakers (including 4 University Presidents) and 225 registrants attended a three day conference at the University of Michigan to focus on four key themes: (1) What is engagement and should we do it? (2) What are the ground rules for public and political engagement? (3) What models have worked, and what can we learn from them? (4) What are the obstacles to engagement, and how can they be overcome? The contents of this report are about the kinds of research we conduct, but even more, it is about the public meaning and goals of that work. Ultimately, it is about who we are as a university and what it means to be an academic in a society facing complex scientific, technological, and social challenges. We come to this discussion driven by a deep concern that the academy is facing a crisis of relevance.https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/136652/1/1367_Hoffman.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/136652/4/1367_Hoffman.pdfDescription of 1367_Hoffman.pdf : May 2017 revision - updated titl

Designing a primary care pharmacist-led review for people treated with opioids for persistent pain: a multi-method qualitative study.

oai:repository.canterbury.ac.uk:97w90Opioids are frequently prescribed for persistent non-cancer pain despite limited evidence of long-term effectiveness and risk of harm. Evidence-based interventions to address inappropriate opioid prescribing are lacking. To explore perspectives of people living with persistent pain to understand barriers and facilitators in reducing opioids in the context of a pharmacist-led primary care review, and identify review components and features for optimal delivery. Primary care multi-method qualitative study. Adults with experience of persistent pain and taking opioids participated in semi-structured interviews (n=15, 73% female) and an online discussion forum (n=31). The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) provided a framework for data collection and thematic analysis, involving deductive analysis to TDF domains, inductive analysis within-domains to generate subthemes, and subtheme comparison to form across-domain overarching themes. The behaviour change technique taxonomy v.1 and motivational behaviour change technique classification system were used to systematically map themes to behaviour change techniques to identify potential review components and delivery features. 32 facilitator and barrier subthemes for patients reducing opioids were identified across 13 TDF domains. These combined into six overarching themes: learning to live with pain, opioid reduction expectations, assuming a medical model, pharmacist-delivered reviews, pharmacist-patient relationship and patient engagement. Subthemes mapped to 21 unique behaviour change techniques, yielding 17 components and five delivery features for the proposed PROMPPT review. This study generated theoretically-informed evidence for design of a practice pharmacist-led PROMPPT review. Future research will test the feasibility and acceptability of the PROMPPT review and pharmacist training. [Abstract copyright: Copyright © 2024, The Authors.