Dried blood spot analysis:facing new challenges

Over the last decade, DBS analysis has gained popularity for TDM because it’s a patient friendly sampling proce- dure [1-4]. Additional advantages are prolonged sample stability, lower risk of infections and transportation at ambient temperature [1-3,5]. These advantages may fa- cilitate implementation of TDM in different clinical set- tings including resource limited areas. Patients will bene- fit from DBS analysis but the analytical development and validation of DBS methods is more complex compared to plasma or serum analysis. Additional validation parameters, like the effect of the hematocrit (HT) and blood spot volume need to be eval- uated. Drug substances may also interact with the blood matrix or with the DBS card, resulting in matrix related recovery effects. Unfortunately, official guidelines for val- idation of DBS are not available yet. However, in recent literature, several interesting issues related to analytical DBS research have been discussed [1,6-12]. Ongoing re- search and improved understanding of the factors that influence DBS analysis results will ultimately result in well-founded guidelines for DBS analytical method val- idation. This would be very helpful for daily practice but would also benefit patient safety because uniformity in method validation prevents potential pitfalls during val- idation or method development and increase credibility of assay results. Our aim is to discuss some relevant topics related to DBS development prior to development of future guidelines on DBS development and validation

Role of therapeutic drug monitoring in pulmonary infections : use and potential for expanded use of dried blood spot samples

Respiratory tract infections are among the most common infections in men. We reviewed literature to document their pharmacological treatments, and the extent to which therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is needed during treatment. We subsequently examined potential use of dried blood spots as sample procedure for TDM. TDM was found to be an important component of clinical care for many (but not all) pulmonary infections. For gentamicin, linezolid, voriconazole and posaconazole dried blood spot methods and their use in TDM were already evident in literature. For glycopeptides, beta-lactam antibiotics and fluoroquinolones it was determined that development of a dried blood spot (DBS) method could be useful. This review identifies specific antibiotics for which development of DBS methods could support the optimization of treatment of pulmonary infections

Therapeutic drug monitoring in patients with tuberculosis and concurrent medical problems

Introduction Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has been recommended for treatment optimization in tuberculosis (TB) but is only is used in certain countries e.g. USA, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden and Tanzania. Recently, new drugs have emerged and PK studies in TB are continuing, which contributes further evidence for TDM in TB. The aim of this review is to provide an update on drugs used in TB, treatment strategies for these drugs, and TDM to support broader implementation. Areas covered This review describes the different drug classes used for TB, multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) and extensively drug-resistant TB (XDR-TB), along with their pharmacokinetics, dosing strategies, TDM and sampling strategies. Moreover, the review discusses TDM for patient TB and renal or liver impairment, patients co-infected with HIV or hepatitis, and special patient populations - children and pregnant women. Expert opinion TB treatment has a long history of using 'one size fits all.' This has contributed to treatment failures, treatment relapses, and the selection of drug-resistant isolates. While challenging in resource-limited circumstances, TDM offers the clinician the opportunity to individualize and optimize treatment early in treatment. This approach may help to refine treatment and thereby reduce adverse effects and poor treatment outcomes. Funding, training, and randomized controlled trials are needed to advance the use of TDM for patients with TB

Precision and Personalized Medicine and anti-TB treatment:Is TDM feasible for programmatic use?

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) is increasingly recommended to ensure the correct drug dose thereby minimizing adverse events and maximizing regimen efficacy. To facilitate implementation in TB programs, a framework for TDM is urgently needed. TDM is only useful for dose optimization if a patient is on an appropriate regimen guided by drug susceptibility testing. TDM using a targeted approach selecting patients with risk factors for suboptimal drug exposure (e.g. diabetes) or not responding to treatment for drugs with a clear concentration-response relationship may provide the best value for money. Semiquantitative point-of-care tests for detection of low or high drug concentration should be implemented at community level while quantitative assays can be performed at regional or central level. Expanding PK/PD research followed by clinical trials including both clinical outcome as well as cost-effectiveness will increase the level of evidence supporting TDM

Nationwide analysis of treatment outcomes in children and adolescents routinely treated for tuberculosis in The Netherlands

Background: As a vulnerable population, children and adolescents with tuberculosis (TB) are faced with many challenges, even those who live in low TB incidence countries. We aimed to evaluate factors associated with TB treatment outcomes allowing more focused interventions to support this population once diagnosed. Methods: A retrospective cohort study using a nationwide surveillance database was performed in children and adolescents (aged 0-18 years) treated for TB in the Netherlands from 1993 to 2018. Logistic regression analyses were used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) for associated factors of mortality and loss to follow-up (LTFU). Results: Among 3253 eligible patients with known outcomes, 94.4% (95.9% children and 92.8% adolescents) were cured or completed treatment, 0.7% died during treatment and 4.9% were LTFU. There were no reported treatment failures. Risk factors of death included children aged 2-4 years (aOR 10.42), central nervous system TB (aOR 5.14), miliary TB (aOR 10.25), HIV co-infection (aOR 8.60), re-treated TB cases (aOR 10.12) and drug-induced liver injury (aOR 6.50). Active case-finding was a protective factor of death (aOR 0.13). Risk factors of LTFU were adolescents aged 15-18 years (aOR 1.91), illegal immigrants (aOR 4.28), urban domicile (aOR 1.59), unknown history of TB contact (aOR 1.99), drug-resistant TB (aOR 2.31), single adverse drug reaction (aOR 2.12), multiple adverse drug reactions (aOR 7.84) and treatment interruption >14 days (aOR 6.93). Treatment in recent years (aOR 0.94) and supervision by public health nurses (aOR 0.14) were protective factors of LTFU. Conclusion: Highly successful treatment outcomes were demonstrated in children and adolescents routinely treated for TB. Special attention should be given to specific risk groups to improve treatment outcomes