2 research outputs found

    Quinclorac and Aminocyclopyrachlor Movement in Sandy Soils of the Sheyenne National Grassland, and Control of Yellow Toadflax with Aminocyclopyrachlor

    Get PDF
    Quinclorac and aminocyclopyrachlor leaching potential was evaluated in replicated field conditions in soil from five ecological sites of the Sheyenne National Grassland (SNG). Herbicide concentration was estimated using bioassays. Quinclorac did not leach past approximately 45 cm following 51 cm of precipitation applied over 9 wk and 15 cm of precipitation applied over 48 h. Aminocyclopyrachlor leaching was greater than quinclorac and moved through all soil types following both precipitation events. Quinclorac is suitable for use at the SNG to control leafy spurge; however, aminocyclopyrachlor will not be recommended. Control of yellow toadflax with aminocyclopyrachlor was evaluated at four growth stages. Control averaged 98% 1 YAT when aminocyclopyrachlor was applied before flowering but only 50% when the herbicide was applied to the fall vegetative stage. Yellow toadflax control with picloram plus dicamba plus diflufenzopyr averaged 92% 1 YAT and was not affected by growth stage

    Characterization of Surfactant Quality and Validation of Standard Water Conditioning Testing

    No full text
    Adjuvants are products added to pesticide applications to increase pest control. There are many different types of adjuvants designed to solve certain problems. Surfactants are a major class of agricultural adjuvant used to increase the efficacy of pesticides. Many companies use physical and chemical characteristics to market surfactants. However, producers do not understand these characteristics. Field efficacy data should be used to effectively market surfactants, but is somewhat limited. The objective of the first study was to evaluate if chemical and physical characteristics of agricultural surfactants can be used to predict field performance. Chemical and physical characteristics tested included HLB, dynamic surface tension, contact angle, and absorption through isolated cuticles. When individual characteristics were used as covariates with field efficacy data, no consistent results were observed. Therefore, physical and chemical characteristics cannot be used to accurately predict field performance of surfactants. In 2011, Zollinger et al. published a paper titled “A test method for evaluating water conditioning adjuvants” as a standardized test method. While this has been an effective test method, a comparison of salt type used has never been conducted. The objective of this research was to validate the standardized test method using three artificially mixed hard water samples with calcium chloride, calcium formate, and calcium nitrate. Field trials were conducted near Hillsboro, ND in 2016 and 2017. Glyphosate and mesotrione were applied at 342 and 70 g ai ha-1, respectively. Three types of water conditioners were evaluated with glyphosate: diammonium sulfate (AMS), AMS replacement, and monocarbamide dihydrogen sulfate (AMADS). Herbicide antagonism was similar between the simulated hard water samples. Within each type of water conditioning adjuvant, antagonism was overcome similarly in all water types. The results of these studies validate the test method established by Zollinger et al. (2011)
    corecore