5 research outputs found
Roadside infrastructure for safer European roads: D06 European best practice for roadside design: guidelines for roadside infrastructure on new and existing roads.
The relevance of single vehicle accidents (SVA) (also known as run-off-road – ROR
or roadside accidents) as a traffic safety issue can be demonstrated in a review of
European accident data. In 1998, 33.8 % of all fatalities in the European Union were
the result of single vehicle collisions (Eurostat).The data collected on single vehicle
accidents in the "Roadside Infrastructure for Safer European Roads" (RISER) project
represented about 10 % of the total road accidents reported for the respective
countries. If the data is restricted to comprise only fatal accidents, then 45 % of all
fatal accidents are SVA. Worse yet, the cases collected in RISER do not represent
100 % of single vehicle accidents and indicate that even higher fatality figures may
occur. The over-representation of SVA fatalities (10 % of accidents producing 45 %
of all fatalities) cannot be ignored when developing road safety plans.
The objective of the RISER project was to develop best practice guidelines that can
be a foundation for national policy and guidelines. The project has synthesized the
data and expertise from nine European countries: Austria, Belgium, Finland, France,
Germany, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. The following
information does not reflect one national practice for structuring the roadside area.
The documents outlining the technical functions and requirements for roadside will
need to reflect the conditions of the local road network. Climatic, geographical, and
demographic characteristics for the road sections of interest must be developed by
local authorities
Roadside infrastructure for safer European Roads: D03 Critical vehicle and infrastructure interactions
The purpose of this report is to describe the relationship between real world crash
situations and the crash tests used to approve road equipment in the European
Union. The source of data was the reconstruction of accidents collected directly in the
RISER project (TNO and CIDAUT), reconstruction of existing accident cases
(Chalmers, TUG, and CETE), the analysis of the RISER detailed accident database
(VSRC) and the collection of standardised crash tests (HUT). Other partners
contributed directly or indirectly to the different tasks in the RISER project
Roadside infrastructure for safer European roads: D04 Envelope of vehicle and driver response prior to collisions
This report describes the human factors issues related to roadside infrastructure.
The report gives an overview of the accident causation issues identified in the
RISER detailed database, summarises the results of a detailed human factors
road scene analysis of ten selected accident sites, and details the results of a
driver simulator study conducted at TNO
Roadside infrastructure for safer European roads: D02 Summary of driver behaviour and driver interactions with roadside infrastructure
Purpose: The literature review presented here was conducted within Work-
Package 1 of the EU-RISER project. Within this Workpackage, Task 1.3
consisted of collecting existing literature identifying the response of the driving
public to changes in road design, in order to prevent severe consequences of
single vehicle run of road accidents. This Deliverable (D 02) serves as a starting
point to include Human Factors principles within the roam of roadside
infrastructure design by means of developing guidelines and analysis
procedures necessary to select, implement, and operate a safe, efficient and
affordable roadside infrastructure in the EU
Roadside infrastructure for safer European roads: D08 European best practice for roadside design: guidelines for maintenance and operations of roadside infrastructure.
Maintenance and operations of road safety equipment and infrastructure ensure that
all safety related elements of the road system are operating as they were designed,
tested, and approved. Maintenance of road equipment should not only be considered
as the repair of broken or damaged equipment, but also as a potential monitoring
system for the road network. This overlooked aspect of maintenance and operations
is a central theme for the following sections